Sittings · Document
On the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on prohibiting products made with forced labour on the Union market
Committee on Foreign Affairs · Rapporteur: Salima Yenbou
PA_Legam
SHORT JUSTIFICATION
Forced labour, including its modern forms and state-sponsored forced labour, constitutes a serious violation of fundamental human rights and labour rights, and is prohibited under the international human rights law. The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in its Article 5(2) explicitly prohibits forced labour. Article 7(1) of the Rome Treaty establishing the International Criminal Court also defines enslavement as a crime against humanity, when committed as a part of the widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population with knowledge of the attack.
Eradicating forced labour and modern slavery, in the context of the EU’s role as one of the most prominent defenders of human rights in the world, has been in the focus of the DROI Subcommittee for a long time. The Rapporteur therefore welcomes the Commission proposal for banning products made with forced labour from the Union market, and welcomes the fact that the proposal itself makes a clear reference to the EU’s 2020-2024 Action Plan on Human Rights and Democracy, in particular its objective to eradicate forced labour and promote responsible business conduct.
Nevertheless, the Rapporteur has identified a number of shortcomings that, if not addressed, would have a serious impact on the efforts of the EU and of the Member States to eradicate forced labour in the EU and in third countries, and on the protection of human rights around the world. The Rapporteur has therefore introduced a series of recommendations to address such shortcomings, keeping as much as possible within the shared competences allocated, but also respecting and following the overall mission of the DROI Subcommittee.
First of all, references are made to the necessity of meaningful consultation and engagement of relevant stakeholders, including workers, workers associations and human rights defenders, during the different stages of the investigation, including the ability to submit complaints and information during the preliminary phase of investigation, as well as in all stages of international cooperation. Measures should also be taken to ensure the protection of all stakeholders and human rights defenders providing information, regardless of their country of origin.
The Rapporteur also proposes to inverse the burden of proof as it currently stands in the Proposal, and to have it fall on economic operators, in line with their due diligence duty to continuously assess their involvement with the adverse impact of their operations, and according to the information reasonably available to them.
Specific requirements for corrective actions, including remediation for victims of forced labour, have also been introduced by the Rapporteur. Currently missing in the proposal, the principle of remediation is a crucial element in the eradication of forced labour and in bringing justice to the victims of forced labour, and its fulfilment should be taken into account when considering the lifting of bans imposed. Indications on remediation should be included in the Commission guidelines.
Other corrective actions proposed by the Rapporteur include a direct connection with the EU Global Human Rights sanctions regime/EU Magnitsky Act and with the economic sanctions regime, targeting respectively individuals or entities and countries who do not respect the prohibition of forced labour.
Finally, the Rapporteur also recommends including stakeholders engagement, in particular as it concerns human rights expertise, for what concerns the database of forced labour risk areas or products and Commission guidelines, as well as accessibility requirements of the database to human rights defenders, civil society actors and local communities. Moreover, the Rapporteur suggests introducing a presumption of violation of Article 3 of the Regulation with regard to the products listed in the database.
AMENDMENTS
The Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the Committee on International Trade, as the committees responsible, to take the following into account:
Amendment 1
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(3) The eradication of forced labour is a priority for the Union. Respect for human dignity and the universality and indivisibility of human rights are firmly enshrined in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union. Article 5(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights provide that no one is to be required to perform forced or compulsory labour. The European Court of Human Rights has repeatedly interpreted Article 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights as requiring Member States to penalise and effectively prosecute any act maintaining a person in the situations described set out in Article 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights.19
(3) The eradication of forced labour is a priority for the Union. Respect for human dignity and the universality and indivisibility of human rights are firmly enshrined in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union. In order to achieve Target 8.7 of the Sustainable Development Goals, the Union should uphold and promote its values and contribute to the protection of human rights, in particular the rights of the child. Article 5(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights provide that no one is to be required to perform forced or compulsory labour. The European Court of Human Rights has repeatedly interpreted Article 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights as requiring Member States to penalise and effectively prosecute any act maintaining a person in the situations described set out in Article 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights.19 The right to remedies is a human right, and a fundamental element in the process of effective prosecution of crimes. Existing Union legislation, the UN Guiding Principles on the Business and Human Rights (UNGPs), the Council of Europe and the OECD affirm the right of victims to an effective remedy for business-related human rights violations or abuses.
