What changed

The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following into its motion for a resolution:

1. Notes that, compared with 2022, the caseload of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) almost doubled in 2023, reaching up to 1 927 active investigations; commends the fruitful activities of the EPPO in 2023, which included 139 indictments, 339 VAT-related cases and over 200 investigations on the implementation of NextGenerationEU; further notes that the EPPO started to bring more perpetrators of EU fraud to judgment in front of national courts;

2. Commends the close cooperation between the EPPO and the Court of Auditors, particularly in detecting any suspicions of criminal offences falling within its competence and involving participating Member States;3. Welcomes the increase in appropriations for the EPPO’s budget in 2023, amounting to EUR 64,6 million in total, which allowed for an 11 % increase in staff in that year; acknowledges that the acceleration of the disbursement of NextGenerationEU funding the rapid rise in the EPPO’s workload – with cases increasing by 70% and the investigations by 58% from 2022 to 2023 –increase andin the expansion of itsEPPO’s membership are projected to put further strain itson the EPPO’s resources; underlines the importance of additional funding and strengthening its staffing to enable the EPPO to effectively combat organized crime, protect the EU’s financial interests, and uphold the rule of law, which are key EU priorities; regrets that the Commission’s proposal for the EPPO’s 2025 budget and the Council’s stance fall short of ensuring sufficient resources for the agency to fulfil its mandate; stresses that the EPPO generates significant financial returns for the EU, demonstrated by the seizure of €1.5 billion in 2023, and callsorder for a dedicated increase init fundingto withinhave the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF)necessary 2028-2034means to ensure it can continue tocarry meetout its objectives and obligations;tasks;

4.3. Acknowledges the importance of taking a holistic approach to combating white-collar crime, such as fraud and corruption, and more conventional types of crime, such as drug trafficking and human trafficking, as they are often linked; recalls the fact that, in its upcoming evaluation report, the Commission should carefully analyse whether and to which categories of crimes the EPPO’s mandate needs to be extended in order for it to be best equipped to fulfil its role; meanwhile, the EPPO’s existing competence to investigate organised crime and money laundering, when linked to fraud affecting EU financial interests, should be supported through adequate resources and efficient cooperation with Europol, and analyse how EPPO’s operations and investigations can become more efficient and effective, and present a legislative proposal to accompany the evaluation; recalls in the regard the plans of Commissioner McGrath to accelerate the evaluation;

5.4. Underlines the essential role of asset recovery in the creation of a credible deterrent to organised crime; welcomes the EPPO’s participation in international networks to advance its asset recovery operations further; stresses the need for the Commission to invite the EPPO to participate in the newly created cooperation network on asset recovery and confiscation; notes that the timely and effective investigation and prosecution of fraud-related crimes can generate significant savings for the budget of the Union and for Member States’ budgets;

6.5. Emphasises the important role of the EPPO in the Union approach to combating corruption and the misuse of Union funds; expresses its satisfaction that 24 Member States participate in the EPPO and calls onencourages the remaining Member States to do so as well or be denied the possibility to manage EU funds indirectly;well; calls on the Commission to closely monitor Member States’ level of cooperation with the EPPO in subsequent reports and to continue engaging in an active dialogue with non-participating Member States to effectively facilitate the EPPO in carrying out its tasks; emphasises the fact that such a dialogue shouldcould also be ongoingof withvalue theto Member States that already participate in the EPPO as regards tackling difficulties in fighting rule of law violations and corruption and support them in the practical implementation of the recommendations in this regard in the annual rule of law reports; reiterates, however, the EP calls that membership of the EPPO should be a precondition for receiving EU funds and the need for an expansion of the mandate of the EPPO; welcomes the participation of Sweden and Poland in the EPPO which was confirmed in January and July 2024 repectively;corruption;

7.6. Welcomes the appointment of 8 new European Prosecutors and 35 new European Delegated Prosecutors to the EPPO in 2023; reiterates that the EPPO can fulfil its role only if it enjoys full judicial independence, which flows from a merit-based and objective appointment procedure; encourages Member States to contribute to the full independence of the EPPO in that regard;

8.7. Encourages continued and enhanced cooperation between the EPPO and OLAF, in line with their respective regulations, andrecognising the obligation of OLAF to report, without undue delay,complementary suspicionsstrengths of criminal contact toboth EPPO,agencies in order to enable it tackletackling fraud, corruption and financial crime affecting the Union’s financial interests; supports the further development of joint initiatives, information sharing and coordinated actions between the EPPO and OLAF, as such cooperation is vital to strengthening the protection of EU financial interests and the Union’s fight against financial crime and to ensuring the effective and efficient use of Union resources.

ANNEX: ENTITIES OR PERSONS FROM WHOM THE RAPPORTEUR HAS RECEIVED INPUT

The rapporteur for the opinion declares under his exclusive responsibility that he did not receive input from any entity or person to be mentioned in this Annex pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure.

INFORMATION ON ADOPTION BY COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION

Date adopted

6.2.2025

Result of final vote

+:

–:

0:

46

13

1

Members present for the final vote

Magdalena Adamowicz, Giuseppe Antoci, Jaume Asens Llodrà, Nikola Bartůšek, Krzysztof Brejza, Saskia Bricmont, Jaroslav Bžoch, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Lena Düpont, Marieke Ehlers, Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle, Branko Grims, Evin Incir, Irena Joveva, Erik Kaliňák, Marina Kaljurand, Fabienne Keller, András László, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Erik Marquardt, Michael McNamara, Birgit Sippel, Krzysztof Śmiszek, Petra Steger, Cecilia Strada, Georgiana Teodorescu, Milan Uhrík, Tom Vandendriessche, Charlie Weimers, Sophie Wilmès, Alessandro Zan, Javier Zarzalejos, Tomáš Zdechovský

Substitutes present for the final vote

Fredis Beleris, David Casa, Sigrid Friis, Markéta Gregorová, Hannah Neumann, Gaetano Pedulla’, Sandro Ruotolo, Oliver Schenk, Alexander Sell, Bartłomiej Sienkiewicz, Malika Sorel, António Tânger Corrêa, Marco Tarquinio, Pekka Toveri, Loránt Vincze, Petar Volgin, Axel Voss, Michał Wawrykiewicz, Lucia Yar

Members under Rule 216(7) present for the final vote

Bart Groothuis, Rima Hassan, Anja Hazekamp, Pär Holmgren, Sérgio Humberto, Evelyn Regner, Carla Tavares, Ingeborg Ter Laak

FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL BY THE COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION

Key to symbols: