Sittings · Compare

What changed

From · opinion parliamentary committee draft · 2022-11-09 ITRE-PA-738514 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Establishing a framework for setting ecodesign requirements for sustainable products and repealing Directive 2009/125/EC
To · opinion parliamentary committee draft · 2022-11-10 IMCO-PA-737400 on establishing a framework for setting ecodesign requirements for sustainable products and repealing Directive 2009/125/EC
+721 added · −127 removed · 9 modified paragraphs

SHORT JUSTIFICATION

Waste prevention and circularity are fundamental pillars of the Green Deal. According to the new Circular Economy Action Plan (CEAP), all packaging on the market must be reusable or recyclable by 2030. In that direction, the reduction of natural resources used for production, the extension of a lifetime, the improvement of its repairability and the adoption of circular economies are the best way to extend the useful life of a product.

The Ecodesign Regulation is the first milestone to make our internal market truly sustainable. Europe succeeded in creating a single market for the exchange of goods and services that establishes the Union as the largest market in the world. We must now use this power wisely to make it compatible with our European values.

Eco-design addresses the consumption of resources and energy and reduces the lifecycle environmental impacts of products by extending the use phase. Especially for industrial enterprises and SMEs, the transformation to circular business models can be curbed by operational tools and the need for more relevant data. However, the optimal eco-design solution is only sometimes generated in the conceptual design stage due to the complex association of the life cycle design information. Therefore, this policy should also reflect ecodesign alternations.

The market is subject to a detrimental market failure that favours economic actors who adopt production methods and create products undermining the environment and social rights. To ensure fair competition, market rules must instead reward those who produce and innovate in line with our social and environmental rights.

The current Ecodesign Directive has successfully delivered environmental and energy efficiency objectives for energy-related products, regulating measurable, verifiable parameters of the product based on a clear and transparent methodology. Therefore, the Rapporteur generally supports many elements of the Commission proposal. However, any new requirement should be measurable on the product and designed to be efficiently enforced unless tested cost-efficiently and within a short enough time. Therefore, the Rapporteur suggests building on the experience of the ecodesign instrument.

The Rapporteur wants to ensure that this Regulation allows us to stay within planetary boundaries and contribute to meeting EU’s environmental and climate targets. This Regulation must therefore endorse this level of ambition through the adoption of ambitious eco-design requirements and put an end to unsustainable business models that are only economically profitable at the expense of environmental standards and social rights. Thus, the negative impact on the competitiveness of economic actors should not be an obstacle in itself to the achievement of our ecodesign objectives.

Moreover, the proposal for a new Regulation on Ecodesign for Sustainable Products (ESPR) should enable a comprehensive and harmonised set of requirements for the sustainability of products placed on the EU market. The industry should undertake those requirements through continual sustainability improvements and encouraging consumers to adopt more sustainable ways. Even though room for improvement that certain technologies or product design choices may have should be left.

Moreover, the Rapporteur believes the Regulation should lay a minimum level for ecodesign requirements to exclude the least performant products from the market. However, Member States should be able to set more stringent requirements and restrict the entry and use of certain products based on environmental objectives. This allows for a more flexible approach to attaining the Union’s environmental objectives in the respect of the subsidiarity principle. Given the urgency of the environmental and climate crisis, preventing Member States from acting locally will only delay the already very late action needed. It is also in line with article 193 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union which provides that Member States shall not be prevented from introducing more stringent protective measures in relation to environmental matters.

Ecodesign and information requirements harmonisation at the EU level by using harmonised methodologies to assess environmental impact is necessary to achieve the sustainability of products. The Rapporteur stresses that the regulations should bring added value to users, avoiding unnecessary and burdensome replications of information in existing databases. To improve environmental sustainability, future regulation requirements should identify the most appropriate variables, considering that product parameters can be interdependent and affect each other (e.g. repairability can affect reliability, etc.).

Concerning the scope of the Regulation, the Rapporteur proposes to include digital services that are not linked to a product. Digital services are a growing part of our economy and starting to promote their ecodesign insurgent. Given their intangible nature, the Rapporteur proposes to develop a label for the ecodesign of digital services and calls the Commission to develop a robust methodology based on best practices in the sector. Such label should reward actors developing eco-designed digital services and serve as a marker for public procurement and private actors’ choices.

Additionally, it is important to ensure that the definitions included in the Regulation are clear and the list of parameters and criteria is exhaustive to cover all possible sustainability aspects across all products. But there is a need to establish overarching product sustainability criteria to minimise the product's negative environmental and social impacts.

The Commission proposes to regulate ecodesign criteria by product category. The Rapporteur welcomes this approach, which allows for granularity in legislative action. However, he is of the opinion that some aspects require horizontal provisions to ensure that we design truly durable and repairable products. He thus proposes to introduce some horizontal requirements on durability and reparability. A general ban on premature obsolescence practices, including software obsolescence, is the natural element of a Regulation on Ecodesign of products. Furthermore, this reflects what the commission has proposed to address under Consumer Law in its proposal “Empowering Consumers in the Green Transition”. Moreover, it is fundamental that reparability be at the heart of Ecodesign requirements by banning certain product designs that prevent a product to be repaired but also by providing access to right tools and information to all actors of the sector. The Rapporteur therefore proposes to detail the criteria that the Commission will have to consider in the framework of a European reparability score, including in particular the price of spare parts and their delivery time. These two elements are indeed at the heart of the concerns of Europeans when questioned about the modalities of recourse to repair and should be reflected in the methodology to establish such a reparability score. Last but not least, the extent of the product lifespan covered by the durability requirement must be reflected in the relevant consumer rights. The Rapporteur therefore calls for the duration of legal guarantees to be aligned with the estimated lifetime of product category in each delegated act.

Furthermore, information disclosure responsibility along the supply chain should be shared. Sharing responsibilities in the supply chain for generating and providing information should be reflected in the Regulation. Data and information shall originate from suppliers, while the obligation to provide such information will rest on manufacturers placing the final products on the EU market.

The Digital Product Passport is a great tool for the free circulation of data and the transparency of value chains. Opening access to data related to the ecodesign of products to researchers, NGOs, economic actors and concerned consumers will allow the opening of new markets and the promotion of the most virtuous actors in their field. The Rapporteur also introduces the exclusion of the storage of personal data of end-users of products in order to prevent the establishment of a generalized surveillance.

Concerning the Digital Product Passport (DPP), it should rely on existing databases to avoid unnecessary and burdensome replication, reduce waste and enable consumers to play a more active role in the green and digital transitions. The DPP could be an effective tool to facilitate communication along the value chain and ensure that the value of information, materials and products is preserved. Information gaps, as identified in the Circular Economy Action Plan, are a key negative externality that needs to be addressed to make sustainable products the norm. Thus, the DPP information should be limited, with added value to the key stakeholders.

Finally, the rapporteur proposes to make some improvement on the market surveillance chapter of this Regulation to ensure its effective enforcement. He proposes to require Member States to establish mechanisms where end-users can easily lodge a complaint in case of non-compliance;. He also introduces a minimum set of penalties that market surveillance authorities can apply to infringers.

Furthermore, the Rapporteur believes that all requirements set by the Regulation must be implemented with sufficient transition times to minimise market distortions. A sufficient lead time should be granted between the publication of legislation and the application of new product requirements, particularly because of the need for developing harmonised standards because the industry needs to adapt its processes for implementing new or updated legal requirements through complex supply chains.

AMENDMENTS

The Committee on Industry,the ResearchInternal Market and EnergyConsumer Protection calls on the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, as the committee responsible, to take into account the following amendments:

Amendment 1

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 265

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(26) The information requirements set under this Regulation should include the requirement to make available a product passport. The product passport is an important tool for making information available to actors along the entire value chain and the availability of a product passport should significantly enhance end-to-end traceability of a product throughout its value chain. Among other things, the product passport should help consumers make informed choices by improving their access to product information relevant to them, allow economic operators other value chain actors such as repairers or recyclers to access relevant information, and enable competent national authorities to perform their duties. To this end, the product passport should not replace but complement non-digital forms of transmitting information, such as information in the product manual or on a label. In addition, it should be possible for the product passport to be used for information on other sustainability aspects applicable to the relevant product group pursuant to other Union legislation.

(5) This Regulation will contribute to making products fit for a climate-neutral, resource-efficient and circular economy, reducing waste and ensuring that the performance of frontrunners in sustainability progressively becomes the norm. It should provide for the setting of new ecodesign requirements to improve product durability, reusability, upgradability and reparability, improve possibilities for refurbishment and maintenance, address the presence of hazardous chemicals in products, increase their energy and resource efficiency, reduce their expected generation of waste materials and increase recycled content in products, while ensuring their performance and safety, enabling remanufacturing and high-quality recycling and reducing carbon and environmental footprints.

(26) The information requirements set under this Regulation should include the requirement to make available a product passport. The product passport is an important tool for making information available to actors along the entire value chain and the availability of a product passport should significantly enhance end-to-end traceability of a product throughout its value chain. Among other things, the product passport should help consumers make informed choices by improving their access to product information relevant to them, allow economic operators other value chain actors such as professional repairers or recyclers to access relevant information, and enable competent national authorities to perform their duties. To this end, the product passport should not replace but complement non-digital forms of transmitting information, such as information in the product manual or on a label. In addition, it should be possible for the product passport to be used for information on other sustainability aspects applicable to the relevant product group pursuant to other Union legislation.

(5) This Regulation will contribute to making products and digital services fit for a climate-neutral, resource-efficient and circular economy, reducing waste and ensuring that the performance of frontrunners in sustainability progressively becomes the norm. It should provide for the setting of new ecodesign requirements to improve product durability, reusability, upgradability and reparability, set conditions for refurbishment and maintenance, address the presence of hazardous chemicals in products, increase their energy and resource efficiency, reduce their expected generation of waste materials and increase recycled content in products, while ensuring their performance and safety, enabling remanufacturing and high-quality recycling and reducing carbon and environmental footprints. By doing so, this Regulation should aim at supporting production and consumption patterns that are aligned with Union’s overall sustainability targets, including climate, environmental, energy, resources-use and biodiversity, while staying within planetary boundaries.

Or. en

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 23

Recital 6

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(23) ‘environmental footprint’ means a quantification of a product’s environmental impacts, whether in relation to a single environmental impact category or an aggregated set of impact categories based on the Product Environmental Footprint method;

(6) The European Parliament, in its Resolution of 25 November 2020 ‘Towards a more sustainable single market for business and consumers’30 , welcomed promoting durable products which are easier to repair, re-use and recycle. In its report on the New Circular Economy Action Plan adopted on 16 February 202131 , the European Parliament further endorsed the agenda presented by the Commission in the CEAP. It considered that the transition to a circular economy can provide solutions to address the current environmental challenges and the economic crisis brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Council, in its conclusions on ‘Making the Recovery Circular and Green’ adopted on 11 December 202032 , also welcomed the Commission’s intention to submit legislative proposals as part of a comprehensive and integrated sustainable product policy framework that promotes climate neutrality, energy and resource efficiency and a non-toxic circular economy, protects public health and biodiversity, and empowers and protects consumers and public buyers.

(23) ‘environmental footprint’ means a quantification of a product’s environmental impacts, whether in relation to a single environmental impact category or an aggregated set of impact categories based on the Product Environmental Footprint method and relevant Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules(PEFCRs), or other scientifically validated category rules ensuring accuracy and reliability in accordance with legislation on substantiating green claims;

(6) The European Parliament, in its Resolution of 25 November 2020 ‘Towards a more sustainable single market for business and consumers’[1], called for setting a right framework to ensure the production of durable products which are easier to repair, re-use and recycle while providing increased rights for consumers, including information requirements and longer legal guarantee periods. In its report on the New Circular Economy Action Plan adopted on 16 February 2021[2], the European Parliament called for EU binding targets to significantly reduce EU material and consumption footprints. considered that the transition to a circular economy can provide solutions to address the current environmental challenges and the economic crisis brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Council, in its conclusions on ‘Making the Recovery Circular and Green’ adopted on 11 December 202032 , also welcomed the Commission’s intention to submit legislative proposals as part of a comprehensive and integrated sustainable product policy framework that promotes climate neutrality, energy and resource efficiency and a non-toxic circular economy, protects public health and biodiversity, and empowers and protects consumers and public buyers.

__________________

__________________

30 P9_TA(2020)0318.

30 P9_TA(2020)0318.

31 P9_TA(2021)0040.

31 P9_TA(2021)0040.

32 13852/20.

32 13852/20.

Or. en

Justification

It is important to acknowledge the need to use the established PEFCRs or other validated category rules. In this context it will be ensured that the dataset used is regularly. The strive for harmonization in the calculation methods used to determine the environmental impact of products will make it easier for consumers to compare the data they receive and avoid greenwashing practices, thus enabling them to make more accurate sustainable choices.

Amendment 3

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Recital 10

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(25) ‘carbon footprint’ means the sum of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and GHG removals in a product system, expressed as CO2 equivalents and based on a life cycle assessment using the single impact category of climate change;

(10) Directive 2009/125/EC has been generally successful in fostering the energy efficiency and some circularity aspects of energy-related products, and its approach has the potential to progressively address the sustainability of all products. To deliver on Green Deal commitments, this approach should be extended to other product groups and systematically address key aspects for increasing the environmental sustainability of products with binding requirements. By ensuring that only products that meet those requirements are placed on the Union market, this Regulation should not only improve the free movement of such products by avoiding national disparities, but also reduce the negative life cycle environmental impacts of products for which such requirements are set.

(25) ‘carbon footprint’ means the sum of greenhouse gas (GHG)emissions and GHG removals in a product system, expressed as CO2 equivalents, as defined in the certification of carbon removals, and based on a life cycle assessment using the single impact category of climate change;

(10) Directive 2009/125/EC has been generally successful in fostering the energy efficiency and some circularity aspects of energy-related products, and its approach has the potential to progressively address the sustainability of all products. To deliver on Green Deal commitments, this approach should be extended to other product groups and systematically address key aspects for increasing the environmental and social sustainability of products with binding requirements. By ensuring that only products that meet at least those requirements are placed on the Union market, this Regulation should not only improve the free movement of such products by avoiding national disparities, but also reduce the negative life cycle environmental impacts of products for which such requirements are set.

Or. en

Justification

It is important the information related to the carbon footprint of products is crucial to enable the take up of truly sustainable products. Wood-based products store CO2 and substitute fossil-based and fossil-intensive materials and energy. The differentiation between carbon sources through separate certificates in the upcoming framework carbon removals framework would support renewable, bio-based products and materials in substituting of fossil-based ones.

Amendment 4

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 59 a (new)

Recital 11 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(59a) “renewability” means the ability of a natural resource to replenish and recover over time.

(11 a) While representing an increasing share of the European economy, digital services are seldom designed in a way that reduces their energy footprint and storage requirements. Actors who would like to resort to ecodesigned digital services have little ways of comparing their environmental virtue. To enable the generalisation of a sustainably digital environment, a European label for the ecodesign of services should be developed. Such label would ensure trustworthy implementation of best practices by digital services providers, distinguish them from their competitors and serve as a market both for public procurement and private actors engaging in the green transition.

Or. en

Justification

To support the further development of the bio-based industries it is important to acknowledge the potential bio-based products to reach the climate neutrality targets and, to incentivise the uptake of ‘renewable products’. By including renewability of the raw materials used to manufacture products is among the essential requirements that could be set in the upcoming delegated acts to support the development of the bio-based industries.

Amendment 5

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 59 b (new)

Recital 13

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(59b) "professional repairer" means an operator or undertaking which provides professional repair and maintenance services.

(13) In order to improve the environmental sustainability of products and to ensure the free movement of products in the internal market, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by setting out ecodesign requirements. Those ecodesign requirements should in principle apply to specific product groups, such as washing machines or washing machines and washer dryers. In order to maximise the effectiveness of ecodesign requirements and to efficiently improve environmental sustainability of products, it should also be possible to set out one or more horizontal ecodesign requirements for a wider range of products groups, such as electronic appliances or textiles. Horizontal ecodesign requirements should be established where the technical similarities of product groups allow their environmental sustainability to be improved based on the same requirements.

(13) In order to improve the environmental sustainability of products and to ensure the free movement of products in the internal market, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by setting out ecodesign requirements. Those ecodesign requirements should in principle apply to specific product groups, such as washing machines or washing machines and washer dryers. In order to maximise the effectiveness of ecodesign requirements and to efficiently improve environmental and social sustainability of products, it should also be possible to set out one or more horizontal ecodesign requirements for a wider range of products groups, such as electronic appliances or textiles. Horizontal ecodesign requirements should be established where the technical similarities of product groups allow their environmental sustainability to be improved based on the same requirements. Horizontal requirements should also be developed with regard to specific product aspects that are durability and reparability to ensure that some design feature and related obligations apply across all products.

Or. en

Justification

The definition should be included to underline the specifications for the product passport set out in Article 8.2 (f and g). The repairer must notably comply with the applicable standards for electrical equipment, but also have relevant liability insurance in case of redress. The proposed definition is already in several pieces of EU eco design legislation as well as at the applied eco-design legislation.

Amendment 6

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 59 c (new)

Recital 14

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(59c) “renewability of materials and use or content of renewable raw materials” means the ability for a natural resource to replenish and recover over time.

(14) In order to allow the Commission to set requirements as appropriate to the product groups covered, ecodesign requirements should include performance and information requirements. Those requirements should be used to improve product aspects relevant for environmental sustainability, such as energy efficiency, durability, reparability and carbon and environmental footprints. Ecodesign requirements should be transparent, objective, proportionate and in compliance with international trade rules.

(14) In order to allow the Commission to set requirements as appropriate to the product groups covered, ecodesign requirements should include performance and information requirements. Those requirements should be used to improve product aspects relevant for environmental and social sustainability, such as energy efficiency, durability, reparability, reuse, refurbishment and carbon and environmental footprints. Ecodesign requirements should be transparent, objective, proportionate and in compliance with international trade rules.

Or. en

Justification

To support the further development of the biobased industries it is important to formally acknowledge the potential biobased products have to reach the climate neutrality targets and, whenever possible, to incentivise the uptake of ‘renewable products’, where ‘renewability’ means the ability for a natural resource to replenish and recover over time and thereby is infinite when growth is greater than consumption that come from sustainably managed sources rather than those made from finite/fossil-based resources.

Amendment 7

Proposal for a regulation

Article 4 –paragraph 4 (new)

Recital 15

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

Delegated acts referred to in the first paragraph shall apply at the earliest 24 months after the entry into force of that delegated act.

(15) Once a delegated act setting ecodesign requirements is adopted by the Commission for a given product group, Member States should, in order to ensure the functioning of the internal market, no longer be allowed to set national performance requirements based on product parameters covered by such performance requirements laid down in that delegated act, and no longer be allowed to set national information requirements based on product parameters covered by such information requirements laid down in that delegated act. In order to ensure the functioning of the internal market, the Commission should be empowered to establish that no ecodesign requirements in the form of performance requirements and/or in the form of information requirements are necessary in relation to a specific product parameter.

deleted

Or. en

Justification

Sufficient transition periods should be allowed by legislation between the entry into force of legislation and the application of new product requirements. Adequate transition time is also necessary to-provide the industry with the legal certainty to make the necessary product design changes and to scale them up. For new technologies to be developed and brought to the market they need a proper, predictable framework to unleash their potential.

Amendment 8

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point n a (new)

Recital 23

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(na) renewability of materials and use or content of renewable raw materials.

(23) To improve environmental sustainability of products, information requirements should relate to a selected product parameter relevant to the product aspect, such as the product’s environmental footprint or its durability. They may require manufacturer to make available information on the product’s performance in relation to a selected product parameter or other information that may influence the way the product is handled by parties other than the manufacturer in order to improve performance in relation to such a parameter. Such information requirements should be set either in addition to, or in place of, performance requirements on the same product parameter as appropriate. Where a delegated act includes information requirements, it should indicate the method for making the required information available, such as its inclusion on a free-access website, product passport or product label. Information requirements are necessary to lead to the behavioural change needed to ensure that the environmental sustainability objectives of this Regulation are achieved. By providing a solid basis for purchasers and public authorities to compare products on the basis of their environmental sustainability, information requirements are expected to drive consumers and public authorities towards more sustainable choices.

(23) To improve environmental sustainability of products, information requirements should relate to a selected product parameter relevant to the product aspect, such as the product’s environmental footprint or its durability. They should require manufacturer to make available information on the product’s performance in relation to a selected product parameter or other information that may influence the way the product is handled by parties other than the manufacturer in order to improve performance in relation to such a parameter. Such information requirements should be set in addition to performance requirements on the same product parameter. Where a delegated act includes information requirements, it should indicate the method for making the required information available, such as its inclusion on a free-access website, product passport or product label. Essential information relating to health, safety and consumer rights should always be provided to consumers through physical means such as on product or a leaflet accompanying the product. Information requirements are necessary to lead to the behavioural change needed to ensure that the environmental sustainability objectives of this Regulation are achieved. By providing a solid basis for purchasers and public authorities to compare products on the basis of their environmental sustainability, information requirements are expected to drive consumers and public authorities towards more sustainable choices.

Or. en

Justification

To support the further development of the biobased industries it is important to formally acknowledge the potential biobased products have to reach the climate neutrality targets and, whenever possible, to incentivise the uptake of ‘renewable products’, where ‘renewability’ means the ability for a natural resource to replenish and recover over time and thereby is infinite when growth is greater than consumption that come from sustainably managed sources rather than those made from finite/fossil-based resources.

Amendment 9

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 5 – point f a (new)

Recital 24

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(fa) they shall be technically feasible in accordance with state-of-the art technology.

(24) Where delegated acts include information requirements, they may in addition determine classes of performance in relation to one or more relevant product parameters, in order to facilitate comparison between products on the basis of that parameter. Classes of performance should enable differentiation of products based on their relative sustainability and could be used by both consumers and public authorities. As such, they are intended to drive the market towards more sustainable products.

(24) Where delegated acts include information requirements, they may in addition determine classes of performance in relation to one or more relevant product parameters, in order to facilitate comparison between products on the basis of that parameter. Classes of performance should enable differentiation of products based on their relative sustainability and could be used by both consumers and public authorities. As such, they are intended to drive the market towards more sustainable products. In this regard, information requirements with regard to durability and reparability of products play a central role for consumers to engage in sustainable consumption patterns. This Regulation should therefore establish criteria to be taken into account for developing a reparability score and durability index to be applied on certain product-categories.

Or. en

Justification

Eco design requirements shall be feasible based on available technologies, i.e. companies cannot be required to implement eco design solutions based on technologies that do not yet exist/do not offer scalable solutions.

Amendment 10

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 3

Recital 24 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

Information ensuring the traceability of substances pursuant to paragraph 5 shall be given either on the product or be accessible through a data carrier included on the product.

(24 a) Next to information on the durability and reparability of products that are essential for consumers to take a purchasing decision for more durable products, displaying information on their rights such as on the length of the legal guarantee of conformity and, where relevant, its voluntary extension by the manufacturer, is also important since they are reliable indicator of a product’s durability. Such information should therefore be part of the labels to be displayed at point of sale.

The information requirements shall be clear and appropriate allowing the users to make comparisons among products.

Or. en

Justification

It is important that the amount of required information remains feasible and understandable for consumers. The information should be clear and allow the users to make meaningful comparisons among products, not overloading them with information that might be difficult to understand.

Amendment 11

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 7 a (new)

Recital 26

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

7a. Any supplier of an article, a substance or a mixture shall provide the recipient of that article, substance of mixture with sufficient information, free of charge, to allow the manufacturers to comply with information requirements related to the product aspects listed in Article 5(1).

(26) The information requirements set under this Regulation should include the requirement to make available a product passport. The product passport is an important tool for making information available to actors along the entire value chain and the availability of a product passport should significantly enhance end-to-end traceability of a product throughout its value chain. Among other things, the product passport should help consumers make informed choices by improving their access to product information relevant to them, allow economic operators other value chain actors such as repairers or recyclers to access relevant information, and enable competent national authorities to perform their duties. To this end, the product passport should not replace but complement non-digital forms of transmitting information, such as information in the product manual or on a label. In addition, it should be possible for the product passport to be used for information on other sustainability aspects applicable to the relevant product group pursuant to other Union legislation.

(26) The information requirements set under this Regulation should include the requirement to make available a product passport. The product passport is an important tool for making information available to actors along the entire value chain and the availability of a product passport should significantly enhance end-to-end traceability of a product throughout its value chain. Among other things, the product passport should help consumers make informed choices by improving their access to product information relevant to them, allow economic operators other value chain actors such as repairers, refurbishers, or recyclers to access relevant information, and enable competent national authorities to perform their duties. To this end, the product passport should not replace but complement non-digital forms of transmitting information, such as information in the product manual or on a label. In addition, it should be possible for the product passport to be used for information on other sustainability aspects applicable to the relevant product group pursuant to other Union legislation.

Or. en

Justification

Objective of this amendment is to have communication from suppliers to manufacturers on all aspects related to the Digital Product Passport. Companies can encounter many difficulties when trying to get information from upstream suppliers, particularly those located outside of Europe.

Amendment 12

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point (f)

Recital 28

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(f) the actors that shall have access to information in the product passport and to what information they shall have access, including customers, end-users, manufacturers, importers and distributors, dealers, repairers, remanufacturers, recyclers, competent national authorities, public interest organisations and the Commission, or any organisation acting on their behalf;

(28) In order to ensure interoperability, the types of permitted data carriers should be specified. For the same reason, the data carrier and the unique product identifier should be released in accordance with internationally recognised standards. The power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission to amend this Regulation by replacing or adding standards in accordance with which the data carrier and the unique identifiers may be released, in light of technical or scientific progress. This should ensure that the information contained in the product passport can be recorded and transmitted by all economic operators, as well as to guarantee the compatibility of the unique identifier with external components such as scanning devices.

(f) the actors that shall have access to information in the product passport and to what information they shall have access, including customers, end-users, manufacturers, importers and distributors, dealers, professional repairers, remanufacturers, recyclers, competent national authorities, public interest organisations and the Commission, or any organisation acting on their behalf;

(28) In order to ensure interoperability, the types of permitted data carriers should be specified. For the same reason, the data carrier and the unique product identifier should be released in accordance with internationally recognised standards. The data should be transferable through an open interoperable data exchange network without vendor lock-in. The power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission to amend this Regulation by replacing or adding standards in accordance with which the data carrier and the unique identifiers may be released, in light of technical or scientific progress. This should ensure that the information contained in the product passport can be recorded and transmitted by all economic operators, as well as to guarantee the compatibility of the unique identifier with external components such as scanning devices.

Or. en

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point (g)

Recital 32

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(g) the actors that may introduce or update the information in the product passport, including where needed the creation of a new product passport, and what information they may introduce or update, including manufacturers, repairers, maintenance professionals, remanufacturers, recyclers, competent national authorities, and the Commission, or any organisation acting on their behalf;

(32) To ensure that the product passport is flexible, agile and market-driven and evolving in line with business models, markets and innovation, it should be based on a decentralised data system, set up and maintained by economic operators. However, for enforcement and monitoring purposes, it may be necessary that competent national authorities and the Commission have direct access to a record of all data carriers and unique identifiers linked to products placed on the market or put in service.

(g) the actors that may introduce or update the information in the product passport, including where needed the creation of a new product passport, and what information they may introduce or update, including manufacturers, professional repairers, maintenance professionals, remanufacturers, recyclers, competent national authorities, and the Commission, or any organisation acting on their behalf;

(32) To ensure that the product passport is flexible, agile and market-driven and evolving in line with business models, markets and innovation, it should be based on a decentralised data system, set up and maintained by economic operators. For enforcement and monitoring purposes, it may be necessary that competent national authorities and the Commission have direct access to a record of all data carriers and unique identifiers linked to products placed on the market or put in service. Researchers, NGOs, economic actors and consumers should also be given access to the eco-design requirements information for the purpose of ensuring a level playing field in the development of tools and studies.

Or. en

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a

Recital 35

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(a) product passports shall be fully interoperable with other product passports required by delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 4 in relation to the technical, semantic and organisational aspects of end-to-end communication and data transfer;

(35) Any processing of personal data pursuant to this Regulation should comply with the applicable rules on the protection of personal data. Processing of personal data by the competent national authorities within Member States should be carried out in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council66 . Processing of personal data by the Commission should be carried out in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council67 .

(a) product passports shall be fully interoperable with other product passports required by delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 4 in relation to the technical, semantic and organisational aspects of end-to-end communication and data transfer and with existing product databases;

(35) Processing of personal data pursuant to this Regulation should comply with the applicable rules on the protection of personal data. Processing of personal data by the competent national authorities within Member States should be carried out in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council66 . Processing of personal data by the Commission should be carried out in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council67 .The product passport’s objective being to ensure value chain transparency and trust in products, the personal data of end-users falls outside the scope its purpose. Such storage by economic actors could result in a generalised surveillance incompatible with the above mentioned Regulation. Therefore personal data of end-users should not be stored or extrapolated from the digital product passport.

__________________

__________________

66 Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1).

66 Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1).

67 Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC (OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39).

67 Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC (OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39).

Or. en

Justification

The information displayed in the Digital Product Passport should be drawn directly from the legally mandated EU databases to achieve time efficiency.

Amendment 15

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point f

Recital 41

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(f) the rights to access and to introduce, modify or update information in product passport shall be restricted based on the access rights specified in delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 4;

(41) Consumers should be protected from misleading information that could hamper their choices for more sustainable products. For this reasons it should be prohibited to place on the market products bearing a label mimicking the labels provided for in this Regulation.

(f) the rights to access and to introduce, modify or update information in product passport shall be restricted based on the access rights specified in delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 4, with specific consideration of information that constitutes trade secrets or proprietary information;

(41) Consumers should be protected from misleading information that could hamper their choices for more sustainable products as determined in accordance with the applicable Union law, including rules on unfair commercial practices. For this reasons it should be prohibited to place on the market products bearing a label mimicking the labels provided for in this Regulation.

Or. en

Justification

Adequate protection of confidential and sensitive information is required.

Amendment 16

Proposal for a regulation

Article 16 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

Recital 48

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

When adopting or updating the working plan referred to in the first subparagraph, the Commission shall take into account the criteria set out in paragraph 1 of this Article and shall consult the Ecodesign Forum referred to in Article 17.

(48) In order to avoid the destruction of unsold consumer products, where the destruction of such products is prevalent, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by prohibiting the destruction of such products. Given the wide range of products that may potentially be destroyed without ever being sold or used, it is necessary to establish such empowerment in this Regulation. However, the prohibition set in the delegated acts should apply to specific product groups to be determined based on an assessment by the Commission of the extent to which the destruction of such products takes place in practice, taking into account the information made available by economic operators where appropriate. To ensure that this obligation is proportionate, the Commission should consider specific exemptions under which destroying unsold consumer products may still be permitted, for instance in view of health and safety concerns. To monitor the effectiveness of this prohibition and to dis-incentivise circumvention, economic operators should be required to disclose the number of unsold consumer products destroyed and the reasons for their destruction under applicable exemptions. Finally, to avoid any undue administrative burden on SMEs, they should be exempted from the obligations to disclose their unsold discarded products and from the prohibition to discard specific products groups set in delegated acts. However, where there is reasonable evidence that SMEs may be used to circumvent those obligations, the Commission should be able to require, in those delegated acts, for some product groups, that these obligations also apply to micro, small or medium sized enterprises.

When adopting or updating the working plan referred to in the first subparagraph, the Commission shall take into account the criteria set out in paragraph 1 of this Article and shall consult the Ecodesign Forum in an appropriate timeframe as referred to in Article 17.

(48) In order to avoid the destruction of unsold consumer products, where the destruction of such products is prevalent, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by prohibiting the destruction of such products. Given the wide range of products that may potentially be destroyed without ever being sold or used, it is necessary to establish such empowerment in this Regulation. However, the prohibition set in the delegated acts should apply to specific product groups to be determined based on an assessment by the Commission of the extent to which the destruction of such products takes place in practice. The Commission may consider specific exemptions under which destroying unsold consumer products may still be permitted, only when it raises health and safety concerns. To monitor the effectiveness of this prohibition and to dis-incentivise circumvention, economic operators should be required to disclose the number of unsold consumer products destroyed and the reasons for their destruction under applicable exemptions.

Or. en

Justification

Given the proven long standing experience with the current Eco design process, we should keep it based on appropriate consultation with all relevant stakeholders.

Amendment 17

Proposal for a regulation

Article 17 – paragraph 1

Recital 55 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

The Commission shall ensure that when it conducts its activities, it observes a balanced participation of Member States’ representatives and all interested parties involved with the product or product group in question, such as industry, including SMEs and craft industry, trade unions, traders, retailers, importers, environmental protection groups and consumer organisations. These parties shall contribute in particular to preparing ecodesign requirements, examining the effectiveness of the established market surveillance mechanisms and assessing self-regulation measures.

(55 a) Refurbishment and second-hand sectors play a specific role to promote sustainable consumption patterns and in the development of circular business models. Due to the specificities of those sectors, their role along the value chain and related obligations must be distinguished from the ones applying to manufacturers, importers or distributors by specifying what should be the rules applicable to them.

The Commission shall ensure that when it conducts its activities, it observes a balanced participation of Member States’ representatives and all interested parties involved with the product or product group in question, such as industry, including SMEs, craft and recycling industry, trade unions, traders, retailers, importers, environmental protection groups, consumer organisations and standardisation organisations. These parties shall contribute in particular to preparing ecodesign requirements, examining the effectiveness of the established market surveillance mechanisms and assessing self-regulation measures.

Or. en

Proposal for a regulation

Article 17 – paragraph 2

Recital 88

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

To that end, the Commission shall establish an expert group, in which those parties shall meet, referred to as the ‘Ecodesign Forum’.

(88) Effective enforcement of ecodesign requirements is essential to ensure equal competition in the Union market and to ensure that this Regulation’s expected benefits and contribution to achieving the Union’s climate, energy and circularity objectives are achieved. Therefore, Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 setting out a horizontal framework for market surveillance and control of products entering the Union market should apply to products for which ecodesign requirements are set pursuant to this Regulation, in so far as there are no specific provisions with the same objective, nature or effect in this Regulation. In addition, to lower the problematic levels of non-compliance of products covered by implementing measures adopted under Directive 2009/125/EC, to better prevent non-compliance with future ecodesign requirements, and taking account of the broader scope and increased ambition of this Regulation compared to Directive 2009/125/EC, this Regulation should contain specific additional rules complemting the framework created by Regulation (EU) 2019/1020. Those specific additional rules should be aimed at further strengthening the planning, coordination and support of Member State efforts and should provide additional tools for the Commission to ensure sufficient action is taken by market surveillance authroties to prevent non-compliance with ecodesign requirements.

To that end, the Commission shall establish an expert group, in which those parties shall meet, referred to as the ‘Ecodesign Forum’. The Ecodesign Forum shall advise the Commission on the delegated acts referred to in Article 4 and carry out its tasks in accordance with the principle of transparency. The Commission shall publish the minutes of the meetings of the Ecodesign Forum and other relevant documents on the Commission website.

(88) Effective enforcement of ecodesign requirements is essential to ensure equal competition in the Union market and to ensure that this Regulation’s expected benefits and contribution to achieving the Union’s climate, energy and circularity objectives are achieved. Therefore, Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 setting out a horizontal framework for market surveillance and control of products entering the Union market should apply to products for which ecodesign requirements are set pursuant to this Regulation, in so far as there are no specific provisions with the same objective, nature or effect in this Regulation. In addition, to lower the problematic levels of non-compliance of products covered by implementing measures adopted under Directive 2009/125/EC, to better prevent non-compliance with future ecodesign requirements, and taking account of the broader scope and increased ambition of this Regulation compared to Directive 2009/125/EC, this Regulation should contain specific additional rules complementing the framework created by Regulation (EU) 2019/1020. Those specific additional rules should be aimed at further strengthening the planning, coordination and support of Member State efforts and should provide additional tools for the Commission to ensure sufficient action is taken by market surveillance authorities to prevent non-compliance with ecodesign requirements, and where relevant bring non-conformity to an end.

Or. en

Justification

The involvement of the industry would ensure delivering concrete environmental benefits in an economically and technically viable way. This can be achieved by building on the model of the Ecodesign and Energy Labelling Consultation Forum (EELCF), which was set up to work on the development and review of implementing measures and delegated acts pursuant to the original Ecodesign Directive.

Amendment 19

Proposal for a regulation

Article 26 – title

Recital 89 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

Obligations related to labels

(89 a) End-users, or other any natural or legal person must have the possibility to lodge complaints since they are well placed to notice that a product or a digital service is not in conformity with the requirements of this Regulation. Therefore, Member States should establish an easy-to-access database to allow natural or legal persons to lodge complaints, as well as put in place the mechanisms to ensure that market surveillance authorities follow-up properly on the complaints received.

Obligations related to labels and suppliers

Or. en

Proposal for a regulation

Article 26 – paragraph 1

Recital 90

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

1.(90) WhereTo aensure delegatedthat actappropriate adoptedchecks pursuantare toperformed Articleon 4an requiresadequate productsscale in relation to haveecodesign arequirements, labelMember asStates referredshould todraw inup Articlea 14,dedicated action plan identifying the economicproducts operatoror placingrequirements theidentified productas onpriorities thefor market orsurveillance puttingunder itthis intoRegulation serviceand shallthe ensureactivities thatplanned to reduce non-compliance of relevant products areor accompanied,with forrelevant eachecodesign individualrequirements. unitWhere andrelevant, freethis action plan should be part of charge,Member byStates’ printednational labelsmarket insurveillance accordancestrategies withadopted thatpursuant delegatedto act.Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020.

1.(90) WhereTo aensure delegatedthat actappropriate adoptedchecks pursuantare toperformed Articleon 4an requiresadequate productsscale in relation to haveecodesign arequirements, labelMember asStates referredshould todraw inup Articlea 14,dedicated action plan identifying the economicproducts operatoror placingrequirements theidentified productas onpriorities thefor market orsurveillance puttingunder itthis intoRegulation serviceand shallthe ensureactivities thatplanned productsto arebring accompanied,to foran eachend individualnon-compliance unitof andrelevant freeproducts ofor charge,with byrelevant printedecodesign orrequirements. digitalWhere labelsrelevant, inthis accordanceaction withplan thatshould delegatedbe act.part Forof sustainabilityMember reasons,States’ preferencenational shallmarket besurveillance givenstrategies adopted pursuant to digitalArticle labels."13 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020.

Or. en

Justification

Providing printed labels to each product can be an unnecessary burden. Dealers can download the digital copies when needed. This would also be an alternative to having to affix a label on the packaging of the product, which is subject to complexities due to different languages and the limited space on packaging for very small products.

Amendment 21

Proposal for a regulation

Article 26 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Recital 91

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

4a. Any supplier of an article, a substance or a mixture shall provide economic operators responsible for compliance with Articles 6 and 7 with sufficient available information related to their supplies or services that are relevant to ensure products comply with the performance and information requirements pursuant to Article 6 and 7. If the recipient of the article, substance or mixture is not economic operator responsible for compliance with the information requirements set out in Articles 6 and 7, the recipient of the article, substance or the mixture shall ensure that the information referred to in the first paragraph of this Article is communicated to the economic operator responsible for compliance with the information requirements set out in Article 6 and 7.

(91) Priorities for market surveillance under this Regulation should be identified based on objective criteria such as the levels of non-compliance observed or the environmental impacts resulting from non-compliance. The activities planned to address those priorities should in turn be proportionate to the facts leading to their prioritisation. In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission to determine products and requirements that Member States should consider as priorities for market surveillance in the context of their action plans identifying priorities for market surveillance under this Regulation and activities planned to reduce non-compliance.

(91) Priorities for market surveillance under this Regulation should be identified based on objective criteria such as the levels of non-compliance observed, the environmental impacts resulting from non-compliance or the number of complaints received. The activities planned to address those priorities should in turn be proportionate to the facts leading to their prioritisation. In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission to determine products and requirements that Member States should consider as priorities for market surveillance in the context of their action plans identifying priorities for market surveillance under this Regulation and activities planned to reduce non-compliance.

Or. en

Justification

Suppliers of product components or substances are best placed to provide sustainability information to manufacturers, as they own the information, who can then integrate it into the DPP as appropriate. Therefore, it is essential for suppliers to disclose to manufacturers all relevant information required under the DPP and also protect smaller European manufacturers that do not have the negotiating power to induce suppliers into providing them the information needed for the DPP.

Amendment 22

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Recital 93

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

The following parameters may, as appropriate, and where necessary supplemented by others, be used as a basis for improving the product aspects referred to in Article 5(1):

(93) Based on data entered into the information and communication system for market surveillance, the Commission should draw up a report containing information on the nature and number of checks performed, on the levels of non-compliance identified and on the nature and severity of penalties imposed in relation to ecodesign requirements over the two previous calendar years. The reports should contain a comparison of Member States’ activities with the activities planned and indicative benchmarks for market surveillance authorities.

The following parameters, justified by an appropriate life cycle and circularity assessment, and, where necessary supplemented by others, may be used, individually or aggregated, as a basis for improving the product aspects referred to in Article 5(1):

(93) Based on data entered into the information and communication system for market surveillance, the Commission should draw up and publish a report containing information on the nature and number of checks performed, on the levels of non-compliance identified and on the nature and severity of penalties imposed in relation to ecodesign requirements over the two previous calendar years. The reports should contain a comparison of Member States’ activities with the activities planned and indicative benchmarks for market surveillance authorities.

Or. en

Justification

There is a need for a holistic, integrated approach. Different interdependent parameters could improve the environmental sustainability of the product. Improving the repairability of the product does not necessarily improve its reliability. This is why the methodology must consider several environmental dimensions and assess the variables of different individual product groups until the end of their life.

Amendment 23

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point b

Recital 94

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(b) ease of repair and maintenance as expressed through: characteristics, availability and delivery time of spare parts, modularity, compatibility with commonly available spare parts, availability of repair and maintenance instructions, number of materials and components used, use of standard components, use of component and material coding standards for the identification of components and materials, number and complexity of processes and tools needed, ease of non-destructive disassembly and re-assembly, conditions for access to product data, conditions for access to or use of hardware and software needed;

(94) To further strengthen coordination of market surveillance authorities, the administrative cooperation group (‘ADCO’) set up pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 should, for the purposes of identifying the products or requirements identified as priorities for market surveillance under this Regulation and the activities planned to reduce non-compliance is Regulation, meet at regular intervals and identify common priorities for market surveillance to be taken into account in Member States’ action plans, priorities for the provision of Union support, and ecodesign requirements that are interpreted differently leading to market distortion.

(b) ease of repair and maintenance keeping in mind product safety as expressed through: characteristics, availability and delivery time of spare parts, modularity, compatibility with commonly available spare parts, availability of repair and maintenance instructions, number of materials and components used, use of components with standardised size and/or form and materials, number and complexity of processes and tools needed, ease of non-destructive disassembly and re-assembly, conditions for access to product data, conditions for access to or use of hardware and software needed. Access to the information should be facilitated on a need-to-know basis and in line with the intellectual property protection rules.

(94) To further strengthen coordination of market surveillance authorities, the administrative cooperation group (‘ADCO’) set up pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 should, for the purposes of identifying the products or requirements identified as priorities for market surveillance under this Regulation and the activities planned to bring to an end non-compliance with this Regulation, meet at regular intervals and identify common priorities for market surveillance to be taken into account in Member States’ action plans, priorities for the provision of Union support, and ecodesign requirements that are interpreted differently leading to market distortion.

Or. en

Justification

It is important to clarify what is meant by standard components. Product safety shall always be considered with this product parameter. Intellectual property rights and trade secrets need to be considered. It is also important in relation to anti-tampering measures, as disclosing certain details about the products could enable their subsequent modification in a manner that could endanger product safety.

Amendment 24

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point c

Recital 95

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(c) ease of upgrading, re-use, remanufacturing and refurbishment as expressed through: number of materials and components used, use of standard components, use of component and material coding standards for the identification of components and materials, number and complexity of processes and tools needed, ease of non-destructive disassembly and re-assembly, conditions for access to product data, conditions for access to or use of hardware and software needed, conditions of access to test protocols or not commonly available testing equipment, availability of guarantees specific to remanufactured or refurbished products, conditions for access to or use of technologies protected by intellectual property rights, modularity;

(95) To support Member States in their efforts to ensure sufficient action is taken to prevent non-compliance with ecodesign requirements, the Commission should, where relevant, make use of the support measures provided for in Regulation (EU) 2019/1020. The Commission should organise and, where appropriate finance, joint market surveillance and testing projects in areas of common interest, joint investments in market surveillance capacities and common trainings for the staff of market surveillance authorities, notifying authorities and notified bodies. In addition, the Commission should draw up guidelines on how to apply and enforce ecodesign requirements where necessary to ensure their harmonised application.

(c) ease of upgrading, re-use, remanufacturing and refurbishment as expressed through: number of materials and components used, use of standard components, use of component and material coding standards for the identification of components and materials, number and complexity of processes and tools needed, ease of non-destructive disassembly and re-assembly, conditions for access to product data, conditions for access to or use of hardware and software needed, conditions of access to test protocols or not commonly available testing equipment, availability of guarantees specific to remanufactured or refurbished products, conditions for access to or use of technologies protected by intellectual property rights, modularity. Access to the information should be facilitated on a need-to-know basis and in line with the intellectual property protection rules.

(95) To support Member States in their efforts to ensure sufficient action is taken to prevent non-compliance with ecodesign requirements, the Commission should make use of the support measures provided for in Regulation (EU) 2019/1020. The Commission should organise and, where appropriate finance, joint market surveillance and testing projects in areas of common interest, joint investments in market surveillance capacities and common trainings for the staff of market surveillance authorities, notifying authorities and notified bodies to support them in their tasks by providing them uniform methods for performing checks and testings. In addition, the Commission should draw up guidelines on how to apply and enforce ecodesign requirements to ensure their harmonised application.

Or. en

Justification

The intellectual property rights and trade secrets need to be considered; if such level of detail is shared, it has to be clearly established who might have access and measures against misuse shall be put in place. This is also important in relation to anti-tampering measures, as disclosing certain details about the products could enable their subsequent modification in a manner that could endanger product safety.

Amendment 25

Proposal for a regulation

AnnexArticle I1 – paragraph 1 – pointsubparagraph d1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(d) ease and quality of recycling as expressed through: use of easily recyclable materials, safe, easy and non-destructive access to recyclable components and materials or components and materials containing hazardous substances, material composition and homogeneity, possibility for high-purity sorting, number of materials and components used, use of standard components, use of component and material coding standards for the identification of components and materials, number and complexity of processes and tools needed, ease of non-destructive disassembly and re-assembly, conditions for access to product data, conditions for access to or use of hardware and software needed;

This Regulation establishes a framework to improve the environmental sustainability of products and to ensure free movement in the internal market by setting ecodesign requirements that products shall fulfil to be placed on the market or put into service. Those ecodesign requirements, which shall be further elaborated by the Commission in delegated acts, relate to:

(d) ease and quality of recycling as expressed through: use of easily recyclable materials, safe, easy and non-destructive access to recyclable components and materials or components and materials containing hazardous substances, material composition and homogeneity, possibility for high-purity sorting, design for recycling, number of materials and components used, use of standard components, use of component and material coding standards for the identification of components and materials, number and complexity of processes and tools needed, ease of non-destructive disassembly and re-assembly, conditions for access to product data, conditions for access to or use of hardware and software needed;

This Regulation establishes a framework to improve the environmental sustainability and the social impact of products and digital services to support consumption patterns that are compliant with the EU overall sustainability targets in terms of resources use, climate and environmental footprint, energy efficiency and biodiversity, while staying within planetary boundaries. It shall ensure free movement in the internal market by setting eco-design requirements that products shall fulfil to be placed on the market or put into service.

Or. en

Justification

Recyclability should indeed be addressed as part of the product parameters mentioned in Annex I (d) as ‘ease and quality of recycling’. High-quality recycling means that the materials are recycled back into the industry and transformed into new products. In order to enable high quality recycling, a requirement for “design for recyclability” can also successfully address the presence of substances of concern, which negatively affect the re-use and recycling of a given product.

Amendment 26

Proposal for a regulation

AnnexArticle I1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point ei a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(e) avoidance of technical solutions detrimental to re-use, upgrading, repair, maintenance, refurbishment, remanufacturing and recycling of products and components;

(i a) (ii) products’ compliance with social and labour standards along the value chain;

(e) avoidance of technical solutions detrimental to re-use, upgrading, repair, maintenance, refurbishment, remanufacturing and recycling of products and components, unless required, to ensure the safety of the product;

Or. en

Justification

It is important that the proposal clearly states that the new eco-design requirements should be in place while ensuring product safety. However, this should be re-emphasised throughout the proposal and taken into account when performing a technical, environmental and economic analysis of the criteria for any product group.

Amendment 27

Proposal for a regulation

AnnexArticle I1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point pi b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(p) amounts of waste generated, including plastic waste and packaging waste and their ease of re-use, and amounts of hazardous waste generated;

(i b) (iii) other due diligence requirements in accordance with Union law.

(p) amounts of waste generated, including plastic waste and packaging waste and their ease of re-use, ease of recycling and amounts of hazardous waste generated;

Or. en

Justification

Recyclability should indeed be addressed as part of the product parameters mentioned in Annex I (d) as ‘ease and quality of recycling’. High-quality recycling means that the materials are recycled back into the industry and transformed into new products. However, ‘ease of recycling’ needs to be consistently addressed throughout the proposal, for example also in the context of the amounts of waste generated and the ease of re-use in Annex I (p).

Amendment 28

Proposal for a regulation

AnnexArticle I2 – paragraph 1 – point q1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(q) conditions for use.

(1 a) ‘digital service’ means:

(q) conditions for use, including the environmental impact and benefits during the use.

(a) a service that allows the consumer to create, process, store or access data in digital form;

or (b) a service that allows the sharing of or any other interaction with data in digital form uploaded or created by the consumer or other users of that service.

Or. en

Justification

It is especially important to allow taking into account environmental benefits linked to the use of the product. .

Amendment 29

Proposal for a regulation

AnnexArticle I2 – paragraph 1 – point q a (new)18

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(qa) renewability of materials and use or content of renewable raw materials.

(18) ‘refurbishment’ means preparing or modifying an object that is waste or a product to restore its performance or functionality within the intended use, range of performance and maintenance originally conceived at the design stage, or to meet applicable technical standards or regulatory requirements, with the result of making a fully functional product;

(18) ‘refurbishment’ means testing, and where necessary performing repair and maintenance, as well as deleting data connected to the previous use, including personal data, in case of electronic devices, by a professional, on an object that is waste or a product to restore its performance or functionality within the intended use, range of performance and maintenance originally conceived at the design stage before making it available on the market. Refurbishment may also include improving the aesthetics of the product;

Or. en

Justification

Amendment 30

To support the further development of the bio based industries it is important to formally acknowledge the potential bio based products have to reach the climate neutrality targets and, whenever possible, to incentivise the uptake of ‘renewable products’. Time is greater than consumption that come from sustainably managed sources rather than those made from finite/fossil-based resources.