__________________
__________________
19 For instance paras. 89 and 102 in Siliadin v. France or para. 105 in Chowdury and Others v. Greece.
19 For instance paras. 89 and 102 in Siliadin v. France or para. 105 in Chowdury and Others v. Greece.
Or. en
Amendment 2
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(4) All Member States have ratified the fundamental ILO Conventions on forced labour and child labour.20 They are therefore legally obliged to prevent and eliminate the use of forced labour and to report regularly to the ILO.
(4) More than 3.3 million children are estimated to be in situation of forced labour, over half of which are in commercial sexual exploitation, and children account for about 12 % of all those in forced labour, although the numbers could be much higher1a. All Member States have ratified the fundamental ILO Conventions on forced labour and child labour.20 They are therefore legally obliged to prevent and eliminate the use of forced labour and to report regularly to the ILO.
__________________
__________________
1a The Global Estimates of Modern Slavery 2021 (Les estimations mondiales de l’esclavage moderne, 2021), https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---ipec/documents/publication/wcms_854733.pdf.
20 https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---europe/---ro-geneva/---ilo-brussels/documents/publication/wcms_195135.pdf.
20 https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---europe/---ro-geneva/---ilo-brussels/documents/publication/wcms_195135.pdf.
Or. en
Amendment 3
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(8) [In particular, Directive 20XX/XX/EU on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence sets out horizontal due diligence obligations to identify, prevent, mitigate and account for actual and potential adverse impacts on human rights, including forced labour, and the environment in the company’s own operations, its subsidiaries and in its value chains, in accordance with international human and labour rights standards and environmental conventions. Those obligations apply to large companies over a certain threshold in terms of number of employees and net turnover, and to smaller companies in high-impact sectors over a certain threshold in terms of number of employees and net turnover.22 ]
(8) [In particular, Directive 20XX/XX/EU on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence sets out horizontal due diligence obligations to identify, prevent, mitigate and account for actual and potential adverse impacts on human rights, including forced labour, and the environment in the company’s own operations, its subsidiaries and in its value chains, in accordance with international human and labour rights standards and environmental conventions. Those obligations apply to large companies over a certain threshold in terms of number of employees and net turnover, and to smaller companies in high-impact sectors over a certain threshold in terms of number of employees and net turnover.22 In order to ensure coherence with that Directive, this Regulation should introduce some definitions such as “remediation”, “relevant stakeholders” and “meaningful engagement of stakeholders”.]
__________________
__________________
22 Directive 20XX/XX/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937, OJ XX, XX.XX.20XX, p. XX.
22 Directive 20XX/XX/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 (OJ XX, XX.XX.20XX, p. XX).
Or. en
Amendment 4
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(16) In order to ensure the effectiveness of the prohibition, such prohibition should apply to products for which forced labour has been used at any stage of their production, manufacture, harvest and extraction, including working or processing related to the products. The prohibition should apply to all products, of any type, including their components, and should apply to products regardless of the sector, the origin, whether they are domestic or imported, or placed or made available on the Union market or exported.
(16) In order to ensure the effectiveness of the prohibition, such prohibition should apply to products for which forced labour has been used at any stage of their production, manufacture, harvest and extraction, including working or processing related to the products, as well as the services related to the shipping and transport towards and within the Union. The prohibition should apply to all products, of any type, including their components, and should apply to products regardless of the sector, the origin, whether they are domestic or imported, or placed or made available on the Union market or exported.
Or. en
Amendment 5
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(18) Micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (’SMEs’) can have limited resources and ability to ensure that the products they place or make available on the Union market are free from forced labour. The Commission should therefore issue guidelines on due diligence in relation to forced labour, which should take into account also the size and economic resources of economic operators. In addition, the Commission should issue guidelines on forced-labour risk indicators and on publicly available information in order to help SMEs, as well as other economic operators, to comply with the requirements of the prohibition.
(18) Micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (’SMEs’) can have limited resources and ability to ensure that the products they place or make available on the Union market are free from forced labour. The Commission should therefore issue guidelines on due diligence in relation to forced labour, which should take into account also the size and economic resources of economic operators, in a way that is without prejudice to the right for the potential victims to access appropriate and effective remedies. In addition, the Commission should issue guidelines on forced-labour risk indicators and on publicly available information in order to help SMEs, as well as other economic operators, to comply with the requirements of the prohibition.
Or. en
Amendment 6
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(20) In order to increase the effectiveness of the prohibition, competent authorities should grant reasonable time to economic operators to identify, mitigate, prevent and bring to an end the risk of forced labour.
(20) In order to increase the effectiveness of the prohibition, competent authorities should grant reasonable time to economic operators to identify, mitigate, prevent, remediate and bring to an end the risk of forced labour.
Or. en
Amendment 7
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(22) Before initiating an investigation, competent authorities should request from the economic operators under assessment information on actions taken to mitigate, prevent or bring to an end risks of forced labour in their operations and value chains with respect to the products under assessment. Carrying out such due diligence in relation to forced labour should help the economic operator to be at a lower risk of having forced labour in its operations and value chains. Appropriate due diligence means that forced labour issues in the value chain have been identified and addressed in accordance with relevant Union legislation and international standards. That implies that where the competent authority considers that there is no substantiated concern of a violation of the prohibition, for instance due to, but not limited to the applicable legislation, guidelines, recommendations or any other due diligence in relation to forced labour being applied in a way that mitigates, prevents and brings to an end the risk of forced labour, no investigation should be initiated.
(22) Before initiating an investigation, competent authorities should request from the economic operators under assessment information on actions taken to mitigate, prevent, remediate or bring to an end risks of forced labour in their operations and value chains with respect to the products under assessment. Carrying out such due diligence in relation to forced labour should help the economic operator to be at a lower risk of having forced labour in its operations and value chains. Appropriate due diligence means that forced labour issues in the value chain have been identified and addressed in accordance with relevant Union legislation and international standards. That implies that where the competent authority considers that there is no substantiated concern of a violation of the prohibition, for instance due to, but not limited to the applicable legislation, guidelines, recommendations or any other due diligence in relation to forced labour being applied in a way that mitigates, prevents and brings to an end the risk of forced labour, no investigation should be initiated.
Or. en
Amendment 8
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(26) Competent authorities should bear the burden of establishing that forced labour has been used at any stage of production, manufacture, harvest or extraction of a product, including working or processing related to the product on the basis of all information and evidence gathered during the investigation, including its preliminary phase. To ensure their right to due process, economic operators should have the opportunity to provide information in their defence to the competent authorities throughout the investigation.
(26) Economic operators should bear the burden of establishing that forced labour has not been used at any stage of production, manufacture, harvest or extraction of a product, including working or processing related to the product and the shipping and transport of the product towards or within the Union market, on the basis of all information and evidence reasonably available to them. To ensure their right to due process, economic operators should have the opportunity to provide information in their defence to the competent authorities throughout the investigation.
Or. en
Amendment 9
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(32) Any person, whether it is a natural or legal person, or any association not having legal personality, should be allowed to submit information to the competent authorities when it considers that products made with forced labour are placed and made available on the Union market and to be informed of the outcome of the assessment of their submission.
(32) Any relevant stakeholder should be allowed to submit information or a complaint to the competent authorities when it considers that products made with forced labour are placed and made available on the Union market and to be informed of the outcome of the assessment of their submission. Measures should be taken to protect stakeholders, including those from third countries, and avoid any reprisals by ensuring their confidentiality and anonymity.
Or. en
Amendment 10
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(33) The Commission should issue guidelines in order to facilitate the implementation of the prohibition by economic operators and competent authorities. Such guidelines should include guidance on due diligence in relation to forced labour and complementary information for the competent authorities to implement the prohibition. The guidance on due diligence in relation to forced labour should build on the Guidance on due diligence for Union businesses to address the risk of forced labour in their operations and supply chains published by the Commission and the European External Action Service in July 2021. The guidelines should be consistent with other Commission guidelines in this regard and relevant international organisations’ guidelines. The reports from international organisations, in particular the ILO, as well as other independent and verifiable sources of information should be considered for the identification of risk indicators.
(33) The Commission should issue guidelines in order to facilitate the implementation of the prohibition by economic operators and competent authorities. Such guidelines should include guidance on due diligence in relation to forced labour, including specific requirements that economic operators need to adhere to in order to prove that they have eliminated forced labour from their supply chains and corrective actions adopted to prevent future abuses, and complementary information for the competent authorities to implement the prohibition. The guidance on due diligence in relation to forced labour should build on the Guidance on due diligence for Union businesses to address the risk of forced labour in their operations and supply chains published by the Commission and the European External Action Service in July 2021. The guidelines should be consistent with other Commission guidelines in this regard and relevant international organisations’ guidelines. The reports from international organisations, in particular the ILO, as well as other independent and verifiable sources of information should be considered for the identification of risk indicators.
Or. en
Amendment 11
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(c) ‘due diligence in relation to forced labour’ means the efforts by economic operator to implement mandatory requirements, voluntary guidelines, recommendations or practices to identify, prevent, mitigate or bring to an end the use of forced labour with respect to products that are to be made available on the Union market or to be exported;
(c) ‘due diligence in relation to forced labour’ means the efforts by economic operator to implement mandatory requirements, voluntary guidelines, recommendations or practices to identify, prevent, mitigate, remediate or bring to an end the use of forced labour with respect to products that are to be made available on the Union market or to be exported;
Or. en
Amendment 12
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point g
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(g) ‘product made with forced labour’ means a product for which forced labour has been used in whole or in part at any stage of its extraction, harvest, production or manufacture, including working or processing related to a product at any stage of its supply chain;
(g) ‘product made with forced labour’ means a product for which forced labour has been used in whole or in part at any stage of its extraction, harvest, production or manufacture, including working or processing related to a product at any stage of its supply chain, including the transport and shipping of the product towards or within the Union market;
Or. en
Amendment 13
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point u a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(ua) ‘remediation’ means both the process of providing remedy for a negative human rights impact and the substantive outcomes that can counteract, or make good, the negative impact. These outcomes may take a range of forms such as apologies, restitution, rehabilitation, financial or non-financial compensation, and punitive sanctions (whether criminal or administrative, such as fines), as well as the prevention of harm through, for example, injunctions or guarantees of non-repetition. Remediation shall be provided according to the context and needs of each victim of forced labour;
Or. en
Amendment 14
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point u b (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(ub) ‘relevant stakeholders’ or ‘stakeholders’ means any person, whether it is a natural or legal person, or any association not having legal personality, who have an interest in and knowledge of potential situations of forced labour; this includes the company’s workers and employees (including under informal arrangements) and their representatives, the workers and employees of its subsidiaries and their representatives, trade unions, local communities, indigenous people, human rights defenders and civil society organisations;
Or. en
Amendment 15
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point u c (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(uc) ‘meaningful engagement of stakeholders’ means an interactive, responsive, ongoing process of engagement with stakeholders, characterised by two-way communication, conducted in good faith and guaranteeing proper implementation of agreed commitments and which involves the timely provision of all relevant information needed by stakeholders, adequate processes to remove barriers to participation for stakeholders, as well as adequate protection to ensure the safety of stakeholders and prevent retaliation and reprisals.
Or. en
Amendment 16
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
1. Competent authorities shall follow a risk-based approach in assessing the likelihood that economic operators violated Article 3. That assessment shall be based on all relevant information available to them, including the following information:
1. Competent authorities shall follow a risk-based approach in assessing the likelihood that economic operators violated Article 3. That assessment shall be based on all relevant information available to them, following a meaningful consultation with and engagement of relevant stakeholders, including the following information:
Or. en
Amendment 17
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(a) submissions made by natural or legal persons or any association not having legal personality pursuant to Article 10;
(a) submissions made by relevant stakeholders pursuant to Article 10;
Or. en
Amendment 18
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
3. Before initiating an investigation in accordance with Article 5(1), the competent authority shall request from the economic operators under assessment information on actions taken to identify, prevent, mitigate or bring to an end risks of forced labour in their operations and value chains with respect to the products under assessment, including on the basis of any of the following:
3. Before initiating an investigation in accordance with Article 5(1), the competent authority shall request from the economic operators under assessment information on actions taken to identify, prevent, mitigate, remediate or bring to an end risks of forced labour in their operations and value chains with respect to the products under assessment, including on the basis of any of the following:
Or. en
Amendment 19
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point d a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(da) evidence of remediation of forced labour.
Or. en
Amendment 20
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 6
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
6. The competent authority shall duly take into account where the economic operator demonstrates that it carries out due diligence on the basis of identified forced labour impact in its supply chain, adopts and carries out measures suitable and effective for bringing to an end forced labour in a short period of time.
6. The competent authority shall duly take into account where the economic operator demonstrates that it carries out due diligence on the basis of identified forced labour impact in its supply chain, adopts and carries out measures suitable and effective for remediating and bringing to an end forced labour in a short period of time.
Or. en
Amendment 21
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
7. Competent authorities shall not initiate an investigation pursuant to Article 5, and shall inform the economic operators under assessment accordingly, where, on the basis of the assessment referred to in paragraph 1 and the information submitted by economic operators pursuant to paragraph 4, the competent authorities consider that there is no substantiated concern of a violation of Article 3, for instance due to, but not limited to, the applicable legislation, guidelines, recommendations or any other due diligence in relation to forced labour referred to in paragraph 3 being applied in a way that mitigates, prevents and brings to an end the risk of forced labour.
7. Competent authorities shall not initiate an investigation pursuant to Article 5, and shall inform the economic operators under assessment accordingly, where, on the basis of the assessment referred to in paragraph 1 and the information submitted by economic operators pursuant to paragraph 4, the competent authorities consider that there is no substantiated concern of a violation of Article 3, for instance due to, but not limited to, the applicable legislation, guidelines, recommendations or any other due diligence in relation to forced labour referred to in paragraph 3 being applied in a way that mitigates, prevents, remediates and brings to an end the risk of forced labour.
Or. en
Amendment 22
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
3a. Competent authorities shall ensure the interactive, responsive and ongoing process of meaningful engagement of relevant stakeholders, including by requesting them to submit any information that is relevant and necessary for the investigation.
Or. en
Amendment 23
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
4. Economic operators shall submit the information within 15 working days from the request referred to in paragraph 3 or make a justified request for an extension of that time limit.
4. Economic operators and relevant stakeholders shall submit the information within 15 working days from the request referred to in paragraphs 3 and 3a or make a justified request for an extension of that time limit.
Or. en
Amendment 24
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 6
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
6. Competent authorities may carry out all necessary checks and inspections including investigations in third countries, provided that the economic operators concerned give their consent and that the government of the Member State or third country in which the inspections are to take place has been officially notified and raises no objection.
6. Competent authorities may carry out all necessary checks and inspections including investigations in third countries and consultations of relevant stakeholders, provided that the government of the Member State or third country in which the inspections are to take place has been officially notified.
Or. en
Amendment 25
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
1. Submissions of information by any natural or legal person or any association not having legal personality, to competent authorities on alleged violations of Article 3 shall contain information on the economic operators or products concerned and provide the reasons substantiating the allegation.
1. Submissions of information and complaints by any relevant stakeholder to competent authorities on alleged violations of Article 3 shall contain information on the economic operators or products concerned and provide the reasons substantiating the allegation. Adequate protection measures shall be set to ensure the safety of relevant stakeholders, including ensuring confidentiality and anonymity, and prevent retaliation and reprisals.
Or. en
Amendment 26
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
2. The competent authority shall, as soon as possible, inform the person or association referred to in paragraph 1 of the outcome of the assessment of their submission.
2. The competent authority shall, as soon as possible, inform the relevant stakeholders referred to in paragraph 1 of the outcome of the assessment of their submission.
Or. en
Amendment 27
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
3. Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council39 shall apply to the reporting of all breaches of this Regulation and the protection of persons reporting such breaches.
3. Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council39 shall apply to the reporting of all breaches of this Regulation and the protection of relevant stakeholders reporting such breaches.
__________________
__________________
39 Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law, OJ L 305, 26.11.2019, p. 17.
39 Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law (OJ L 305, 26.11.2019, p. 17).
Or. en
Amendment 28
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
1. The Commission shall call upon external expertise to provide an indicative, non-exhaustive, verifiable and regularly updated database of forced labour risks in specific geographic areas or with respect to specific products including with regard to forced labour imposed by state authorities. The database shall be based on the guidelines referred to in Article 23, points (a), (b) and (c), and relevant external sources of information from, amongst others, international organisations and third country authorities.
1. The Commission shall call upon external expertise to provide an indicative, non-exhaustive, verifiable and regularly updated database of forced labour risks in specific geographic areas or with respect to specific products including with regard to forced labour imposed by state authorities. The database shall be based on independent and verifiable information and the guidelines referred to in Article 23, points (a), (b) and (c), and relevant external sources of information from, amongst others, relevant stakeholders, international organisations and third country authorities.
Or. en
Amendment 29
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
1a. The products referred to in paragraph 1 or coming from areas referred to in paragraph 1 shall be presumed to be in violation of Article 3 and shall therefore be automatically subject to an investigation in accordance with Article 5. Economic operators have the burden to disproof such presumption.
Or. en
Amendment 30
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
2. The Commission shall ensure that the database is made publicly available by the external expertise at the latest 24 months after the entry into force of this Regulation.
2. The Commission shall ensure that the database is made publicly available and easily accessible to all by the external expertise at the latest 24 months after the entry into force of this Regulation.
Or. en
Amendment 31
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point a
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(a) guidance on due diligence in relation to forced labour, which shall take into account applicable Union legislation setting out due diligence requirements with respect to forced labour, guidelines and recommendations from international organisations, as well as the size and economic resources of economic operators;
(a) guidance on due diligence in relation to forced labour, which shall take into account applicable Union legislation setting out due diligence requirements with respect to forced labour, guidelines and recommendations from international organisations, as well as the size and economic resources of economic operators, with a particular focus on accompanying measures to support SMEs to comply with this Regulation;
Or. en
Amendment 32
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(ea) guidance on remediation measures;
Or. en
Amendment 33
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(eb) guidance on meaningful stakeholder engagement;
Or. en
Amendment 34
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point e c (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(ec) guidance on requirements that economic operators need to adhere to in order to prove that they have eliminated forced labour from their supply chains and corrective actions adopted to prevent future abuses.
Or. en
Amendment 35
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
1. In order to facilitate effective implementation and enforcement of this Regulation, the Commission may as appropriate cooperate, engage and exchange information with, amongst others, authorities of third countries, international organisations, civil society representatives and business organisations. International cooperation with authorities of third countries shall take place in a structured way as part of the existing dialogue structures with third countries or, if necessary, specific ones that will be created on an ad hoc basis.
1. In order to facilitate effective implementation and enforcement of this Regulation, the Commission may as appropriate cooperate, engage and exchange information with, amongst others, authorities of third countries, international organisations, relevant stakeholders, civil society representatives and business organisations. International cooperation with authorities of third countries shall take place in a structured way as part of the existing dialogue structures with third countries or, if necessary, specific ones that will be created on an ad hoc basis.
Or. en
Amendment 36
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, cooperation with, amongst others, international organisations, civil society representatives, business organisations and competent authorities of third countries may result in the Union developing accompanying measures to support the efforts of companies and partner countries efforts and locally available capacities in tackling forced labour.
2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, cooperation with, amongst others, international organisations, relevant stakeholders, civil society representatives, business organisations and competent authorities of third countries may result in the Union developing accompanying measures to support the efforts of companies, in particular SMEs, and partner countries efforts and locally available capacities in tackling forced labour.
Or. en
Amendment 37
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
2a. The Council shall impose sanctions through the EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime (EU Magnitsky Act) or country-based sanctions regimes on those violating Article 3 of this Regulation. Those sanctions shall be coordinated with like-minded partners. The Council shall also adopt conclusions outlining strategies of the Union and the Member States to promote bilateral and multilateral coordination with third countries and other diplomatic initiatives to address state-sponsored forced labour, up to and including the recourse to country-based economic sanctions for third countries who promote forced labour, in line with ILO Convention No. 105.
Or. en
Amendment 38
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2 b (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
2b. The Union and its Member States shall support third countries, in particular developing countries, by promoting the ratification and the effective implementation of fundamental ILO’s conventions and standards related to the prohibition of forced labour and by taking measures to enable partner countries in collaboration with civil society organisations and relevant stakeholders to effectively prevent, minimise, remediate to and eradicate forced labour.
Or. en