Sittings · Document
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application
6.3.2026 A10-0040/7
Amendment 7
António Tânger Corrêa, Jaroslav Bžoch
on behalf of the PfE Group
Report A10-0040/2026
Birgit Sippel
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application
(COM(2025)0797 – C10-0370/2025 – 2025/0429(COD))
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(3) It is important that child sexual abuse online can be combated effectively, in accordance with the applicable rules of Union law, including the conditions set out in Regulation (EU) 2021/1232, and without interruption, pending the adoption and application of the long-term legal framework.
(3) It is important that child sexual abuse online can be combated effectively, in full compliance with Union law and the Charter of Fundamental Rights, including the principles of necessity and proportionality, the confidentiality of communications and the protection of personal data, as well as the conditions set out in Regulation (EU) 2021/1232, pending the adoption and application of a long-term legal framework.
Or. en
6.3.2026 A10-0040/8
Amendment 8
António Tânger Corrêa, Jaroslav Bžoch
on behalf of the PfE Group
Report A10-0040/2026
Birgit Sippel
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application
(COM(2025)0797 – C10-0370/2025 – 2025/0429(COD))
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(3 a) The derogation provided for in Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 is based on a voluntary regime. This extension does not create, and may not be interpreted as creating, additional obligations for providers, nor duties whose non-compliance could trigger sanctions, fines or liability for not deploying such technologies.
Or. en
6.3.2026 A10-0040/9
Amendment 9
António Tânger Corrêa, Jaroslav Bžoch
on behalf of the PfE Group
Report A10-0040/2026
Birgit Sippel
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application
(COM(2025)0797 – C10-0370/2025 – 2025/0429(COD))
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3 b (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(3 b) The extension of the application period of Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 should not lead to the outsourcing of law-enforcement functions to private entities, nor turn providers into private watchdogs of a bureaucratic system. The investigation, prosecution and enforcement of criminal law remain the responsibility of the competent authorities.
Or. en
6.3.2026 A10-0040/10
Amendment 10
António Tânger Corrêa, Jaroslav Bžoch
on behalf of the PfE Group
Report A10-0040/2026
Birgit Sippel
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application
(COM(2025)0797 – C10-0370/2025 – 2025/0429(COD))
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3 c (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(3 c) The mere existence of voluntary detection measures by the providers does not relieve the co-legislators from ensuring that any temporary derogation fully respects the prohibition of general monitoring under Union law and the requirements of articles 7 and 8 of the Charter.
Or. en
6.3.2026 A10-0040/11
Amendment 11
António Tânger Corrêa, Jaroslav Bžoch
on behalf of the PfE Group
Report A10-0040/2026
Birgit Sippel
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application
(COM(2025)0797 – C10-0370/2025 – 2025/0429(COD))
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(5) Considering the need to ensure legal certainty in a timely manner, and considering the limited nature of the amendment provided for in this Regulation, namely the extension of its period of application, it is appropriate to provide that this Regulation should enter into force as soon as possible.
(5) Considering the need to ensure legal certainty in a timely manner, and considering the limited nature of the amendment provided for in this Regulation, it shall not be interpreted as altering the enforcement architecture of Regulation (EU 2021/1232) or as conferring new enforcement powers vis-à-vis providers.
Or. en
6.3.2026 A10-0040/12
Amendment 12
António Tânger Corrêa, Jaroslav Bžoch
on behalf of the PfE Group
Report A10-0040/2026
Birgit Sippel
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application
(COM(2025)0797 – C10-0370/2025 – 2025/0429(COD))
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(5 a) Nothing in this Regulation shall prohibit, weaken, undermine or circumvent end-to-end encryption, and providers shall not be prevented nor discouraged for offering end-to-end encrypted services.
Or. en
6.3.2026 A10-0040/13
Amendment 13
António Tânger Corrêa, Jaroslav Bžoch
on behalf of the PfE Group
Report A10-0040/2026
Birgit Sippel
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application
(COM(2025)0797 – C10-0370/2025 – 2025/0429(COD))
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(7 a) The Commission’s implementing reports of 19 December 2023 and 27 November 2025 (the “2023 and 2025 implementing reports”) do not provide conclusive evidence regarding the proportionality of this derogation, nor do they contain sufficiently detailed information on the different categories of CSAM detected or on whether the reported detections resulted from voluntary measures by service providers or from reports by helplines or users. This lack of clarity raises serious questions as to the necessity and added value of establishing a costly EU agency in the future, particularly given that the vast majority of detection activities by providers appear to rely primarily on obligations stemming from United States law.
Or. en