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 18 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(18 a) ‘software update’ means either a security update or any other functionality or feature update, that is necessary to keep goods with digital elements, digital content and digital services in conformity in accordance with Directives (EU) 2019/770 and (EU) 2019/771;

Or. en

Amendment 31

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 18 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(18 b) ‘security update’ means an operating system update, including security patches, if relevant for a given device, whose main purpose is to provide enhanced security for the device and/or bring it into conformity;

Or. en

Amendment 32

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 18 c (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(18 c) ‘functionality update’ means an operating system update that is not necessary to keep the device in conformity and whose main purpose is to improve current functionalities and/or implement new functionalities;

Or. en

Amendment 33

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 20 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(20 a) ‘repair and maintenance information’ means all information, including all subsequent amendments and supplements, that is required for diagnosing and performing the repair of a relevant product, independently of whom is performing the repair, i.e. either a professional repairer or end-user;

Or. en

Amendment 34

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 20 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(20 b) ‘professional repairer’ means a natural or legal person who provides repair and maintenance services on a product , whether acting within the manufacturer’s distribution system, or independently from the manufacturer’s distribution system;

Or. en

Amendment 35

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(21) ‘durability’ means the ability of a product to function as required, under specified conditions of use, maintenance and repair, until a limiting event prevents its functioning;

(21) ‘durability’ means the ability of a product to function and maintain for a certain period of time its required function and performance under normal conditions of use, maintenance and repair;

Or. en

Amendment 36

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 22

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(22) ‘reliability’ means the probability that a product functions as required under given conditions for a given duration without a limiting event;

(22) ‘reliability’ means the high probability that a product functions as required under given conditions for a given duration without a limiting event;

Or. en

Amendment 37

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 37

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(37) ‘unsold consumer product’ means any consumer product that has not been sold or that has been returned by a consumer in view of their right of withdrawal in accordance with Article 9 of Directive (EU) 2011/83/EU;

(37) ‘unsold consumer product’ means any consumer product that has not been sold, including surplus, excessive inventory, overstock, deadstock and samples, or that has been returned by a consumer in view of their right of withdrawal in accordance with Article 9 of Directive (EU) 2011/83/EU;

Or. en

Amendment 38

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 55

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(55) ‘online marketplace’ means a provider of an intermediary service using software, including a website, part of a website or an application, that allows customers to conclude distance contracts with economic operators for the sale of products covered by delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 4;

(55) ‘online marketplace’ means a provider of an intermediary service using an online interface allows customers to conclude distance contracts with economic operators for the sale of products covered by delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 4;

Or. en

Amendment 39

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 55 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(55 a) ‘online interface’ means any software, including a website, part of a website or an application, including mobile applications;

Or. en

Amendment 40

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

2. Member States shall not prohibit, restrict or impede the placing on the market or putting into service of products that comply with the performance requirements set out in delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 4 for reasons of non-compliance with national performance requirements relating to product parameters referred to in Annex I covered by performance requirements included in such delegated acts.

deleted

Member States shall not prohibit, restrict or impede the placing on the market or putting into service of products that comply with the information requirements set out in delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 4 for reasons of non-compliance with national information requirements relating to product parameters referred to in Annex I covered by information requirements included such delegated act.

Or. en

Amendment 41

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

4. Member States shall not prohibit, restrict or impede the placing on the market or putting into service of products on grounds of non-compliance with national requirements relating to product parameters referred to in Annex I, for which a delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 4 provides that no performance, no information or neither performance nor information requirements are necessary.

deleted

Or. en

Amendment 42

Proposal for a regulation

Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point h a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(h a) establishing due diligence obligations for economic operators with regard to the environmental and social impacts referred to in paragraph 1(m) of Article 5.

Or. en

Amendment 43

Proposal for a regulation

Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point h b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(h b) specifying rules to provide for longer period for the legal guarantee of conformity based on the product parameters referred to in Annex I, point (a).

Or. en

Amendment 44

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point n a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(n a) products’ compliance with social and labour standards along the value chain;

Or. en

Amendment 45

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

However, where two or more product groups display technical similarities allowing a product aspect referred to in paragraph 1 to be improved based on a common requirement, ecodesign requirements may be established horizontally for those product groups.

Where two or more product groups display technical similarities allowing a product aspect referred to in paragraph 1 to be improved based on a common requirement, ecodesign requirements may be established horizontally.

Or. en

Amendment 46

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

A horizontal ecodesign requirement established pursuant to the second subparagraph may cover products falling in the scope of a self-regulation measure established as a valid alternative pursuant to Article 18(3), where the Commission considers that that self-regulation measure does not address the product aspect covered by that horizontal ecodesign requirement.

deleted

Or. en

Amendment 47

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 3 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

3. Ecodesign requirements shall, as appropriate, include:

3. Ecodesign requirements shall include:

Or. en

Amendment 48

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 5 – point a

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(a) there shall be no significant negative impact on the functionality of the product, from the perspective of the user;

deleted

Or. en

Amendment 49

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

Article 5 a

Specific ecodesign requirements on durability andreparability of products

1. Pursuant to Article 5(1), first subparagraph, with regard to ecodesign requirements for durability of products falling under the scope of this Regulation, the following practices aimed at shortening a product’s lifespan by downgrading or limiting its functionality shall be prohibited :

(a) Downgrading or limiting the functionality of a product when using consumables, spare parts or accessories that are not provided by the original manufacturer;

(b) Downgrading or limiting the functionality of the relevant product through the design of specific feature;

(c) Providing software updates, including security updates that will downgrade or limit the functionality of the products ; (d) Not decoupling the provision of security and functionality updates;

2. Pursuant to Article 5(1), with regard to ecodesign requirements for reparability of products falling under the scope of this Regulation, restricting the reparability, including by impeding the disassembly of its key components or parts, or allowing access to repair and maintenance information and spare parts exclusively to authorized repairers shall be prohibited

3. In order to comply with the general requirements referred to in Paragraph 1 and 2 of this Article, manufacturers and importers shall fulfil the following obligations:

(a) Make spare parts available to professional repairers, refurbishers and end-users for a minimum period of time after the last unit has been placed on the market. This minimum period shall be further defined in the delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 4;

(b) Provide access to repair and maintenance information, including access to diagnostic tool, to professional repairer, refurbishers and end-users;

(c) Provide information on the availability and price of spare parts to relevant economic operators, including professional repairers, refurbishers and end-users;

(d) For products with digital elements, provide software updates, including security updates, for the period of time that corresponds to consumers' expectations in accordance with Article 7 of Directive2019/771. Security and functionality updates shall be provided separately. This minimum period shall be further defined in the delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 4.

(e) For products with digital elements, the user shall have the option to de-install a functionality update and to re-install the version running on the device prior to the update, unless the device performance remains at least the same when performing the same functions after the update;

(f) For products with digital elements, ensure, where applicable, that the core functionality of a connected product can bede-connected to enable performance without software updates or internet connection, when such functionality does not depend on an internet connection;(g) ensure that the user has the option to securely delete data from any data storage device.

Or. en

Amendment 50

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b – paragraph 1 – point i

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(i) information on the performance of the product in relation to the product parameters referred to in Annex I;

(i) information on the performance of the product in relation to the product parameters referred to in Annex I. For product parameters referred to in points (a) and (b) of Annex I, the information shall be displayed in an easy-to-understand manner and clearly visible at the time of purchase, including in case of distance selling, pursuant to requirements under Article 14 of this Regulation.

Or. en

Amendment 51

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b – paragraph 1 – point ii

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(ii) information for consumers and other end-users on how to install, use, maintain and repair the product in order to minimise its impact on the environment and to ensure optimum durability, as well as on how to return or dispose of the product at end-of-life;

(ii) A leaflet laying out information for consumers and other end-users on how to install, use, maintain and repair the product in order to minimise its impact on the environment and to ensure optimum durability, as well as on how to return or dispose of the product at end-of-life;

Or. en

Amendment 52

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

Those classes of performance shall correspond to statistically significant improvements in performance levels.

Those classes of performance shall correspond to statistically significant improvements in performance levels and with the view to support a consumption trajectory compliant with EU overall sustainability targets in terms of climate, environmental, energy efficiency, resource security and biodiversity.

The highest class of performance shall be reserved for those products with demonstrated alignment with the objectives of the Paris Agreement and do not cross other planetary boundaries.

Or. en

Amendment 53

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 – point e

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(e) in a user manual;

deleted

Or. en

Amendment 54

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 – point f

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(f) on a free access website or application.

deleted

Or. en

Amendment 55

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

In addition to the points mentioned in subparagraph 1, the required information can, as appropriate, be provided using the following manners:

(a) in a user manual,

(b) on a free access website or application

Or. en

Amendment 56

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

Article 7 a

Requirements for the establishment of an EU-wide repair score

1. Information on product parameters referred to in point (b) of Annex I shall be displayed to consumers in a clear and visible way at the time of purchase pursuant to the requirements under Article 14 of this Regulation and shall enable consumers to compare easily the characteristics of products with regard to their reparability.

2. This repair score shall determine classes of performance with regard to the reparability of a product from “very easy to repair” to “impossible to repair” based on an objective methodology aggregating various parameters. The methodology shall take into account the following scoring parameters:

(a) disassembly depth;

(b) availability of spare parts, including timely delivery to the repairer;

(c) price of spare parts;

(d) type of fasteners;

(e) type of tools used to perform the repair;

(f) access to repair and maintenance information;

(g) availability of security updates.

3. By [1 year after the entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall adopt a delegated act specifying the methodology and calculation method to assess the reparability of a product, define the classes of performance to be displayed by the repair score and define the product categories to which it will apply.

4. The Commission shall regularly review the methodology based on feedbacks from the Ecodesign Forum and relevant stakeholders and where necessary update it.

Or. en

Amendment 57

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

Article 7 b

Durability index

1. Information on product parameters referred to in point (a) of Annex I shall be displayed to consumers in a clear and visible way at the time of purchase pursuant to the requirements under Article 14 of this Regulation and shall enable consumers to compare easily the characteristics of products with regard to their durability.

2. By [2 years after entry into force], the Commission shall adopt a delegated act specifying the methodology and calculation methods to deploy a durability index and the classes of performance to be displayed. The delegated act shall also specify the product categories to which it will apply.

3. In addition to the requirements of paragraph 1 of this Article, distributors and dealers, as applicable, shall provide consumers with clear and easy-to-understand information at the time of purchase on the guaranteed lifetime of a product. This label shall include as a minimum the information of the length of the legal guarantee of conformity and its voluntary extension by the manufacturer

Or. en

Amendment 58

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 c (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

Article 7 c

Label on ecodesign features of digital services

For digital services not incorporated or interconnected with a tangible movable item and regulated under a product-related delegated act, the Commission shall establish ecodesign criteria and methodology to distinguish providers engaging in ambitious ecodesign aspects of their digital services, such as on energy and resource efficiency as well as carbon and environmental footprints.

Such label should enable consumers, enterprises and public authorities to choose digital services with a view to sustainability and resources consumptions reduction.

Or. en

Amendment 59

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point f

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(f) the actors that shall have access to information in the product passport and to what information they shall have access, including customers, end-users, manufacturers, importers and distributors, dealers, repairers, remanufacturers, recyclers, competent national authorities, public interest organisations and the Commission, or any organisation acting on their behalf;

(f) the actors that shall have access to information in the product passport and to what information they shall have access, including customers, end-users, manufacturers, importers and distributors, dealers, repairers, refurbishers, remanufacturers, recyclers, competent national authorities, public interest organisations and the Commission, or any organisation acting on their behalf;

Or. en

Amendment 60

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point g

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(g) the actors that may introduce or update the information in the product passport, including where needed the creation of a new product passport, and what information they may introduce or update, including manufacturers, repairers, maintenance professionals, remanufacturers, recyclers, competent national authorities, and the Commission, or any organisation acting on their behalf;

(g) the actors that may introduce or update the information in the product passport, including where needed the creation of a new product passport, and what information they may introduce or update, including manufacturers, repairers, refurbishers, maintenance professionals, remanufacturers, recyclers, competent national authorities, and the Commission, or any organisation acting on their behalf;

Or. en

Amendment 61

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point h

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(h) the period for which the product passport shall remain available.

(h) the period for which the product passport shall remain available by specifying the minimum period of time during which the actors of the value chain storing the data shall guarantee continuous availability of those data.

Or. en

Amendment 62

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(d) all information included in the product passport shall be based on open, standards, developed with an inter-operable format and shall be machine-readable, structured, and searchable, in accordance with the essential requirements set out in Article 10;

(d) all information included in the product passport shall be based on open, standards, developed with an inter-operable format and shall be machine-readable, structured, searchable, and shall be transferable through an open interoperable data exchange network without vendor lock-in, in accordance with the essential requirements set out in Article 10;

Or. en

Amendment 63

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(d a) personal data, as defined by the article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, related to the end-user of the product shall not be stored in or extrapolated from the product passport.

Or. en

Amendment 64

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(c) the data included in the product passport shall be stored the economic operator responsible for its creation or by operators authorised to act on their behalf;

(c) the data included in the product passport shall be stored the economic operator responsible for its creation or by operators authorised to act on their behalf. The operator storing the data shall guarantee its continuous availability for a minimum period of time after the last unit has been placed on the market to be specified by the delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 8(2);

Or. en

Amendment 65

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

Article 13 a

Access of data to researcher, NGOs and consumers

The Commission shall ensure that data related to performance and information requirements of products be made accessible to researchers, NGOs, economic actors and consumers in the definition of access right to the digital passport, for the purpose of ensuring a level playing field in the development of comparison tools and studies.

Or. en

Amendment 66

Proposal for a regulation

Article 20 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 66 to supplement this Regulation by prohibiting economic operators to destroy unsold consumer products in the Union, where the destruction of unsold consumer products falling within a certain product group has significant environmental impact.

The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 66 to supplement this Regulation by prohibiting economic operators to destroy unsold consumer products in the Union. When adopting such delegated act, the Commission shall take into account the environmental impact caused by the destruction of unsold consumer products falling within a certain product group and set specific targets for reuse, refurbishment or remanufacturing.

Or. en

Amendment 67

Proposal for a regulation

Article 20 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(b) damage to products as a result of their handling or detected after a product has been returned by a consumer;

deleted

Or. en

Amendment 68

Proposal for a regulation

Article 21 – paragraph 8 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

8 a. Manufacturers shall ensure access to reporting channels for end-users where they can submit complaints or raise concerns about possible non-conformity of products. Manufacturers shall assess the complaints received and, where relevant, inform market surveillance authorities of the suspected non-compliance of the product. Manufacturers shall keep a register of complaints received for 10 years and make it available upon request from a market surveillance authority.

Or. en

Amendment 69

Proposal for a regulation

Article 23 – paragraph 7 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

7 a. Importers shall ensure access to reporting channels for end-users where they can submit complaints or raise concerns about possible non-conformity of products. Importers shall assess the complaints received and, where relevant, inform market surveillance authorities of the suspected non-compliance of the product. Importers shall keep a register of complaints received for 10 years and make it available upon request from a market surveillance authority.

Or. en

Amendment 70

Proposal for a regulation

Article 24 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

4 a. Distributors shall ensure access to reporting channels for end-users where they can submit complaints or raise concerns about possible non-conformity of products. Distributors shall assess the complaints received and, where relevant, inform market surveillance authorities of the suspected non-compliance of the product. Distributors shall keep a register of complaints received for 10 years and make it available upon request from a market surveillance authority.

Or. en

Amendment 71

Proposal for a regulation

Article 28 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

This Article shall not apply to economic operators acting as refurbishers.

Or. en

Amendment 72

Proposal for a regulation

Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(b) informing the market surveillance authorities of any action taken;

(b) informing the market surveillance authorities of any action taken on a regular and timely basis;

Or. en

Amendment 73

Proposal for a regulation

Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(e a) cooperating to ensure effective product recalls, including carrying out recalls directly and offering remedies to consumers if the responsible economic operator fails to take adequate and timely action;

Or. en

Amendment 74

Proposal for a regulation

Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(e b) cooperating with law enforcement agencies at national and Union level, including the European Anti Fraud Office through regular and structured exchange of information on offers that have been removed on the basis of this Article by online marketplaces;

Or. en

Amendment 75

Proposal for a regulation

Article 29 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

The information shall be able to be provided for each product offered and displayed or otherwise made easily accessible by customers on the product listing.

The information shall be able to be provided for each product offered and displayed or otherwise made accessible on the product listing in a way and a language that is easily accessible and understandable for all consumers.

Or. en

Amendment 76

Proposal for a regulation

Article 29 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

Online marketplaces shall ensure that the traders provide the required information for each product sold on the online interface and that they verify that such information is reliable, complete and up-to-date on a regular basis.

Or. en

Amendment 77

Proposal for a regulation

Article 29 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

3. As far as powers conferred by Member States in accordance with Article 14 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 are concerned, Member States shall confer on their market surveillance authorities the power, for all products covered by a relevant delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 4, to order an online marketplace to remove specific illegal content referring to a non-compliant product from its online interface, disable access to it or display an explicit warning to end-users when they access it. Such orders shall comply with [Article 8(1)] of Regulation (EU) …/… [the Digital Services Act].

3. As far as powers conferred by Member States in accordance with Article 14 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 are concerned, Member States shall confer on their market surveillance authorities the power, for all products covered by a relevant delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 4, to order an online marketplace to remove specific illegal content referring to a non-compliant product from its online interface, disable access to it or display an explicit warning to end-users when they access it. Such orders shall comply with [Article 8(1)] of Regulation (EU) …/… [the Digital Services Act].

Without prejudice to the prohibition to conduct general monitoring as established under the DSA, online marketplaces shall periodically carry out visual inspections and sample testing of randomly chosen products considering previous reports, databases, reviews and potential problems of compliance with the requirements set out in this Regulation and its delegated acts.

Or. en

Amendment 78

Proposal for a regulation

Article 29 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

4. Online marketplaces shall take the necessary measures to receive and process the orders referred to in paragraph 2 in accordance with [Article 8] of Regulation (EU) …/… [the Digital Services Act].

4. Online marketplaces shall take the necessary measures to receive and process the orders referred to in paragraph 2 in accordance with [Article 8] of Regulation (EU) …/… [the Digital Services Act].

Upon receipt of the order issued by the market surveillance authority, the online marketplace shall act without delay and no later than one calendar day from the receipt of the order.

Or. en

Amendment 79

Proposal for a regulation

Article 29 – paragraph 5 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

5 a. 6. Online marketplaces shall ensure that all consumers have the possibility to communicate with them in an effective, swift and easily accessible way. For this purpose:

a. Online marketplaces shall disclose their contact details, including their phone numbers, email addresses and the postal address of their establishment within the Union.

b. Online marketplaces shall not exclusively rely on automated tools for the purpose of ensuring communication with consumers.

c. Where online marketplaces propose electronic contact forms or instant messaging for consumers, online marketplaces shall also encourage consumers to store or save on a durable medium any correspondence, including the date and hour of such correspondence.

d. Online marketplaces shall provide consumers with the postal address and the identity of the seller on whose behalf the online marketplace is acting.

Online marketplaces shall allocate the necessary human and financial resources to ensure that the provisions referred to in this Paragraph are performed in a quick, effective and efficient manner.

7. Online marketplaces shall ensure that a meaningful response is provided without delay and no later than one calendar day to complaints submitted by consumers, consumer and other civil society organisations, and other stakeholders..

8. Competent authorities shall be entitled to impose deterrent, proportionate and effective sanctions on online marketplaces failing to comply with the obligations laid down in this Article, in accordance with Article 68 of this Regulation.

9. Consumers, consumer organisations and other stakeholders shall be entitled to seek remedies against online marketplaces for failing to comply with the obligations laid down in this Regulation.

Or. en

Amendment 80

Proposal for a regulation

Article 58 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

1. Requirements pursuant to Article 4, third subparagraph, point (h) for public contracts awarded by contracting authorities, as defined in Article 2(1) of Directive 2014/24/EU or Article 3(1) of Directive 2014/25/EU, or contracting entities, as defined in Article 4(1) of Directive 2014/25/EU, may take the form of mandatory technical specifications, selection criteria, award criteria, contract performance clauses, or targets, as appropriate.

1. Requirements pursuant to Article 4, third subparagraph, point (h) for public contracts awarded by contracting authorities, as defined in Article 2(1) of Directive 2014/24/EU or Article 3(1) of Directive 2014/25/EU, or contracting entities, as defined in Article 4(1) of Directive 2014/25/EU, shall take the form of either mandatory technical specifications, selection criteria, award criteria, contract performance clauses, or targets, as appropriate.

Or. en

Amendment 81

Proposal for a regulation

Article 58 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(a) the value and volume of public contracts awarded for that given product group or for the services or works using the given product group;

deleted

Or. en

Amendment 82

Proposal for a regulation

Article 58 – paragraph 2 – point c

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(c) the economic feasibility for contracting authorities or contracting entities to buy more environmentally sustainable products, without entailing disproportionate costs.

deleted

Or. en

Amendment 83

Proposal for a regulation

Article 58 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

2 a. When setting targets pursuant to paragraph 1 of this Article, the Commission shall prioritise second-hand and refurbished products, when available.

Or. en

Amendment 84

Proposal for a regulation

Article -59 (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

Article -59

Possibility to lodge complaints

1. Each Member States shall establish a publicly and easy-to-access database to allow any natural or legal person to lodge complaints where they deem based on objective circumstances that an operator or trader fail to comply with the requirements under this Regulation.

2. Market surveillance authorities shall assess the complaints received and take appropriate action, including checks, inspections and hearings of operators or traders within a reasonable time-limit, with the view of detecting potential non-compliance and adopt interim measure.

3. Market surveillance authorities shall inform the natural or legal person having submitted a complaint of its decision to accede to or refuse the request for action. Such decision shall state the reason for it.

4. The information received on possible non-compliance shall be shared with other national market surveillance authorities and with the Commission through the information and communication system referred to in Article 61 of this Regulation.

5. Market surveillance authorities shall publish a summary of the findings of their investigations, as well as of the decision taken, including sanctions and penalties applied to the economic operator or traders having infringed its obligations.

Or. en

Amendment 85

Proposal for a regulation

Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

Without prejudice to Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020, each Member State shall, at least every 2 years, draw up an action plan outlining the market surveillance activities planned to ensure that appropriate checks are performed on an adequate scale in relation to this Regulation and the delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 4. Each Member State shall draw up the first such action plan by [16 July 2024].

Without prejudice to Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020, each Member State shall, at least every 2 years, draw up an action plan outlining the market surveillance activities planned to ensure that appropriate checks, inspections and audits are performed on an adequate scale in relation to this Regulation and the delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 4. Each Member State shall draw up the first such action plan by [16 July 2024].

Or. en

Amendment 86

Proposal for a regulation

Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(b) the market surveillance activities planned in order to reduce non-compliance for those products or requirements identified as priorities, including the nature and minimum number of checks to be performed during the period covered by the action plan.

(b) the market surveillance activities planned in order to bring to an end non-compliance for those products or requirements identified as priorities, including the nature and minimum number of checks to be performed during the period covered by the action plan.

Or. en

Amendment 87

Proposal for a regulation

Article 59 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(a) the levels of non-compliance observed in the market;

(a) the levels of non-compliance observed in the market for a specific product-category;

Or. en

Amendment 88

Proposal for a regulation

Article 59 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(b a) the number of complaints received from end-users, consumer organisations or other representative entities

Or. en

Amendment 89

Proposal for a regulation

Article 59 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

3. The nature and number of checks planned pursuant to paragraph 1, point (b), shall be proportionate to the objective criteria used to identify the priorities in line with paragraph 2.

3. The nature and number of checks planned pursuant to paragraph 1, point (b), shall be proportionate to the objective criteria used to identify the priorities in line with paragraph 2. For product-categories identified as being high-risk of non-compliance, the checks shall include as a minimum sample testing.

Or. en

Amendment 90

Proposal for a regulation

Article 59 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

The Commission may adopt implementing acts listing the products or requirements that Member States shall at least consider as priorities for market surveillance pursuant to paragraph 1, point (a).

The Commission may adopt implementing acts listing the products that Member States shall include as priorities for market surveillance pursuant to paragraph 1, point (a).

Or. en

Amendment 91

Proposal for a regulation

Article 60 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 66 to supplement this Regulation by laying down the minimum number of checks to be performed by the market surveillance authorities of each Member State on specific products covered by delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 4 or in relation to specific requirements set out in such delegated acts. The delegated act may, where relevant, specify the nature of the checks required and methods to be used.

The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 66 to supplement this Regulation by laying down the minimum number of checks to be performed by the market surveillance authorities of each Member State on specific products covered by delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 4 or in relation to specific requirements set out in such delegated acts taking into account the size of market covered and the available resources. The delegated act may, where relevant, specify the nature of the checks required and methods to be used.

Or. en

Amendment 92

Proposal for a regulation

Article 61 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

1. Market surveillance authorities shall enter into the information and communication system referred to in Article 34 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 information on the nature and severity of any penalty imposed in relation to non-compliance with this Regulation.

1. Market surveillance authorities shall enter into the information and communication system referred to in Article 34 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 information on the number of checks and inspections performed, as well as the nature and severity of any penalty imposed in relation to non-compliance with this Regulation.

Or. en

Amendment 93

Proposal for a regulation

Article 61 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

3. The Commission shall publish the report referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article in the information and communication system referred to in Article 34 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 and shall make public a summary of the report.

3. The Commission shall publish the report referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article in the information and communication system referred to in Article 34 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 and shall make public the report.

Or. en

Amendment 94

Proposal for a regulation

Article 63 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

Where the market surveillance authorities of one Member State have sufficient reason to believe that a product covered by a delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 4presents a risk, they shall carry out an evaluation covering all requirements relevant to the risk and laid down in this Regulation or in the relevant delegated act. The relevant economic operators shall cooperate as necessary with the market surveillance authorities.

Where the market surveillance authorities of one Member State have sufficient reason to believe that a product covered by a delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 4 presents a risk or that a performance requirement adopted in the delegated act is insufficient, they shall carry out an evaluation covering all requirements relevant to the risk and laid down in this Regulation or in the relevant delegated act. The relevant economic operators shall cooperate as necessary with the market surveillance authorities.

Or. en

Amendment 95

Proposal for a regulation

Article 63 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

Where, in the course of that evaluation, the market surveillance authorities find that the product does not comply with the requirements laid down in the applicable delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 4, they shall without delay require the relevant economic operator to take appropriate and proportionate corrective action, within a reasonable period prescribed by the market surveillance authorities and commensurate with the nature and where relevant the degree of the non-compliance, to bring the non-compliance to an end. The corrective action required to be taken by the economic operator may include the actions listed in Article 16(3) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020.

Where, in the course of that evaluation, the market surveillance authorities find that the product does not comply with the requirements laid down in the applicable delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 4, they shall without delay require the relevant economic operator to take appropriate and proportionate corrective action, within a reasonable period prescribed by the market surveillance authorities and commensurate with the nature and where relevant the degree of the non-compliance, to bring the non-compliance to an end. The corrective action required to be taken by the economic operator shall include as a minimum the actions listed in Article 16(3) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020.

Or. en

Amendment 96

Proposal for a regulation

Article 66 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 4, Article 9(1), second subparagraph, Article 11(4), Article 20(3), and Article 61(1) shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of six years from [one month after the entry into force of this act]. The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power not later than nine months before the end of the six-year period. The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before the end of each period.

2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 4, Article 7(a), (7b), 7(c), Article 9(1), second subparagraph, Article 11(4), Article 20(3), and Article 61(1) shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of six years from [one month after the entry into force of this act]. The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power not later than nine months before the end of the six-year period. The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before the end of each period.

Or. en

Amendment 97

Proposal for a regulation

Article 68 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of this Regulation and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive, taking into account the extent of non-compliance and the number of units of non-complying products placed on the Union market. Member States shall notify the Commission of those provisions by [one year after the date of application of this Regulation] at the latest and shall notify it without delay of any subsequent amendment affecting them.

Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of this Regulation and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive, taking into account the extent of non-compliance, the number of units of non-complying products placed on the Union market, as well as the environmental impact of the non-compliance. Member States shall notify the Commission of those provisions by [one year after the date of application of this Regulation] at the latest and shall notify it without delay of any subsequent amendment affecting them.

Penalties shall include as a minimum:

(a) fines proportionate to the extent of non-compliance, number of units of non-complying products and environmental impact of the non-compliance, calculating the level of the fines in such as way as to make sure that they effectively deprive those responsible of the economic benefits derived from their infringements, and gradually increasing the level of such fines for repeated infringements. The maximum amount of such fines shall be at least 4 % of the manufacturer’s annual EU turnover.

(b) in case of repeated and serious infringements to the requirements of this Regulation, temporary suspension of placing products on the market;

(c) temporary exclusion from public procurement processes;

(d) publication of the decision taken by the market surveillance authority stating the extent of non-compliance, the corrective action to be taken and the penalties applied to the economic operator.

Or. en

Amendment 98

Proposal for a regulation

Article 68 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

Article 68 a

Access to remedies in case of non-compliance

1.In the event of non-compliance of a product with ecodesign requirements, the product shall be considered to be in non-conformity with the sales contract pursuant to Article 5 of Directive (EU)2019/771, and shall give consumers the rights to remedy under the conditions set out in Article 13 of this Directive.

2. Marketing or offering on sale of a product which is non-compliant with ecodesign requirements shall be considered as an unfair commercial practice in accordance with article 5 of Directive (EU) 2005/29. Consumers shall be given the right to remedy as laid down in the later.

Or. en

Amendment 99

Proposal for a regulation

Article 70 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

Article 70 a

Amendement to Directive (EU) 2020/1828

1. Point (27) of Annex I to Directive (EU) 2020/1828 shall be replaced by the following: “27” Regulation (EU) .../... of the European Parliament and of the Council .. on establishing a framework for setting ecodesign requirements for sustainable products and repealing Directive 2009/125/EC.

Or. en

Amendment 100

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(b) ease of repair and maintenance as expressed through: characteristics, availability and delivery time of spare parts, modularity, compatibility with commonly available spare parts, availability of repair and maintenance instructions, number of materials and components used, use of standard components, use of component and material coding standards for the identification of components and materials, number and complexity of processes and tools needed, ease of non-destructive disassembly and re-assembly, conditions for access to product data, conditions for access to or use of hardware and software needed;

(b) ease of repair and maintenance as expressed through: characteristics, existence of usage-meters, availability and delivery time of spare parts, modularity, compatibility with commonly available spare parts, availability of repair and maintenance instructions, number of materials and components used, use of standard components, use of component and material coding standards for the identification of components and materials, number and complexity of processes and tools needed, ease of non-destructive disassembly and re-assembly, conditions for access to product data, conditions for access to or use of hardware and software needed;

Or. en

ANNEX: LIST OF ENTITIES OR PERSONS FROM WHOM THE RAPPORTEUR FOR THE OPINION HAS RECEIVED INPUT

The following list is drawn up on a purely voluntary basis under the exclusive responsibility of the rapporteur. The rapporteur has received input from the following entities or persons in the preparation of the draft opinion, until the adoption thereof in committee:

Entity and/or person

The European Consumer Organization - BEUC

The European Environmental Bureau - EEB

Backmarket

E-Bay

Business Europe

ANEC

CEN-CENELEC

Syctom

Refurbed

Privacy International

Danish Business Authority

European Organization for Packaging and the Environment - EUROPEN

ADEME

Halte à l’obsolescence programmée - HOP

Avery Dennison

Etsy

ECOS

I fixit

Right to repair coalition