Sittings · Compare
What changed
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
on the proposal for adraft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union and the United Mexican States
(COM(2025)0812(12421/2025 – C100000/2026C100126/2026 – 2025/0271(NLE))
(Consent)
– having regard to the proposal for adraft Council decision (COM(2025)0812),(12421/2025),
– having regard to the draft Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union and the United Mexican States (COM(2025)0811),
– having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 91(1), Article 100(2), and Article 207(4), first subparagraph, in conjunction with Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), and Article 218(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C10-0000/2026),(C10-0126/2026),
– having regard to its interim resolution of [date] on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the United Mexican States, of the other part,
– having regard to Rule 107(1) and (4) and Rule 117(7) of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the recommendationletter offrom the Committee on InternationalAgriculture Tradeand (A10Rural 0000/2026),Development,
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A10-0198/2026),
1. Gives its consent to the conclusion of the agreement;
2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the United Mexican States.
ANNEX: DECLARATION OF INPUT
Pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure, the rapporteur declares that he included in his report input on matters pertaining to the subject of the file that he received, in the preparation of the report, prior to the adoption thereof in committee, from the following interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register, or from the following representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies:
1. Interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register
Confederación Española de Organizaciones Empresariales (CEOE)
Confederation of European Business (Business Europe)
Universidad de Sevilla
Asociación Nacional de Fabricantes de Conservas de Pescados y Productos Transformados de Pescados y Mariscos - Centro Nacional de Conocimiento y Tecnología para la Industria Marina, Acuícola y Alimentaria (ANFACO-CYTMA)
2. Representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies
Embassy of Mexico to the Kingdom of Belgium and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg / Mission of Mexico to the European Union
The list above is drawn up under the exclusive responsibility of the rapporteur.
Where natural persons are identified in the list by their name, by their function or by both, the rapporteur declares that he has submitted to the natural persons concerned the European Parliament's Data Protection Notice No 484 (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/data-protect/index.do), which sets out the conditions applicable to the processing of their personal data and the rights linked to that processing.
MINORITY POSITION
pursuant to Rule 56(4) of the Rules of Procedure
Manon Aubry, Marina Mesure, Rudi Kennes
This deal is a corporate power-grab. It gives corporations the right to sue States before international tribunals and claim millions of euros when governments regulate in the public interest, while granting no equivalent enforceable rights to workers, communities or the environment. This exposes a glaring contradiction with Europe’s exit from the Energy Charter Treaty to protect itself from such lawsuits.
The agreement also runs counter to efforts to re-industrialise Europe. It facilitates the relocation of industries, particularly automotive production, to Mexico, and puts workers in Europe and Mexico into competition instead of supporting decent jobs, deepening a race to the bottom in labour conditions.
It significantly restricts governments’ policy space while promoting a harmful extractivist model and incentivises agri-food exports instead of supporting agricultural sovereignty.
This agreement will not deliver the benefits claimed. More than 95% of EU-Mexico trade in goods has already been tariff-free for over a decade and the Commission’s own evaluation of the existing agreement found that, after nearly twenty years, its economic impact was marginal even by the narrow measure of GDP.
We support stronger EU–Mexico relations and closer cooperation but on different terms.
29.6.2026
LETTER OF THE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
Mr Bernd Lange
Chair
Committee on International Trade
BRUSSELS
Subject: Opinion on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union and the United Mexican States (COM(2025) 812 – 2025/0271(NLE))
Dear Mr Chair,
The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development calls on the Committee on International Trade, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions into its motion for a resolution:
At its meeting of 29 June 2026, the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development considered the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union and the United Mexican States.
The Committee agreed with the proposed conclusion and decided to convey its opinion to the Committee on International Trade, as the committee responsible, pursuant to Rule 57.
Yours sincerely,
Veronika Vrecionová
ANNEX I: DECLARATION OF INPUT
Pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure, the rapporteur for opinion declares that he included in his opinion input on matters pertaining to the subject of the file that he received, in the preparation of the opinion, prior to the adoption thereof in committee, from the following interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register, or from the following representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies:
1. Interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register
N/A
2. Representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies
N/A
The list above is drawn up under the exclusive responsibility of the rapporteur for opinion.
Where natural persons are identified in the list by their name, by their function or by both, the rapporteur for opinion declares that he has submitted to the natural persons concerned the European Parliament's Data Protection Notice No 484 (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/data-protect/index.do), which sets out the conditions applicable to the processing of their personal data and the rights linked to that processing.
FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL BY THE COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION
Key to symbols:
PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
Title
Conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union and the United Mexican States
References
12421/2025 – C10-0126/2026 – 2025/0271(NLE)
Date of consultation or request for consent
27.5.2026
Committee(s) responsible
Date announced in plenary
INTA
18.6.2026
Committees asked for opinions
Date announced in plenary
BUDG
18.6.2026
AGRI
18.6.2026
Not delivering opinions
Date of decision
BUDG
23.9.2025
Rapporteurs
Date appointed
Borja Giménez Larraz
24.9.2025
Date adopted
6.7.2026
Result of final vote
+:
–:
0:
29
8
2
Date tabled
6.7.2026
FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL BY THE COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
Key to symbols: