What changed

P10_TA(2025)0318

European Parliament

2019-2024

TEXTS ADOPTED

P9_TA(2024)0139

Amending the Directive on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes

Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection

PE781.128

PE757.840

European Parliament legislative resolution of 1613 DecemberMarch 20252024 on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoptionproposal offor a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2013/11/EU on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputesdisputes, andas amendingwell as Directives (EU) 2015/2302, (EU) 2019/2161 and (EU) 2020/1828 following the discontinuation of the European Online Dispute Resolution Platform (11778/1/2025(COM(2023)0649 – C10-0309/2025C9-0384/2023 – 2023/0376(COD))

(Ordinary legislative procedure: secondfirst reading)

– having regard to the Council position at first reading (11778/1/2025 – C100309/2025),

The European Parliament,

– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2023)0649),

– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C90384/2023),

– having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

– having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 14 February 2024,

– having regard to its position at first reading on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2023)0649),

– having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,

– having regard to Articlethe 294(7)opinion of the TreatyCommittee on the Functioning of theTransport Europeanand Union,Tourism,

– having regard to the provisional agreement approvedreport byof the committee responsibleCommittee underon Rulethe 75(4)Internal ofMarket itsand RulesConsumer ofProtection Procedure,(A9-0060/2024),

– having regard to Rule 68 of its Rules of Procedure,

1. Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;

– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection (A10-0249/2025),

2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it replaces, substantially amends or intends to substantially amend its proposal;

1. Approves the Council position at first reading;

3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

2. Notes that the act is adopted in accordance with the Council position;

P9_TC1-COD(2023)0376

3. Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council, in accordance with Article 297(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 13 March 2024 with a view to the adoption of Directive (EU) 2024/… of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2013/11/EU on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes, as well as Directives (EU) 2015/2302, (EU) 2019/2161 and (EU) 2020/1828

4. Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union;

(Text with EEA relevance)

5. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 114 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments,

Having regard the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee,

Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure,

Whereas:

(1) Directive 2013/11/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council was adopted in order to ensure that consumers within the Union have access to high quality alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”) procedures to resolve the contractual disputes arising from the sale of goods or provision of services by traders established in the Union to consumers resident in the Union. It provides for the availability of ADR procedures for all types of domestic and cross-border consumer disputes within the Union, ensuring that ADR procedures meet minimum quality standards. It requires Member States to monitor the performance of ADR entities. To increase consumer awareness and promote the use of ADR, it also provides that traders should be required to inform their consumers of the possibility to settle their dispute out-of-court through ADR procedures.

(2) In 2019 the Commission adopted a report on the implementation of the Directive 2013/11/EU and of Regulation (EU) No 524/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council which revealed that Directive 2013/11/EU has led to increased coverage of consumer markets by quality ADR entities throughout the Union. However, the report also identified that consumer and business uptake of ADR procedures was lagging behind in some sectors and Member States. One reason for this was the low level of awareness of traders and consumers about such procedures in Member States where they had only recently been introduced. Another reason was the lack of trust of consumers and traders in unregulated ADR entities. Data provided by national competent authorities in early 2022, as well as the evaluation of the implementation of the Directive 2013/11/EU conducted in 2023, suggest that the uptake remained relatively stable (apart from a small increase of cases related to Covid-19 pandemic). Most stakeholders consulted in the context of that evaluation confirmed that the lack of awareness and understanding of ADR procedures by consumers, low engagement by traders, gaps in ADR coverage in certain Member States, high costs and complex national ADR procedures and differences in the competences of ADR entities, are frequent factors hindering the uptake of ADR procedures. There are additional barriers in cross-border ADR like language, lack of knowledge of the applicable law, as well as specific access difficulties for vulnerable consumers.

(2a) In order to reach its full potential and deliver for consumers, this Directive should require participation to be mandatory for air carriers falling under the scope of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004, provided that it does not prevent the parties from exercising their right of access to the judicial system. This is the case, given that several studies have highlighted the high number of consumer complaints in the transport and tourism sector, especially in the field of air passengers rights. [Am. 1]

(2b) ADR entities should communicate to the competent authorities a list of traders who systematically and unduly refuse to comply with the outcomes of ADR procedures. Furthermore, Member States should ensure that, where they do not comply with the outcome of an ADR procedure, traders are required to provide the other parties to the ADR procedure with a written explanation. [Am. 2]

(3) Since at least two out of five online transactions made by consumers residing in the Union are with traders based in third countries, the scope of Directive 2013/11/EU should be extended to allow those third country traders willing to participate in an ADR procedure to do so. No procedural impediments should hinder consumers residing in the Union from resolving disputes against traders, irrespective of their establishment, if the traders accept to follow an ADR procedure through an ADR entity established in a Member State. In accordance with applicable Union law, the consumer should be able to commence a procedure in the Member State where he or she resides. It should not be possible to access ADR procedures in a Member State in which neither the consumer resides nor the trader is established. [Am. 3]

(4) The complexity of consumer disputes has evolved significantly since the adoption of Directive 2013/11/EU. DigitilisationDigitalisation of goods and services, the growing importance of e-commerce and digital advertising in the formation of consumer contracts has resulted in a rise in the number of consumers being exposed to misleading online information and manipulative interfaces preventing them from making informed purchasing decisions. It is, therefore, necessary to clarify that contractual disputes arising from the sale of goods or services include digital content and digital services, and to extend the scope of Directive 2013/11/EU, beyond such disputes so that consumers are also able to seek redress for practices harming them at a pre-contractual stage, irrespective of whetherprovided they later become bound by a contract, or at a post-contractual stage. [Am. 4]

(5) Moreover, Directive 2013/11/EU should also cover consumer rights arising from Union legislation which governs relationships between consumers and traders when there is no relationship of a contractual nature, with respect to the right to access and to pay for goods and services without undergoing discrimination based on nationality, place of residence or of establishment, as provided for in Articles 4 and 5 of Regulation (EU) 2018/302 of the European Parliament and of the Council, or on any ground as referred to in Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union; the right to open and switch bank accounts as provided for in Articles 9, 10, 11, and 16 of Directive 2014/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and to not be discriminated against as provided for in Article 15 of that Directive; the right to receive transparent information on retail conditions for roaming calls and SMS messages as provided for in Articles 13, 14 and 15 of Regulation (EU) 2022/612 of the European Parliament and of the Council, the right to price transparency in air fares and rates as provided for in Article 23 of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Therefore, it should be provided that disputes arising in relation to such categories of consumer rights can be dealt with in ADR procedures. [Am. 5]

(5a) Member States should take note of the Commission Recommendation of 17 October 2023 on quality requirements for dispute resolution procedures offered by online marketplaces and Union trade associations. The Commission should be encouraged to complement this Directive with a Regulation on quality requirements for dispute resolution procedures offered by online marketplaces and Union trade associations. [Am. 6]

(6) Member States should have the right to apply ADR procedures also to disputes that relate to other non-contractual rights stemming from Union law, including rights stemming from Articles 101 and 102 TFEU or rights of users provided in Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council. This is without prejudice of public enforcement of those rules.

(7) Where a dispute arises between a provider of an online platform and a recipient of that service in relation to that provider's activities in moderating illegal or harmful content on its platform, Article 21 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council on out-of-court dispute settlement applies to that dispute, in accordance with Article 2(4) of that Regulation, given that it lays down more detailed rules in relation to such disputes.

(8) The definitions of ‘domestic dispute’ and ‘cross-border dispute’ should be adapted accordingly to reflect the extension of the scope of Directive 2013/11/EU.

(9) To ensure that ADR procedures are well-suited for the digital age where communication takes place online, including in a cross-border context, it is necessary to ensure swift and fair processes for all consumers. Member States should ensure that ADR entities established in their territories have the competence to provide dispute resolution procedures in disputes between traders established outside of the Union and consumers residing in their territory.

(10) Member States should ensure that ADR should enable consumer to initiate and follow ADR procedures also offline if requested. It should also be ensured that when digital tools are provided, those can be used by all consumers, including vulnerable consumers or those with varying levels of digital literacy. Members States should ensure that, upon request, parties to the disputes, in particular consumers, always have access to a review of automated procedures by a natural person, who should be independent and impartial. [Am. 7]

(10a) In order to enhance consumer and traders’ trust and increase their participation in ADR procedures, it is fundamental to ensure that the functioning and work of ADR entities is of good quality. In this sense, the expertise and knowledge of the ADR entity staff should be updated on a regular basis. Therefore, ADR entities should provide natural persons in charge of ADR procedures with regular training to ensure their knowledge is continuously updated. [Am. 8]

(11) Member States should also enable ADR entities with sufficient knowledge to bundle similar cases against a specific trader, where the natural persons in charge of ADR procedures have sufficient knowledge and expertise to deal with the case. This would help to make ADR outcomes consistent for consumers subjected to the same illegal practice, and more cost-efficient for ADR entities and for traders. Consumers should be informed accordingly and should be given the opportunity to refuse from having their dispute bundled. [Am. 9]

(12) Member States should also not allow the introduction of disproportionate rules as regards the reasons that an ADR entity may invoke to refuse the handling of a dispute, such as the obligation to use the company escalation system after a first negative contact with the complaints handling service, or the obligation to prove that a specific part of a company’s after sales service was contacted.

(13) Under Directive 2013/11/EU, Member States may introduce national legislation to make trader participation in ADR compulsory in sectors they deem fit, in addition to sector-specific Union legislation which provides for mandatory participation of traders in ADR. To encourage traders’ participation in the ADR procedures and to ensure due and swift ADR procedures, traders should be required, especially in cases where their participation is not compulsory, to respond within a specific period that should not exceed 15 working days to enquiries made by ADR entities on whether they intend to participate to the proposed procedure. An extension of this deadline could be granted for complex disputes or as a result of exceptional circumstances, such as a period of high activity or an external crisis. [Am. 10]

(13a) In order to ensure that consumers can expect full independence and impartiality, as provided for in this Directive, when dealing with all types of ADR entities, including ADR entities where the natural persons in charge of dispute resolution are employed or remunerated exclusively by the individual trader, also commonly referred to as ‘in-house’ ADR entities, such ADR entities should only have access to data strictly related to the case and explicitly provided by the trader or the consumer. [Am. 11]

(14) To reduce information and reporting requirements and to save costs for ADR entities, national competent authorities and traders, reporting and information requirements should be simplified and the amount of information provided by ADR entities to the competent authorities should be reduced. [Am. 12]

(14a) ADR procedures should preferably be free of charge for the consumer. In the event that costs are applied, those costs should not exceed a nominal fee. Furthermore, in order to increase the accessibility and attractiveness of ADR procedures to consumers, those fees should be reimbursable. It is important to clarify that such reimbursement is to be made by Member States, in full compliance with the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, and not by other entities, such as the other party to the ADR procedure. [Am. 13]

(14b) In many Member States, consumers are still insufficiently informed about the existence and services proposed by ADR entities. In order to increase consumer awareness about ADR entities and traders participating in ADR procedures, traders should provide ADR information in a clear, prominent, comprehensible and easily accessible way. Where the trader has a website, it should present the information on it. Traders should also provide such information in their general terms and conditions and on invoices issued by them. In order to facilitate communication, traders should make an email address available allowing consumers to contact them, including for the purpose of ADR procedures. [Am. 14]

(14c) A swift cooperation between the different actors involved in the enforcement of consumer rights is crucial to ensure the overall consistency and coherence of the consumer enforcement system. In cases where an unfair commercial practice has been brought to the attention of ADR entities, those entities should report to their national competent authorities or consumer organisation if they have credible reasons to suspect that an unfair commercial practice and terms has occurred. [Am. 15]

(15) To provide effective assistance to consumers and traders in cross-border disputes, it is necessary to ensure that Member States establish ADR contact points with clearly defined tasks. European Consumer Centres (“ECCs”) are well placed to perform such tasks, as they are specialised in assisting consumers with issues with their cross-border purchases, but Member States should also be able to choose other bodies with relevant expertise. Member States should communicate those designated ADR contact points should be communicated to the Commission and ensure that they have adequate budgetary and human resources. Consumers should be entitled to carry out a cross-border ADR procedure in an official language of the Member State in which they are resident. [Am. 16]

(15a) To ensure procedural fairness, consumers engaging in cross-border disputes should engage with the ADR contact point determined by the consumer’s place of residence, thereby discouraging selective choice of ADR contact points for convenience or advantageous outcomes. [Am. 17]

(15b) In cross-border disputes, ADR entities should use Union law as a point of reference for the resolution of the disputes. Nevertheless, in both domestic and cross-border disputes, ADR entities should always take into account the remedies available in Union and applicable national law. [Am. 18]

(16) Despite the fact that ADR procedures are meant to be simple, consumers may be assisted by a third party of their choice during ADR procedures. Member States should ensure that such assistance is provided in good faith to allow a fair procedure and in full transparency, in particular regarding the possible fees required in exchange for the assistance. In addition, Member States are encouraged to extend the benefit of consumer ADR systems to micro enterprises and self employed to ensure that such businesses have access to cheap and quality alternative dispute resolution systems to solve contractual disputes. [Am. 19]

(16a) Not all ADR entities have the expertise to deal with non-contractual matters, in particular unfair commercial practices and terms. Therefore, procedures of ADR entities in this area should be limited to unfair commercial practices and terms with a personal scope, and hence only cover matters where a damage or loss, material or immaterial, has occurred to the consumer directly. In addition, only ADR entities that can demonstrate necessary expertise in the relevant area, covering the relevant economic sector in its entirety, such as a sectorial ombudsman, should be empowered to take on such procedures. ADR entities sometimes choose to deviate from strict legal provisions in order to base their decisions on equity principles. This implies that ADR entities could opt for solutions that, in their judgment, align with a sense of what is morally or ethically right in a particular situation, diverging from a strict adherence to legal statutes. However, the use of fairness principles should not be acceptable when it comes to unfair commercial practices, which are not subject to compromises or mediated outcomes as they touch upon public order and the fundamentals of consumer protection. [Am. 20]

(16b) The means used by consumer organisations and business associations to make the Commission’s list of ADR entities publicly available can include relevant broadcasts concerning consumer protection and consumer rights. [Am. 21]

(17) To ensure that consumers are able to easily find a suitable ADR entity, especially in a cross-border context, the Commission should develop and maintain a digital interactive tool that provides information about ADR entities’ main characteristics, practical information about how to avail of ADR procedures in a cross-border context and links to the webpages of the ADR entities, as notified to it, allowing consumers to be directed to a competent body to resolve their disputes. The Commission should ensure coordination between this digital interactive tool and other EU and national digital tools, where appropriate. [Am. 22]

(18) Therefore, Directive 2013/11/EU should be amended accordingly.

(19) As Regulation (EU) No 524/2013 is to be repealed by a separate act, it is also necessary to amend Directives (EU) 2015/2302, (EU) 2019/2161 and (EU) 2020/1828 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as a consequence of that repeal,

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

Article 1 Amendments to Directive 2013/11/EU

Directive 2013/11/EU is amended as follows:

-1. Article 1 is replaced by the following:

‘Article 1 Subject matter

The purpose of this Directive is, through the achievement of a high level of consumer protection, to contribute to the proper functioning of the internal market by ensuring that consumers can, on a voluntary basis, submit complaints against traders to entities offering independent, impartial, transparent, effective, fast and fair alternative dispute resolution procedures.

The participation of air carriers falling under the scope of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 in ADR procedures shall be mandatory, without prejudice to the right of parties to access the judicial system.

This Directive is without prejudice to national legislation making participation in such procedures mandatory in economic sectors other than those referred to in the second subparagraph, provided that such legislation does not prevent the parties from exercising their right of access to the judicial system.’. [Am. 23]

1. In Article 2, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:

‘1. This Directive shall apply to procedures for the out-of-court resolution of disputes between consumers resident in the Union and a traders offering goods or services, including digital content and digital services, to those consumers, through the intervention of an ADR entity which proposes or imposes a solution or brings the parties together with the aim of facilitating an amicable solution concerning one of the following:

(a) contractual obligations stemming from sales contracts, including for the supply of digital content, or service contracts, including pre-contractual and post-contractual obligations and in particular in relation to:

(i) unfair commercial practices and terms;

(ii) compulsory pre-contractual information;

(iii) passenger and travellers’ rights;

(iv) remedies in the event of non-conformity of products and digital content; and

(v) access to deliveries; [Am. 24]

(b) consumer rights applicable to non-contractual and pre-contractual situations and provided in Union law concerning: [Am. 25]

(i) unfair commercial practices and terms,non-discrimination on the basis of nationality or place of residence; [Am. 26]

(ii) compulsory precontractual information,access to services; [Am. 27]

(iii) non-discrimination on the basis of nationality or place of residence,right to switch providers; and [Am. 28]

(iv) access to services and deliveriesunfair commercial practices not falling under point (a)(i), provided that:

(1) the ADR entity is a sectorial coverage entity with the necessary knowledge about unfair commercial practices;

(2) the ADR entity has adequate resources and funding;

(3) the unfair practice resulted in material or immaterial damage to the consumer; and

(4) the entity applies applicable law when dealing with unfair commercial practices. [Am. 29]

(v) remedies in case of non-conformity of products and digital content, [Am. 30]

(vi) right to switch providers, and [Am. 31]

(vii) passenger and travellers’ rights. [Am. 32]

Member States may apply the ADR procedures set out in this Directive, also to categories of disputes other than those listed the first subparagraph, point (b).’.

2. In Article 4(1), points (e) and (f) are replaced by the following:

‘(e) ‘domestic dispute’ means a dispute between a consumer and a trader, related to contractual obligations and/or consumer rights provided in in Union laws as referred to in article 2(1), where the consumer is resident in the same Member State as that in which the trader is established;

(f) ‘cross-border dispute’ means a dispute between a consumer and a trader, related to contractual obligations and/or consumer rights provided in Union acts as referred to in article 2(1), where the consumer is resident in a Member State other than the Member State in which the trader is established or where the consumer is resident in a Member State and the trader is established outside of the Union;’.

2a. In Article 4, the following point is inserted:

‘(fa) “unfair commercial practice” means any misleading commercial practice within the meaning of Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC.’. [Am. 33]

3. Article 5 is amended as follows:

(a) paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:

‘1. Member States shall facilitate access by consumers to ADR procedures and shall ensure that disputes covered by this Directive and which involve a trader established on their respective territories, or a trader not established in the territory of any Member State but offering goods or services, including digital content and digital services, to consumers residing in their respective territories, can be submitted to an ADR entity which complies with the requirements set out in this Directive. Member States may facilitate access by self-employed or micro enterprises to ADR procedures.’; [Am. 34]

(b) in paragraph 2, points (a) to (d) are replaced by the following:

‘(-a) maintain an up-to-date website which provides the parties with easy access to information concerning the ADR procedure; [Am. 35]

(a) ensure that consumers can submit complaints and the requisite supporting documents online in a traceable manner and ensure that consumers may also submit and access these documents in a non-digital format upon request;

(aa) ensure that consumers can submit complaints in the Member State in which they reside; [Am. 36]

(b) offer digital ADR procedures through easily accessible and inclusive tools;

(c) grant the right to the parties to the dispute to request that the outcome of the ADR procedure be reviewed by a natural person when the procedure was carried out by automated means, ensure that parties to the dispute have access to review by a natural person, who is independent and impartial; [Am. 37]

(d) may bundle similar cases against one specific trader into one procedure, underon condition that the consumer concerned is informed and does not objectexpressly agrees to that bundling and that, in accordance with Article 6, the natural persons in charge of the ADR procedures have sufficient knowledge to deal with the case;’; [Am. 38]

(c) in paragraph 4, point (a) is replaced by the following:

‘(a) the consumer did not attempt to contact the trader concerned in order to discuss the complaint and seek, as a first step, to resolve the matter directly with the trader, without introducing disproportionate rules about the format of such contact;’;

(d) the following paragraph 8 is added:

‘8. Member States shall ensure that traders established in their territories that are contacted by an ADR entity from their countryown Member State or from another Member State, inform that ADR entity whether, or not, they accept to participate in the proposed procedure and reply within a reasonable period of time that shall not exceed 15 working days. However, an extension to this deadline up to a maximum of 20 working days may be granted in the case of complex disputes or as a result of exceptional circumstances, such as a period of high activity or an external crisis.’. [Am. 39]

3a. Article 6 is amended as follows:

(a) paragraph 1, point (a) is replaced by the following:

‘(a) possess the necessary knowledge and skills in the field of alternative or judicial resolution of consumer disputes, as well as a general understanding of law, including, when dealing with cross-border cases, private international law;’;

(b) in paragraph 3 the following point is inserted:

‘(aa) where a dispute is handled by an ADR entity and the natural persons in charge of dispute resolution are employed or remunerated exclusively by the individual trader, the ADR entity shall only have access to data strictly related to the case and specifically provided by the trader or the consumer;’;

(c) paragraph 6 is replaced by the following:

‘6. For the purposes of point (a) of paragraph 1, Member States shall ensure that ADR entities provide regular training for natural persons in charge of ADR, in particular in the area of consumer law and other relevant sectorial legislation. Competent authorities shall monitor the training schemes established by ADR entities, on the basis of information communicated to them in accordance with point (g) of Article 19(3).’ [Am. 40]

4. Article 7, paragraph 2 is amended as follows:

(a) in the introductory phrase, the first sentence is replaced by the following:

‘Member States shall ensure that ADR entities make publicly available on their websites, on a durable medium upon request, and by any other means they consider appropriate, biennial activity reports.’.

(b) point (h) is deleted. [Am. 41]

4a. Article 8 is amended as follows:

(a) point (c) is replaced by the following:

‘(c) the ADR procedure is free of charge or available at a nominal fee for consumers and, in the event that a nominal fee is charged for consumers, that fee is reimbursable by national authorities when the dispute is resolved;’;

(b) the following point is inserted:

‘(da) at the consumer’s request, the parties have access to the procedure with the possibility to hold a physical meeting;’. [Am. 42]

4b. The following article is inserted:

‘Article 11a

Member States shall ensure that, where they do not comply with the outcome of an ADR procedure, irrespective of whether the outcome of that procedure is binding, traders are required to provide the other parties to the ADR procedure with a written explanation.’. [Am. 43]

5. In Article 13, paragraph 3 is deleted.2 is replaced by the following:

‘2. The information referred to in paragraph 1 shall be provided:

(a) on the traders’ website, where it exists, in a clear, prominent, comprehensible and easily accessible way;

(b) in the general terms and conditions of sales or service contracts between the trader and a consumer; and

(c) on the invoices issued by the trader.

2a. Traders shall make an email address available allowing consumers to contact them, including for the sole purpose of ADR procedures.’. [Am. 44]

6. Article 14 is replaced by the following:

‘Article 14 Assistance for consumers

1. Member States shall ensure that, with regard to cross-border disputes, consumers and traders are able to obtain assistance to access the ADR entity or entities competent to deal with their cross-border dispute.

1a. Member States shall ensure that consumers can carry out cross-border ADR procedures in an official language of the Member State in which they are resident. [Am. 45]

2. Each Member State shall designate an ADR contact point in charge of the task referred to in paragraph 1. Each Member State shall communicate the name and contact details of its ADR contact point to the Commission. Member States shall confer responsibility for the operation of the ADR contact points on their centre belonging to the European Consumer Centres Network, or, if not possible, on consumer organisations or on any other body dealing with consumer protection and ensure that they have adequate budgetary and human resources. [Am. 46]

2a. Consumers and traders engaged in cross-border disputes shall use the ADR contact point assigned on the basis of the consumer’s place of residence and the ADR entity of the Member State in which he or she is resident. [Am. 47]

3. The ADR contact points shall facilitate communication between the parties and the competent ADR entity, which may include, in particular:

(a) assisting with the submission of the complaint and, where appropriate, relevant documentation;

(aa) assisting the parties and ADR entities, where necessary, with the translation of information, documentation or procedural rules; [Am. 48]

(b) providing the parties and ADR entities with general information on EU consumer rights;

(ba) providing the parties and ADR entities with relevant information on the consumer protection law of the Member State; [Am. 49]

(c) providing the parties with explanations on the procedural rules applied by the specific ADR entities;

(d) informing the complainant party of other means of redress when a dispute cannot be resolved through an ADR procedure.

4. Member States may grant ADR contact points the right to provide assistance referred to in this Article to consumers and traders when accessing ADR entities also with regard to domestic disputes.

5. Member States shall ensure that any actors assisting consumers in cross-border or domestic disputes, act in good faith to allow parties to the dispute to reach an amicable settlement and provide relevant information to consumers in full transparency, including information regarding procedural rules and any applicable fees.’.

6a. In Article 15, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:

‘2. Member States shall ensure that relevant consumer organisations and business associations make publicly available on their websites and brochures and by any other means they consider appropriate, the list of ADR entities referred to in Article 20(4).’. [Am. 50]

6b. In Article 17, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:

‘2. This cooperation shall in particular include mutual exchange of information on practices in specific business sectors about which consumers have repeatedly lodged complaints. It shall also, where appropriate, include an obligation for ADR entities to direct consumers to the national authorities referred to in paragraph 1 whenever they report unfair commercial practices. In addition, it shall also, where appropriate, include an obligation on ADR entities to report unfair commercial practices and terms and conditions to those national authorities whenever they become aware of them. It shall also include the provision of technical assessment and information by such national authorities to ADR entities where such assessment or information is necessary for the handling of individual disputes and is already available.’. [Am. 51]

6c. In Article 17, the following paragraph 5 is added:

‘5. When an unfair commercial practice is brought to the attention of the ADR entity by a consumer, the principle of confidentiality shall not apply. If there are credible reasons to suspect that such a practice has occurred, the ADR entity shall inform the national competent authority thereof, and, if appropriate, shall keep it informed about the outcome of the dispute.’. [Am. 52]

6d. In Article 18, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:

‘1. Each Member State shall designate a competent authority which shall carry out the functions set out in Articles 19 and 20. Member States shall ensure that their competent authorities have the necessary resources, including sufficient budgetary and other resources, such as a sufficient number of competent personnel, expertise, procedures and other arrangements for the proper performance of their duties. The natural persons working for competent authorities should be impartial and independent from the ADR entities that they supervise. Each Member State may designate more than one competent authority. If a Member State does so, it shall determine which of the competent authorities designated is the single point of contact for the Commission. Each Member State shall communicate the competent authority or, where appropriate, the competent authorities, including the single point of contact it has designated, to the Commission.’. [Am. 53]

6e. In Article 19, paragraph 3, point (d) is replaced by the following:

‘(d) the rate of compliance, if known, with the outcomes of the ADR procedures and the traders who systematically and unduly refuse to comply with the outcomes of ADR procedures;’. [Am. 54]

7. In Article 19(3), points (f), (g) and (h) are deleted. [Am. 55]

8. In Article 20 is amended as follows:

(a) in paragraph 2, the following subparagraph is inserted after the second subparagraph:

‘Competent Authorities shall conduct regular checks into the functioning and activities of the ADR entities to monitor compliance with the requirements of this Directive.’;

(b) the following paragraph is added:

‘8. The Commission shall develop and maintain a user-friendly digital interactive tool that provides general information on consumer redress, practical information about how consumers can avail themselves of ADR procedures in a cross-border context and links to the webpages of the ADR entities notified to it in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Article, directing consumers to a competent body to resolve their disputes.

Where similar digital tools exist at the national level, they should provide a link to the Commission digital tool, to inform consumers with a cross-border issue.’. [Am. 56]

8a. Article 21 is replaced by the following:

‘Article 21 Penalties

Member States shall lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive, in particular Article 5(8) and Article 13, and shall take all measures necessary to ensure they are implemented. The penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.’ [Am. 57]

9. In article 24, the following paragraph 4 is added:

‘4. By [insert date] Member States shall communicate to the Commission the names and contact details of the ADR contact points designated in accordance with Article 14(2).’.

Article 2 Amendment to Directive (EU) 2015/2302

In Article 7(2) of Directive (EU) 2015/2302, point (g) is replaced by the following:

‘(g) information on available in-house complaint handling procedures and on alternative dispute resolution (‘ADR’) mechanisms pursuant to Directive 2013/11/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and, where applicable, on the ADR entity by which the trader is covered;’.

Article 3 Amendment to Directive (EU) 2019/2161

In Article 5 of Directive (EU) 2019/2161, point (b) is replaced by the following:

‘(b) submit a complaint to the competent centre of the European Consumer Centres Network, depending on the parties involved.’.

Article 4 Amendment to Directive (EU) 2020/1828

In Annex I to Directive (EU) 2020/1828, point (44) is deleted.

Article 5 Transposition

1. By [ dd/month/year - 1 year after entry into force], Member States shall adopt and publish the measures necessary to comply with Article 1 of this Directive. They shall immediately inform the Commission thereof.

They shall apply those measures from [date].

2. By [dd/month/year… 1 year after entry into force of Regulation xx/…. [the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing Regulation (EU) No 524/2013 on online dispute resolution for consumers]], Member States shall adopt and publish the measures necessary to comply with Articles 2, 3 and 4 of this Directive. They shall immediately inform the Commission thereof.

They shall apply those measures from [insert date].

3. When Member States adopt the measures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication. The methods of making such reference shall be laid down by Member States.

4. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the main measures of national law which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive.

Article 6 Entry into force

This Directive shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Article 7 Addressees

This Directive is addressed to the Member States.

Done at …,

For the European Parliament For the Council

The President The President