Sittings · Document
On the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on temporary trade-liberalisation measures supplementing trade concessions applicable to Ukrainian products under the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part
Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development · Rapporteur: Juozas Olekas
PA_Legam
AMENDMENTS
The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development calls on the Committee on International Trade, as the committee responsible, to take the following into account:
Amendment 1
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(4) Russia’s unprovoked and unjustified war of aggression against Ukraine since 24 February 2022 has had a profoundly negative impact on the ability of Ukraine to trade with the rest of the world, both because of the destruction of production capacity and the unavailability of a significant proportion of means of transport due to, for example, the restriction and uncertainty of access to the Black Sea. Under such exceptional circumstances and to mitigate the negative economic impact of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, it is necessary to accelerate the development of closer economic relations between the Union and Ukraine in order to provide continued support to the Ukrainian authorities and population. It is therefore necessary and appropriate to continue stimulating trade flows and granting concessions in the form of trade-liberalisation measures for all products, in line with the acceleration of the elimination of customs duties on trade between the Union and Ukraine.
(4) Russia’s unprovoked and unjustified war of aggression against Ukraine since 24 February 2022 has had a profoundly negative impact on the ability of Ukraine to trade with the rest of the world, both because of the destruction of production capacity and the unavailability of a significant proportion of means of transport due to, for example, the restriction and uncertainty of access to the Black Sea. Under such exceptional circumstances and to mitigate the negative economic impact of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, it is necessary to accelerate the development of closer economic relations between the Union and Ukraine in order to provide continued support to the Ukrainian authorities and population. It is therefore necessary and appropriate to continue stimulating trade flows and granting concessions in the form of trade-liberalisation measures for all products, in line with the acceleration of the elimination of customs duties on trade between the Union and Ukraine, while at the same time preserving the livelihood of the European producers, among others, in countries in vicinity of Ukraine.
Amendment 2
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(4 a) The trade liberalisation measures, being an important signal of further integration of Ukraine into the EU market, also provide additional stability to Ukrainian economy that relies heavily on exports. Any safeguard measures that limit the trade liberalisation should not become a barrier to the future economic and market integration, but serve as a way to create balanced trade.
Amendment 3
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(8) In order to prevent fraud, the preferential arrangements established by this Regulation should be conditional upon Ukraine complying with all the relevant conditions for obtaining benefits under the Association Agreement, including the rules of origin of products concerned and the procedures related thereto, as well as Ukraine’s involvement in close administrative cooperation with the Union, as provided for by the Association Agreement.
(8) In order to prevent fraud, the preferential arrangements established by this Regulation should be conditional upon Ukraine complying with all the relevant conditions for obtaining benefits under the Association Agreement, including the rules of origin of products concerned and the procedures related thereto, as well as Ukraine’s involvement in close administrative cooperation with the Union so as to prevent any major destabilisation of the internal market, as provided for by the Association Agreement, and also with the Member States where bilateral mutually agreed solutions have been established.
Amendment 4
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(9) The preferential arrangements established by this Regulation should also be conditional upon Ukraine abstaining from introducing new duties or charges having equivalent effect and new quantitative restrictions or measures having equivalent effect, from increasing existing levels of duties or charges, or from introducing any other restrictions on trade with the Union, unless clearly justified in the context of Russia’s war of aggression.
(9) The preferential arrangements established by this Regulation should also be conditional upon Ukraine abstaining from introducing new duties or charges having equivalent effect and new quantitative restrictions or measures having equivalent effect, from increasing existing levels of duties or charges, or from introducing any other restrictions on trade with the Union, unless clearly justified in the context of Russia’s war of aggression and in mutually agreed cases.
Amendment 5
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(11) Subject to an assessment by the Commission carried out in the context of the regular monitoring of the impact of this Regulation and launched either following a duly substantiated request from a Member State or on the Commission’s own initiative, it is necessary to provide for the possibility to take any necessary measures for imports of any products falling under the scope of this Regulation which are adversely affecting the Union market or the market of one or several Member States for like or directly competing products. There is a particularly precarious situation in the markets for poultry, eggs, and sugar that may harm Union agricultural producers if imports from Ukraine were to increase. It is appropriate to introduce an automatic safeguard for eggs, poultry, and sugar products that is activated if quantities imported pursuant to this Regulation exceed the arithmetic mean of quantities in 2022 and 2023.
(11) Subject to an assessment by the Commission carried out in the context of the regular monitoring of the impact of this Regulation and launched either following a duly substantiated request from a Member State or on the Commission’s own initiative, it is necessary to provide for the possibility to take any necessary measures for imports of any products falling under the scope of this Regulation which are adversely affecting the Union market or the market of one or several Member States for like or directly competing products. There is a particularly precarious situation in the markets for cereals, poultry, eggs, and sugar that may harm Union agricultural producers if imports from Ukraine were to increase. It is appropriate to introduce an automatic safeguard for cereals,eggs, poultry, and sugar products, that is activated if quantities imported pursuant to this Regulation exceed the arithmetic mean of quantities in 2021 and 2022, as well as adequate safeguard measures for the other products.
Amendment 6
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(11a) Draws the Commission’s attention to the critical situation in the sugar market, where the import volumes during the first half of 2024 are already very high; emphasises the need, therefore, for the Commission to be vigilant as soon as this Regulation enters into force, by closely monitoring exports on a monthly basis;
Amendment 7
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(13 a) Given the candidate status for EU membership of Ukraine, when making the assessment and the annual report, the Commission should take into account the need to start working on a restructuring programme of the Ukrainian agricultural sector as well as their agri-food industry. Such a programme should be compatible with the objectives of the Ukraine accession to the Union as well as the objective of Ukraine remaining a major world exporter of agri-food products and should include an adequate reform of Ukrainian agricultural policies in the period of restructuring and reconstruction. The annual report should also, where appropriate, identify elements for review of the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area as a part of the Association Agreement.
Amendment 8
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13 b (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(13 b) Support for and supervision of the development of agricultural trade with Ukraine must be seen in a long-term perspective and not be limited to short-term measures. To this end, the Commission should propose a comprehensive system of import and export licences with Ukraine, to allow detailed monitoring of agricultural products from their entry into an EU Member State to their destination, under the supervision of the Commission, as well as a permanent package of measures including levers adapted to the final destination of each product, investment in storage and logistics and the application of EU standards if the product is destined for the EU market. If refundable duties are applied, this money should be used to fund the war effort in Ukraine
Amendment 9
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(b) Ukraine’s abstention from introducing new duties or charges having equivalent effect and new quantitative restrictions or measures having equivalent effect for imports originating in the Union, from increasing existing levels of duties or charges, or from introducing any other restrictions on trade with the Union, including discriminatory internal administrative measures, unless clearly justified in the war context; and
(b) Ukraine’s abstention from introducing new duties or charges having equivalent effect and new quantitative restrictions or measures having equivalent effect for imports originating in the Union, from increasing existing levels of duties or charges, or from introducing any other restrictions on trade with the Union, including discriminatory internal administrative measures, unless clearly justified in the war context and mutually agreed between Ukraine and the EU or a member state of it; and
Amendment 10
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
2. Where a Member State requests that the Commission suspends any of the preferential arrangements on the basis of Ukraine’s failure to comply with the conditions set out in Article 2, point (b), the Commission shall provide a reasoned opinion within four months of the request on whether the claim of Ukraine’s failure to comply is substantiated. If the Commission concludes that the claim is substantiated, it shall initiate the procedure referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article.
2. Where a Member State requests that the Commission suspends any of the preferential arrangements on the basis of Ukraine’s failure to comply with the conditions set out in Article 2, point (b), the Commission shall provide a reasoned opinion within four weeks of the request on whether the claim of Ukraine’s failure to comply is substantiated. If the Commission concludes that the claim is substantiated, it shall initiate the procedure referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article.
Amendment 11
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
If a product covered by Article 1(1) originating in Ukraine is imported under conditions which adversely affect the Union market or the market of one or several Member States for like or directly competing products, the Commission may impose any measure which is necessary by means of an implementing act. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 5(3).
If a product covered by Article 1, or any other product originating in Ukraine is imported under conditions which adversely affect the Union market or the market of one or several Member States for like or directly competing products, the Commission may, by means of an implementing act, impose any measure which is necessary, including employing funds under Regulation (EU) 2024/… of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Ukraine Facility (COD 2023/0200) to purchase Ukrainian agricultural products destined for third countries in the framework of the Union's humanitarian food assistance which may also involve storage within Union territory. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 5(3).
Justification
Safeguard measures based on article 4 should be applicable to all products imported from Ukraine. Article 1(2) applies to all imports from Ukraine and suspends the possibility of applying standard WTO safeguards. Therefore the possibility of safeguard measures under article 4 of ATM regulation should also apply to all imports. In addition, among the necessary measures, the Commission should be allowed to use funds under the Facility to stabilize market prices, through purchases of agricultural products for humanitarian objectives.
Amendment 12
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The Commission shall inform the Member States of the results of the regular monitoring every two months, starting from the entry into force of this Regulation.
The Commission shall inform the Member States and the European Parliament of the results of the regular monitoring every month, starting from the entry into force of this Regulation.
Amendment 13
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The assessment referred to in the first subparagraph shall be concluded within four months of its launch.
The assessment referred to in the first subparagraph shall be concluded within two months of its launch.
Amendment 14
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(a) the rate and amount of the increase in imports from Ukraine of the product concerned in absolute and relative terms,
(a) the rate and amount of the increase in imports from Ukraine of the product concerned in absolute and relative terms to both the EU as a whole and each member of it,
Amendment 15
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
5. In critical circumstances where delay would cause damage that would be difficult to repair, the Commission may provisionally impose any measure which is necessary by means of an implementing act. Such measures may only be imposed upon a duly substantiated request from a Member State pursuant to paragraph 3(a) of this Article and shall be adopted within 21 days after the request has been received. The implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 5(4). The duration of a provisional safeguard measure shall not exceed 120 days.
5. In critical circumstances where delay would cause damage that would be difficult to repair, the Commission may provisionally impose any measure which is necessary by means of an implementing act. Such measures may only be imposed upon a duly substantiated request from a Member State pursuant to paragraph 3(a) of this Article and shall be adopted within 10 days after the request has been received. The implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 5(4). The duration of a provisional safeguard measure shall not exceed 150 days.
Amendment 16
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
If, during the period 6 June to 31 December 2024, cumulative import volumes of either eggs, poultry or sugar since 1 January 2024 reach the respective arithmetic mean of import volumes recorded in 2022 and 2023, the Commission shall, within 21 days and after informing the Committee on Safeguards established by Article 3(1) of Regulation (EU) 2015/478:
If, during the period 6 June to 31 December 2024, cumulative import volumes of either common wheat, wheat flours, and pellets, barley, barley flour and pellets, oats, maize, maize flour and pellets, barley groats and meal, cereal grains otherwise worked, sunflower seeds, oil and meals, rapeseed seeds, oil and meal, honey, eggs, poultry, sugar since 1 January 2024 reach the respective arithmetic mean of import volumes recorded in 2021 and 2022, the Commission shall, within 10 days and after informing the Committee on Safeguards established by Article 3(1) of Regulation (EU) 2015/478:
Amendment 17
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(a) reintroduce for that product the corresponding tariff-rate quota suspended by Article 1(1), point b, until 31 December 2024; and
(a) reintroduce for that product the corresponding tariff-rate quota suspended by Article 1(1), point b, until 31 December 2024, or in the case of cereals and oilseeds introduce a new tariff-rate quota based on the respective arithmetic mean of import volumes recorded in 2021 and 2022, until 31 December 2024;
Amendment 18
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(a a) promote Ukraine in exporting any product that has reached the respective arithmetic mean of import volumes recorded in 2021 and 2022, to markets outside the EU; and
Justification
From a geopolitical point of view we have to help Ukraine regain market share outside of the EU, especially those markets and products where we see Russia filling in the gaps.
Amendment 19
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(b) introduce from 1 January 2025 either a tariff-rate quota equal to five twelfths of that arithmetic mean or the corresponding tariff-rate quota suspended by Article 1(1), point b, whichever is higher.
(b) introduce from 1 January 2025 either a tariff-rate quota equal to five twelfths of that arithmetic mean or the corresponding tariff-rate quota suspended by Article 1(1), point b, whichever is lower.
Amendment 20
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(ba) for maize, movement of the goods concerned is authorised only under the customs transit procedure as provided for under Article 226 of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013, to a country or territory outside the customs territory of the European Union.
Amendment 21
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
If, during the period 1 January to 5 June 2025, cumulative import volumes of either eggs, poultry or sugar for the period since 1 January 2025 reach five twelfths of the respective arithmetic mean of import volumes recorded 2022 and 2023,the Commission shall, within 21 days and after informing the Committee on Safeguards, reintroduce for that product the corresponding tariff-rate quota suspended by Article 1(1), point b.
If, during the period 1 January to 5 June 2025, cumulative import volumes of either common wheat, flours, and pellets, barley, flour and pellets, oats, maize, flour and pellets, barley groats and meal, cereal grains otherwise worked, sunflower seeds, oil and meals, rapeseed seeds, oil and meal, honey, eggs, poultry, sugar for the period since 1 January 2025 reach five twelfths of the respective arithmetic mean of import volumes recorded 2021 and 2022, the Commission shall, within 10 days and after informing the Committee on Safeguards, reintroduce for that product the corresponding tariff-rate quota suspended by Article 1(1) point b or in the case of cereals; sunflower seeds, oil and meals; rapeseed seeds, oil and meal; introduce a new tariff-rate quota based on the respective arithmetic mean of import volumes recorded in 2021, 2022 and 2023.
Amendment 22
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 3
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
For the purposes of this paragraph, the terms eggs, poultry and sugar refer to all products covered by the tariff-rate quotas in the Appendix to Annex I-A of the Association Agreement for, respectively, eggs and albumins, poultry meat and poultry meat preparations, and sugars, and the arithmetic mean shall be calculated by dividing the sum of import volumes in 2022 and 2023 by two.
For the purposes of this paragraph, the terms common wheat, flours, and pellets, barley, flour and pellets, oats, maize, flour and pellets, barley groats and meal, cereal grains otherwise worked, sunflower seeds, oil and meals, rapeseed seeds, oil and meal, honey, eggs, poultry, sugar, refer to all products covered by the tariff-rate quotas in the Appendix to Annex I-A of the Association Agreement for, respectively common wheat, wheat flours, and pellets, barley, barley flour and pellets, oats, maize, maize flour and pellets, barley groats and meal, cereal grains otherwise worked, sunflower seeds, oil and meals, rapeseed seeds, oil and meal, honey, malt and wheat gluten, starches, starch processed, bran, shaps and residues, eggs and albumins, poultry meat and poultry meat preparations, and sugars, and the arithmetic mean shall be calculated by dividing the sum of import volumes in 2021 and 2022 by two.
Amendment 23
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
If a product covered by Article 1(1) originating in Ukraine is imported to the EU or in transit through the EU, the destination for all consignments of that product should be determined by the Ukrainian authorities prior to its entry into the EU. Furthermore, the Ukrainian authorities should provide the European Commission with all the necessary documentation certifying that those consignments reached their destination.
Justification
Many Ukrainian imports do not reach the areas where they are needed and end up in other locations creating issues with surplus.
Amendment 24
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 8 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
8 a. Ukrainian authorities are responsible for the documentation accompanying products, covered by Article 1(1), originating in Ukraine and imported in the EU or in transit through the EU. Relevant products shall be clearly marked with their final destination prior to the import in the EU.
Amendment 25
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
Article 4a
Reports
The European Commission shall present by 31 May 2024 a report to the European Parliament and the Council of Ministers on the monthly flows of imports into the European Union of Ukrainian agricultural products, such as cereals and oilseeds, not covered by Article 4 of this Regulation, comparing these volumes with the imports recorded in the years 2021 and 2022. The report shall also describe the evolution of market prices in the European Union. It shall be accompanied, where appropriate, by a legislative proposal for the application of safeguard measures to those products.
Amendment 26
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The Commission’s annual report on the implementation of the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area shall include a detailed assessment of the implementation of the trade-liberalisation measures provided for in this Regulation and shall include, insofar as appropriate, an assessment of the social impact of those measures in Ukraine and in the Union. Information on imports of products under Article 1(1), point (b), shall be made available via the website of the Commission and shall be updated on a monthly basis.
The Commission’s annual report on the implementation of the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area shall include a detailed assessment of the implementation of the trade-liberalisation measures provided for in this Regulation and shall include, insofar as appropriate, an assessment of the social impact of those measures in Ukraine and in the Union both from economic and rural development perspectives. Information on imports of products under Article 1(1), point (b), shall be made available via the website of the Commission and shall be updated on a monthly basis.
In view of Ukraine’s candidate status, the annual report should take into account the need to develop a restructuring program of the Ukrainian agricultural sector as well as their agri-food industry as soon as possible, in full compatibility with the objectives of the Ukraine accession to the Union as well as the objective of Ukraine remaining a major world exporter of agri-food products. The annual report should also, where appropriate, identify elements for review of the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area as a part of the Association Agreement.
Commission shall report twice a year to Member States on the state of play regarding implementation by Ukraine of its obligations under Annex V to the DCFTA and the process of approximation of Ukrainian law to EU standards and requirements in agricultural production, in particular the food safety and animal welfare standards.
ANNEX: ENTITIES OR PERSONS FROM WHOM THE RAPPORTEUR HAS RECEIVED INPUT
The rapporteur has received input from the following entities or persons in the preparation of the opinion, until the adoption thereof in committee:
Entity and/or person
Trade representative of Ukraine
Copa-Cogeca
The list above is drawn up under the exclusive responsibility of the rapporteur.
PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION
Title
Temporary trade-liberalisation measures supplementing trade concessions applicable to Ukrainian products under the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part
References
COM(2024)0050 – C9-0021/2024 – 2024/0028(COD)
Committee responsible
Date announced in plenary
INTA
Rapporteur for the opinion
Date appointed
Juozas Olekas
13.2.2024
Date adopted
26.2.2024
Result of final vote
+:
–:
0:
31
7
5
Members present for the final vote
Mazaly Aguilar, Clara Aguilera, Attila Ara-Kovács, Benoît Biteau, Franc Bogovič, Daniel Buda, Isabel Carvalhais, Angelo Ciocca, Dacian Cioloş, Ivan David, Paolo De Castro, Herbert Dorfmann, José Manuel Fernandes, Luke Ming Flanagan, Paola Ghidoni, Dino Giarrusso, Francisco Guerreiro, Martin Häusling, Martin Hlaváček, Krzysztof Jurgiel, Jarosław Kalinowski, Elsi Katainen, Camilla Laureti, Gilles Lebreton, Norbert Lins, Chris MacManus, Marlene Mortler, Ulrike Müller, Maria Noichl, Juozas Olekas, Katarína Roth Neveďalová, Bert-Jan Ruissen, Veronika Vrecionová, Sarah Wiener, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez
Substitutes present for the final vote
Rosanna Conte, Anna Deparnay-Grunenberg, Peter Jahr, Cristina Maestre Martín De Almagro, Alin Mituța, Michaela Šojdrová, Tom Vandenkendelaere
Substitutes under Rule 209(7) present for the final vote
Iuliu Winkler
FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION
Key to symbols: