What changed

PR_COD_1amCom

PA_Legam

Symbols for procedures

AMENDMENTS

* Consultation procedure

The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs calls on the Committee on Transport and Tourism, as the committee responsible, to take the following into account:

*** Consent procedure

***I Ordinary legislative procedure (first reading)

***II Ordinary legislative procedure (second reading)

***III Ordinary legislative procedure (third reading)

(The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the draft act.)

Amendments to a draft act

Amendments by Parliament set out in two columns

Deletions are indicated in bold italics in the left-hand column. Replacements are indicated in bold italics in both columns. New text is indicated in bold italics in the right-hand column.

The first and second lines of the header of each amendment identify the relevant part of the draft act under consideration. If an amendment pertains to an existing act that the draft act is seeking to amend, the amendment heading includes a third line identifying the existing act and a fourth line identifying the provision in that act that Parliament wishes to amend.

Amendments by Parliament in the form of a consolidated text

New text is highlighted in bold italics. Deletions are indicated using either the ▌symbol or strikeout. Replacements are indicated by highlighting the new text in bold italics and by deleting or striking out the text that has been replaced.

By way of exception, purely technical changes made by the drafting departments in preparing the final text are not highlighted.

DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION

on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 as regards minimum requirements on minimum breaks and daily and weekly rest periods in the occasional passenger transport sector

(COM(2023)256 – C90178/2023 – 2023/0155(COD))

(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)

– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2023)256),

– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 91(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C90178/2023),

– having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 11 September 2023;

– having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions of ... ;

– having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

– having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,

– having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs,

– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A90000/2023),

1. Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;

2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it replaces substantially amends or intends to substantially amend its proposal;

3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

Amendment 1

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 1

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(1) Good working conditions for drivers and fair business conditions for road transport undertakings are of paramount importance to create an efficient, safe and socially accountable road transport sector, ensure non-discrimination and attract qualified workers. It is therefore essential that Union social rules on road transport are clear, proportionate, fit for purpose, easy to apply, and easy to enforce and implemented in an effective and consistent manner throughout the Union.

(1) Good working conditions for drivers and fair business conditions for road transport undertakings are of paramount importance to create an efficient, safe and socially accountable road transport sector, ensure non-discrimination and attract qualified workers. It is therefore essential that Union social rules on road transport are clear, proportionate, fit for purpose, as well as easy to implement, apply and enforce in an effective and consistent manner throughout the Union. While there has been progress on the enforcement of the existing rules, there is still room for further improvements, for example with regard to the recording of working hours in situations when different tasks are mixed.

Amendment 2

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 3

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(3) However, the specificities of the occasional road passenger transport sector are not shared by the road freight transport or the regular road passenger transport sector. Occasional road passenger transport is characterised by high seasonality and different lengths of time spent driving which depend on the touristic activities undertaken by passengers. It needs to accommodate unscheduled and impromptu requests from passengers in terms of additional stops and changes of the route or the schedule, wherever feasible. Occasional road passenger transport generally involves less driving time when compared to freight transport or regular bus services. In addition drivers usually sleep in hotels, and seldom drive at night. On the other hand, drivers during the working time may be subject to some additional activities, often resulting from interactions with passengers.

(3) However, the specificities of occasional road passenger transport are not shared by road freight transport or regular road passenger transport. Occasional road passenger transport can be characterised by seasonality and different lengths of time spent driving which depend on the activities undertaken by passengers. It needs to accommodate unscheduled and impromptu requests from passengers in terms of additional stops and changes of the route or the schedule, wherever feasible. Occasional road passenger transport can involve less driving time, when compared to freight transport or regular bus services. However, drivers in seasonal occasional road passenger transport may also be often engaged in other transport operations during off-peak seasons. In addition, drivers in occasional road transport usually sleep in hotels, and drive less at night. However, when taking into account the total number of hours worked, including activities performed during driving breaks, there can be a cumulative impact on stress and driver fatigue1a, which may pose a risk to road safety and the health and safety of drivers. Additional activities include frequent interactions with passengers, the maintenance and cleaning of the vehicle, and the loading and unloading of baggage. The responsibility of drivers for the safety of their passengers requires not only good physical and mental fitness but also a high level of concentration and a high level of stress resistance.

__________________

1a Vitols, Katrin and Voss, Eckhard (2021): Driving fatigue in European Road Transport; https://www.etf-europe.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Driver-Fatigue-in-European-Road-Transport-Report-.pdf

Amendment 3

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 4

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(4) The ex post evaluation of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 concluded that some of the uniform rules related to minimum breaks and rest periods do not fit the specificities of occasional road passenger transport services. Further assessments undertaken by the Commission in that respect have shown that some of the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 on breaks and daily and weekly rest periods are unsuitable and impractical for drivers and operators engaged in the occasional road carriage of passengers, as they have a negative impact on the ability to organise efficient and high-quality occasional passenger services, on the working conditions of drivers, and consequently on road safety.

(4) The ex post evaluation of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 concluded that some of the uniform rules related to minimum breaks and rest periods do not fit the specificities of occasional road passenger transport services. Further assessments undertaken by the Commission in that respect have shown that some of the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 on breaks and daily and weekly rest periods can have negative implications for working conditions of drivers and the provision of the efficient and high-quality occasional passenger services.

Amendment 4

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 5

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(5) Therefore, it is appropriate to adapt the requirements on minimum breaks and rest periods to fit, as well, the specific requirements of the occasional road passenger transport services. It is also appropriate to align applicable rules for national and international occasional-passenger transport services by road.

(5) Therefore, it is appropriate to adapt the requirements on minimum breaks and rest periods to better fit the specific requirements of the occasional road passenger transport services.

Amendment 5

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 6

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(6) More flexible rules in the scheduling of the breaks and rest periods of drivers engaged in occasional road passenger transport services should in no way jeopardise the safety of drivers, road safety, increase the level of fatigue of drivers or lead to a deterioration in working conditions. Such flexibility should therefore not alter the current rules on the total minimum breaks, on maximum driving periods per day and per week and on the maximum fortnightly driving time.

(6) Rules in the scheduling and distribution of the breaks and rest periods of drivers engaged in occasional road passenger transport services should allow the organisation of working time in the best possible manner, notably during periods of peak travel demand, and reduce the time drivers spend away from home, not least in order to attract workers for the transport sector. In no way should the rules jeopardise the safety of drivers or road safety, increase the level of fatigue and stress of drivers, endanger their mental or physical health and safety, or lead to a deterioration in working conditions. More flexibility should therefore not alter the current rules on the total minimum breaks, on maximum driving periods per day and per week and on the maximum fortnightly driving time.

Amendment 6

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 7

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(7) To ensure the uniform definition of occasional passenger services, it is necessary to clarify that the definition set out in Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council23 covers both national and international services. It is also appropriate to update the reference to Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009, which repealed Council Regulation (EEC) No 684/9224 .

deleted

__________________

23 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 on common rules for access to the international market for coach and bus services, and amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 (recast) (OJ L 300, 14.11.2009, p. 88).

24 Council Regulation (EEC) No 684/92 of 16 March 1992 on common rules for the international carriage of passengers by coach and bus (OJ L 74, 20.3.1992, p. 1).

Amendment 7

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 8

(8) More flexibility in the scheduling of breaks for drivers engaged in occasional road passenger transport services should not prevent those drivers from taking breaks of the minimum duration necessary to enable them to rest properly. Therefore, it is appropriate to set a minimum duration for each break. Therefore, drivers engaged in occasional road passenger transport services should be allowed to split their obligatory break into three separate breaks of at least 15 minutes each, in addition to the other possibility of splitting a break.

(8) More flexibility inTo theensure schedulingadequate ofrest breakstime for drivers engaged in occasional road passenger transport services should not prevent those driversservices, fromwhich takingis breaksessential offor the minimum duration necessary to enable themsafety toof restdrivers properly.and Therefore,passengers, it is appropriate to set a minimum duration for each break. Therefore, driversDrivers engaged in occasional road passenger transport services should be allowed to split their obligatory break into two or three separate breaks of at least 15 minutes eacheach, distributedwhile freelyrespecting overthe total required minimum rest time of 45 minutes. More flexibility in the drivingscheduling period.of these obligatory breaks, however, should not prevent drivers from having additional breaks or breaks longer than the total required minimum rest time.

Or. en

Amendment 8

Justification

The currently applicable rules on breaks are not often well aligned with the natural stops on occasional passenger trips. This may create customer dissatisfaction which may increase stress for the drivers. In order to provide high quality occasional passenger transport services, drivers need to be able to adapt to unexpected circumstances and have their breaks when it makes practical sense.

Amendment 2

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 8 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(8a) Drivers should be able to postpone the start of their daily rest period for a maximum period of one hour, in cases where the driving time for that day has not exceeded seven hours, provided they are carrying out journeys of eight days or longer and the maximum daily working time is respected. Such flexibility should not jeopardise road safety and the health and safety of drivers and be further limited to only one derogation during the period of the journey.

Amendment 9

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 9

(9) To ensure that greater flexibility in the scheduling of rest periods of drivers engaged in occasional road passenger transport services is not abused, it is essential to clearly delimit the scope of such flexibility and also to provide for appropriate checks. Drivers should therefore be able to postpone the start of their daily rest periods for a maximum period of 1 or 2 hours, in cases where the driving period for that day has not exceeded 5 or 7 hours respectively, and should postpone the start only when carrying out journeys of 8 days or longer. Such flexibility should be further limited to only one of each derogation during the period of the tour. It should be also possible to counter check such circumstances with a printout from the recording equipment or the duty roster, in addition to the tachograph records.

(9) To ensure that greater flexibility in the scheduling of rest periods of drivers engaged in occasional road passenger transport services is not abused, it is essential to clearly delimitdefine the scope of such flexibility and also to provide for appropriate checks.checks Driversby shouldnational thereforecompetent beauthorities ablesupported by the European Labour Authority (ELA). With a view to postponeeffective theand startefficient ofenforcement, theiradministrative dailyrequirements restshould periodsbe forestablished, athat maximumtake periodfull advantage of 1digital hour,tools. inIn casesaddition whereto the driving periodtachograph forrecords, thata daydigital hasjourney notform exceededshould 7be hours,electronically andregistered shouldprior postponeto the start onlyof whenan carryinginternational outjourney. journeysThe ofdigital 4forms daysshould orbe longer.accessible Suchin flexibilityreal shouldtime during roadside checks and be furthersolely limitedused tofor onlycontrols twoand derogationsenforcement. duringSocial partners at Union and national level can play an essential role in improving the periodenforcement of theexisting tour.regulations. ItThey should be also possibleinvited to counterundertake checkjoint suchactions, circumstancesdevelop withguidelines aand printoutissue fromrecommendations in this regard. The Commission should regularly monitor the recordingworking equipmentconditions orand the dutyenforcement roster,of the existing rules in additionthe tooccasional passenger transport sector. It should also assess the tachographimpact records.of the rules on road safety in this context.

Or. en

Amendment 10

Justification

The required duration is changed to 4 days as most occasional passenger service tours are considerably shorter than 8 days. The possibility of postponing the taking of daily rest by 1 hour, without exceeding regulatory driving time and without reducing daily rest, brings the rules closer to the actual needs of the passenger groups.

Amendment 3

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 10

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(10) Limiting the possibility to postpone the weekly rest period for up to 12 consecutive 24-hour periods exclusively to occasional international passenger services has a negative impact in terms of undistorted and fair competition between operators, especially small and medium enterprises. Occasional national passenger services might as well provide their services under the same conditions as occasional international passenger services in terms of the distance travelled or the duration or services rendered to passengers. Occasional national passenger services should therefore also benefit from such possibility.

deleted

Amendment 11

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)

Regulation (EC) No 561/2006

Article 7 – paragraph 2

Present text

Amendment

(1a) in Article 7, the second paragraph is amended as follows:

This break may be replaced by a break of at least 15 minutes followed by a break of at least 30 minutes each distributed over the period in such a way as to comply with the provisions of the first paragraph.

„For a driver engaged in an occasional passenger service this break may be replaced by two breaks of at least 15 minutes each distributed over the period in such a way as to comply with the provisions of the first paragraph;”

Amendment 12

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2

Amendment

(2) in Article 7, the following fourth paragraph is added:

deleted

For a driver engaged in an occasional passenger service the break referred to in the first paragraph may also be replaced by three breaks of at least 15 minutes each, distributed over the driving period referred to in the first paragraph, in such a way as to comply with the first paragraph.;

For a driver engaged in an occasional passenger service the break referred to in the first paragraph may also be replaced by two or three breaks of at least 15 minutes each, distributed freely over the driving period referred to in the first paragraph, in such a way as to comply with the first paragraph.;

Amendment 13

Or. en

Justification

The currently applicable rules on breaks are not often well aligned with the natural stops on occasional passenger trips. This may create customer dissatisfaction which may increase stress for the drivers. In order to provide high quality occasional passenger transport services, drivers need to be able to adapt to unexpected circumstances and have their breaks when it makes practical sense.

Amendment 4

Proposal for a regulation

Regulation (EC) No 561/2006

Article 8 – paragraph 2a – subparagraph 1 – introductory part and point a

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

2a. Provided that road safety is not thereby jeopardised, a driver engaged in an occasional passenger service with a duration of at least 8 days may derogate from paragraph 2, first subparagraph, in the following ways:

Provided that road safety is not thereby jeopardised,2a. aA driver engaged in a single occasional passenger service accompanied by one journey form, with a duration of at least 48 days may derogate from paragraph 2, first subparagraph, inby postponing the followingdaily way:rest period by at most 1 hour, provided that the total accumulated driving time for that day has not exceeded 7 hours and the maximum daily working time under the applicable national law is respected.

Or. en

(a) postponing the daily rest period by at most 1 hour, provided that the total accumulated driving time for that day has not exceeded 7 hours;

Justification

Amendment 14

It should be clarified that the possibility for derogation concerns a driver engaged in a service with one group travelling during the same single journey. The required duration is changed to 4 days as most occasional passenger service tours are considerably shorter than 8 days.

Amendment 5

Proposal for a regulation

deleted

Or. en

Amendment 15

Justification

The possibility of postponing the taking of daily rest by 1 hour, without exceeding regulatory driving time and without reducing daily rest, already brings the rules closer to the actual needs of the passenger groups.

Amendment 6

Proposal for a regulation

Regulation (EC) No 561/2006

AricleArticle 8 – paragraph 2a – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission

Each of the derogations referred to in the first subparagraph, points (a) and (b), may be used only once during the journey referred to in the first subparagraph.

TheSuch derogation referred to in the first subparagraph, point (a), may be used only twiceonce during the journey referred to in the first subparagraph.

Or. en

Amendment 16

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Proposal for a regulation

The Rapporteur welcomes the Commission proposal and recognises that the proposal is needed due to the specific characteristics of the occasional passenger transport sector.

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b

The Rapporteur notes that as Regulation (EC) 561/2006 on driving and resting times has been reviewed as recently as 2020, this regulatory update should remain limited in scope, namely to occasional passenger services. The objectives of the rules should remain the same - harmonizing the conditions of competition while improving working conditions and road safety. Attention should be paid to proper enforcement and control of existing rules, both in freight and in passenger transport.

Regulation (EC) No 561/2006

However, simultaneously a slight adaptation of existing rules is justified to better serve the specific needs of the occasional passenger transport sector. A degree of additional flexibility is needed, without jeopardizing road safety, working conditions and enforceability of the rules.

Article 8 – paragraph 6a – introductory part and point a

With regard to the rules on breaks, the Rapporteur notes that the currently applicable rules are often not well aligned with the natural stops on occasional passenger journeys. In order to be able to provide quality occasional passenger transport services, drivers need to be able to adapt to changing circumstances.

Text proposed by the Commission

With regard to the rules on daily rests, the Rapporteur supports the possibility for postponing the start of the daily rest by one hour in certain situations. Unlike freight transport or regular passenger transport, occasional passenger transport services are characterized by longer distances driven at the beginning and the end of the tour, and by a shorter duration of driving time at the place where the touristic activities mostly take place. The possibility of postponing the taking of the daily rest by one hour twice during the tour, without exceeding regulatory driving time and without reducing daily rest, would bring the rules closer to the actual needs of the passenger groups.

Amendment

Finally, the Rapporteur supports the Commission’s proposal to allow drivers to postpone their weekly rest period by up to 12 days (24-hour periods) on national journeys, as is already the case for international journeys. This alignment of the rules for national and international services is justified for the proper functioning of the single market and for streamlining enforcement and control.

(b) in paragraph 6a, the introductory phrase and point (a) are replaced by the following:

Transparency register:

deleted

FinMobility

By way of derogation from paragraph 6, a driver engaged in a single occasional passenger service may postpone the weekly rest period for up to 12 consecutive 24-hour periods following a previous regular weekly rest period, provided that:

Autoliikenteen Työnantajaliitto ry

(a) the service lasts at least 24 consecutive hours;.

European Transport Workers' Federation ETF

Amendment 17

Finnish Ministry of Transport and Communications

Proposal for a regulation

European Commission, DG MOVE

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b a (new)

International Road Transport Union IRU

Regulation (EC) No 561/2006

Article 8 – paragraph 6a – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(ba) in paragraph 6a, the following point is added:

“(da) a digital journey form including all features specified in Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 has been electronically registered prior to the start of the journey.”

ANNEX: LIST OF ENTITIES OR PERSONS FROM WHOM THE RAPPORTEUR FOR THE OPINION HAS RECEIVED INPUT

- ETF - European Transport Federation

- IRU - International Road Transport Union

- 3F Transport, Danish Trade Union

- Ver.di, German Trade Union

PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION

Title

Amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 as regards minimum requirements on minimum breaks and daily and weekly rest periods in the occasional passenger transport sector

References

COM(2023)0256 – C9-0178/2023 – 2023/0155(COD)

Committee responsible

Date announced in plenary

TRAN

1.6.2023

Opinion by

Date announced in plenary

EMPL

1.6.2023

Associated committees - date announced in plenary

14.9.2023

Rapporteur for the opinion

Date appointed

Marianne Vind

1.9.2023

Discussed in committee

19.9.2023

Date adopted

25.10.2023

Result of final vote

+:

–:

0:

41

0

2

Members present for the final vote

João Albuquerque, Marc Angel, Dominique Bilde, Gabriele Bischoff, Milan Brglez, Jordi Cañas, David Casa, Ilan De Basso, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Özlem Demirel, Klára Dobrev, Jarosław Duda, Estrella Durá Ferrandis, Lucia Ďuriš Nicholsonová, Loucas Fourlas, Cindy Franssen, Chiara Gemma, Helmut Geuking, Elisabetta Gualmini, Alicia Homs Ginel, Agnes Jongerius, Stelios Kympouropoulos, Katrin Langensiepen, Miriam Lexmann, Elena Lizzi, Sara Matthieu, Max Orville, Kira Marie Peter-Hansen, Dragoş Pîslaru, Elżbieta Rafalska, Daniela Rondinelli, Pirkko Ruohonen-Lerner, Monica Semedo, Romana Tomc, Nikolaj Villumsen, Marianne Vind, Maria Walsh, Tomáš Zdechovský

Substitutes present for the final vote

Alexander Alexandrov Yordanov, Aurore Lalucq, Eugenia Rodríguez Palop

Substitutes under Rule 209(7) present for the final vote

Sirpa Pietikäinen, Caroline Roose

FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION

Key to symbols: