Sittings · Compare
What changed
PR_COD_1amCom
19.2.2024
Symbols for procedures
PROVISIONAL AGREEMENT RESULTING FROM INTERINSTITUTIONAL NEGOTIATIONS
* Consultation procedure
Subject: Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Establishing a Single Market emergency instrument and repealing Council Regulation No (EC) 2679/98
*** Consent procedure
***I Ordinary legislative procedure (first reading)
***II Ordinary legislative procedure (second reading)
***III Ordinary legislative procedure (third reading)
(The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the draft act.)
Amendments to a draft act
Amendments by Parliament set out in two columns
Deletions are indicated in bold italics in the left-hand column. Replacements are indicated in bold italics in both columns. New text is indicated in bold italics in the right-hand column.
The first and second lines of the header of each amendment identify the relevant part of the draft act under consideration. If an amendment pertains to an existing act that the draft act is seeking to amend, the amendment heading includes a third line identifying the existing act and a fourth line identifying the provision in that act that Parliament wishes to amend.
Amendments by Parliament in the form of a consolidated text
New text is highlighted in bold italics. Deletions are indicated using either the ▌symbol or strikeout. Replacements are indicated by highlighting the new text in bold italics and by deleting or striking out the text that has been replaced.
By way of exception, purely technical changes made by the drafting departments in preparing the final text are not highlighted.
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Single Market emergency instrument and repealing Council Regulation No (EC) 2679/98
(COM(2022)0459 – C90315/2022 – 2022/0278(COD))
(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)
The interinstitutional negotiations on the aforementioned proposal for a regulation have led to a compromise. In accordance with Rule 74(4) of the Rules of Procedure, the provisional agreement, reproduced below, is submitted as a whole to the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection for decision by way of a single vote.
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2022)0459),
▌
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Articles 114, 21 and 45 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C90315/2022),
▌ REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL ▌
– having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
establishing a framework of measures on the emergency and resilience of the internal market and amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2679/98 (Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Act)
– having regard to the reasoned opinion submitted, within the framework of Protocol No 2 on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, by the Swedish Parliament, asserting that the draft legislative act does not comply with the principle of subsidiarity,
(Text with EEA relevance)
– having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 14 December 2022,
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
– having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 8 February 2023,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 21, 46 and 114 thereof,
– havingHaving regard to Rule 59the ofproposal itsfrom Rulesthe ofEuropean Procedure,Commission,
– having regard to the letters from the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Transport and Tourism,
After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments,
– havingHaving regard to the opinionsopinion of the Committee onEuropean EmploymentEconomic and Social Affairs and the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy,Committee,
– havingHaving regard to the reportopinion of the Committee onof the Internal Market and Consumer Protection (A90000/2023),Regions,
1. Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;
Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure,
2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it replaces, substantially amends or intends to substantially amend its proposal;
Whereas:
3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.
(1) Past crises, especially the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, have shown that the free movement of goods, persons and services in the internal market and its supply chains can be severely affected. This may have consequences on cross-border trade between Member States, thus creating obstacles to the proper functioning of the internal market. Furthermore, during those crises, appropriate crisis management tools and coordination mechanisms were either lacking, did not cover all aspects of the internal market or did not allow for a timely and effective response to such crises.
Amendment 1
(2) In the early phase of the COVID 19 crisis Member States introduced barriers to free movement on the internal market as well as diverging measures on the supply of goods and services that were of critical importance or were indispensable for responding to the crisis, which could not always be justified. Ad-hoc measures taken by the Commission in order to re-establish the functioning of the internal market based on the existing rules were not sufficient. The Union was not sufficiently prepared to ensure efficient manufacturing, procurement and distribution of crisis-relevant non-medical goods such as personal protective equipment. Measures to ensure the availability of crisis-relevant non-medical goods during the COVID-19 crisis were necessarily reactive. The pandemic also revealed insufficient information sharing and overview of manufacturing capacities across the Union as well as vulnerabilities related to the intra-EU and global supply chains.
Proposal for a regulation
(2a) Furthermore, uncoordinated measures restricting the free movement of persons had a particular impact on sectors that rely on mobile workers, including workers in border regions, who played an essential role in the internal market during that time.
Title
(3) The Council could through the integrated political crisis response (IPCR) exchange information and coordinate certain actions with regard to the COVID 19 crisis, while Member States acted independently in other situations. However, actions by the Commission were delayed by several weeks due to the lack of ▌ Union wide contingency planning measures and of clarity as to which ▌ national authority to contact to find rapid solutions to the impact on the internal market caused by the crisis. In addition, it became clear that uncoordinated restrictive actions taken by the Member States would further aggravate the impacts of the crisis on the internal market. It emerged that there is a need for arrangements between the Member States and Union authorities as regards contingency planning, technical level coordination and cooperation and information exchange. Additionally, it became clear that the lack of effective coordination between Member States exacerbated the shortages of goods and created more obstacles to the free movement of services and persons.
Text proposed by the Commission
(4) Representative organisations of economic operators have suggested that economic operators did not have sufficient information on the restrictions to free movement introduced and crisis response measures of the Member States during the pandemic. This was partly due to a lack of transparency from Member State authorities, partly due to economic operators not knowing where to obtain such information. Other reasons were language constraints and the administrative burden implied in making repeated inquiries in all the Member States, especially in a constantly changing regulatory environment. This prevented them from making informed business decisions as to what extent they could exercise their free movement rights or continue cross-border business operations during the crisis. It is necessary to improve the availability of information on national and Union level restrictions to free movement and crisis response measures.
Amendment
(4a) Yet, despite the initial lack of coordination, the internal market rules played a key role in mitigating the negative impact of the crisis and in ensuring a swift recovery of the economy of the Union, namely by precluding unjustified and disproportionate national restrictions contained in the unilateral responses by the Member States and by providing a strong incentive to find common solutions, thus promoting solidarity.
Proposal for a
(5) These recent events have also highlighted the need for the Union to be better prepared and coordinated for possible future crises, especially as we consider the continuing effects of climate change and resulting natural disasters as well as global economic and geopolitical instabilities. Other crises, which could require a quicker response to prevent barriers to the free movement in the internal market and avoid severe disruptions of supply chains that are indispensable in the maintenance of activities in the internal market, include for example forest fires, earthquakes or large-scale cyber attacks. The fact that all those crises constitute exceptional and sudden events of extraordinary nature and scale, implies that those events are reasonably unexpected. Given the fact that it is not known which kind of crises could come up next and produce severe impacts on the internal market and its supply chains in the future, it is necessary to provide for an instrument that would apply with regards to impacts on the internal market of a wide range of crises.
Proposal for a
(6) The impact of a crisis on the internal market can hinder the functioning of internal market in two ways. It can give rise to obstacles to the free movement or it can cause disruptions to the supply chains. The latter can exacerbate shortages of goods and services on the internal market and hinder production, thus also disrupting proper functioning of the internal market as well as lead to the emergence or likely emergence of diverging national measures to address those issues regarding the supply chains in the internal market, leading to an internal market emergency mode. This Regulation should address these types of impacts on the internal market and introduces measures to avoid obstacles to the free movement or supply chain disruptions that create shortages of crisis-relevant goods and services. Such impact on the supply chains could hinder production and ultimately lead to additional barriers to trade and to the distortion of competition between Member States and between private operators.
REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
(6a) In order to avoid unnecessary administrative burden on Member States, incidents reported under the ad hoc alert mechanism for early warning should be defined in such a manner that they exclude events of a negligible foreseeable consequence on the free movement of goods, services and persons, including workers, or on the supply chains of goods and services that are indispensable for the maintenance of vital societal or economic activities in the internal market.
REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
▌
establishing a Single Market emergency instrument and repealing Council Regulation No (EC) 2679/98
(7) In order to ensure that the framework of measures laid down by this Regulation can deploy their full effects in the context of the internal market vigilance and the internal market emergency modes, the Commission should be empowered to set out detailed arrangements regarding crisis preparedness, cooperation, exchange of information and crisis communication. This contingency framework should set out the specific technical and operational aspects of the mechanisms of exchange of information between the Commission and the Member States. Furthermore, the contingency framework should lay down the arrangements for the operational coordination between the Commission and the Member States of the crisis communication. In this context, a dedicated inventory of the all the respective competent authorities of the Member States, involved in the implementation of the framework laid down by this Regulation should be set up on the basis of the information communicated by the Member States. This inventory should indicate in particular the respective competent authorities as well as their assigned roles and responsibilities during the vigilance and emergency modes in accordance with national law. The detailed arrangements between the Commission and the Member States should also cover the secure exchange of information concerning the consultation of the economic operators and social partners with respect to their respective initiatives and actions to mitigate and respond to the effects of a potential crisis.
establishing an internal market emergency and resilience act and repealing Council Regulation No (EC) 2679/98
(8) The ▌ measures set out in this Regulation should be deployed in a coherent, transparent, efficient, proportionate and timely manner, having due regard to the need to maintain vital societal functions, ▌ including public security, safety, public order, or public health. This Regulation should not affect the competences of Member States for example with respect to national policies of public health and should be without prejudice to the responsibility of the Member States to safeguard national security and their power to safeguard other essential state functions, including ensuring the territorial integrity of the state and maintaining law and order. This Regulation should therefore be without prejudice to matters related to national security and defence.
Or. en
Amendment 2
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(1) Past crises, especially the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, have shown that the internal market (also referred to as the Single Market and its supply chains can be severely affected by such crises, and appropriate crisis management tools and coordination mechanisms are either lacking, do not cover all aspects of the Single market or do not allow for a timely response to such impacts.
(1) Past crises, especially the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, have shown that the internal market and its supply chains can be severely affected by such crises, and appropriate crisis management tools and coordination mechanisms are either lacking, do not cover all aspects of the internal market or do not allow for a timely response to such impacts.
Or. en
Amendment 3
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(3) Actions by the Commission were delayed by several weeks due to the lack of any Union wide contingency planning measures and ofclarity as to which part of the national administration to contact to find rapid solutions to the impact on the Single Market being cause by the crisis. In addition it became clear that uncoordinated restrictive actions taken by the Member States would further aggravate the impacts of the crisis on the Single market. It emerged that there is a need for arrangements between the Member States and Union authorities as regards contingency planning, technical level coordination and cooperation and information exchange.
(3) Actions by the Commission were delayed by several weeks due to the lack of any Union wide contingency planning measures and of clarity as to which part of the national administration to contact to find rapid solutions to the impact on the internal market being cause by the crisis. In addition it became clear that uncoordinated restrictive actions taken by the Member States would further aggravate the impacts of the crisis on the Internal market. It emerged that there is a need for arrangements between the Member States and Union authorities as regards contingency planning, technical level coordination and cooperation and information exchange. Additionally, it became evident that a lack of coordination between Member States and other European countries, for example States of the European Free Trade Association, countries participating in the internal market or candidate countries, exacerbated the shortages of countermeasures outside the Union.
Or. en
Amendment 4
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(9) To this end, this Regulation provides:
(9) To this end, this Regulation provides- the necessary means to ensure the continued functioning of the internalSingle market,Market, the free circulation of goods, services and persons in timesbusinesses ofthat crisisoperate andon the availability of crisis-relevantinternal goodsmarket and services to citizens, businessesits andstrategic publicsupply authoritieschains, atincluding the time of crisis. It alsofree setsmovement outof rulesgoods, forservices theand adequatepersons, coordination,including cooperationworkers, andin exchangetimes of information,crisis and establishes digital tools to guarantee the functioningavailability of fast lanes for criticalcrisis-relevant goods and services, with the aim of accelerating authorisation, registration or declaration procedures. Furthermore, in orderservices to enhance the involvement of all economic actors, in particularcitizens, businesses and civilpublic societyauthorities inat the establishmenttime of crisis-relevant measures, this Regulation imposes an obligation on the Commission to set up a stakeholder platform to facilitate and encourage voluntary response to internal market emergencies.crisis;
— the necessary means to ensure the continued functioning of the Single Market, the businesses that operate on the Single Market and its strategic supply chains, including the free circulation of goods, services and persons in times of crisis and the availability of crisis relevant goods and services to citizens, businesses and public authorities at the time of crisis;
- a forum for adequate coordination, cooperation and exchange of information; and
— a forum for adequate coordination, cooperation and exchange of information; and
- the means for the timely accessibility and availability of the information which is needed for a targeted response and adequate market behaviour by businesses and citizens during a crisis.
— the means for the timely accessibility and availability of the information which is needed for a targeted response and adequate market behaviour by businesses and citizens during a crisis.
(10) Where possible, this Regulation should allow for anticipation of events and crises by allowing the Union to continue building on on-going analysis concerning strategically important areas of the internal market economy ▌ .
Or. en
(10a) By reinforcing the resilience and preparedness of European industry with regards to critical raw materials, the Critical Raw Materials Act complements this Regulation, which allows the Commission in internal market vigilance or internal market emergency mode to activate targeted measures when a threat to or a disruption of the supply of goods of critical importance emerges, which may include critical raw materials.
Amendment 5
(11) This Regulation should not duplicate the existing framework for medicinal products, medical devices or other medical counter-measures under the EU Health Security Framework, including Regulation (EU) 2022/2371 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Regulation (EU) 2022/2372, Regulation (EU) 2022/2370 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EU) 2022/123 of the European Parliament and of the Councilregarding crisis preparedness and response in the area of health. This EU Health Security Framework should take precedence over this Regulation as regards the supply chain disruptions and shortages of medicinal products, medical devices or other medical counter-measures where the conditions of that framework are met. Therefore, medicinal products, medical devices or other medical counter-measures as defined by Regulation (EU) 2022/2372 [SCBDH Regulation], and Regulation (EU) 2022/2372 [the Emergency Framework Regulation], when they have been included in the list of the Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2372 [the Emergency Framework Regulation], should be excluded from the scope of this Regulation, except in relation to the provisions relating to free movement of goods, services and persons, including workers, during the internal market emergency, and in particular those designed to re-establish and facilitate free movement ▌ .
Proposal for a regulation
▌
Recital 9 a (new)
(12) This Regulation should be without prejudice to the Integrated Political Crisis Response arrangements operated by the Council under Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1993. This Regulation should complement the Integrated Political Crisis Response arrangements operated by the Council under Council Decision 2014/415/EU as regards its work on internal market impacts of cross-sectoral crises that require decision-making in relation to contingency planning and implementation of vigilance and emergency measures.
Text proposed by the Commission
(13) This Regulation should be without prejudice to the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (‘UCPM’). This Regulation should complement the UCPM and should support it, where necessary, as regards availability of critical goods and free movement of civil protection workers, including their equipment, for crises that fall into the remit of that mechanism.
Amendment
(14) This Regulation should be without prejudice to Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council, including its general framework for the temporary introduction or prolongation of internal border controls and the notification system for the temporary reintroduction of internal border controls.
(9a) In order to ensure the smooth functioning of the internal market, this Regulation should set up an advisory board to advise the Commission on the appropriate measures for anticipating, preventing or responding to the impact of a crisis. The Commission should ensure that the European Parliament and Council have equal access to all information, so that the Parliament receives all documents at the same time as Member States’ representatives. The European Parliament should systematically have access to the meetings of the advisory group to which Member States' experts are invited. The participation of representatives of EFTA States as observers should be ensured in accordance with the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as well as in accordance with the bilateral agreements between the Union and the Swiss Confederation.
(15) This Regulation should be without prejudice to Articles 55 to 57 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety, implemented by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/300 of 19 February 2019 establishing a general plan for crisis management in the field of the safety of food and feed. This Regulation should be without prejudice to the European Food Security Crisis preparedness and response Mechanism (EFSCM). Nevertheless, food products should be governed by the free movement provisions of this Regulation, including those ▌ concerning restrictions to free movement rights ▌ The measures concerning food products ▌ may be also reviewed for their compliance with any other relevant provisions of Union law.
Or. en
(15a) This Regulation is without prejudice to the Commission entering into consultations or cooperation, on behalf of the Union, with relevant authorities of third countries, in accordance with Union law, with particular attention paid to developing countries, with a view to seeking cooperative solutions to avoid supply chain disruptions, in compliance with international obligations. This may involve, where appropriate, coordination in relevant international fora.
Amendment 6
(15b) One of the challenges identified during the Covid 19 crisis was the lack of network for preparedness and information sharing between the Member States and also between the Member States and the Commission. Therefore, the achievement of the objectives pursued by this Regulation should be supported by a governance mechanism. At Union level, this Regulation should establish an Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Board, composed of representatives of the Member States and chaired by the Commission, to facilitate a smooth, effective and harmonised implementation of this Regulation, cooperation and the exchange of information. The Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Board should provide advice to and assist the Commission on specific questions, including the consistent implementation of this Regulation, facilitating cooperation among Member States as well as analyse and discuss relevant topics relating to the imminent or ongoing crisis.
Proposal for a regulation
(15c) The Commission should chair the Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Board and provide its secretariat. Each Member State should appoint a representative and an alternate representative. The Chair should invite a representative from the European Parliament as a permanent observer. To receive important advice on the activities of the Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Board and allow appropriate participation of experts with specific expertise, the Chair should be able to invite experts and observers to take part in the work of the Board and to attend specific meetings, on an ad-hoc basis, where such attendance is relevant considering the agenda of the meeting. With a view to ensure a coherent and coordinated Union response to various crises which may have an impact on the functioning of the internal market, the Chair may also invite representatives of other crisis-relevant bodies at Union level as observers to the relevant meetings of the Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Board. With a view of promoting international cooperation, the Chair may invite representatives of international organisations and third countries to take part as observers in meetings of the Board in accordance with the relevant bilateral or international agreement. Observers may contribute to the discussions with relevant expertise, information and insights but they should not take part in the formulation of opinions, recommendations or advice of the Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Board.
Recital 10
(15d) The Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Board should have specific tasks in the context of the contingency framework, the internal market vigilance mode and the internal market emergency mode. These include the exchange of views and providing advice to the Commission with respect to the assessment of the criteria which are to be taken into consideration when activating the different modes as well as with respect to the assessment whether the specific preconditions for the deployment of concrete response measures are met. The Commission should take the utmost account of opinions, recommendations or reports by the Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Board.
Text proposed by the Commission
(15e)In the interest of guaranteeing the confidentiality of the received information under this Regulation, the Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Board should provide in its Rules of Procedures that its members and observers should not disclose trade and business secrets and other sensitive and confidential information acquired or generated in application of this Regulation and respect equivalent professional secrecy obligations as Commission staff members.
Amendment
(15f) In order to guarantee greater transparency, coordination and accountability, particularly in times of crises, the European Parliament should be able to invite the Chair of the Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Board to appear in front of its competent Committee. The Commission should take into account elements arising from the views expressed through the Emergency and Resilience dialogue with respect of this Regulation, including the relevant resolutions of the European Parliament. The European Parliament should be informed of any Council implementing act proposed or adopted as soon as possible.
(10) Where possible, this Regulation should allow for anticipation of events and crises, building on on-going analysis concerning strategically important areas of the Single Market economy and the Union’s continuous foresight work.
(15g) Member States should also appoint a Central Liaison Office that should work as a focal point in communication with other Member States and the Commission as regards contacts for relevant authorities in the Member States, compiling information from those authorities, and should also be responsible for coordination and information exchange. The Central Liaison Office to be appointed can be an already existing authority in the Member State.
(10) Resilience is key to ensuring that the internal market delivers on its ultimate goal of supporting the Union’s economy. This Regulation should allow for anticipation of events and crises, building on on-going analysis concerning critically important areas of the internal market economy and the Union’s continuous foresight work. In order to ensure the crisis-preparedness of all actors, it is necessary to set out rules on biennial stress tests, trainings and crisis protocols involving not only all relevant national authorities, but also stakeholders such as businesses, social partners and experts.
(15h) This Regulation is without prejudice to the possibility of the Commission to assess whether it is appropriate to impose restrictions to exports of goods in line with the international rights and obligations of the Union under Regulation (EU) 2015/479 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Or. en
(15i) This Regulation is without prejudice to measures taken pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007.
Amendment 7
(15j) This Regulation applies without prejudice to and is complementary with Directive (EU) 2022/2557 on the resilience of critical entities, which lays down harmonised minimum rules to ensure that services essential for the maintenance of vital societal functions or economic activities are provided in an unobstructed manner in the internal market, to enhance the resilience of critical entities providing such services, and to improve cross-border cooperation between competent authorities.
Proposal for a regulation
(15k) An information exchange relating to ad hoc alerts should be possible through the network created between the Central Liaison Offices and the Union Central Liaison Offices. These ad hoc alerts should be notified to the Commission in cases of significant incidents in order to allow the Union to better follow the development of the potential, imminent crisis or crisis as such thus being able to have better preparedness should the crisis emerge or develop.
Recital 17
(15l) With the objective to be better prepared for and more resilient during potential future crises which may cause severe negative impacts on the free movement of goods, services and persons, including workers or cause disruptions to the supply chains of goods and services in the internal market, the Commission should encourage and facilitate the drawing up of voluntary crisis protocols by economic operators. Economic operators remain free to decide whether to take part in such voluntary crisis protocols. The participation in such voluntary crisis protocols should not give rise to disproportionate administrative burden. The voluntary crisis protocols should set out the specific parameters of the disruptions that are considered, as well as a distribution of the specific roles of each participant, a description of the mechanisms of activation of such protocols and the associated actions. Relevant stakeholders, including Member States’ authorities, Union bodies, offices and agencies and civil society organisations may also be involved in the drawing up of such voluntary crisis protocols. In determining the parameters of the disruptions to be considered, economic operators should be able to build on their past experiences with free movement and supply chain disruptions caused by various crises.
Text proposed by the Commission
(15m) With the view of drawing from the experiences of past crises, the Commission should develop and manage training programmes and materials for public and private stakeholders, including economic operators. Participation in such training programmes and simulations should remain voluntary.
Amendment
(15n) As part of crisis preparedness, this Regulation should allow for anticipation of events and crises for which stress tests and simulations would be carried out, building on ongoing analysis concerning critically important areas of the internal market economy and the Union’s continuous foresight work. In particular, the Commission should develop scenarios and parameters in specific areas that capture the particular risks associated with a crisis. In order to ensure the crisis-preparedness of all actors, it is necessary to set out rules on stress tests to be conducted at least every two years, and on trainings and crisis protocols involving not only relevant national authorities, but also stakeholders such as businesses, social partners and experts. In this context, the Commission should facilitate and encourage the development of strategies for emergency preparedness, including strategies for crisis communication and exchanging information about applicable restrictions in challenging circumstances. The identification of the specific focus areas should be based on existing indicator-based tools which monitor the evolution of supply chains in the EU with a view of identifying potential distress, taking into account relevant specific criteria such as the trade flows, demand and supply, concentration of supply, Union and global production and production capacities at different stages of the value chain and the interdependencies between economic operators.
(17) Article 21 TFEU lays down the right of EU citizens to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States, subject to the limitations and conditions laid down in the Treaties and the measures adopted to give them effect. The detailed conditions and limitations are laid down in Directive 2004/38/EC. This Directive sets out the general principles applicable to these limitations and the grounds that may be used to justify such measures. These grounds are public policy, public security or public health. In this context, restrictions to freedom of movement can be justified if they are proportionate and non-discriminatory. This Regulation is not intended to provide for additional grounds for the limitation of the right to free movement of persons beyond those provided for in Chapter VI of Directive 2004/38/EC.
(16) In order to account for the exceptional nature of and potential far-reaching consequences for the ▌ operation of the internal market of internal market vigilance or of an internal market emergency, implementing powers should exceptionally be conferred on the Council for the activation of the internal market vigilance or emergency mode pursuant to Article 291(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). The Council implementing act for the activation of the internal market vigilance mode should contain elements which are intrinsically linked to the assessment of the fulfilment of the preconditions justifying the activation, namely an assessment of the potential impact of the crisis on the free movement of goods, services and persons including workers in the internal market and on its supply chains, a list of the goods and services of critical importance which are indispensable in the maintenance of vital societal or economic activities in the internal market and the vigilance measures to be taken. Furthermore, where the activation of the internal market emergency mode also requires the adoption of a list of crisis-relevant goods and services, such a list should be adopted at the same time as the activation and can therefore be intrinsically linked to the activation. For this reason, implementing powers should also be conferred on the Council for the adoption of the list of crisis-relevant goods and services and its update. It should be possible to extend the internal market vigilance or emergency mode through a Council implementing act on a proposal from the Commission. Should it transpire that there is no need for either of the modes to be active, then the respective mode should be deactivated.
(17) Article 21 TFEU lays down the right of EU citizens to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States, subject to the limitations and conditions laid down in the Treaties and the measures adopted to give them effect. The detailed conditions and limitations are laid down in Directive 2004/38/EC. This Directive sets out the general principles applicable to these limitations and the grounds that may be used to justify such measures. These grounds are public policy, public security or public health. In this context, decisions to restrict freedom of movement can be justified if they are proportionate and non-discriminatory. This Regulation is not intended to provide for additional grounds for the limitation of the right to free movement of persons beyond those provided for in Chapter VI of Directive 2004/38/EC. Any such decisions to restrict the freedom of movement of persons are without prejudice to the possibility for the Commission to adopt measures at a later stage, including the launching of infringement proceedings.
▌
Or. en
▌
Amendment 8
▌
Proposal for a regulation
▌
Recital 34 a (new)
(20) For national measures which are not harmonised under this Regulation and which affect when adopted and applied in response to an internal market emergency the free movement of goods or persons, ▌ or the freedom to provide services ▌ during internal market emergencies, Member States should ensure that they fully comply with the Treaty and other provisions of Union law such as Directive 2004/38/EC, Regulation No 492/2011, Directive 2006/123/EC, Directive 2005/36/EC and Directive 2015/1535. If Member States adopt such restrictions, they should be justified and respect the principles of proportionality and non-discrimination in accordance with Union law. Furthermore, in line with these principles, such measures should not create an unnecessary administrative burden and Member States should take all possible measures to limit any administrative burden of measures taken to respond to internal market emergency.
Text proposed by the Commission
In addition, any such measures should take adequately into account the situation of cross-border regions and outermost regions, especially for cross-border workers. Member States should remove measures taken to respond to internal market emergency that restrict free movement as soon as they are no longer necessary. In general, national measures restricting free movement, which are not harmonised under this Regulation would be in principle no longer justified or proportionate when the internal market emergency mode is deactivated and should be therefore removed.
Amendment
(20a) This Regulation should not be construed as authorising or justifying restrictions to the free movement of goods, services and persons contrary to the Treaty or other provisions of Union law. For example, the fact that some restrictions are explicitly prohibited during an internal market emergency mode should not be construed as justifying such restrictions outside this mode or as justifying other possible restrictions incompatible with EU law that are not explicitly prohibited by this Regulation.
(34a) In order to safeguard the freedom of movement, the Commission should develop interoperable digital tools to guarantee the functioning of so-called ‘fast lanes’ for critical goods and services. The Commission should set up and maintain a digital portal, covering all registration or authorisation forms for cross-border activities, especially for crisis-relevant declarations similar to EU Digital Covid Certificates, and for crisis-relevant professional services to accelerate authorisation, registration or declaration procedures. That portal should also be usable for the administration of social security forms in the context of posting crisis-relevant workers, in particular to administer the A1 forms. Furthermore, to enable the involvement of all economic actors, in particular businesses and civil society, the Commission should set up a stakeholder platform to facilitate and encourage a voluntary response to internal market emergencies.
(20b) Article 21 TFEU lays down the right of EU citizens to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States, subject to the limitations and conditions laid down in the Treaties and the measures adopted to give them effect. The detailed conditions and limitations are laid down in Directive 2004/38/EC. That Directive sets out the general principles applicable to these limitations and the grounds that may be used to justify such measures. These grounds are public policy, public security or public health. In this context, restrictions to the freedom of movement can be justified if they are proportionate and non-discriminatory. This Regulation is not intended to provide for additional grounds for the limitation of the right to free movement of persons beyond those provided for in Chapter VI of Directive 2004/38/EC.
Or. en
(20c) As regards the measures for facilitating free movement of persons and any other measures affecting the free movement of persons provided under this Regulation, they are based on Article 21 TFEU and complement Directive 2004/38/EC at the time of internal market emergencies. Such measures should not result in authorising or justifying restrictions to free movement contrary to the Treaties or other provisions of Union law.
Amendment 9
(20d) Article 45 TFEU lays down the right to free movement of workers, subject to the limitations and conditions laid down in the Treaties and the measures adopted to give them effect. Article 46 TFEU is the legal basis for the adoption of measures required to bring about freedom of movement for workers as defined in Article 45 TFEU. This Regulation contains provisions which complement the existing measures in order to reinforce free movement of persons, increase transparency and provide administrative assistance during internal market emergencies. Such measures include setting up and making available of the single points of contact to workers and their representatives in the Member States and at Union level during the internal market vigilance and emergency modes under this Regulation.
Proposal for a regulation
(20e) It is appropriate to prohibit certain national measures which restrict free movement or the freedom to provide services and which should not be imposed during, and in response to, an internal market emergency, since they are manifestly disproportionate. Therefore, any measures taken by Member States relating thereto should be assessed in the light of those harmonising provisions and not the Treaty or other provisions of Union law.
Recital 35
(20f) In particular, Member States should refrain from introducing measures that constitute a discrimination based on nationality or, in the case of companies, location of their registered office, central administration or principal place of business.
Text proposed by the Commission
(20g) Member States should refrain from taking measures that make it impossible for beneficiaries of the right to free movement to return to their Member State of residence should they find themselves in another Member State at the outbreak of a crisis.
Amendment
(20h) Member States should refrain from taking measures that make it impossible for beneficiaries of the right to free movement to travel to other Member States for imperative family reasons if such travel remains permitted within the Member State adopting the measure despite the circumstances being the same.
(35) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission as regards the possibility to adopt supportive measures for facilitating free movement of persons, for establishing a list of individual targets (quantities and deadlines) for those strategic reserves that the Member States should maintain, so that the objectives of the initiative are achieved. Furthermore, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission as regards activating the vigilance mode and vigilance measures in order to carefully monitor the strategic supply chains and coordinate the building up of strategic reserves for goods and services of strategic importance. Moreover, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission as regards activation of specific emergency response measures at the time of a Single Market emergency, to allow for a rapid and coordinated response. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
(20i) This Regulation should not prevent the Member States from letting their nationals and residents return to their territory during internal market emergencies. To facilitate such travel, other Member States should allow such nationals and residents to exit their territory to travel to the Member State of nationality or residence, or to transit through its territory in order to reach the Member State of nationality or residence.
(35) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission as regards the possibility to adopt supportive measures for facilitating free movement of persons. Furthermore, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission as regards activating the vigilance mode and vigilance measures in order to carefully monitor the strategic supply chains and coordinate the building up of strategic reserves for goods and services of strategic importance. Moreover, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission as regards activation of specific emergency response measures at the time of an internal market emergency, to allow for a rapid and coordinated response. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council
(20j) Restrictions to free movement, including in the form of administrative requirements and procedures such as declaration, registration or authorisation procedures, are prohibited, unless they comply with Union law. When justified and proportionate administrative requirements and procedures have been adopted in line with Union law, Member States should, during an internal market emergency, prioritise facilitating compliance with such requirements and processing such procedures for persons involved in the production or supply of crisis-relevant goods or services and the Commission should, to that end and when to do so is necessary to facilitate the free movement of such providers or certain categories thereof, put in place arrangements, including digital arrangements and templates.
Or. en
(21) To ensure effective coordination and information exchange in the context of the contingency framework, as well as in the context of the internal market vigilance and emergency modes, this Regulation lays down an obligation for Member States to designate central liaison offices, responsible for contact with the Union level central liaison office designated by the Commission and with the central liaison offices of other Member States. Each central liaison office should compile the inputs from relevant competent authorities of its Member State, including, where relevant, at regional and local level. Such liaison offices should also transmit all crisis-relevant information to the single points of contact in the Member States in real time where possible.
Amendment 10
(21a) This Regulation lays down obligations with a view to ensuring transparency in relation to national measures adopted during an internal market emergency mode that restrict the right to free movement of persons. Any such restrictions must comply with Union law, notably Directive 2004/38/EC. Those obligations should be without prejudice to any existing information or notification obligations that continue to apply in full.
Proposal for a regulation
Free movement of persons is of paramount importance for the proper functioning of the internal market. Experience from the COVID-19 crisis shows that restrictions to that right can have spill-over effects for all other fundamental freedoms. Lack of information on crisis-related restrictions to free movement of persons can cause Union citizens and economic operators additional difficulties in managing their activities during a crisis. Currently, there is no applicable transparency system in force that could provide Union citizens and economic operators with information on free movement of persons restrictions.
Recital 36
Member States should communicate to the Commission and other Member States the full text of the national legislative or regulatory provisions introducing restrictions on the exercise of the right to free movement of persons in response to the crisis, as well as the modifications thereof, without delay after their adoption. This should be accompanied by the reasons for such measures, including reasons demonstrating that the measure is justified and proportionate, as well as any underlying scientific or other data supporting their adoption, the scope of such measures, and the date of adoption and date of application and duration of those measures.
Text proposed by the Commission
To make sure that Union citizens and economic operators can obtain reliable information regarding restrictions to free movement, Member States should provide the public with clear, comprehensive and timely information explaining such measures, notably their scope, entry into application and duration, as soon as possible. This information should also be provided to the Commission. On this basis, the Commission should publish relevant information on a dedicated website available in all official languages of the Union.
Amendment
▌
(36) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the ‘Charter’). In particular, it respects the right to privacy of the economic operators enshrined in Article 7 of the Charter, right to data protection set out in Article 8 of the Charter, the freedom to conduct business and the freedom of contract, which are protected by Article 16 of the Charter, the right to property, protected by Article 17 of the Charter, right to collective bargaining and action protected by Article 26 of the Charter and the right to an effective judicial remedy and to a fair trial as provided for in Article 47 of the Charter. Since the objective of this Regulation cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can rather, by reason of the scale or effects of the action, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty. In accordance with the principle of proportionality as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective. The Regulation should not affect the autonomy of the social partners as recognised by the TFEU.
(23) In order to ensure that the specific internal market emergency measures provided for in this Regulation are used only where this is indispensable for responding to a particular internal market emergency, such measures should require ▌ activation by means of Commission implementing acts, which indicate the reasons for such activation and the crisis-relevant goods or services that such measures apply to.
(36) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the ‘Charter’). In particular, it respects the right to privacy of the economic operators enshrined in Article 7 of the Charter, right to data protection set out in Article 8 of the Charter, the freedom to conduct business and the freedom of contract, which are protected by Article 16 of the Charter, the right to property, protected by Article 17 of the Charter, the right to collective bargaining and action, including the right to strike, protected by Article 28 of the Charter and the right to an effective judicial remedy and to a fair trial as provided for in Article 47 of the Charter. Since the objective of this Regulation cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can rather, by reason of the scale or effects of the action, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty. In accordance with the principle of proportionality as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective. The Regulation should not affect the autonomy of the social partners as recognised by the TFEU.
(24) Furthermore, in order to ensure the proportionality of the implementing acts and due respect for the role of economic operators in crisis management, the Commission should only resort to the dual activation of the internal market emergency mode, where economic operators are not able to provide a solution on a voluntary basis within a reasonable time. Why this is the case should be indicated in each such act, and in relation to all particular aspects of a crisis.
Or. en
(24a) To ensure that the Board receives appropriate information about potential internal market emergency, it is necessary to provide for monitoring. Such monitoring concerns supply chains or goods and services of critical importance for which the vigilance mode has been activated and the free movement of persons who are involved in the production and supply of such goods and services. Monitoring of the supply chains of goods and services of critical importance should be carried out by the competent authorities of the Member States on the basis of voluntary requests for information about factors impacting the availability of the selected goods and services of critical importance such as production capacity, availability of the necessary workforce, stocks, suppliers limitations, possibilities for diversification and substitution, demand conditions, bottlenecks. The voluntary request for information should be addressed to all actors along the relevant supply chain of goods and services of strategic importance and other relevant stakeholders established in Member States national territory. Collecting information about free movement disruptions from the economic operators along the supply chains of goods and services of critical importance is particularly important because the lack of appropriate workforce is one of the prevailing causes of supply chain disruptions. The monitoring by Member State authorities of disruptions to the free movement of persons involved in the production and supply of goods and services should be understood broadly, covering workers, service providers, business representatives and other persons involved in the research, development and placing products on the market. Competent authorities of the Member States should provide the gathered information to the Commission and the Board via the central liaison offices. This information should enable the Board to advise the Commission on the necessity of activation of the internal market emergency mode.
Amendment 11
(24b) To enable precise assessments whether the deployment of specific internal market emergency response measures would allow to reduce the severe shortages of crisis-relevant goods or services the threat thereof in an internal market emergency, the Commission should be able to request information from economic operators in supply chains of crisis-relevant goods and services. Such information requests should, where appropriate, concern production capacities and stocks of crisis-relevant goods in production facilities located both in the Union and in the third countries where those economic operators operate, with which they contract or from which they purchase supplies; the schedule or an estimation of the expected production output for the following three months for each production facility located in the Union as well as production facilities which are located in third countries where those economic operators operate or have purchase contracts with as well as information about any relevant supply chain disruptions or shortages. To ensure full involvement of the Member State where the undertaking has its production site, the Commission should forward, without delay, a copy of the information request to that Member State and, if the competent authority of the Member State so requests, the Commission should share the acquired information with that Member State through secure means.
Proposal for a regulation
(25) Information requests to economic operators should be used by the Commission only where the information which is necessary for responding adequately to the internal market emergency, such as information necessary for procurement by the Commission on behalf of the Member States or estimating the production capacities of manufacturers of crisis-relevant goods the supply chains of which have been disrupted, is not yet available to the Commission and cannot be obtained from publicly available sources or as a result of information provided voluntarily. When activating an information request by means of an implementing act, the Commission should ensure that the benefit for the public interest outweighs the possible inconveniences that the concerned economic operators may sustain. The Commission should take into consideration the burden that such an information request may represent in particular for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and should modulate the timelines for reply accordingly. When the processing of an information request by an economic operator has the potential to significantly disrupt its operations, the said economic operator should be allowed to refuse to supply the requested information. The economic operator should be obliged to provide to the Commission the reasons for any refusal to supply requested information. Such reasons should include, in particular, the risk of liability for breach of contractual non-disclosure obligations based on contracts governed by the law of a third country or the risk of disclosing information related to national security in the case of goods with possible uses in the context of national security, which could include national reserves.
Recital 37
(25a) The maximum time limit for an economic operator to reply to an information request should be 20 working days. The specific individual time limit should be set on a case-by-case basis and could be shorter. The economic operator should be allowed to request a one-time extension which could, subject to the explicit agreement by the Commission, extend the overall time limit beyond 20 days. It should be provided that any request for an extension of the time limit by the economic operator should be submitted to the Commission in accordance with the communication arrangements specified within the individual decision. It should also be provided that until the Commission has responded to the request for extension, the initial time limit should be regarded as fully applicable.
Text proposed by the Commission
(26) The activation of the internal market emergency mode, where needed, should also enable the triggering of the application of certain crisis-response procedures which introduce adjustments to the rules governing the design, manufacture, conformity assessment and the placing on the market of goods subject to Union harmonised rules as well as to certain rules governing the goods subject to the EU general product safety framework. These crisis-response procedures should enable products, designated as crisis-relevant goods to be placed swiftly on the market in an emergency context. In the case of harmonised products, the conformity assessment bodies should prioritise the conformity assessment of crisis-relevant goods over any other ongoing applications for other products. ▌Where there are undue delays in the conformity assessment procedures of crisis-relevant goods, the ▌ competent authorities in the Member States should be able to issue authorisations for such goods which have not undergone the applicable conformity assessment procedures to be placed on their respective market, provided that they comply with the applicable safety requirements. Such authorisations should be only valid on the territory of the issuing Member State until their validity is extended to the territory of the Union by means of a Commission implementing act. The validity of such derogatory authorisation should be limited to the duration of the internal market emergency. In addition, with a view to facilitating the increase in supply of harmonised and non-harmonised crisis-relevant goods, certain flexibilities should be introduced with respect to the mechanisms of presumption of conformity and presumption of conformity with the general safety requirement respectively. In the context of an internal market emergency, the manufacturers of crisis-relevant goods should be able to rely also on national and international standards, which provide an equivalent level of protection to the ▌ European standards whose references have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union. With respect to the harmonised goods alone, in cases where the later do not exist or the compliance with them is rendered excessively difficult by the disruptions to the internal market, the Commission should be able to issue common technical specifications providing a presumption of conformity in order to provide ready-to-use technical solutions to the manufacturers.
Amendment
(27) The introduction of these crisis-relevant adjustments to the relevant sectorial Union harmonised rules requires targeted adjustments to the following 16 frameworks ▌ Directive 2000/14/EC, Directive 2006/42/EU, Directive 2010/35/EU, Directive ▌ 2014/29/EU, Directive 2014/30/EU, Directive ▌ 2014/33/EU, Directive 2014/34/EU, Directive 2014/35/EU, Directive 2014/53/EU, Directive 2014/68/EU, Regulation (EU) 2016/424, Regulation (EU) 2016/425, Regulation (EU) 2016/426, Regulation (EU) 305/2011, Regulation (EU) 2023/988 and Regulation (EU) 2023/1230. The amendments laying down emergency response procedures in each of the respective frameworks should only become applicable where they are specifically activated. The activation of the emergency procedures under each respective framework should be conditional upon the activation of the internal market emergency mode under this Regulation and should be limited to ▌ products designated as crisis-relevant goods and limited in time to the duration of the internal market emergency.
(28) In cases where there are substantial risks to the functioning of the internal market or in cases of severe and persistent shortages or an exceptionally high demand of crisis-relevant goods, measures at Union level aimed to ensure the availability of crisis-relevant goods, such as priority rated requests may prove to be indispensable to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and its supply chains.
(28a) As an instrument of last resort to ensure the maintenance of vital societal economic activities in the internal market where the production or supply of crisis-relevant goods could not be achieved by other measures, the Commission can address requests to economic operators established in the Union to produce or supply crisis-relevant goods. When issuing a request, the Commission should take into account the possible negative impacts on competition in the internal market and the risk of exacerbating the market distortions. Furthermore, the choice of the recipients and beneficiaries of the requests should not be discriminatory.
(28b) The priority-rated request should be taken based on objective, factual, measurable, and substantiated data. It should have regard for the legitimate interests of the undertakings and the cost and effort required for any change in production sequence. The priority-rated request should clearly specify that the choice to accept or refuse the request remains entirely with the economic operator. Where the economic operator chooses to refuse the priority-rated request, the economic operator is also free to decide whether to provide an explicit rejection and whether to provide a justification when communicating its rejection to the Commission.
(28c) When accepted, the obligation to perform the priority-rated request should take precedence over any performance obligation under private or public law. Each priority-rated request should be placed at a fair and reasonable price. The calculation of such price may be carried out on the basis of average market prices over recent years, subject to reasons being given for any increase or decrease, for example taking into account inflation or input costs. In light of the importance to ensure the supply of crisis-relevant goods, which are indispensable for the maintenance of vital societal economic activities in the internal market, compliance with the obligation to perform a priority-rated request should not entail liability for damages towards third parties for any breach of contractual obligations governed by the law of a Member State that may result, to the extent the violation of contractual obligations was necessary for compliance with the mandated prioritisation. Economic operators potentially within scope of a priority-rated order may anticipate this possibility in the conditions of their commercial contracts. Without prejudice to the applicability of other provisions, the liability for defective products, provided for by Council Directive 85/374/EEC, is not affected by this liability exemption.
(28d) Where the economic operator has expressly accepted a priority-rated request and the Commission has adopted an implementing act following such an acceptance, the economic operator should comply with all the conditions of that implementing act. Non-compliance by the economic operator with the conditions laid down in the implementing act should result in a loss of the benefit of a waiver of contractual liability. When the non-compliance is intentional or attributable to gross negligence, the economic operator may also be subject to a fine, subject to the proportionality principle. Economic operators which have not explicitly accepted a priority-rated request cannot be subject to any sanctions or fines.
(29) In addition to the current possibility for joint procurement between the Commission and one or more Member States foreseen in the Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Financial Regulation) , one or more Member States should also be able to request the Commission to procure in their name or on their behalf, in order to leverage the purchasing power and negotiating position of the Commission during the internal market vigilance mode and the internal market emergency mode.
Such procurement should mean the acquisition by means of a contract of crisis-relevant works, supplies or services and the acquisition or rental of land, buildings or other immovable property for responding to the crisis, by the contracting authority from economic operators chosen by that contracting authority. The Commission should be able to conduct the relevant procurement procedure in the name of or on behalf of Member States based on an agreement between the parties, or act as a wholesaler, by buying, stocking and reselling or donating supplies and services, including rentals, to the participating Member States or partner organisations it has selected.
It became clear during the COVID-19 pandemic that the Commission should be able to procure crisis-relevant goods and services jointly with third countries, such as the EFTA states and the European microstates.
Any joint procurement procedures launched for the acquisition of crisis-relevant goods and services or goods and services of critical importance should not negatively affect the functioning of the internal market and should not constitute discrimination or a restriction of trade, nor should such procurement procedures cause distortion of competition or have any direct financial impact on the budget of the countries that do not participate in the joint procurement procedure.
It is also essential to ensure that Member States coordinate their actions with the support of the Commission and the Board prior to launching procedures for the procurement of crisis-relevant goods and services. During contingency phase, Member States should put in place a system which would allow to identify during emergencies which contracting authorities subject to Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council are procuring the crisis-relevant goods and services. Member States should be able to rely on the central liaison offices for collection and transmission of information about ongoing and intended procurement by the contracting authorities and contracting entities in their territory for the purposes of compliance with the coordination clause under this Regulation.
The agreement governing the Commission’s procurement on behalf of or in the name of one or more Member States or joint procurement between the Commission and one or more Member States should where appropriate, provide for an exclusivity clause, under which participating countries commit to not procuring the goods or services in question through other channels and to not running parallel negotiation processes.
Where such an exclusivity clause is provided for, it should stipulate that where Member States have additional procurement needs and such procurement does not undermine the ongoing joint procurement or procurement on behalf of or in the name of the Member States according to the assessment of the Commission, the participating Member States may launch their own procurement procedure. Having in mind the purpose of the exclusivity clause not to undermine the ongoing joint procurement or procurement on behalf of or in the name of the Member States, which would not be affected by a de minimis procurement, it may be permitted for Member States’ contracting authorities and contracting entities to launch a procurement procedure which falls below the thresholds of Directives 2014/24/EU and 2014/25/EU. Given that procurement from an economic operator that is not participating in the ongoing tender would not undermine the ongoing procurement, the exclusivity clause laid down in Article 39 should also not apply to this kind of procurement.
Where a Member State decides to participate in joint procurement or procurement on behalf of or in the name of Member States for acquiring crisis-relevant goods and services, it should be able to use the central liaison offices provided for in this Regulation to inform all contracting authorities and contracting entities in its territory of such ongoing procurement, which will trigger the application of the exclusivity clause.
Transparency is a core principle of effective public procurement that improves competition, increases efficiency and creates a level playing field. The European Parliament should be informed about procedures concerning joint procurements under this Regulation and, upon request, be granted access to the contracts concluded as a result of those procedures, subject to the adequate protection of secrecy and protection of any personal data, the national security of the Member States and commercially sensitive information, including business secrets.
(29a) The Member States should act in solidarity during crisis and may therefore, when the emergency mode has been activated, be encouraged by the Commission to share the crisis-relevant goods and services that the Member State in question might have at their disposal to be distributed to another Member State in need. The Commission should help to coordinate this distribution.
(30) Where the Commission is informed by one or more Member States of shortages of crisis-relevant goods and services or a risk thereof, the Commission should be able to recommend to the Member States ▌ to take measures aimed at ensuring the swift increase of the availability of crisis-relevant goods and services. The Commission should consider the impact of the envisaged measures on the concerned economic operators. Such recommendations may include measures aimed at facilitating the expansion, repurposing or establishment of new production capacities for crisis-relevant goods or new capacities related to crisis-relevant service activities as well as aimed at accelerating the relevant and applicable approval, authorisation and registration requirements.
▌
▌
(32a) It is necessary to provide information holders with safeguards that the information that they have provided as a result of the application of this Regulation is processed and used respecting the principles of necessity and proportionality. Information received via monitoring, information requests and priority rated requests, may therefore only be used by any Union institution or body, Member State authority and their staff as well any individuals, including the members and observers of the Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Board, only for the purpose for which it was requested.
(32b) Given that the Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Board acts as an advisory body to the Commission, it must respect the Commission’s principles, standards and rules for protecting classified information and sensitive non-classified information including, inter alia, provisions for processing and storage of such information as set out in Commission Decisions (EU, Euratom) 2015/443 and (EU, Euratom) 2015/444. Staff members of the Commission and other Union institutions and bodies that have access to the classified information and sensitive non-classified information relating to the work of the Board are bound by the confidentiality requirements under Article 339 TFEU, even after their duties have ceased.
(33) Where the Commission is informed by one or more Member States of shortages of crisis-relevant goods and services, the Commission should transmit the information to all competent authorities of the Member States and streamline the coordination of the response. Furthermore, to ensure availability of crisis-relevant goods and services during an internal market emergency and with a view to ending the internal market emergency, the Commission may recommend that the Member States distribute those crisis-relevant goods or services, having ▌ due regard to the principles of solidarity, necessity and proportionality.
(34) Where the activities to be carried out pursuant to this Regulation involve the processing of personal data, such processing should comply with the relevant Union legislation on personal data protection, namely Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
(35) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission as regards specifications of the contingency framework regarding preparedness cooperation, exchange of information and crisis communication for the internal market vigilance and emergency modes. Moreover, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission as regards the possibility to adopt administrative arrangements and templates for facilitating free movement of persons. Moreover, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission as regards activation of specific emergency response measures at the time of an internal market emergency, to allow for a rapid and coordinated response. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
(35a) The Commission should adopt immediately applicable implementing acts where, in duly justified cases relating to the impacts of the crisis on the internal market, imperative grounds of urgency so require.
(36) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the ‘Charter’). In particular, it respects the right to privacy of the economic operators enshrined in Article 7 of the Charter, right to data protection set out in Article 8 of the Charter, the freedom to conduct business and the freedom of contract, which are protected by Article 16 of the Charter, the right to property, protected by Article 17 of the Charter, right to collective bargaining and action protected by Article 28 of the Charter and the right to an effective judicial remedy and to a fair trial as provided for in Article 47 of the Charter. ▌
(36a) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely to ensure the smooth and undisrupted functioning of the internal market by putting in place contingency, vigilance and emergency measures across the internal market in order to facilitate the coordination of the response measures in the case of a crisis, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can rather, by reason of the scale or effects of the action, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty. In accordance with the principle of proportionality as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective. The Regulation should not affect the autonomy of the social partners as recognised by the TFEU.
(36b) This Regulation should not be interpreted as affecting the right to environmental protection, the right of collective bargaining and the right to take collective action in accordance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the Charter’), including the right of workers and employees to take collective action to defend their interests, including strike action, and the right or freedom to strike or to take other action covered by the specific industrial relation systems in Member States in accordance with national law or practice.
(36c) Other Union legal acts, such as those providing for obligations on economic operators to make data available to public sector bodies, do not affect this Regulation. Therefore where other Union legal acts also contain provisions on information requests by the Commission which have the same purpose as those provided for under this Regulation after the emergency mode has been activated by the Council, only the relevant provisions of this Regulation should apply.
(37) The Union remains fully committed to international solidarity and strongly supports the principle that any measures deemed necessary taken under this Regulation, including those necessary to prevent or relieve critical shortages, are implemented in a manner that is targeted, transparent, proportionate, temporary and consistent with WTO obligations.
(37) Any actions under this Regulation should be consistent with the Union’s obligations under the relevant international law. The Union remains fully committed to international solidarity and strongly supports the principle that any measures deemed necessary taken under this Regulation, including those necessary to prevent or relieve critical shortages, are implemented in a manner that is targeted, transparent, proportionate, temporary and consistent with WTO obligations.
(38) The Union framework should include interregional elements to establish coherent, multi-sectoral, cross-border internal market vigilance and emergency response measures, in particular considering the resources, capacities and vulnerabilities across neighbouring regions, specifically border regions.
Or. en
▌
Justification
▌
Moved from Art. 2.7 because it only restates the hierarchy of norms.
▌
Amendment 12
▌
Proposal for a regulation
▌
Article 1 – paragraph 1
▌
Text proposed by the Commission
▌
Amendment
▌
1. This Regulation establishes a framework of measures to anticipate, prepare for and respond to impacts of crises on the Single Market, with the purpose of safeguarding the free movement of goods, services and persons and of ensuring the availability of goods and services of strategic importance and crisis-relevant goods and services in the Single Market.
▌
1. The aim of this Regulation is to contribute to the proper functioning of the internal market by setting out a framework of harmonised rules to strengthen its resilience, to ensure an effective response to crisis and to facilitate the free movement of goods, services and persons.
▌
Or. en
(41g) It is necessary to lay down rules on digital tools in order to ensure preparedness for responding to possible future emergencies in a timely and efficient manner to guarantee the continued functioning of the internal market, the free circulation of goods, services and persons in times of crisis and the availability of crisis-relevant goods and services to citizens, businesses and public authorities. This Regulation should also set out rules for digital tools ensuring prioritisation and acceleration of authorisation, registration or declaration procedures to facilitate the free movement of persons and the secure transmission and exchange of information. The Commission and the Member States should reuse or expand to the extent possible their existing digital tools. When this is not possible, the Commission and the Member States should establish, where necessary and justified, new digital tools. The Commission should set out the technical aspects of such tools or infrastructures by means of implementing acts. Furthermore, in order to enhance involvement of all economic actors, in particular businesses and civil society, the Commission should set up a stakeholder platform to facilitate and encourage voluntary response to internal market emergencies.
Amendment 13
▌
Proposal for a regulation
▌
Article 1 – paragraph 2
(41j) The Commission should carry out a regular evaluation of the functioning and effectiveness of this Regulation and submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council, including an evaluation of the work of the Board, stress tests, training and crisis protocols, the criteria for the activation of the emergency mode as well as the use of digital tools. Furthermore, reports should be submitted by 4 months after the deactivation of the internal market vigilance and emergency modes. Those reports should include an evaluation of the measures implemented under this Regulation in relation to the crisis that lead to such an activation, in particular on the effectiveness of those measures. Those reports could suggest any improvements if necessary, and be accompanied, where appropriate, by relevant legislative proposals.
Text proposed by the Commission
▌
Amendment
▌
2. The measures referred to in paragraph 1 include:
▌
deleted
(41n) Council Regulation (EC) No 2679/98 provides for a mechanism for bilateral discussions and notification of obstacles to the functioning of the internal market. In order to avoid the duplication of rules where the internal market emergency mode has been activated, that Council Regulation should therefore be amended accordingly. Regulation (EC) No 2679/98 should not in any way affect the exercise of fundamental rights as recognised in the Member States and at Union level, including the right or freedom to strike or to take other action covered by the specific industrial relations systems in Member States, in accordance with national law or practice. It should also be without prejudice to the right to negotiate and to conclude collective agreements, to take collective action in accordance with national law or practice.
(a) an advisory group to advise the Commission on the appropriate measures for anticipating, preventing or responding to the impact of a crisis on the Single Market;
▌
(b) measures for obtaining, sharing and exchanging the relevant information;
Part I
(c) contingency measures aiming at anticipation and planning;
Title I Scope
(d) measures for addressing Single Market impacts of significant incidents that have not yet resulted in a Single Market emergency (Single Market vigilance), including a set of vigilance measures and
Article 1
(e) measures for addressing Single Market emergencies, including a set of emergency response measures.
Subject matter and objectives
Or. en
1. This Regulation establishes a framework of harmonised measures to effectively anticipate, prepare for and respond to the impact of crises on the internal market.
Justification
1a. The framework referred to in paragraph 1 aims to:
These paragraphs are not suitable to describing the subject matter or clarifying the objective of this regulation.
(a) safeguard and facilitate the free movement of goods, services and persons, including workers;
Amendment 14
(b) ensuring the availability of goods and services of critical importance and crisis-relevant goods and services in the internal market where the Member States have adopted or are likely to adopt divergent national measures; and
Proposal for a regulation
(c) prevent the creation of obstacles to the proper functioning of the internal market.
Article 1 – paragraph 3
2. This Regulation lays down, in particular:
Text proposed by the Commission
(a) rules on the establishment and functioning of an Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Board to assist and advise the Commission in anticipating, preventing or responding to the impact of a crisis on the internal market;
Amendment
▌
3. Member States shall regularly exchange information on all matters falling within the scope of this Regulation among themselves and with the Commission.
(c) contingency measures aiming at anticipation, planning and resilience;
deleted
(d) measures during the internal market vigilance mode for addressing the impacts of a crisis that has the potential to escalate into an internal market emergency;
Or. en
(e) measures, during the internal market emergency mode, for addressing a crisis on the internal market, including facilitating the free movement of goods, services and persons, including workers, during internal market emergency mode;
Justification
(ea) rules on public procurement during the internal market vigilance and emergency modes;
These paragraphs are not suitable to describing the subject matter or clarifying the objective of this regulation.
(eb) rules on the provision of digital tools and the cooperation between the competent authorities.
Amendment 15
▌
Proposal for a regulation
▌
Article 1 – paragraph 4
Article 2
Text proposed by the Commission
Scope ▌
Amendment
1. ▌This Regulation applies to goods, services and persons, including workers within the internal market▌ .
4. The Commission may obtain any relevant specialised and/or scientific knowledge, which is necessary for the application of this Regulation.
2. This Regulation shall not apply to the following:
deleted
(a) medicinal products as defined in Article 1, point 2 of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council;
Or. en
(b) medical devices as defined in Article 2, point (e), of Regulation (EU) 2022/123 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
Justification
(c) other medical countermeasures as defined in Article 3, point (10), of Regulation (EU) 2022/2371 and included in the list established in accordance with Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2372;
These paragraphs are not suitable to describing the subject matter or clarifying the objective of this regulation.
(d) semiconductors as defined in Article 2, point (1) of Regulation EU) 2023/1781 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
Amendment 16
(e) energy products as defined in Article 2, paragraph 1, of Council Directive 2003/96/EC, electricity as defined in Article 2, paragraph 2 of that Directive and other products as referred to in Article 2, paragraph 3, of that Directive;
Proposal for a regulation
(f) financial services, such as banking, credit, insurance and re-insurance, occupational or personal pensions, securities, investment funds, payment and investment advice, including the services listed in Annex I to Directive 2013/36/EU, as well as settlement and clearing activities and advisory, intermediation and other auxiliary financial services;
Article 2 – title
(g) defence-related products as defined in Article 3 paragraph 1 of Directive 2009/43/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 6 May 2009 simplifying terms and conditions of transfers of defence-related products within the Community or as defined by national law of Member States in compliance of Union law;
Text proposed by the Commission
3. By way of derogation from paragraph 2, points (a), (b) and (c), Articles 16 to 19 and Article 41 ▌ shall apply to the products referred to in those points.
Amendment
▌
Scope of application
4. This Regulation is without prejudice to other legal acts of the Union laying down specific rules on crisis response or crisis management, such as:
Scope
(a) Union Civil Protection Mechanism set out in Decision No 2013/1313/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council;
Or. en
(b) Regulation (EU) 2015/479;
Amendment 17
(c) Regulation (EU) 2022/2371 on serious cross-border threats to health, the HERA Crisis Regulation (EU) 2022/2372;
Proposal for a regulation
(d) the Integrated Political Crisis Response (IPCR) arrangements operated by the Council under Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1993 and Council Decision 2014/415/EU establishing the Integrated Political Crisis Response (IPCR) arrangements including the political coordination role of the IPCR.
Article 2 – paragraph 1
▌
Text proposed by the Commission
▌
Amendment
▌
1. The measures set out in this Regulation apply in relation to significant impacts of a crisis on the functioning of the Single Market and its supply chains.
▌
1. The measures set out in this Regulation apply in relation to significant impacts of a crisis on the functioning of the internal market and its supply chains.
▌
Or. en
▌
Amendment 18
▌
Proposal for a regulation
5. This Regulation is without prejudice to Union competition rules ▌ , including antitrust, merger and State aid rules.
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a
▌
Text proposed by the Commission
▌ ▌
Amendment
▌
(a) medicinal products as defined in Article 2, paragraph 2 of Directive 2001/83/EC;
▌
(a) medicinal products as defined in Article 1, point 2 of Directive 2001/83/EC;
▌
Or. en
▌
Amendment 19
8. This Regulation is without prejudice to the responsibility of the Member States to safeguard national security or their power to safeguard essential state functions, including ensuring the territorial integrity of the State and maintaining law and order. In particular, national security remains the sole responsibility of each Member State.
Proposal for a regulation
8a. This Regulation shall not affect the exercise of fundamental rights, in accordance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the ‘Charter’). In particular the right to strike or the right to take other action covered by the specific industrial relations systems in Member States, in accordance with national law and practice. It also shall not affect the right to negotiate, to conclude and enforce collective agreements, or to take collective action in accordance with national law and practice.
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c
▌
Text proposed by the Commission
Article 3
Amendment
Definitions
(c) other medical countermeasures as defined in Article 3, point (8), of Regulation (EU) …/… on Serious Cross-Border Threats to Health [the SCBTH Regulation]44 and included in the list established in accordance with Article 6(1) of the proposal for] Council Regulation (EU) …/… on a framework of measures for ensuring the supply of crisis-relevant medical countermeasures45 ;
For the purposes of this Regulation, the following definitions apply:
(c) other medical countermeasures as defined in Article 3, point (10), of Regulation (EU) 2022/2371 of the European Parliament and of the Council44;
(1) ‘crisis’ means an exceptional, unexpected and sudden, natural or man-made event of extraordinary nature and scale that takes place inside or outside of the Union which has or may have a severe negative impact on the functioning of the internal market and disrupts the free movement of goods, services and persons or its supply chains;
__________________
(2) ‘internal market vigilance mode’ means a framework for addressing the threat of a crisis, which has the potential to escalate into an internal market emergency within the next six months;
__________________
(3) ‘internal market emergency mode’ means a framework for addressing a crisis with significant negative impact on the internal market that severely disrupts the free movement of goods, services and persons or, where such a severe disruption has been or is likely to be subject to divergent national measures, the functioning of the supply chains;
44 [reference to adopted Act to be inserted once available]
(4) ‘critically important areas’ means those areas with critical importance to the Union and its Member States, in that they are of systemic and vital importance for upholding public security, public safety, public order or public health, and if there is a disruption, failure, loss or destruction of which it can have a significant negative impact on the functioning of the internal market in times of a threat of a crisis;
44 Regulation (EU) 2022/2371 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 November 2022 on serious cross-border threats to health and repealing Decision No 1082/2013/EU (OJ L 314, 6.12.2022, p. 26.).
(5) ‘goods and services of critical importance’ means goods and services that are non-substitutable, non-diversifiable or indispensable in the maintenance of vital societal or economic activities in order to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and its supply chains in critically important areas;
45 [reference to adopted Act to be inserted once available]
(6) ‘crisis-relevant goods and services’ means goods and services that are non-substitutable, non-diversifiable or indispensable in the maintenance of vital or societal economic activities in order to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market, including the functioning of its supply chains and that are considered essential for responding to a crisis;
Or. en
▌
Amendment 20
▌
Proposal for a regulation
(7a) ‘significant incidents’ means incidents that significantly disrupt or have the potential to significantly disrupt the functioning of the internal market and its supply chains;
Article 2 – paragraph 5
(7b) ‘relevant economic operator’ means an economic operator along the supply chain that has the ability or capacity to produce or distribute any of the following: (a) goods and services of critical importance; (b) crisis-relevant goods or services; (c) components for the goods referred to in point (a) and (b);
Text proposed by the Commission
Title II Governance
Amendment
Article 4
5. This Regulation is without prejudice to Union competition rules (Articles 101 to 109 TFEU and implementing regulations), including antitrust, merger and State aid rules.
Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Board
5. This Regulation is without prejudice to Union competition rules, including antitrust, merger and State aid rules.
1. An Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Board (the 'Board') is established.
Or. en
2. The Board shall be composed of one representative from each Member State and one representative from the Commission. Each Member State shall appoint a representative and an alternate representative. In addition, Member States may appoint a sector-specific ad hoc representative if this is appropriate depending on the nature of the crisis.
Amendment 21
3. The Commission shall chair the Board and provide its secretariat.
Proposal for a regulation
The Chair shall invite a representative from the European Parliament as a permanent observer to the Board.
Article 2 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
The Chair may invite experts with specific expertise to take part, as observers, in the work of the Board and to attend specific meetings, on an ad-hoc basis, where such attendance is relevant considering the agenda of the meeting. Such experts may include representatives of economic operators, stakeholder organisations and social partners.
Text proposed by the Commission
The Chair shall invite the representatives of other crisis-relevant bodies at Union level as observers to the relevant meetings of the Board.
Amendment
The Chair shall invite representatives of international organisations and third countries in meetings of the Board in accordance with the relevant bilateral or international agreements.
6. This Regulation is without prejudice to the Commission:
Observers shall not have voting rights and shall not participate in the formulation of opinions, recommendations or advice of the Board. Where appropriate, the Chair may invite those observers to contribute with information and insights.
6. This Regulation is without prejudice to Union law on the protection of personal data, in particular Regulations (EU) 2016/679 and (EU) 2018/1725 and Directive 2002/58/EC;
▌
(a) entering into consultations or cooperation, on behalf of the Union, with relevant third countries, with particular attention paid to developing countries, with a view to seeking cooperative solutions to avoid supply chain disruptions, in compliance with international obligations. This may involve, where appropriate, coordination in relevant international fora; or
3a. The Board shall meet at least three times a year. At its first meeting, on a proposal by and in agreement with the Commission, the Board shall adopt its rules of procedure.
(b) assessing whether it is appropriate to impose restrictions to exports of goods in line with the international rights and obligations of the Union under Regulation (EU) 2015/479 of the European Parliament and of the Council48 .
▌
________________________
3b. The Board may adopt opinions, recommendations or reports in the context of its tasks set out in Article 4a. The Commission shall in a transparent manner take the utmost account of opinions, recommendations or reports by the Board.
48 OJ L 83, 27.3.2015, p. 34.
▌ Article 4a
Or. en
Tasks of the Board
Amendment 22
1. For the purpose of contingency planning under Articles 6 to 8, the Board shall assist and advise the Commission as regards the following tasks:
Proposal for a regulation
(a) proposing arrangements for administrative cooperation to facilitate the exchange of information between the Commission and the Member States at the time of the internal market vigilance and emergency modes that would be contained in the contingency framework referred to in Article 6;
Article 2 – paragraph 7
(b) assessing incidents that the Member States have alerted the Commission in accordance with in Article 8 and their impact on the internal market and its supply chains;
Text proposed by the Commission
▌
Amendment
7. Any actions under this Regulation shall be consistent with Union’s obligations under international law
deleted
Or. en
Justification
Moved to Recital 37 as this only restates the hierarchy of norms.
Amendment 23
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 8
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
8. This Regulation is without prejudice to the responsibility of the Member States to safeguard national security or their power to safeguard essential state functions, including ensuring the territorial integrity of the State and maintaining law and order.
deleted
Or. en
Justification
Member States should be able to pursue legitimate public interests, including that of national security, while respecting the Treaties. Therefore, this was moved to Art. 16.
Amendment 24
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(1) ‘crisis’ means an exceptional unexpected and sudden, natural or man-made event of extraordinary nature and scale that takes place inside or outside of the Union;
(1) ‘crisis’ means an exceptional , natural or man-made event of extraordinary nature and scale that takes place inside or outside of the Union, which has a detrimental impact on the free movement of goods, services or persons;
Or. en
Justification
The crisis definition should be clearly linked to the objective of the regulation and provide certainty on when crisis measures can be activated.
Amendment 25
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(2) ‘Single Market vigilance mode’ means a framework for addressing a threat of significant disruption of the supply of goods and services of strategic importance and which has the potential to escalate into a Single Market emergency within the next six months;
(2) ‘internal market vigilance mode’ means a framework for addressing a threat of significant disruption of the supply of goods and services of critical importance and which has the potential to escalate into an internal market emergency within the next six months;
Or. en
Amendment 26
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(3) ‘Single Market emergency’ means a wide-ranging impact of a crisis on the Single Market that severely disrupts the free movement on the Single Market or the functioning of the supply chains that are indispensable in the maintenance of vital societal or economic activities in the Single Market;
(3) ‘internal market emergency’ means a wide-ranging impact of a crisis on the internal market that severely disrupts the free movement of goods, services and persons, or the functioning of the supply chains that are indispensable in the maintenance of vital societal or economic activities in the internal market;
Or. en
Amendment 27
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(4) ‘strategically important areas’ means those areas with critical importance to the Union and its Member States, in that they are of systemic and vital importance for public security, public safety, public order or public health, and the disruption, failure, loss or destruction of which would have a significant impact on the functioning of the Single Market;
(4) ‘critically important areas’ means areas with critical importance to the Union and its Member States which are of systemic and vital importance for public security, public safety, public order or public health, and the disruption, failure, loss or destruction of which would have a significant impact on the functioning of the internal market;
Or. en
Amendment 28
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(5) ‘goods and services of strategic importance’ means goods and services that are indispensable for ensuring the functioning of the Single Market in strategically important areas and which cannot be substituted or diversified;
(5) ‘goods and services of critical importance’ means goods and services that are indispensable for ensuring the functioning of the internal market in critically important areas and which cannot be substituted or diversified;
Or. en
Amendment 29
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(6) ‘crisis-relevant goods and services’ means goods and services that are indispensable for responding to the crisis or for addressing the impacts of the crisis on the Single Market during a Single Market emergency ;
(6) ‘crisis-relevant goods and services’ means goods and services that are indispensable for responding to the crisis or for addressing the impacts of the crisis on the internal market during an internal market emergency ;
Or. en
Amendment 30
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(7) ‘strategic reserves’ means a stock of goods of strategic importance for which building a reserve may be necessary to prepare for a Single Market emergency, under the control of a Member State.
(7) ‘strategic reserves’ means a stock of goods of critical importance under the control of a Member State for which building a reserve may be necessary to prepare for an internal market emergency.
Or. en
Amendment 31
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – title
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
Advisory group
Advisory board
Or. en
Amendment 32
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
1. An advisory group is established.
1. An advisory board is established.
Or. en
Amendment 33
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
2. The advisory group shall be composed of one representative from each Member State. Each Member State shall nominate a representative and an alternate representative.
2. The advisory board shall be composed of one representative from each Member State. Each Member State shall nominate a representative and an alternate representative. European Free Trade Association (EFTA) States may participate as observers in accordance with the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as well as in accordance with the bilateral agreements between the Union and the Swiss Confederation.
Or. en
Justification
The internal market is not only made up of EU member states, and the Covid pandemic has shown that a fragmented response across the continent can be detrimental to all.
Amendment 34
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
3. The Commission shall chair the advisory group and ensure its secretariat. The Commission may invite a representative of the European Parliament, representatives of EFTA States that are contracting parties to the Agreement on the European Economic Area49 , representatives of economic operators, stakeholder organisations, social partners and experts, to attend meetings of the advisory group as observers. It shall invite the representatives of other crisis-relevant bodies at Union level as observers to the relevant meetings of the advisory group.
3. The Commission shall chair the advisory board and provide its secretariat. Where appropriate, the Commission may establish standing or temporary sub-groups of the advisory board for the purpose of examining specific questions.
__________________
__________________
49 OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3.
49 OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3.
Or. en
Justification
Participation of EFTA states is moved to Art 4.2, granting them observer status.
Amendment 35
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
3a. The Commission may invite organisations representing all interested parties, in particular representatives of economic operators, stakeholder organisations and social partners, to attend meetings of the advisory board as observers. The Commission may also invite experts with a specific competence in a crisis-relevant subject to participate in the work of the board on an ad hoc basis.
Or. en
Amendment 36
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
4. For the purpose of contingency planning under Articles 6 to 8, the advisory group shall assist and advise the Commission as regards the following tasks:
4. For the purpose of contingency planning under Articles 6 to 8, the advisory board shall assist and advise the Commission as regards the following tasks:
Or. en
Amendment 37
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – point a
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(a) proposing arrangements for administrative cooperation between the Commission and the Member States at the time of the Single Market vigilance and emergency modes that would be contained in the crisis protocols;
(a) proposing arrangements for administrative cooperation between the Commission and the Member States at the time of the internal market vigilance and emergency modes that would be contained in the crisis protocols;
Or. en
Amendment 38
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – point b a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(ba) recommending Member States to build a reserve of a critical good in order to prepare for an internal market emergency, taking into account the probability and impact of shortages;
Or. en
Amendment 39
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – point b b (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(bb) gathering foresight on the possibility of a crisis occurring, conducting data analysis and providing market intelligence;
Or. en
(bc) consulting the representatives of economic operators, including SMEs, and the industry, as well as, where relevant, social partners, in order to collect market intelligence in line with Article 40a;
Amendment 40
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – point b c (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(bc) consulting the representatives of economic operators, including SMEs, and representative organisations in order to collect market intelligence;
Or. en
Amendment 41
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – point b d (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(bd) analysing aggregated data received by other crisis-relevant bodies at Union and international level;
Or. en
(be) maintaining a repository of national and Union crisis measures that have been used in previous crises and that have had an impact on the internal market and its supply chains;
Amendment 42
(bf) advising on the identification and implementation of the measures chosen to anticipate and plan, while strengthening the internal market’s resilience, in accordance with Articles 6 to 8.
Proposal for a regulation
2. For the purpose of the internal market vigilance mode as referred to in Article 9, the Board shall assist and advise the Commission in the following tasks:
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – point b e (new)
(a) establishing whether the criteria for activation or deactivation of the vigilance mode have been fulfilled in order to determine whether the crisis threat referred to in Article 3(2) is present, and the scope of such threat;
Text proposed by the Commission
▌
Amendment
▌
(be) maintaining a repository of national and Union crisis measures that have been used in previous crises and that have had an impact on the internal market and its supply chains.
▌
Or. en
(e) coordinating and facilitating exchanges and sharing of information, including with other relevant bodies and other crisis-relevant bodies at Union level and in Member States, as well as third countries, as appropriate, with particular attention paid to developing countries, and international organisations;
Amendment 43
▌
Proposal for a regulation
▌
Article 4 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
(fa) analysing and discussing the effect of the crisis on the internal market, with due regard to the situation in border regions, with a view to finding possible solutions.
Text proposed by the Commission
3. For the purposes of the internal market emergency mode as referred to in Article 14, the Board shall assist and advise the Commission in the following tasks:
Amendment
(a) analysing crisis-relevant information gathered by Member States or the Commission;
5. For the purpose of of the Single Market vigilance mode as referred to in Article 9, the advisory group shall assist the Commission in the following tasks:
(b) establishing whether the criteria for activation or deactivation of the emergency mode have been fulfilled;
5. For the purpose of the internal market vigilance mode as referred to in Article 9, the advisory board shall assist the Commission in the following tasks:
(c) advising on the identification and implementation of the measures chosen to respond to internal market emergency at Union level;
Or. en
(d) performing a review of national crisis measures;
Amendment 44
(e) coordinating and facilitating exchanges and sharing of information, including with other crisis-relevant bodies at Union level, as well as, as appropriate, third countries, with particular attention paid to EFTA members, candidate countries to the EU, developing countries, and international organisations;
Proposal for a regulation
(ea) analysing and discussing the effect of the crisis on the internal market, with due regard to the situation in border regions, with a view to finding possible solutions; and
Article 4 – paragraph 5 – point b
(eb) establishing, where appropriate, a list of categories of persons involved in the production or supply of crisis-relevant goods and services for whom it is necessary to establish common templates and forms which can be used by the Member States on a voluntary basis.
Text proposed by the Commission
4. The Commission shall ensure the participation of all bodies at Union level that are relevant to the respective crisis. The Board shall cooperate and coordinate closely, where appropriate, with other relevant crisis-related bodies at Union level and the European Critical Raw Materials Board established by Regulation (EU) .../2024+25. The Commission shall ensure coordination with the measures implemented through other Union mechanisms, such as the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM), the Integrated Political Crisis Response (IPCR) arrangements, or the EU Health Security Framework and the European critical raw materials framework. The Board shall ensure information exchange with the Emergency Response Coordination Centre under the UCPM and the Integrated Situational Awareness and Analysis (ISAA) support capability under the IPCR.
Amendment
▌
(b) gathering foresight, data analysis and market intelligence;
4a. The Board shall, in cooperation with the Commission, adopt annually its activity report and transmit it to the European Parliament and the Council.
deleted
▌
Or. en
Article 4b
Justification
Emergency and Resilience Dialogue
moved to Art. 8a (new)
1. In order to enhance the dialogue between the institutions of the Union in the context of this Regulation, and to ensure greater transparency, accountability and coordination, the competent committee of the European Parliament may invite the Commission in its capacity as Chair of the Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Board to appear before the committee to provide information on all matters falling within the scope of this Regulation, in particular, after each meeting of the Board and after each deactivation of the vigilance or emergency modes.
Amendment 45
2. The European Parliament shall be informed as soon as possible of any Council implementing acts proposed or adopted pursuant to this Regulation.
Proposal for a regulation
3. The Commission shall take into account any elements arising from the views expressed through the emergency and resilience dialogue, including the relevant resolutions of the European Parliament.
Article 4 – paragraph 5 – point c
▌
Text proposed by the Commission
▌
Amendment
▌
(c) consulting the representatives of economic operators, including SMEs, and industry to collect market intelligence;
▌
deleted
Article 4c
Or. en
Emergency and resilience platform
Justification
1. The Commission shall establish a stakeholder platform in order to facilitate sector-specific dialogue and partnerships by bringing together key stakeholders, namely representatives of economic operators, social partners, researchers and civil society. In particular, that platform shall provide a functionality that allows interested stakeholders to:
moved to Art. 8a (new)
(a) indicate voluntary actions needed to successfully respond to an internal market emergency;
Amendment 46
(b) provide scientific advice, opinions or reports on crisis-related issues;
Proposal for a regulation
(c) contribute to the exchange of information and best practices. in particular as regards the free movement of goods, services and persons and the avoidance of divergent national measures which could create cross-border restrictions.
Article 4 – paragraph 5 – point d
2. The Commission and the Board shall take into account the outcomes of the sector-specific dialogue and partnerships, as well as any relevant input provided by stakeholders in accordance with paragraph 1 in the implementation of this Regulation.
Text proposed by the Commission
Article 5
Amendment
Central liaison offices
(d) analysing aggregated data received by other crisis-relevant bodies at Union and international level;
1. Each Member State shall designate a central liaison office ▌ .
deleted
1a. The central liaison office of a Member State shall be responsible for contacts, coordination and information exchange with:
Or. en
(a) the central liaison offices of other Member States and the Union level central liaison office referred to in paragraph 2;
Justification
(b) the relevant competent authorities in that Member State, in particular with the national single point of contact in Article 21.
moved to Art. 8a (new)
1b. In order to perform its tasks under this Regulation, the central liaison office of a Member State shall compile input from the relevant competent authorities in that Member State.
Amendment 47
▌
Proposal for a regulation
2. The Commission shall designate a Union level ▌ liaison office ▌ .
Article 4 – paragraph 5 – point f
2a. The Union level liaison office shall be responsible for ensuring the coordination and information exchange with the central liaison offices of the Member States for the management of the internal market vigilance and emergency modes, including as regards crisis-relevant information.
Text proposed by the Commission
Part II
Amendment
Internal market contingency planning
(f) maintaining a repository of national and Union crisis measures that have been used in previous crises that have had an impact on the Single Market and its supply chains
Article 6
deleted
Contingency framework
Or. en
1. The Commission, taking due consideration of the opinion of the Board and the input of relevant Union level bodies, may adopt an implementing act to set out the detailed arrangements for a contingency framework regarding crisis preparedness, cooperation, exchange of information and crisis communication for the internal market vigilance and emergency modes. That implementing act shall set out the detailed arrangements for:
Justification
(a) cooperation between Member States and Union level competent authorities in the internal market vigilance and emergency modes;
moved to Art. 8a (new)
(b) ▌ secure exchange of information; and
Amendment 48
(c) a coordinated approach to crisis communication for the internal market vigilance and emergency modes vis-à-vis the public with a coordinating role for the Commission;
Proposal for a regulation
▌
Article 4 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
1a. The implementing act referred to in paragraph 1 shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 42(2).
Text proposed by the Commission
2. The Commission and the Member States shall ensure arrangements for ▌ timely cooperation and secure exchange of information between the Commission, the relevant Union-level bodies and the Member States concerning:
Amendment
(a) an inventory of competent authorities of the Member States, the central liaison offices designated in accordance with Article 5 and the single points of contact referred to in Article 21, their contact details, assigned roles and responsibilities during the vigilance and emergency modes under this Regulation, in accordance with national law;
6. For the purposes of the Single Market emergency mode as referred to in Article 14, the advisory group shall assist the Commission in the following tasks:
(b) consultation of the representatives of economic operators ▌ , including SMEs, on their initiatives and actions to mitigate and respond to potential internal market crisis;
6. For the purposes of the internal market emergency mode as referred to in Article 14, the advisory board shall assist the Commission in the following tasks:
(ba) consultation of social partners on the implications of their initiatives and actions to mitigate and respond to a potential of the crisis on the free movement of workers;
Or. en
(c) technical level cooperation in the vigilance and emergency modes ▌ ;
Amendment 49
(d) risk and emergency communication, with a coordinating role for the Commission, ▌ taking into account already existing structures;
Proposal for a regulation
3. In order to ensure the operation of the framework established in accordance with paragraph 1, the Commission may conduct stress tests, simulations and in-action and after-action reviews with Member States, and propose the relevant Union-level bodies and the Member States to update the framework as necessary
Article 4 – paragraph 6 – point c
3a. In order to promote and facilitate the free movement of goods and services during an internal market emergency mode, the Commission shall assist Member States and coordinate their efforts in laying down single digital forms for the purpose of declaration, registration or authorisation for activities carried out between Member States
Text proposed by the Commission
Article 6a (new)
Amendment
Voluntary crisis protocols
(c) advising on the implementation of the measures chosen to respond to Single Market emergency at Union level;
1. The Board may recommend the Commission to initiate the drawing up of voluntary crisis protocols by economic operators for addressing crisis under the emergency mode.
(c) advising on the implementation of the measures chosen to respond to the internal market emergency at internal market level;
2. The Commission shall encourage and facilitate the drawing up of those voluntary crisis protocols by economic operators. Economic operators may decide, on a voluntary basis, whether to participate or not in voluntary crisis protocols.
Or. en
3. The voluntary crisis protocols shall set out:
Amendment 50
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
7. The Commission shall ensure the participation of all bodies at Union level that are relevant to the respective crisis. The advisory group shall cooperate and coordinate closely, where appropriate, with other relevant crisis-related bodies at Union level. The Commission shall ensure coordination with the measures implemented through other Union mechanisms, such as the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) or the EU Health Security Framework. The advisory group shall ensure information exchange with the Emergency Response Coordination Centre under the UCPM.
7. The Commission shall ensure the participation of all bodies at Union level that are relevant to the respective crisis, including the European Parliament, and shall, in particular, ensure equal access to all information, so that the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time. The advisory board shall cooperate and coordinate closely, where appropriate, with other relevant crisis-related bodies at Union level. The Commission shall ensure coordination with the measures implemented through other Union mechanisms, such as the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) or the EU Health Security Framework. The advisory board shall ensure information exchange with the Emergency Response Coordination Centre under the UCPM.
Or. en
Justification
The European Parliament should be able to oversee the work of the board. To meaningfully oversee the board's work, the European Parliament needs the same degree of access to information as the Council.
Amendment 51
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 8
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
8. The advisory group shall meet at least three times a year. At its first meeting, on a proposal by and in agreement with the Commission, the advisory group shall adopt its rules of procedure.
8. The advisory board shall meet at least three times a year. At its first meeting, on a proposal by and in agreement with the Commission, the advisory board shall adopt its rules of procedure.
Or. en
Amendment 52
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 9
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
9. The advisory group may adopt opinions, recommendations or reports in the context of its tasks set out in paragraphs 4 to 6.
9. The advisory board may adopt opinions, recommendations or reports in the context of its tasks set out in paragraphs 4 to 6.
Or. en
Amendment 53
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
1. Member States shall designate central liaison offices responsible for contacts, coordination and information exchange with the central liaison offices of other Member States and Union level central liaison office under this Regulation. Such liaison offices shall coordinate and compile the inputs from relevant national competent authorities.
1. Member States shall designate central liaison offices responsible for contacts, coordination and information exchange with the central liaison offices of other Member States and Union level central liaison office under this Regulation. Such liaison offices shall coordinate and compile the inputs from relevant national competent authorities. Such liaison offices shall also transmit to the national single points of contact, referred to in Article 21, all crisis-relevant information for the purposes of that Article, in real time where possible.
Or. en
Justification
The uneven flow of information between different agencies and layers of government during the Covid pandemic lead to uncertainty for persons, workers and businesses. Therefore, it should be more streamlined and automated, where possible in real time.
Amendment 54
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
2. The Commission shall designate a Union level central liaison office for contacts with the central liaison offices of the Member States during the Single Market vigilance and emergency modes under this Regulation. The Union level central liaison office shall ensure the coordination and information exchange with the central liaison offices of the Member States for the management of the Single Market vigilance and emergency modes.
2. The Commission shall designate a Union level central liaison office for contacts with the central liaison offices of the Member States during the internal market vigilance and emergency modes under this Regulation. The Union level central liaison office shall ensure the coordination and information exchange with the central liaison offices of the Member States for the management of the internal market vigilance and emergency modes.
Or. en
Amendment 55
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
1. The Commission taking into consideration the opinion of the advisory group and the input of relevant Union level bodies, is empowered after consulting the Member States, to adopt a delegated act to supplement this Regulation with a framework setting out crisis protocols regarding crisis cooperation, exchange of information and crisis communication for the Single Market vigilance and emergency modes, in particular:
1. The Commission, taking into consideration the opinion of the advisory board and the input of relevant Union level bodies, and after consulting the Member States, is empowered to adopt a delegated act to supplement this Regulation with a framework setting out crisis protocols regarding crisis cooperation, exchange of information and crisis communication for the internal market vigilance and emergency modes, in particular:
Or. en
Amendment 56
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(a) cooperation between national and Union level competent authorities for the management of the Single Market vigilance and emergency modes in vigilance and emergency modes across the sectors of the Single Market;
(a) cooperation between national and Union level competent authorities for the management of the internal market vigilance and emergency modes in vigilance and emergency modes across the sectors of the internal market;
Or. en
Amendment 57
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(b) consultation of the representatives of economic operators and social partners, including SMEs, on their initiatives and actions to mitigate and respond to potential supply chain disruptions and overcome potential shortages of goods and services in the Single Market;
(b) consultation of the representatives of economic operators and social partners, including SMEs, on their initiatives and actions to mitigate and respond to potential supply chain disruptions and overcome potential shortages of goods and services in the internal market;
Or. en
Amendment 58
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
2a. The Commission, taking into account the opinion of the advisory board, may initiate, encourage and facilitate the drawing up of voluntary crisis protocols by economic operators in order to address internal market emergencies, strictly limited to extraordinary circumstances. The Commission may, where necessary and appropriate, also involve civil society organisations or other relevant organisations in drawing up the crisis protocols. The voluntary crisis protocols shall set out:
(a) the specific parameters of the disruption that the voluntary crisis protocol seeks to address and the objectives it pursues;
(b) the role of each participant under the voluntary crisis protocol and the preparatory measures they are to put in place inonce preparationthe andinternal theirmarket roleemergency oncemode thehas crisisbeen protocolactivated hasto beenmitigate activated;and respond to the crisis;
(c) thea clear procedure for determining whenthe moment of the activation and the period during which the measures to be taken once the crisis protocol ishas been activated are to be activated;taken;
(d) actions to mitigate and respond to potential supply-chain disruptions and to overcome potential shortages of goods and servicescrisis inunder the internalemergency market,mode, strictly limited to what is necessary for addressing the disruption;them.
(e) safeguards to address any negative effects on the free movement of goods, services and workers.
4. The Commission shall, as appropriate, involve Member States’ authorities, Union bodies, offices and agencies in drawing up the crisis protocols. The Commission may, where necessary and appropriate, also involve civil society organisations or other relevant organisations.
Or. en
▌
Justification
▌
During the pandemic, economic operators relied on their specific knowledge on productions processes and supply chain risk management to adapt to the new situation. Such industry-lead efforts should complement administrative measures, as they are best placed to take into account sector-specific risks and vulnerabilities.
Article 7
Amendment 59
Trainings and simulations
Proposal for a regulation
1. The Commission shall develop and regularly organise ▌ training on crisis preparation, coordination, cooperation and information exchange referred to in Article 6 for the staff of the designated central liaison offices. It shall organise simulations involving the staff of the central liaison offices from all Member States based on potential scenarios of internal market emergencies.
Article 6 – paragraph 3
1a. In particular, the Commission shall develop and manage a training programme derived from lessons learnt from previous crises, including aspects of the entire emergency management cycle, in order to provide a rapid response to crises under the vigilance or emergency mode. That programme may include, in particular:
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
3. In order to ensure the operation of the framework referred to in paragraph 1, the Commission may conduct stress tests, simulations and in-action and after-action reviews with Member States, and propose the relevant Union-level bodies and the Member States to update the framework as necessary.
deleted
Or. en
Justification
Dealt with in Article 7 and 7a (new)
Amendment 60
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The Commission shall organise the training on crisis coordination, cooperation and information exchange referred to in Article 6 for the staff of the designated central liaison offices. It shall organise simulations involving the staff of the central liaison offices from all Member States based on potential scenarios of Single Market emergencies.
The Commission shall develop and regularly organise trainings on crisis coordination, cooperation and information exchange for the staff of the designated central liaison offices. It shall organise simulations involving the staff of the central liaison offices as well as for other relevant actors or bodies involved in the prevention of, preparedness for and response to internal market emergencies.
Or. en
Justification
Trainings on specific scenarios should involve all relevant actors that may be relevant to that specific crisis response to ensure that the framework is fit for crisis.
Amendment 61
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
In particular, the Commission shall develop and manage a training programme derived from lessons learnt from previous crises, including aspects of the entire emergency management cycle, in order to provide a rapid response to crises. The programme shall include:
(a) monitoring, analysing and evaluating all the relevant actions to facilitate the free movement of goods, services and persons;
(c) developing guidance on knowledge dissemination and the implementation of different tasks at national and, where relevant, regional and local level;
(d) encouraging the introduction and use of relevant new technologies and digital tools for the purpose of responding to internal market emergencies.
Or. en
2. The Commission shall develop and make available training programmes and materials for stakeholders, including economic operators. Where relevant, the Commission may invite stakeholders to participate in trainings and simulations.
Justification
2a. At the request of a Member State, the Commission may provide advice and support on preparedness and response measures, taking particular account of the needs and interests of that Member State.
The trainings are essential to prepare the governance framework, but also all relevant actors who until now might not have been involved in crisis response for an emergency affecting the internal market.
Amendment 62
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 b (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
At the request of a Member State facing a disruption, the Commission may deploy an expert team on site to provide advice on preparedness and response measures. When carrying out this task, the Commission shall take particular account of the needs and interests of that Member State.
Or. en
Justification
While not all crises may constitute an internal market emergency, the lessons learnt from the crisis framework may also help member states facing disruptions.
Amendment 63
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
Article 7a
Stress tests
In order to ensure the free movement and the availability of goods and services of critical importance, as well as the resilience of supply chains,1. theThe Commission, taking into consideration the opinion of the advisory board,Board, shall conduct and coordinate stress tests, including simulations that aim to anticipate and peerprepare reviews.for a crisis in the internal market.
In particular, the Commission shall:
(a) develop scenarios and parameters in a specific area that capture the specificparticular risks associated with internal market emergencies that aim to identifya vulnerabilitiescrisis, in critically important areas, as well asorder to assess the potential impact on the free movement of goods, services and persons;persons in that area;
(b) invite staff from the central liaison offices of all Member States to participate in simulations of potential internal market emergencies’;
(b) facilitate and encourage the development of strategies for emergency preparedness;
(c) identify relevant economic operators and representative organisations, as well as other relevant actors or bodies involved in the prevention of, preparedness for and response to emergencies and invite them to participate on a voluntary basis;
(c) identify, in cooperation with all actors involved, risk mitigation measures after the completion of the stress tests.
(d) ensure the secure exchange of information during the stress tests;
3. In order to identify the specific area referred to in paragraph 2, point (a), the Commission, in cooperation with the Board, shall make use of all the existing tools at its disposal, including mapping exercises.
(e) facilitate peer reviews and encourage the development of strategies for emergency preparedness;
4. The Commission shall conduct stress tests regularly and at least once every two years at Union level. To that end, the Commission shall invite staff from the central liaison offices of all Member States to participate in simulations. The Commission may also invite other relevant actors involved in the prevention of, preparedness for and response to emergencies to participate on a voluntary basis.
(g) identify, in cooperation with all actors involved, risk mitigation measures after the completion of the stress tests.
5. On the basis of a request by two or more Member States, the Commission may conduct stress tests in specific geographical areas or border regions in those Member States.
2. The Commission shall conduct stress tests at least once every two years, covering comprehensive Union-wide stress tests or specific geographical areas or border regions.
6. The Commission shall communicate the results of the stress tests, conducted pursuant to this Article, to the Board and publish a report thereon.
3. The Commission shall communicate the results of the stress tests to the advisory board and publish a report, including, where necessary, a proposal to update the existing framework.
▌
Or. en
▌
Justification
▌ ▌
Stress tests can help in identifying sector- or region specific vulnerabilities. Stress tests that include economic operators should be based on the principle of voluntary cooperation with the goal of increasing awareness also within companies for the crisis framework and developing operator's capacity to respond to crisis and to overcoming it.
▌
Amendment 64
▌
Proposal for a regulation
▌
Article 8 – paragraph 1
▌
Text proposed by the Commission
▌
Amendment
▌
1. The central liaison office of a Member State shall notify the Commission and the central liaison offices of other Member States without undue delay of any incidents that significantly disrupt or have the potential to significantly disrupt the functioning of the Single Market and its supply chains (significant incidents).
▌
1. The central liaison office of a Member State shall notify the Commission and the central liaison offices of other Member States without undue delay of any incidents that significantly disrupt or have the potential to significantly disrupt the functioning of the internal market and its supply chains (significant incidents).
Article 8
Or. en
Ad hoc alerts for early warning
Amendment 65
1. The central liaison office of a Member State shall notify the Commission and the central liaison offices of other Member States without undue delay of any ▌ significant incidents ▌ .
Proposal for a regulation
2. The central liaison offices and any relevant competent authorities of the Member States shall, in accordance with Union law and national legislation that complies with Union law, adopt all measures necessary to treat the information referred to in paragraph 1 in a way that respects its confidentiality, protects the security and public order of the ▌ Union or its Member States, and protects the security and commercial interests of the economic operators concerned.
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. In order to determine whether incidents should be the object of the alert referred to in paragraph 1, the central liaison office of a Member State shall take the following into account:
Text proposed by the Commission
(a) the market position or number of economic operators affected by the incident;
Amendment
(b) the duration or anticipated duration of the incidents;
3. In order to determine whether the disruption or potential disruption of the functioning of the Single Market and its supply chains of goods and services is significant and should be the object of an alert, the central liaison office of a Member State shall take the following into account:
(c) the geographical area; the proportion of the internal market affected by the incident and its cross-border effects, as well as its impact on particularly vulnerable or exposed geographical areas such as the outermost regions; or
3. In order to determine whether the disruption or potential disruption of the functioning of the internal market and its supply chains of goods and services is significant and should be the object of an alert, the central liaison office of a Member State shall take the following into account:
(d) the effect of those incidents on non-diversifiable and non-substitutable goods.
Or. en
▌
Amendment 66
▌
Proposal for a regulation
▌
Article 8 a (new)
▌
Text proposed by the Commission
▌
Amendment
▌
Article 8a
▌
Strategic reserves
▌
1. Member States shall make best efforts to build up strategic reserves of goods of critical importance. The Commission shall provide support to Member States in order to assist them in coordinating and streamlining their efforts.
▌
In particular, the Commission shall ensure coordination and information exchange, and shall promote solidarity between national competent authorities in relation to shortages of crisis-relevant goods or services or building strategic reserves for goods of critical importance. Capacities which are part of the rescEU reserve in accordance with Article 12 of Decision No 1313/2013/EU shall be excluded from the application of this Article.
Part III
2. The exchange of information and best practices shall cover in particular:
Internal market vigilance
(a) the probability and the potential impact of the shortages referred in paragraph 1;
Title I Vigilance mode
(b) the level of existing stocks of the economic operators and strategic reserves across the Union, and any information regarding the ongoing activities of economic operators to increase their stocks;
Article 9
(c) the costs for building and maintaining such strategic reserves;
Activation
(d) the options for alternative supply and potential for alternative supply;
1. Where the Commission, taking into consideration the opinion provided by the Board, considers that the conditions laid down in Article 3(2) are fulfilled, it shall propose to the Council to activate the internal market vigilance mode. The Council may activate the internal market vigilance mode by means of a Council implementing act. The duration of the activation shall be specified in the implementing act, and shall be a maximum of six months. Such ▌ implementing act shall contain the following:
(e) further information that could ensure the availability of such goods and services.
(a) an assessment of the potential impact of the crisis on the free movement of goods, services and persons, including workers, on the internal market and on its supply chains;
Or. en
(b) a list of the goods and services of critical importance concerned; and
Justification
(c) the vigilance measures to be taken, including a justification regarding the necessity and proportionality of such measures.
Article 12.1 - 12.3 was moved here. Strategic reserves must become a more permanent consideration in increasing the Union’s resilience and be part of the contingency mode. But the pro-cyclical creation of reserves during the “Vigilance Mode” or “Emergency Mode” risks an exacerbation of the situation. The Commission should have a permanent role in ensuring coordination, information exchange and promoting solidarity between Member States in the administration of strategic reserves, but not be empowered to prescribe mandatory stockpiles.
1a. When assessing whether the conditions laid down in Article 3(2) are fulfilled to qualify as internal market vigilance, the Commission and the Council shall take into account at least the following criteria:
Amendment 67
(a) the anticipated time before the threat escalates into an internal market emergency;
Proposal for a regulation
(b) the number or market position of economic operators expected to be affected by the crisis;
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
(c) the extent to which goods and services of critical importance are expected to be impacted by the crisis; and
Text proposed by the Commission
(ca) the geographic area expected to be impacted by the crisis, in particular the impact on border regions and outermost regions.
Amendment
▌
1. Where the Commission, taking into consideration the opinion provided by the advisory group, considers that the threat referred to in Article 3(2) is present, it shall activate the vigilance mode for a maximum duration of six months by means of an implementing act. Such an implementing act shall contain the following:
Article 10
1. Where the Commission, taking into consideration the opinion provided by the advisory board, considers that the threat referred to in Article 3(2) is present, it shall activate the vigilance mode for a maximum duration of six months by means of an implementing act. Such an implementing act shall contain the following:
Extension and deactivation
Or. en
1. Where the Commission ▌ considers that the reasons for activating the vigilance mode pursuant to Article 9(1) remain valid, and taking into consideration the opinion provided by the Board, it shall propose to the Council to extend the vigilance mode. Subject to urgent and exceptional changes in circumstances, the Commission shall make best efforts to do so no later than 30 days before the expiry of the period for which the internal market vigilance mode has been activated. On the basis of this proposal, the Council may extend the vigilance mode by no more than six months at a time by means of a Council implementing act.
Amendment 68
2. Where the Commission, taking into consideration the opinion provided by the Board, finds that the conditions laid down in Article 3(2) are no longer fulfilled, with respect to some or all vigilance measures or for some or all of the goods and services, it shall propose to the Council to deactivate the vigilance mode in full or in part. On the basis of this proposal, the Council may deactivate the vigilance mode by means of a Council implementing act.
Proposal for a regulation
▌
Article 11 – paragraph 3
Title II Vigilance measures
Text proposed by the Commission
Article 11
Amendment
Monitoring
3. Member States shall1. setWhen upthe andvigilance maintainmode anhas inventorybeen ofactivated thein mostaccordance relevantwith economicArticle operators9, established▌ oncompetent theirauthorities respectivein nationalthe territoryMember thatStates operateshall alongmonitor the supply chains of goods and services of strategiccritical importance that have been identified in the implementing act activating the vigilance mode.mode and the free movement of persons, including workers, involved in the production and supply of those goods and services.
3. Member States shall set up and maintain an inventory of the most relevant economic operators established on their respective national territory that operate along the supply chains of goods and services of critical importance that have been identified in the implementing act activating the vigilance mode. The contents of the inventory shall be confidential at all times.
2. The Commission shall provide for standardised and secure means for the collection of the information and the processing of that information in an aggregated manner for the purpose of paragraph 1, using electronic means. Without prejudice to national legislation in compliance with Union law, requiring collected information including business secrets to be kept confidential, confidentiality with regard to the commercially sensitive information and information affecting the security and public order of the Union or its Member States shall be ensured.
Or. en
3. Member States shall, where possible, set up, update and maintain an inventory of the ▌ relevant economic operators established on their respective national territory that operate along the supply chains of goods and services of critical importance that have been identified in the implementing act activating the vigilance mode. The contents of the inventory shall be confidential at all times.
Amendment 69
4. On the basis of the inventory set up pursuant to paragraph 3 of this Article competent authorities in the Member States shall, when the information could not be obtained from other sources, address requests for voluntary provision of information to the most relevant operators along the supply chains of goods and services of critical importance identified in the implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 9 and, in their respective national territory. Such requests shall in particular state which information about factors impacting the availability of the identified goods and services of critical importance is requested. Each economic operator that voluntarily provides information shall do so on an individual basis in line with the Union rules on competition governing the exchange of information. The ▌ competent authorities in the Member States shall transmit the relevant findings to the Commission and the Board without undue delay via the respective central liaison office.
Proposal for a regulation
5. ▌Competent authorities in the Member States shall have due regard to the administrative burden on economic operators and in particular SMEs, which may be associated with requests for information, and ensure that such administrative burden is kept to a minimum and that the confidentiality of the information is respected.
Article 12
6. On the basis of the information collected through the monitoring activities carried out in accordance with paragraph 1, the Commission shall present a report to the Board of the aggregated findings. 7. The Commission may ask the Board to discuss the aggregated findings and prospects of evolution based on the information obtained by Member States pursuant to paragraphs 1 and 4 regarding their monitoring of supply chains of goods and services of critical importance, duly ensuring confidentiality and observing the commercial sensitivity of the information concerned.
Text proposed by the Commission
▌
Amendment
▌
[...]
7a. The Commission may also share with the Member States relevant information obtained through other monitoring means or systems.
deleted
▌
Or. en
▌
Justification
▌
Moved to Art. 8a new. Strategic reserves must become a more permanent consideration in increasing the Union’s resilience and be part of the contingency mode. But the pro-cyclical creation of reserves during the “Vigilance Mode” or “Emergency Mode” risks an exacerbation of the situation. The Commission should have a permanent role in ensuring coordination, information exchange and promoting solidarity between Member States in the administration of strategic reserves, but not be empowered to prescribe mandatory stockpiles.
▌
Amendment 70
▌
Proposal for a regulation
▌
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point a
▌
Text proposed by the Commission
▌
Amendment
▌
(a) the crisis has caused activation of any relevant Council crisis response mechanism, Union Civil Protection Mechanism or the mechanisms set up within the EU Health Security Framework, including [the proposal for] Regulation (EU) …/… on serious cross-border health threats and [the proposal for] Council Regulation (EU) …/… on a framework of measures for ensuring the supply of crisis-relevant medical countermeasures;
▌
(a) the crisis has caused activation of a relevant crisis response mechanism, such as the Union Civil Protection Mechanism or the mechanisms set up within the EU Health Security Framework, including Regulation (EU) 2022/2372;
▌
Or. en
▌
Amendment 71
▌
Proposal for a regulation
▌
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b
▌
Text proposed by the Commission
▌
Amendment
▌ ▌
(b) an estimation of the number of economic operations or users relying on the disrupted sector or sectors of the Single Market for the provision of the goods or services concerned;
▌
(b) the impact on the free movement of goods, services and persons, including an estimation of the number of economic operations or users relying on the disrupted sector or sectors of the internal market for the provision of the goods or services concerned;
▌
Or. en
▌
Amendment 72
▌
Proposal for a regulation
▌
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point c
▌
Text proposed by the Commission
▌
Amendment
▌
(c) the importance of the goods or services concerned for other sectors;
▌
(c) the critical importance of the goods or services concerned for other sectors;
▌
Or. en
▌
Amendment 73
▌
Proposal for a regulation
▌
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point e
▌
Text proposed by the Commission
▌
Amendment
▌
(e) the economic operators affected have not been able to provide a solution in a reasonable time to the particular aspects of the crisis on a voluntary basis.
Part IV Internal market emergency
(e) the economic operators affected by the disruption have not been able to provide a solution in a reasonable time to the particular aspects of the crisis on a voluntary basis;
Title I Emergency mode
Or. en
Article 13
Amendment 74
Criteria for activation
Proposal for a regulation
1. ▌ When assessing whether the conditions laid down in Article 3(3) are fulfilled in order to determine the need to activate the internal market emergency mode, the Commission and the Council shall, based on concrete and reliable evidence, assess whether the crisis creates one or more obstacles to the free movement of goods, services or persons, having an impact on at least one sector of vital societal or economic activities in the internal market. Where the crisis leads to a disruption to the functioning of supply chains, in addition to the criteria set out in the first subparagraph, the Commission and the Council shall assess whether the goods, services or workers concerned can be diversified or substituted.
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point g
▌
Text proposed by the Commission
1a. When applying paragraph 1, the Commission and the Council shall take into account in particular the following indicators:
Amendment
(-a) the number of significant incidents notified pursuant to Article 8(1);
(g) the geographic area that is and could be affected, including any cross-border impacts on the functioning of supply chains that are indispensable in the maintenance of vital societal or economic activities in the Single Market;
▌
(g) the geographic area, including border regions, that is and could be affected by the disruption, including any cross-border impacts on the functioning of supply chains that are indispensable in the maintenance of societal or economic activities in the internal market;
(a) the fact that the crisis has triggered the activation of any of the following: (i) a relevant Council crisis response mechanism, including the Integrated Political Crisis Response; (ii) the Union Civil Protection Mechanism; or (iii) any of the mechanisms set up within the EU Health Security Framework, including the emergency framework under Regulation (EU) 2022/2372;
Or. en
(b) an estimation of the number or market position and market demand of economic operators or users relying on the disrupted sector or sectors of the internal market for the provision of the goods or services concerned;
Amendment 75
(c) an estimation of types of goods, services or the number of persons, including workers affected by the crisis;
Proposal for a regulation
(d) the actual or potential impact of the crisis in terms of degree and duration on economic and vital societal activities, the environment and public safety;
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point i
(e) the fact that the economic operators affected by the crisis have not been able to provide a solution in a reasonable time to the particular aspects of the crisis on a voluntary basis;
Text proposed by the Commission
▌
Amendment
(g) the geographic area, including border regions and outermost regions, that is and could be affected by the crisis, including any cross-border impacts on the functioning of supply chains that are indispensable to the maintenance of vital societal or economic activities in the internal market;
(i) the absence of substitute goods, inputs or services.
(h) the importance of the affected economic operators in maintaining a sufficient level of supply of the goods or services, taking into account the availability of alternative means for the provision of those goods or services; and
(i) the absence or shortagesshortage of substitutesubstitutes goods,for inputsgoods ▌ or services;services.
Or. en
▌
Amendment 76
Article 14
Proposal for a regulation
Activation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
-1. The internal market emergency mode shall only be activated if the criteria laid down in Article 13(1) are fulfilled.
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(ia) the introduction of travel restrictions or border controls.
Or. en
Amendment 77
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
1. The Single Market Emergency mode may be activated without the Single Market vigilance mode having previously been activated with regard to the same goods or services. Where the vigilance mode has previously been activated, the emergency mode may replace it partially or entirely.
1. The internal market emergency mode may be activated without the internal market vigilance mode having previously been activated with regard to the same goods or services. Where the vigilance mode has previously been activated, the emergency mode may replace it partially or entirely.
Or. en
2. Where the Commission, taking into consideration the opinion provided by the Board, considers there is an internal market emergency, it shall propose to the Council to activate the internal market emergency mode and, where applicable, to adopt a list of crisis-relevant goods and services.
Amendment 78
3. The Council may activate the internal market emergency mode, and where applicable, adopt a list of crisis-relevant goods and services by means of a Council implementing act on a proposal from the Commission. The duration of the activation shall be specified in the implementing act, and shall be a maximum of six months. The list of crisis-relevant goods and services may be amended by means of Council implementing act on a proposal from the Commission.
Proposal for a regulation
4. The activation of the internal market emergency mode regarding certain goods and services does not prevent the activation or continued application of the vigilance mode and deployment of the measures laid down in Article 11 regarding the same goods and services.
Article 14 – paragraph 2
▌
Text proposed by the Commission
▌
Amendment
Article 15
2. Where the Commission, taking into consideration the opinion provided by the advisory group, considers there is a Single Market emergency, it shall propose to the Council to activate the Single Market emergency mode.
Extension and deactivation
2.1. Where the Commission,Commission considers, taking into consideration the opinion provided by the advisory board, considersBoard, that therean isextension anof the internal market emergency,emergency mode is necessary, it shall propose to the Council to activateextend the internal market emergency mode. Subject to urgent and exceptional changes in circumstances, the Commission shall make best efforts to do so no later than 30 days before the expiry of the period for which the internal market emergency mode has been activated. The Council may extend the internal market emergency mode by no more than six months at a time by means of a Council implementing act.
Or. en
2. Where the Board has concrete and reliable evidence that the internal market emergency mode should be deactivated, it may formulate an opinion to that effect and transmit it to the Commission. Where the Commission, taking into consideration the opinion provided by the Board, considers that the internal market emergency no longer exists, it shall propose to the Council, without delay, the deactivation of the internal market emergency mode.
Amendment 79
3. The measures taken in accordance with Articles 24 to 33 ▌ shall cease to apply upon deactivation of the internal market emergency mode. ▌
Proposal for a regulation
Title II ▌Free movement during the internal market emergency
Article 14 – paragraph 3
Chapter I Measures ▌ facilitating free movement
Text proposed by the Commission
Article 16
Amendment
Restrictions to free movement during an internal market emergency mode
3. The Council may activate the Single Market emergency mode by means of a Council implementing act. The duration of the activation, hall be specified in the implementing act, and shall be a maximum of six months.
1. Without prejudice to Article 17, when adopting and applying national measures in response to an internal market emergency ▌ , Member States shall ensure that such measures comply with Union law, including as regards non-discrimination, justification and proportionality.
3. The Council may activate the internal market emergency mode by means of a Council implementing act. The duration of the activation shall be specified in the implementing act, and shall be a maximum of six months.
2. Member States shall ensure, in particular, that the measures referred to in paragraph 1 are removed as soon as they are no longer justified or proportionate.
Or. en
▌
Amendment 80
3. Member States shall ensure that any requirement imposed on citizens or economic operators does not create an undue or unnecessary administrative burden.
Proposal for a regulation
▌ ▌
Article 14 – paragraph 4
▌
Text proposed by the Commission
▌
Amendment
▌ ▌
4. The activation of the Single Market emergency mode regarding certain goods and services does not prevent the activation or continued application of the vigilance mode and deployment of the measures laid down in Articles 11 and 12 regarding the same goods and services.
▌
4. The activation of the internal market emergency mode regarding certain goods and services does not prevent the activation or continued application of the vigilance mode and deployment of the measures laid down in Articles 11 and 12 regarding the same goods and services.
▌
Or. en
▌
Amendment 81
5. Member States shall ensure that all affected citizens and stakeholders are informed in a clear and unambiguous manner of the measures restricting the free movement of goods, services and persons, including workers and service providers, before their entry into force. Member States shall ensure a continuous dialogue with stakeholders, including communication with social partners and international partners.
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 5
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
5. As soon as the Single Market emergency mode is activated, the Commission shall, without delay, adopt a list of crisis-relevant goods and services by means of an implementing act. The list may be amended by means of implementing acts.
5. As soon as the internal market emergency mode is activated, the Commission shall, without delay, adopt a list of crisis-relevant goods and services by means of an implementing act. The list may be amended by means of implementing acts.
Or. en
Amendment 82
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 6
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
6. The Commission implementing act referred to in paragraph 5 shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 42(2). On duly justified imperative grounds of urgency relating to the impacts of the crisis on the Single Market, the Commission shall adopt immediately applicable implementing acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 42(3).
6. The Commission implementing act referred to in paragraph 5 shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 42(2). On duly justified imperative grounds of urgency relating to the impacts of the crisis on the internal market, the Commission shall adopt immediately applicable implementing acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 42(3).
Or. en
Amendment 83
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
1. Where the Commission considers, taking into consideration the opinion provided by the advisory group, that an extension of the Single Market emergency mode is necessary, it shall propose to the Council to extend the Single Market emergency mode. Subject to urgent and exceptional changes in circumstances, the Commission shall endeavour to do so no later than 30 days before the expiry of the period for which the Single Market emergency mode has been activated. The Council may extend the Single Market emergency mode by no more than six months at a time by means of an implementing act.
1. Where the Commission considers, taking into consideration the opinion provided by the advisory board, that an extension of the internal market emergency mode is necessary, it shall propose to the Council to extend the internal market emergency mode. Subject to urgent and exceptional changes in circumstances, the Commission shall endeavour to do so no later than 30 days before the expiry of the period for which the internal market emergency mode has been activated. The Council may extend the internal market emergency mode by no more than six months at a time by means of an implementing act.
Or. en
Amendment 84
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
2. Where the advisory group has concrete and reliable evidence that the Single Market emergency should be deactivated, it may formulate an opinion to that effect and transmit it to the Commission. Where the Commission, taking into consideration the opinion provided by the advisory group, considers a Single Market emergency no longer exists, it shall propose to the Council without delay the deactivation of the Single Market emergency mode.
2. Where the advisory board has concrete and reliable evidence that the internal market emergency should be deactivated, it may formulate an opinion to that effect and transmit it to the Commission. Where the Commission, taking into consideration the opinion provided by the advisory group, considers that an internal market emergency no longer exists, it shall propose to the Council without delay the deactivation of the internal market emergency mode.
Or. en
Amendment 85
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
3. The measures taken in accordance with Articles 24 to 33 and pursuant to the emergency procedures introduced in the respective Union legal frameworks by means of the amendments to sectorial product legislation set out in Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2016/424, Regulation (EU) 2016/425, Regulation (EU) 2016/426, Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 and Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 and introducing emergency procedures for the conformity assessment, adoption of common specifications and market surveillance in the context of a Single Market emergency and Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2000/14/EC, 2006/42/EC, 2010/35/EU, 2013/29/EU, 2014/28/EU, 2014/29/EU, 2014/30/EU, 2014/31/EU, 2014/32/EU, 2014/33/EU, 2014/34/EU, 2014/35/EU, 2014/53/EU, and2014/68/EU and introducingas regard emergency procedures for the conformity assessment, adoption of common specifications and market surveillance in the context ofdue to a Single Market shall cease to apply upon deactivation of the duration of the Single Market emergency mode. The Commission shall submit to the Council an assessment on the effectiveness of the measures taken in addressing the Single Market emergency no later than three months after the expiry of the measures, on the basis of the information gathered via the monitoring mechanism foreseen by Article 11.
3. The measures taken in accordance with Articles 24 to 33 and pursuant to the emergency procedures introduced in the respective Union legal frameworks in the area of the sectorial product legislation set out in Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2016/424, (EU) 2016/425, (EU) 2016/426, (EU) 2019/1009, (EU) 2023/XXX [General Product Safety Regulation], (EU) 2023/XXX [Machinery Regulation] and (EU) No 305/2011 as regards emergency procedures for the conformity assessment, adoption of common specifications and market surveillance due to a Single Market emergency and Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2000/14/EC, 2006/42/EC, 2010/35/EU, 2013/29/EU, 2014/28/EU, 2014/29/EU, 2014/30/EU, 2014/31/EU, 2014/32/EU, 2014/33/EU, 2014/34/EU, 2014/35/EU, 2014/53/EU, and 2014/68/EU as regards emergency procedures for the conformity assessment, adoption of common specifications and market surveillance due to an internal Market emergency shall cease to apply upon deactivation of the internal market emergency mode. The Commission shall submit to the Council an assessment on the effectiveness of the measures taken in addressing the internal market emergency no later than three months after the expiry of the measures, on the basis of the information gathered via the monitoring mechanism foreseen by Article 11.
Or. en
Amendment 86
Proposal for a regulation
Chapter I – title
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
Measures for re-establishing and facilitating free movement
Measures facilitating free movement
Or. en
Amendment 87
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – title
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
General requirements for measures restricting free movement to address a Single Market emergency
General requirements for measures restricting free movement to address an internal market emergency and prohibitions
Or. en
Amendment 88
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
1. When adopting and applying national measures in response to a Single Market emergency and the underlying crisis, Member States shall ensure that their actions fully comply with the Treaty and Union law and, in particular, with the requirements laid down in this Article.
1. Restrictions to the free movement of goods, services and persons imposed by Member States in response to an internal market emergency shall be prohibited, unless they are justified on grounds of legitimate public interest objectives, such as public policy, public security or public health, and are in compliance with the principle of proportionality.
Or. en
Amendment 89
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
2. Any restriction shall be limited in time and removed as soon as the situation allows it. Additionally, any restriction should take into account the situation of border regions.
2. Any restriction shall be limited in time and immediately removed as soon as the emergency allows it or in the event that it is no longer justified or proportionate.
Or. en
Amendment 90
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
2a. Any restriction should take into account the situation of border regions.
Or. en
Amendment 91
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
3. Any requirement imposed on citizens and businesses shall not create an undue or unnecessary administrative burden.
3. Any requirement imposed on citizens and economic operators shall not create an undue or unnecessary administrative burden. Member States shall take every available measure to limit and reduce any administrative burden.
Or. en
Amendment 92
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
3a. During the internal market emergency mode, Member States shall not adopt any of the following:
(a) intra-Union export bans or other measures having equivalent effect on crisis-relevant goods or services listed in the implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14(5);
(b) restrictions on the intra-Union export of goods or provision or receipt of services, or measures having equivalent effect;
(c) discrimination between Member States or between citizens, including in their role as service providers or workers, based directly on nationality or, in the case of companies, the location of the registered office, central administration or principal place of business; or
(d) restrictions on the free movement of persons or travel restrictions on persons involved in the production, maintenance or transportation of crisis-relevant goods that are listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14(5) and their parts or restrictions on persons involved in the provision of crisis-relevant services that are listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14(5), or other measures having equivalent effect, that:
(i) cause shortages of necessary workforce on the internal market and thus disrupt supply chains of crisis-relevant goods and services or create or increase shortages of such goods and services in the internal market; or
(ii) are directly discriminatory based on nationality or the place of residence of the person.
Or. en
Justification
Moved up and modified from Art. 17.1 to clearly state that export restrictions and discriminating between member states shall be prohibited.
Amendment 93
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 b (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
3b. During the internal market emergency mode, Member States shall not:
(a) apply more favourable rules to goods originating from a neighbouring Member State, any other Member State or a group of Member States, as compared to goods originating from other Member States;
(b) selectively refuse the entry of goods originating from specific other Member States to their territory; or
(c) introduce prohibitions on the operation of freight transport.
Or. en
Justification
Moved up from Art 17.2 with some clarifications to ensure that such practices are blacklisted in any internal market emergency mode.
Amendment 94
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 c (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
3c. During the internal market emergency mode, Member States shall not:
(a) ban types of services or modes of service provision; or
(b) block flows of passenger transport.
Or. en
Justification
Moved here from Art. 17.3 and adjusted for clarity
Amendment 95
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 d (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
3d. During the internal market emergency mode, Member States shall not:
(a) apply more favourable rules to travel to or from one Member State to another Member State or group of Member States, as compared to travel to and from other Member States or to or from cross border-regions;
(b) deny beneficiaries the right to free movement under Union law, the right to enter the territory of their Member State of nationality or residence, the right to exit the territory of a Member State to travel to their Member State of nationality or residence, or the right to transit through a Member State in order to reach the Member State of nationality or residence;
(c) prohibit business travels linked to the research and development or production of crisis-related goods that are listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14(5), or the placing of such goods on the market or to the related inspections;
(d) impose restrictions on travel, including restrictions on travel for imperative family reasons, which are not appropriate for the achievement of any legitimate public interest purportedly pursued by such restrictions or which manifestly go beyond what is necessary to achieve that aim;
(e) impose restrictions on workers and service providers and their representatives, unless such restrictions do not manifestly go beyond what is necessary for that purpose.
Or. en
Justification
Moved up from Art. 17.4 with some clarifications in the first sentence
Amendment 96
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 e (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
3e. When the internal market emergency mode has been activated in accordance with Article 14 and the activities exercised by the service providers, business representatives and workers are not affected by the crisis in a Member State and, despite the crisis, safe travel is possible, that Member State shall not impose travel restrictions on such categories of persons from other Member States in the event that doing so would prevent them from having access to their place of activity or workplace.
Or. en
Justification
moved up from Art. 17.5
Amendment 97
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 f (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
3f. When the internal market emergency mode has been activated in accordance with Article 14 and the activities exercised by the service providers, business representatives and workers are not affected by the crisis in a Member State and, despite the crisis, safe travel is possible, that Member State shall not impose travel restrictions on the following categories of persons from other Member States in the event that doing so would prevent them from having access to their place of activity or workplace:
(a) service providers that provide crisis-relevant services that are listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14(5), or business representatives or workers, including health workers, that are involved in the production of crisis-relevant goods or the provision of crisis-relevant services that are listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14(5) to allow them to have access to the place of their activities, if activities in the sector concerned are still allowed in the Member State;
(b) civil protection workers to allow them to have unhindered access to their place of activity and their equipment in any of the Member States.
Or. en
Justification
Moved up from Art. 17.6
Amendment 98
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 4
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
4. Member States shall inform citizens, consumers, businesses, workers and their representatives about measures that affect their free movement rights in a clear and unambiguous manner.
deleted
Or. en
Justification
Moved to the end of Article 19 (Notifications and Information).
Amendment 99
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 5
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
5. Member States shall ensure that all affected stakeholders are informed of measures restricting free movement of goods, services and persons, including workers and service providers, before their entry into force. Member States shall ensure a continuous dialogue with stakeholders, including communication with social partners and international partners.
deleted
Or. en
Justification
Moved to the end of Article 19 (Notifications and Information).
Amendment 100
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17
Text proposed by the Commission
Prohibited restrictions on the right to free movement ▌ during an internal market emergency
Amendment
1. During an internal market emergency mode and when responding to an internal market emergency, Member States shall refrain from introducing any of the following:
[...]
(-a) any measures which are not limited in time;
deleted
(a) bans on intra-Union export or other measures having equivalent effect on crisis-relevant goods or services listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14(3); or on the transit of crisis-relevant goods listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14(3), or measures having equivalent effect;
Or. en
(b) measures that restrict the intra-Union export of goods or the cross-border provision or receipt of services, or measures having equivalent effect, where those restrictions cause any of the following:
Justification
(i) disruptions to supply chains of crisis-relevant goods and services that are listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14(3), or
Article 16 and 17 must provide legally unambiguous prohibitions and must be aligned with the provisions on free movement of goods, services and workers as enshrined in the Treaties and case law. Therefore, Article 16 and 17 have been combined, and ambiguous wording regarding "the inherent nature of the crisis" removed from introductory sentences in each paragraph of the former Article 17.
(ii) shortages or an increase in shortages of such goods and services in the internal market;
Amendment 101
(c) measures that discriminate beneficiaries of the right to free movement under Union law, based ▌ on nationality or, in the case of companies, the location of their registered office, central administration or principal place of business;
Proposal for a regulation
▌ ▌
Article 18 – paragraph 1
▌
Text proposed by the Commission
▌
Amendment
▌ ▌
1. During the Single Market emergency mode, the Commission may provide for supportive measures to reinforce free movement of persons referred to in Article 17(6) and 17(7) by means of implementing acts. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 422(2). On duly justified imperative grounds of urgency relating to the impacts of the crisis on the Single Market, the Commission shall adopt immediately applicable implementing acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 42(3).
▌
1. During the internal market emergency mode, the Commission may provide for supportive measures to reinforce free movement of persons referred to in Article 16by means of implementing acts. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 42(2). On duly justified imperative grounds of urgency relating to the impacts of the crisis on the internal market, the Commission shall adopt immediately applicable implementing acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 42(3).
▌
Or. en
▌
Amendment 102
▌ ▌
Proposal for a regulation
▌
Article 18 – paragraph 2
▌
Text proposed by the Commission
▌
Amendment
▌
2. During the Single Market emergency mode, where the Commission establishes that Member States have put in place templates for attesting that the individual or economic operator is a service provider that provides crisis-relevant services, a business representative or worker that is involved in production of crisis-relevant goods or provision of crisis-relevant services or a civil protection worker and it considers that the use of different templates by each Member States is an obstacle to the free movement at the time of a Single Market emergency, the Commission may issue, if it considers it necessary for supporting the free movement of such categories of persons and their equipment during the ongoing Single Market emergency, templates for attesting that they fulfil the relevant criteria for the application Article 17(6) in all Member States by means of implementing acts.
(d) measures that deny to beneficiaries of the right to free movement under Union law, ▌ the right to enter the territory of their Member State of nationality or residence, the right to exit the territory of a Member State to travel to their Member State of nationality or residence, or the right to transit through a Member State in order to reach their Member State of nationality or residence;
2. During the internal market emergency mode, where the Commission establishes that Member States have put in place templates for attesting that the individual or economic operator is a service provider that provides crisis-relevant services, a business representative or worker that is involved in production of crisis-relevant goods or provision of crisis-relevant services or a civil protection worker and it considers that the use of different templates by each Member State is an obstacle to the free movement at the time of an internal market emergency, the Commission may issue templates for attesting that they fulfil the relevant criteria for the application Article 16 in all Member States by means of implementing acts.
(e) measures that prohibit business travel linked to the research and development, production, placing on the market or related inspections and maintenance of crisis-relevant goods that are listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14(3);
Or. en
(f) measures that prohibit travel between Member States for imperative family reasons, when such travel is permitted within the Member State introducing such a measure;
Justification
▌
Provided for a more consistent approach to issuing templates: where divergence in national templates constitutes an obstacle to free movement, the commission shall act.
(g) measures that impose travel restrictions on service providers, business representatives and workers, preventing them from travelling between Member States in order to access to their place of activity or workplace when there are no such restrictions on travel within the Member State introducing such a measure;
Amendment 103
▌
Proposal for a regulation
▌
Article 18 – paragraph 3
(h) measures that impose restrictions preventing the travel of providers of crisis-relevant services listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14(3), business representatives and workers ▌ involved in the production of crisis-relevant goods, or in the provision of crisis-relevant services ▌ listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14(3), or civil protection workers or preventing the transport of their equipment to the place of their activities.
Text proposed by the Commission
▌
Amendment
▌
3. The implementing acts referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 42(2). On duly justified imperative grounds of urgency relating to the impacts of the crisis on the Single Market, the Commission shall adopt immediately applicable implementing acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 42(3).
Article 18
3. The implementing acts referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 42(2). On duly justified imperative grounds of urgency relating to the impacts of the crisis on the internal market, the Commission shall adopt immediately applicable implementing acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 42(3).
Mitigation measures for the free movement of persons
Or. en
1. During the internal market emergency mode and for the purpose of facilitating the free movement of persons referred to in points (e) to (h) of Article 17(1), the Commission may, by means of implementing acts, adopt administrative arrangements or provide Member States with digital tools to facilitate the identification of the categories of persons and verification of the facts referred to in those provisions by the Member States in cooperation with the other relevant Member States and the Commission.
Amendment 104
2. During the internal market emergency mode, where the Commission establishes that Member States have put in place templates for attesting that an individual or economic operator fulfils the general requirements stemming from national emergency measures and it considers that the use of different templates by each Member State is an obstacle to the free movement of those individuals or economic operators and their equipment, the Commission may issue, by means of implementing acts, templates which may be used by all Member States.
Proposal for a regulation
2a. Without prejudice to relevant Union law and applicable national law and procedures, Member States shall prioritise declaration, registration or authorisation procedures for the providers of crisis-relevant services listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14(3).
Article 19 – title
2b. The Commission shall identify the categories of persons involved in the production or supply of crisis-relevant goods and services listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14(3), for which it is necessary to facilitate free movement by establishing by means of implementing acts, after consulting the Board, templates which may be used by the Member States on a voluntary basis.
Text proposed by the Commission
3. The implementing acts referred to in paragraphs 1, 2 and 2b shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 42(2). On duly justified imperative grounds of urgency relating to the impacts of the crisis on the internal market, the Commission shall adopt immediately applicable implementing acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 42(3).
Amendment
▌
Notifications
3b. Where, in duly justified cases and in accordance with relevant Union law, Member States have introduced restrictions on travel between Member States, the Commission shall coordinate the information exchange between Member States with the aim of making this information publicly available, including, where possible, real-time information.
Notifications and information
3c. The Commission shall make information on the mitigation measures it has adopted pursuant to this Article publicly available on a dedicated website.
Or. en
Chapter II Transparency and administrative assistance
Amendment 105
Article 19
Proposal for a regulation
Transparency
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. Where the internal market emergency mode has been activated in accordance with Article 14(3), Member States shall communicate to the Commission and to other Member States via the Union level liaison office the text of any emergency measures in response to the crisis introducing restrictions on the exercise of the right to free movement of persons between Member States where such measure is not already covered by an information or notification obligation provided for in other Union legislation, without delay after their adoption, together with:
Text proposed by the Commission
a) the reasons for such measures, including reasons demonstrating that the measure is justified and proportionate, as well as any underlying scientific or other data supporting their adoption;
Amendment
b) the scope of such measures;
During the Single Market emergency, Member States shall notify to the Commission any crisis-relevant draft measures restricting free movement of goods and the freedom to provide services as well as crisis-relevant restrictions of free movement of persons, including workers together with the reasons for those measures.
c) the date of adoption and date of application and duration of those measures.
During the internal market emergency, Member States shall notify to the Commission draft measures linked to the crisis and restricting the free movement of goods and the freedom to provide services as well as restrictions of the free movement of persons, including workers together with the reasons for those measures.
▌
Or. en
▌
Amendment 106
3. Member States may communicate to the Commission and the other Member States via the Union level liaison office the draft text of any measures referred in paragraph 1 before their adoption, together with the information referred to in points a) to c) of paragraph 1.
Proposal for a regulation
3a. The communication referred to in paragraph 3 shall not prevent Member States from adopting the measures in question.
Article 19 – paragraph 2
4. Member States shall provide the public with clear, comprehensive and timely information explaining the measures referred to in paragraph 1 as soon as possible and shall provide that information to the Commission at the same time.
Text proposed by the Commission
5. The Commission shall, based on the information received pursuant to this Article, publish on a dedicated website, available in all official languages of the Union, relevant information on any restrictions on the exercise of the right to free movement, including information on the scope and duration of national measures in question. The dedicated website may include an interactive map with relevant real-time information on those measures.
Amendment
6. The Commission shall make the information received pursuant to paragraphs 1, 3 and 4 available to the Board.
2. Member States shall provide to the Commission a statement of the reasons which make the enactment of such measure justified and proportionate, where those reasons have not already been made clear in the notified measure. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the full text of the national legislative or regulatory provisions which contain or are modified by the measure.
7. The information referred to in paragraphs 1, 3 and 4 shall be transmitted via a secure tool provided by the Commission ▌ .
2. Member States shall provide to the Commission a statement demonstrating that the enactment of such measures is justified and proportionate. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the full text of the national legislative or regulatory provisions which contain or are modified by the measure.
▌
Or. en
▌
Amendment 107
▌
Proposal for a regulation
▌
Article 19 – paragraph 14
▌
Text proposed by the Commission
▌
Amendment
▌
14. The Commission decisions referred to in paragraphs 11 and 12 shall be based on available information and may be issued when there are immediately obvious and serious grounds to believe that the notified measures do not comply with Union law, including Article 16 or 17 of this Regulation, the principle of proportionality or the principle of non-discrimination. The adoption of those decisions shall be without prejudice to the possibility for the Commission to adopt measures at a later stage, including the launching of an infringement procedure on the basis of Article 258 TFEU.
▌
14. The Commission decisions referred to in paragraphs 11 and 12 shall be based on available information and may be issued when there are immediately obvious and serious grounds to believe that the notified measures do not comply with Union law, including Article 16 of this Regulation, the principle of proportionality or the principle of non-discrimination.
▌
Or. en
▌
(Moved to recital 21)
▌
Amendment 108
▌
Proposal for a regulation
▌
Article 19 – paragraph 15
▌
Text proposed by the Commission
▌
Amendment
Article 21
15. Information supplied under this Article shall not be confidential except at the express request of the notifying Member State. Any such request shall relate to draft measures and shall be justified.
Single points of contact in the Member States
15. Information provided by Member States under this Article shall be made public. Member States may request that information related to draft measures is kept confidential.
1. Member States shall operate national single points of contact that shall provide citizens, consumers, economic operators and workers and their representatives with the following ▌ :
Or. en
(a) assistance in requesting and obtaining information about national restrictions of the free movement of goods, services, persons and workers that are related to an activated internal market emergency mode;
Justification
(b) assistance in the performance of any national level crisis procedures and formalities that have been put in place due to the activated internal market emergency mode.
More Transparency is needed in the development of crisis linked restrictions to enable proper public scrutiny and increase transparency for citizens, economic operators and at all levels of government.
2. Member States shall ensure that it is possible for citizens, consumers, economic operators and workers and their representatives to receive, at their request and via the respective single points of contact, information from the competent authorities on the way in which the respective national crisis response measures are generally interpreted and applied. Where appropriate, such information shall include a step-by-step guide. The information shall be provided in clear, understandable and intelligible language. It shall be easily accessible at a distance and by electronic means and shall be kept up to date. Member States shall make the information referred to in paragraph 1 also accessible in an official language of the Union that is broadly understood by the largest possible number of cross-border users and shall make best efforts to provide such information in other official languages of the Union, paying particular attention to the situation and needs of the border regions.
Amendment 109
Article 22
Proposal for a regulation
Union level single point of contact
Article 19 – paragraph 16
1. The Commission shall set up and operate a Union level single point of contact.
Text proposed by the Commission
2. The Union level single point of contact shall provide citizens, consumers, economic operators, workers and their representatives with the following ▌ :
Amendment
(a) assistance in requesting and obtaining information as regards Union level crisis response measures that are relevant to the activated internal market emergency mode or which affect the exercise of the free movement of goods, services and persons, including workers;
16. The Commission shall publish the text of the measures adopted by the Member States in the context of the Single market emergency that restrict free movement of goods, services and the persons, including workers, which have been communicated by means of the notifications referred to in this Article as well as via other sources. The text of the measures shall be published within one working day of its receipt by means of an electronic platform managed by the Commission.
(b) assistance in the performance of any crisis procedures and formalities that have been put in place at the Union level due to the activated internal market emergency mode;
16. The Commission shall publish any information provided under this Article, except information that is deemed confidential in accordance with paragraph 15.
(c) compiling and publishing a list of all national crisis measures and national contact points.
Or. en
2a. Sufficient human and financial resources shall be allocated to the Union level single point of contact.
Amendment 110
Title III Internal market emergency response measures
Proposal for a regulation
Chapter I Targeted information requests and availability of crisis-relevant goods and services
Article 19 – paragraph 16 a (new)
Article 23
Text proposed by the Commission
Requirement of dual activation
Amendment
1. The measures included in this Chapter may only be adopted by the Commission when an internal market emergency mode has been activated and a list crisis-relevant goods and, as applicable, services has been established by the Council pursuant to Article 14(3).
16a. The Commission shall publish the measures adopted by the Member States in the context of the internal market emergency that restrict free movement of goods, services and persons, including workers, which have been communicated. Those measures shall be published within one working day of their receipt via an electronic platform managed by the Commission.
2. An implementing act introducing a measure included in this Chapter shall clearly and specifically list the crisis-relevant goods and services, from those listed in the implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14(3) to which such a measure applies. That measure shall apply only for the duration of the emergency mode.
Or. en
▌
Amendment 111
Article 24
Proposal for a regulation
Information requests to economic operators
Article 19 – paragraph 16 b (new)
1. ▌The Commission may invite the relevant economic operators in the supply chains of crisis-relevant goods or services to transmit on a voluntary basis ▌ within a set time limit, specific information where:
Text proposed by the Commission
(a) there are severe shortages of crisis-relevant goods or services or an immediate threat thereof;
Amendment
(b) the information sought is strictly necessary for assessing whether any of the measures laid down in Article 26, or Articles 32 to 37 would be capable of reducing such shortages or the threat thereof;
16b. Member States shall inform citizens, consumers, businesses, workers and their representatives and any affected stakeholders, in a clear and unambiguous manner, about measures that affect the free movement of goods, services and persons, including workers and service providers, before their entry into force, in particular through their single point of contact. Member States shall ensure a continuous dialogue with stakeholders, including communication with social partners and international partners.
(c) the information provided through the Board or through other means from the Member States in the contingency or internal market vigilance mode is not sufficient; and
Or. en
(d) the Commission is not able to obtain such information from other sources.
Justification
The Commission, after consulting and in cooperation with the Board, shall assess the existence of the conditions referred to in the first subparagraph.
moved here from Art. 16.4 and 16.5 and further substantiated.
2. If no information is transmitted to the Commission on a voluntary basis within the set time limit pursuant to paragraph 1 and if the information gathered by the Commission, through the requests for information on a voluntary basis pursuant to paragraph 1, or from any other sources as listed in the contingency or internal market vigilance mode, remains insufficient for assessing whether the deployment of the measures laid down in Article 26, or Articles 32 to 37 would allow reducing the severe shortages of crisis-relevant goods or services or the threat thereof and whether any such measures should be taken, the Commission may make a request for information, by means of an implementing act.
Amendment 112
2a. Before adopting such an implementing act, and taking into consideration the opinion of the Board, the Commission shall:
Proposal for a regulation
(a) assess the necessity and the proportionality of such an information request for the achievement of the envisaged objectives laid down in paragraph 1(b); This assessment shall be published with the implementing act, if adopted; and
Article 21 – paragraph 2
(b) take due account of the administrative burden, which such a request may entail for the concerned economic operators and in particular for small and medium-sized enterprises as defined in the Annex of Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC (SMEs) and modulate the timelines for submitting the information accordingly.
Text proposed by the Commission
3. The information requests referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 may only concern targeted information about:
Amendment
(a) ▌ the production capacities and possible existing stocks of the crisis-relevant goods ▌ in production facilities located in the Union and production facilities located in a third country which the relevant operator operates or contracts or purchases supply from, while fully respecting trade and business secrets ▌ ;
2. Member States shall ensure that it is possible for citizens, consumers, economic operators and workers and their representatives to receive, at their request and via the respective single points of contact, information from the competent authorities on the way in which the respective national crisis response measures are generally interpreted and applied. Where appropriate, such information shall include a step-by-step guide. The information shall be provided in clear, understandable and intelligible language. It shall be easily accessible at a distance and by electronic means and shall be kept up to date.
(aa) the schedule of the expected production output of crisis-relevant goods for the following 3 months, if available, the information request regarding production facilities located in the Union or in a third country in which the operator operates or contracts;
2. Member States shall ensure that it is possible for citizens, consumers, economic operators and workers and their representatives to receive, at their request and via the respective single points of contact, information from the competent authorities on the way in which the respective national crisis response measures are generally interpreted and applied. Where appropriate, such information shall include a step-by-step guide. The information shall be provided in clear, understandable and intelligible language. It shall be easily accessible at a distance and by electronic means and shall be kept up to date. Member States shall make best efforts to provide the information in all official languages of the Union, paying particular attention to the situation and needs of the border regions.
(b) any relevant disruptions or shortages of supply chains of crisis-relevant goods or services.
Or. en
3a. Any implementing act laying down an information request to economic operators pursuant to paragraph 2 shall:
Justification
(a) specify the crisis-relevant goods and services as defined in the list according to Article 14(3) that are relevant for the information request;
The lack of available information in all relevant languages caused great issues in the border regions, where the limitations on free movement were already particularly impactful.
(b) specify the relevant economic operators concerned by the information request;
Amendment 113
(c) specify the information that is sought, including providing where necessary a template with the questions that may be addressed to the individual relevant economic operators;
Proposal for a regulation
(d) demonstrate the existence of the exceptional need referred to in paragraph 1 point b for which the information are requested;
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point a
(e) explain the purpose of the request, the intended use of the information requested, and the duration of that use;
Text proposed by the Commission
(f) specify the timeline by which the economic operator may ask the Commission to modify the request;
Amendment
(g) be expressed in a clear, concise and understandable language;
(a) assistance in requesting and obtaining information as regards Union level crisis response measures that are relevant to the activated Single Market emergency or which affect the exercise of the free movement of goods, services, persons and workers;
(h) take into account the protection of trade secrets; and
(a) assistance in requesting and obtaining information as regards Union level crisis response measures that are relevant to the activated internal market emergency or which affect the exercise of the free movement of goods, services, persons and workers;
(i) take into account the economic operator's effort required to make the information available on a voluntary basis, especially if it is an SME.
Or. en
4. Following the activation of the information requests to economic operators by means of an implementing act pursuant to paragraph 2, the Commission shall address a ▌ decision to each of those relevant economic operators in supply chains of crisis-relevant goods or services that have been identified in the implementing act pursuant to paragraph 2, requesting them to either provide the information specified in the implementing act pursuant to paragraph 2 or to explain why they cannot provide such information. The Commission shall rely, where possible, on the relevant and available contact lists of the economic operators active in the selected supply chains of crisis-relevant goods and services, compiled by the Member States in accordance with Article 11. The Commission may also where relevant obtain the necessary information on the relevant economic operators from the Member States.
Amendment 114
4a. When the processing of an information request by a relevant economic operator has the potential to significantly disrupt its operations, the said economic operator may refuse to supply the requested information. The relevant economic operator shall provide to the Commission the reasons for any refusal to supply requested information. The Commission shall not forward or publish an economic operator’s refusal to supply the requested information or their reasoning for doing so.
Proposal for a regulation
4b. The Commission shall without delay forward a copy of any request for information referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 to the competent authority of the Member State in whose territory the economic operator is situated. If the competent authority of the Member States so requires, the Commission shall transmit the information acquired from the respective economic operator in accordance with Union law.
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point b
4c. The Commission receiving information pursuant to a request for information referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall:
Text proposed by the Commission
(a) not use the information in a manner incompatible with the purpose for which the information was requested;
Amendment
(b) ensure, insofar as the processing of personal data is necessary, the implementation of technical and organisational measures that preserve the confidentiality and integrity of the requested information, including in particular personal data, as well as safeguard the rights and freedoms of data subjects;
(b) assistance in the performance of any crisis procedures and formalities that have been put in place at the Union level due to the activated Single Market emergency;
(c) erase the information as soon as it is no longer necessary for the stated purpose and inform the economic operator and the relevant competent authority of the Member State without undue delay that the information has been erased unless archiving of the information is required for transparency purposes in accordance with national law.
(b) assistance in the performance of any crisis procedures and formalities that have been put in place at the Union level due to the activated internal market emergency;
5. The Commission decisions containing individual information requests adopted pursuant to paragraph 4 shall contain a reference to the implementing act referred to in paragraph 2 on which they are based and to the situations of severe crisis-related shortages or an immediate threat thereof which has given rise to them. Any information request shall be duly justified and proportionate in terms of the volume, nature and granularity of the data, as well as the frequency of access to the data requested, and shall be necessary for the management of the emergency ▌ . A request shall set out a reasonable time limit not exceeding 20 working days within which the information or the justification for the refusal to supply such information are to be provided. The operator may request a one-time extension to the time limit until two days prior to its expiration in the event that the gravity of the situation requires such extension. The Commission shall respond, within one working day, to any such request for an extension to the time limit. When setting this time limit the Commission shall in particular take into consideration the size of the undertaking concerned in terms of employees and its effort to collect and make information available. The decision shall also contain safeguards for protection of data in accordance with Article 40 of this Regulation, safeguards for non-disclosure of sensitive business information and safeguards for non-disclosure of trade secrets and intellectual property contained in the reply in accordance with Article 40a, and information on the possibility of contesting it before the Court of Justice of the European Union in line with relevant Union law and the ▌ timeline for a reply.
Or. en
6. Relevant economic operators or anyone duly authorised to represent the economic operator may supply the information requested on behalf of the economic operator ▌ concerned. Each relevant economic operator ▌ shall provide the requested information on an individual basis in line with the Union rules on competition governing the exchange of information. ▌
Amendment 115
▌
Proposal for a regulation
8. The implementing acts referred to in paragraph 2 shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 42(2). On duly justified imperative grounds of urgency relating to the impacts of the crisis on the internal market, the Commission shall adopt immediately applicable implementing acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 42(3).
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point c
8a. The information requests shall not entail the supply of information the disclosure of which would be contrary to the essential interests of Member States’ national security.
Text proposed by the Commission
▌
Amendment
▌
(c) putting together a list with all national crisis measures and national contact points.
▌
(c) establishing a list with all national crisis measures and national contact points.
▌
Or. en
▌
Amendment 116
▌
Proposal for a regulation
▌
Title III – title
Article 26
Text proposed by the Commission
Activation of emergency procedures in relevant Union product legislation
Amendment
When the internal market emergency mode has been activated by means of a Council implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14, and there is a shortage of crisis-relevant goods the Commission may activate by means of implementing acts the emergency procedures included in the Union legal frameworks amended by ▌ Regulation (EU) .../... of the European Parliament and of the Council+26 [IMERA Omnibus Regulation] and Directive (EU) .../... of the European Parliament and of the Council++27 [IMERA Omnibus Directive] as regards crisis-relevant goods, indicating which crisis-relevant goods and emergency procedures are subject to the activation, providing reasons for such activation and its proportionality and indicating the duration of such activation ▌ . That measure shall apply only during the duration of the internal market emergency mode.
Single Market emergency response measures
Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 42(2). On duly justified imperative grounds of urgency relating to the impacts of the crisis on the internal market, the Commission shall adopt immediately applicable implementing acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 42(3).
Internal market emergency response measures
Article 27
Or. en
Priority-rated requests
Amendment 117
1. The Commission may, in exceptional situations, after consulting the Member State(s) in which the economic operators are established, and taking utmost account of its/their view(s), address a request to one or more economic operators established in the Union to accept and prioritise certain requests for the production or supply of crisis-relevant goods (‘priority-rated requests') when: (a) there is a severe and persistent shortage of the crisis-relevant goods subject to the request; and (b) the production or supply of such goods could not be achieved by other measures provided for in this Regulation, including those referred to in Article 33 or in Part V.
Proposal for a regulation
1a. The Commission must demonstrate that the choice of the recipients and beneficiaries of the requests is non-discriminatory and complies with competition rules.
Article 23 – paragraph 1
2. The Commission shall base its request on objective, factual, measurable and substantiated data, showing that such prioritisation is indispensable to ensure the maintenance of vital societal economic activities in the internal market, as well as having regard to the legitimate interests of the ▌ economic operator and the cost and effort required for any change in production sequence the supply chain. The Commission’s request shall explicitly indicate that the economic operator remains free to refuse the request.
Text proposed by the Commission
3. Where the economic operator to which the request referred to in paragraph 1 is addressed has expressly accepted the request to prioritise the requests, the Commission shall adopt an implementing act providing for:
Amendment
(a) the legal basis of the priority-rated requests which has to be complied with by the economic operator;
1. Binding measures included in this Chapter may be adopted by the Commission by means of implementing acts in accordance with Articles 24(2), first subparagraph of Article 26 and Article 27(2) may be adopted only after a Single Market Emergency has been activated by means of a Council implementing act in accordance with Article 14.
(b) the goods subject to the priority-rated requests and quantity in which they are to be supplied;
1. Binding measures included in this Chapter may be adopted by the Commission by means of implementing acts in accordance with Article 27(2) only when an internal market emergency has been activated by means of a Council implementing act in accordance with Article 14.
(c) the time limits within which the priority-rated request is to be completed; and
Or. en
(d) the beneficiaries of the priority-rated requests; and
Amendment 118
(e) the waiver of contractual liability under the conditions laid down in paragraph 3b.
Proposal for a regulation
3a. The priority-rated requests shall be placed at a fair and reasonable price adequately taking into account the economic operator’s opportunity costs when fulfilling the priority-rated requests vis-à-vis existing contractual obligations. The priority-rated requests shall take precedence over any prior private or public contractual obligation related to the goods subject to the priority-rated request under private or public law.
Article 23 – paragraph 2
3b. The economic operator subject to that priority-rated requests shall not be liable for any breach of contractual obligation that is governed by the law of a Member State, only to the extent that:
Text proposed by the Commission
(a) the breach of contractual obligations is necessary for compliance with the required prioritisation;
Amendment
(b) the implementing act referred to in paragraph 3 has been complied with; and
2. An implementing act introducing a measure included in this Chapter shall clearly and specifically list the crisis-relevant goods and services to which such measure applies. That measure shall apply only for the duration of the emergency mode.
(c) the acceptance of the priority-rated request was not solely made with a view to unduly avoiding a prior performance obligation.
2. An implementing act introducing a measure included in this Chapter shall clearly and specifically list the crisis-relevant goods and services identified in the implementing act adopted in accordance with Article 15(5) to which such a measure applies. That measure shall apply only for the duration of the emergency mode.
4. The priority-rated requests shall not include goods the production or supply of which would be contrary to the essential interests of Member States’ national security or defence.
Or. en
▌
Amendment 119
5. The Commission shall adopt the implementing act referred to in paragraph 3 in accordance with applicable Union law, including the principles of necessity and proportionality, and the Union’s obligations under international law.
Proposal for a regulation
6. The implementing act referred to in paragraph 3 shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 42(2).
Article 24 – paragraph 1
7. Where an economic operator, after having expressly accepted to prioritise the orders requested by the Commission, intentionally or through gross negligence, does not comply with the obligation to prioritise those orders, the Commission may by means of a decision, where deemed necessary and proportionate, impose a fine on the economic operator concerned. That fine shall not exceed 100 000 EUR. Fines imposed on economic operators that are SMEs, as defined in Recommendation 2003/361/EC, shall not exceed 25 000 EUR.
Text proposed by the Commission
▌
Amendment
Article 28
1. Where there is a severe crisis-related shortages or an immediate threat thereof, the Commission may invite representative organisations or economic operators in crisis-relevant supply chains to transmit on a voluntary basis, within a set time limit, specific information to the Commission on the production capacities and possible existing stocks of crisis-relevant goods and components thereof in Union production facilities and third country facilities which it operates, contracts or purchases supply from, as well as information on any relevant supply chain disruptions within a given deadline.
Fines to economic operators for failure to comply with an accepted priority-rated request
1. Where there is a severe crisis-related shortages or an immediate threat thereof, the Commission may invite economic operators in crisis-relevant supply chains to transmit on a voluntary basis, within a reasonable time limit, specific information to the Commission in accordance with paragraph 3.
▌ ▌
Or. en
▌
Justification
▌
Information should only be provided on a voluntary basis. It is disproportionate to require companies to provide amounts of information similar to companies under investigation, for example in the area of competition. Moreover, the information that the Commission can demand from companies should be contained in a closed list to provide legal certainty, but above all, ensure comparability of results when multiple companies are asked to provide information.
▌
Amendment 120
▌
Proposal for a regulation
▌
Article 24 – paragraph 2
1. In fixing the amount of the fine in Article 27(7), regard shall be had to the size and economic resources of the economic operator concerned, to the nature, gravity and duration of the infringement, taking due account of the principles of proportionality and appropriateness.
Text proposed by the Commission
2. The Court of Justice of the European Union shall have unlimited jurisdiction to review decisions whereby the Commission has fixed a fine in Article 27(7). It may cancel, reduce or increase the fine imposed.
Amendment
Article 29
2. If the addressees do not transmit the information requested in accordance with paragraph 1 within the time-limit and do not provide a valid justification for not doing so, the Commission may, by means of an implementing act, require that they transmit the information, indicating in the implementing act why it is proportionate and necessary to do so, specifying the crisis-relevant goods and services and addressees concerned by the information request, and the information that is sought, providing where necessary a template with the questions that may be addressed to the economic operators.
Limitation period for the imposition of fines
2. If the addressees do not transmit the information requested in accordance with paragraph 1 within the time-limit and do not provide a valid justification for not doing so, the Commission may, by means of a recommendation, request that they transmit the information, indicating why it is proportionate and necessary to do so, specifying the crisis-relevant goods and services and addressees concerned by the information request, and the information that is sought, providing where necessary a template with the questions that may be addressed to the economic operators.
1. The Commission power to impose fines in accordance with Article 27(7) and Article 28 shall be subject to a two-year limitation periods.
Or. en
▌
Amendment 121
▌
Proposal for a regulation
2. The time shall begin to run on the day on which the Commission becomes aware of the infringement. However, in case of continuous or repeated infringements, time shall begin to run on the day on which the infringement ceases.
Article 24 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Any action taken by the Commission or the competent authorities of the Member States for the purposes of ensuring compliance with the provisions of this Regulation shall interrupt the limitation period.
Text proposed by the Commission
4. The interruption of the limitation period shall apply for all the parties which are held responsible for the participation in the infringement.
Amendment
5. Each interruption shall start the time running afresh. However, the limitation period shall expire at the latest on the day in which a period equal to twice the limitation period has elapsed without the Commission having imposed a fine. That period shall be extended by the time during which the limitation period is suspended because the decision of the Commission is the subject of proceedings pending before the Court of Justice of the European Union.
3. The information requests referred to in paragraph 1 may concern the following:
Article 30
3. The information requests referred to in paragraph 1 may concern the following, while fully respecting trade and business secrets, and protecting intellectual property:
Limitation periods for enforcement of fines
Or. en
1. The power of the Commission to enforce decisions taken pursuant to Article 27(7) shall be subject to a limitation period of five years.
Justification
2. Time shall begin to run on the day on which the decision becomes final.
The information that the Commission can demand from companies should be contained in a closed list. Moreover, economic operators should be the only addressees of such requests as they are better placed to answer them. Lastly, it cannot be expected that economic operators provide information relating to production facilities they do not own from which they purchase supplies because such information is held by the operator of such facilities.
3. The limitation period for the enforcement of fines shall be interrupted:
Amendment 122
(a) by notification of a decision varying the original amount of the fine or refusing an application for variation;
Proposal for a regulation
(b) by any action of the Commission or of a Member State, acting at the request of the Commission, designed to enforce payment of the fine.
Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point a
4. Each interruption shall start time running afresh.
Text proposed by the Commission
5. The limitation period for the enforcement of fines shall be suspended for so long as:
Amendment
(a) time to pay is allowed;
(a) targeted information to the Commission in relation to the production capacities and possible existing stocks of the crisis-relevant goods and components thereof in production facilities located in the Union and production facilities located in a third country which the organisation or the operator referred to in paragraph 1 operates, contracts or purchases supply from, while fully respecting trade and business secrets and requiring them to transmit to the Commission a schedule of the expected production output for the following 3 months for production facility located in the Union as well as any relevant supply chain disruptions;
(b) enforcement of payment is suspended pursuant to a decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
(a) targeted information to the Commission on the production capacities and possible existing stocks of the crisis-relevant goods and components thereof in production facilities located in the Union and production facilities located in a third country which the operator referred to in paragraph 1 operates or contracts;
Article 31
Or. en
Right to be heard for the imposition of fines
Amendment 123
1. Before adopting a decision pursuant to Article 27(7), the Commission shall give the economic operator ▌ concerned the opportunity of being heard on:
Proposal for a regulation
(a) preliminary findings of the Commission, including any matter to which the Commission has taken objections;
Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) measures that the Commission may intend to take in view of the preliminary findings pursuant to point (a) of this paragraph.
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(b) other information necessary for assessing the nature or magnitude of a given supply chain disruption or shortage.
(b) a schedule of the expected production output of crisis-relevant goods for the 3 months following the information request for production facilities located in the Union or in a third country which the operator operates or contracts;
Or. en
Amendment 124
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 4
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
4. Following the activation of the mandatory information requests to economic operators by means of an implementing act, the Commission shall address a formal decision to each of those representative organisations or economic operators in crisis-relevant supply chains that have been identified in the implementing act, requesting them to provide the information specified in the implementing act. The Commission shall rely, where possible, on the relevant and available contact lists of the economic operators active in the selected supply chains of crisis-relevant goods and services, compiled by the Member States. The Commission may obtain the necessary information on the relevant economic operators from the Member States.
4. The Commission shall rely, where possible, on the relevant and available contact lists of the economic operators active in the selected supply chains of crisis-relevant goods and services, compiled by the Member States. The Commission may obtain the necessary information on the relevant economic operators from the Member States.
Or. en
Amendment 125
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 5
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
5. The Commission Decisions containing individual information requests shall contain a reference to the implementing act referred to in paragraph 2 on which they are based and to the situations of severe crisis-related shortages or an immediate threat thereof which has given rise to them. Any information request shall be duly justified and proportionate in terms of the volume, nature and granularity of the data, as well as the frequency of access to the data requested, and shall be necessary for the management of the emergency or for compiling relevant official statistics. A request shall set out a reasonable time limit within which the information is to be provided. It shall take into account the effort required to collect and make the data available by the economic operator or representative organisation. The formal decision shall also contain safeguards for protection of data in accordance with Article 39 of this Regulation, safeguards for non-disclosure of sensitive business information contained in the reply in accordance with Article 25, and information on the possibility of contesting it before the Court of Justice of the European Union in line with relevant Union law and the fines provided for in Article 28 for failure to comply and the timeline for a reply.
5. The Commission recommendation shall contain a reference to the situations of severe crisis-related shortages or an immediate threat thereof which has given rise to them. Any information request shall be duly justified and proportionate in terms of the volume, nature and granularity of the data, as well as the frequency of access to the data requested, and shall be necessary for the management of the emergency. A request shall set out a reasonable time limit within which the information is to be provided. The operator may demand a one-time extension to the time limit until two days prior to its expiration in the event that the gravity of the situation requires so. The Commission shall respond, within one working day, to any such request for an extension to the time limit. An information request shall take into account the effort required to collect and make the data available by the economic operator. The recommendation shall also contain safeguards for protection of data in accordance with Article 39 of this Regulation, safeguards for non-disclosure of sensitive business information contained, and safeguards for non-disclosure of trade secrets and intellectual property in the reply in accordance with Article 25.
Or. en
Justification
The selective nature of information requests would render them useless for the compilation of official statistics, and rules for the data collection relating to the computation of official statistics are already in place. Moreover, information requests should be voluntary and contain sufficient safeguards for the protection of trade and business secrets, as well as intellectual property.
Amendment 126
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 7
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
7. The Court of Justice of the European Union shall have unlimited jurisdiction to review decisions whereby the Commission has imposed a mandatory information request to an economic operator.
deleted
Or. en
Amendment 127
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 8
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
8. The implementing acts referred to in paragraph 2 shall be adopted in accordance with the committee procedure referred to in Article 42(2). On duly justified imperative grounds of urgency relating to the impacts of the crisis on the Single Market, the Commission shall adopt immediately applicable implementing acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 42(3).
deleted
Or. en
Amendment 128
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 2
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
2. Member States and the Commission shall ensure the protection of trade and business secrets and other sensitive and confidential information acquired and generated in application of this Regulation, including recommendations and measures to be taken, in accordance with Union and the respective national law.
2. Member States and the Commission shall ensure the protection of trade and business secrets, intellectual property and other sensitive and confidential information acquired and generated in application of this Regulation, including recommendations and measures to be taken, in accordance with Union and the respective national law.
Or. en
Amendment 129
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
5a. Any information obtained through information requests shall be deleted immediately upon the expiration of the internal market emergency mode, or as soon as all relevant reports pertaining to the internal market emergency mode have been submitted. The Commission and Member States shall send a confirmation of the deletion of that information to the economic operators affected immediately after its deletion.
Or. en
Justification
Companies voluntarily and actively contributing to resolving a crisis through the provision of information must have certainty that the use of the information is not only limited to the purposes it was demanded for, but also that the information is no longer stored than needed.
Amendment 130
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
When the Single Market emergency mode has been activated by means of a Council implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14, and there is a shortage of crisis relevant goods the Commission may activate by means of implementing acts the emergency procedures included in the Union legal frameworks amended by [Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2016/424, Regulation (EU) 2016/425, Regulation (EU) 2016/426, Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 and Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 and introducing emergency procedures for the conformity assessment, adoption of common specifications and market surveillance in the context of a Single Market emergency and Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2000/14/EC, 2006/42/EC, 2010/35/EU, 2013/29/EU, 2014/28/EU, 2014/29/EU, 2014/30/EU, 2014/31/EU, 2014/32/EU, 2014/33/EU, 2014/34/EU, 2014/35/EU, 2014/53/EU, and2014/68/EU and introducingas regard emergency procedures for the conformity assessment, adoption of common specifications and market surveillance in the context ofdue to a Single Market] as regards crisis-relevant goods, indicating which crisis-relevant goods and emergency procedures are subject to the activation, providing reasons for such activation and its proportionality, and indicating the duration of such activation.
deleted
Or. en
Amendment 131
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
1. The Commission may invite one or more economic operators in crisis-relevant supply chains established in the Union to accept and prioritise certain orders for the production or supply of crisis-relevant goods (‘priority rated order’).
1. The Commission may invite one or more economic operators in crisis-relevant supply chains established in the Union to accept and prioritise certain orders for the production or supply of crisis-relevant goods (‘priority rated order’). The Commission shall specify all relevant information, including the quantity of the crisis-relevant goods and a fair price.
Or. en
Amendment 132
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
2. If an economic operator does not accept and prioritise priority rated orders, the Commission may, at its own initiative or at the request of 14 Member States, assess the necessity and proportionality of resorting to priority rated orders in such cases, the Commission shall give the economic operator concerned as well as any parties demonstrably affected by the potential priority rated order, the opportunity to state their position within a reasonable time limit set by the Commission in light of the circumstances of the case. In exceptional circumstances, following such an assessment, the Commission may address an implementing act to the economic operator concerned, requiring it to either accept and prioritise the priority rated orders specified in the implementing act or explain why it is not possible or appropriate for that operator to do so. The Commission’s decision shall be based on objective data showing that such prioritisation is indispensable to ensure the maintenance of vital societal economic activities in the Single Market
2. If an economic operator does not accept and prioritise priority rated orders, the Commission may, following a positive opinion of the advisory board, at the request of 14 Member States, assess the necessity and proportionality of resorting to priority rated orders. In such cases, the Commission shall give the economic operator concerned as well as any parties demonstrably affected by the potential priority rated order, the opportunity to state their position within a reasonable time limit set by the Commission in light of the circumstances of the case. In exceptional circumstances, following such an assessment, the Commission may, following a positive opinion of the advisory group, address an implementing act to the economic operator concerned, requiring it to either accept and prioritise the priority rated orders specified in the implementing act or explain why it is not possible or appropriate for that operator to do so. The Commission’s decision shall be based on objective data showing that such prioritisation is indispensable to ensure the maintenance of vital societal economic activities in the internal market.
Or. en
Justification
Priority rated orders should be an instrument of very last resort. Therefore, the conditions for activation should be narrower.
Amendment 133
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
Where the economic operator to which the decision referred to in paragraph 2 is addressed declines to accept the requirement to accept and prioritise the orders specified in the decision, it shall provide to the Commission, within 10 days from the notification of the decision, a reasoned explanation setting out duly justified reasons why it is not possible or appropriate, in light of the objectives of this provision, for it to comply with the requirement. Such reasons include the inability of the operator to perform the priority rated order on account of insufficient production capacity or a serious risk that accepting the order would entail particular hardship or economic burden for the operator, or other considerations of comparable gravity.
Where the economic operator to which the decision referred to in paragraph 2 is addressed declines to accept the requirement to accept and prioritise the orders specified in the decision, it shall provide to the Commission, within 10 days from the notification of the decision, a reasoned explanation setting out duly justified reasons why it is not possible or appropriate for it to comply with the requirement. Such reasons include the inability of the operator to perform the priority rated order on account of insufficient production capacity or a serious risk that accepting the order would entail particular hardship or economic burden for the operator, particularly taking into account the prices and quantities specified by the Commission, or other considerations of comparable gravity.
Or. en
Justification
Operators should have a broader set of justifications available going beyond the objectives of the regulation for refusing a priority rated order because the objectives of this regulation might not sufficiently relate to the reasons for which the operator refuses a priority rated order.
Amendment 134
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The Commission may make such reasoned explanation or parts of it public, with due regard to business confidentiality.
deleted
Or. en
Justification
There is no additional value in publishing the contents of such a reasoned explanation, and it might have a direct impact on the company value and its owners, employees or downstream trade links.
Amendment 135
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 6
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
6. The Commission shall take the decision referred to in paragraph 2 in accordance with applicable Union law, including the principles of necessity and proportionality, and the Union’s obligations under international law. The decision shall in particular take into account the legitimate interests of the economic operator concerned and any available information concerning the cost and effort required for any change in production sequence. It shall state the legal basis for its adoption, fix the time limits within which the priority rated order is to be performed and, where applicable, specify the product and quantity. It shall state the fines provided for in Article 28 for failure to comply with the decision. The priority rated order shall be placed at a fair and reasonable price.
6. The Commission shall take the decision referred to in paragraph 2 in accordance with applicable Union law, including the principles of necessity and proportionality, and the Union’s obligations under international law. The decision shall in particular take into account the legitimate interests of the economic operator concerned and any available information concerning the cost and effort required for any change in production sequence. It shall state the legal basis for its adoption, fix the time limits within which the priority rated order is to be performed and specify the product, the price and quantity. It shall state the fines provided for in Article 28 for failure to comply with the decision. The priority rated order shall be placed at a fair and reasonable price, which shall include, where relevant, an appropriate compensation for all additional costs incurred by the economic operator.
Or. en
Justification
No economic hardship should arise from priority rated orders. Potential changes to production lines, capital investment and retraining must be compensated for. Moreover, the goods subject to priority orders are likely to be crisis relevant and therefore, subject to high demand and price increases. Any such price increases must be reflected in the prices that are quoted in relation to priority rated orders.
Amendment 136
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – title
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
Fines to operators for failure to comply with the obligation to reply to mandatory information requests or to comply with priority rated orders
Fines to operators for failure to comply with priority rated orders
Or. en
Justification
As the requests for information should remain voluntary for companies, only the fining regime for priority rated orders should be maintained.
Amendment 137
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point a
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(a) where a representative organisation of economic operators or an economic operator, intentionally or through gross negligence, supplies incorrect, incomplete or misleading information in response to a request made pursuant to Article 24, or does not supply the information within the prescribed time limit;
deleted
Or. en
Amendment 138
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 2
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
2. Fines imposed in the cases referred to in paragraph 1 (a) and (b) shall not exceed 200 000 EUR.
2. Fines imposed in the cases referred to in paragraph 1 (b) shall not exceed 50 000 EUR.
Or. en
Justification
Fines should be proportional to the offense and reflect the economic burdens weighting on companies during a crisis.
Amendment 139
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 3
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
3. Fines imposed in the cases referred to in paragraph 1 (c) shall not exceed 1 % of the average daily turnover in the preceding business year for each working day of non-compliance with the obligation pursuant to Article 27 (priority rated orders) calculated from the date established in the decision not exceeding 1% of total turnover in the preceding business year.
3. Fines imposed in the cases referred to in paragraph 1 (c) shall not exceed 1 % of the average daily turnover in the preceding business year for each working day of non-compliance with the obligation pursuant to Article 27 (priority rated orders) calculated from the date established in the decision not exceeding 1% of global turnover in the preceding business year.
Or. en
Amendment 140
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 4
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
4. In fixing the amount of the fine, regard shall be had to the size and economic resources of the economic operator concerned, to the nature, gravity and duration of the infringement, taking due account of the principles of proportionality and appropriateness.
4. In fixing the amount of the fine, the Commission shall take into account the size and economic resources of the economic operator concerned, to the nature, gravity and duration of the infringement, taking due account of the principles of proportionality and appropriateness. The impact of the crisis on the economic operator and its business activities shall also be taken into account.
Or. en
Amendment 141
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point a
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(a) two years in the case of infringements of provisions concerning requests of information pursuant to Article 24;
deleted
Or. en
Justification
Compliance with requests for information shall remain voluntary, hence alignment with proposed changes to Art.28.
Amendment 142
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point b
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
(b) three years in the case infringements of provisions concerning the obligation to prioritise the production of crisis-relevant goods pursuant to Article 26(2).
(b) three years in the case infringements of provisions concerning the obligation to prioritise the production of crisis-relevant goods pursuant to Article 27.
Or. en
Amendment 143
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
1. Before adopting a decision pursuant to Article 28, the Commission shall give the economic operator or representative organisations of economic operators concerned the opportunity of being heard on:
1. Before adopting a decision pursuant to Article 28, the Commission shall give the economic operator concerned the opportunity of being heard on:
Or. en
Justification
Priority rated orders should only be addressed to economic operators (alignment with Art. 27 and proposed changes to sanctions regime).
Amendment 144
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 2
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
2. Undertakings and representative organisations of economic operators concerned may submit their observations to the Commission’s preliminary findings within a time limit which shall be fixed by the Commission in its preliminary findings and which may not be less than 21 days.
2. The economic operators concerned may submit their observations to the Commission’s preliminary findings within a time limit which shall be fixed by the Commission in its preliminary findings and which may not be less than 21 days.
Or. en
3. The Commission shall base its decisions only on objections on which economic operators ▌ concerned have been able to comment.
Amendment 145
4. The rights of defence of the economic operator ▌ concerned shall be fully respected in any proceedings. The economic operator ▌ concerned shall be entitled to have access to the Commission's file under the terms of a negotiated disclosure, subject to the legitimate interest of economic operators in the protection of their business secrets. The right of access to the file shall not extend to confidential information and internal documents of the Commission or the authorities of the Member States. In particular, the right of access shall not extend to correspondence between the Commission and the authorities of the Member States. Nothing in this paragraph shall prevent the Commission from disclosing and using information necessary to prove an infringement.
Proposal for a regulation
Chapter II Other measures for ensuring availability of crisis-relevant goods and services
Article 31 – paragraph 3
Article 32
Text proposed by the Commission
Solidarity and coordinated distribution of crisis-relevant goods and services
Amendment
1. In the event of a shortage of crisis-relevant goods and services affecting one or more Member States, the Member States concerned may notify the Commission thereof and indicate the quantities needed and any other relevant information. The Commission shall transmit the information to all competent authorities and streamline the coordination of Member States’ responses.
3. The Commission shall base its decisions only on objections on which economic operators and representative organisations of economic operators concerned have been able to comment.
2. Where, pursuant to paragraph 1, the Commission is informed that crisis-relevant goods and services are insufficient in a Member State to meet the needs related to the internal market emergency, the Commission, taking into consideration the opinion provided by the Board and the information collected under this Regulation, may recommend to other Member States to distribute these crisis-relevant goods or services in a targeted way, where possible, having regard to the need not to further aggravate disruptions on the internal market, including in geographical areas particularly affected by such disruptions and in accordance with the principles of necessity, proportionality and solidarity and establishing the most efficient use of crisis-relevant goods and services with a view to ending the internal market emergency.
3. The Commission shall base its decisions only on objections on which economic operators concerned have been able to comment.
Article 33
Or. en
▌ Measures to ensure the availability and supply of crisis-relevant goods or services
Amendment 146
1. Where, pursuant to Article 32(1), the Commission is informed that there is a risk of a shortage of crisis-relevant goods and services in a Member State to meet the needs related to the internal market emergency, it may, taking into consideration the opinion by the Board, recommend that Member States take specific measures. Those measures shall ensure the efficient re-organisation of supply chains and production lines and the use of existing stocks to increase the availability and supply of crisis-relevant goods and services, as quickly as possible.
Proposal for a regulation
2. In particular, the measures referred to in paragraph 1 may include measures:
Article 31 – paragraph 4
(a) facilitating the expansion or repurposing of existing or the establishment of new production capacities for crisis-relevant goods;
Text proposed by the Commission
(b) facilitating the expansion of existing or the establishment of new capacities related to service activities;
Amendment
(c) aiming at accelerating relevant approval and authorisation procedures, including environmental permits, regarding or affecting the production and distribution of crisis-relevant goods;
4. The rights of defence of the economic operator or representative organisations of economic operators concerned shall be fully respected in any proceedings. The economic operator or representative organisations of economic operators concerned shall be entitled to have access to the Commission's file under the terms of a negotiated disclosure, subject to the legitimate interest of economic operators in the protection of their business secrets. The right of access to the file shall not extend to confidential information and internal documents of the Commission or the authorities of the Member States. In particular, the right of access shall not extend to correspondence between the Commission and the authorities of the Member States. Nothing in this paragraph shall prevent the Commission from disclosing and using information necessary to prove an infringement.
(ca) aiming at accelerating authorisation and registration requirements of crisis-relevant services;
4. The rights of defence of the economic operator concerned shall be fully respected in any proceedings. The economic operator concerned shall be entitled to have access to the Commission's file under the terms of a negotiated disclosure, subject to the legitimate interest of economic operators in the protection of their business secrets. The right of access to the file shall not extend to confidential information and internal documents of the Commission or the authorities of the Member States. In particular, the right of access shall not extend to correspondence between the Commission and the authorities of the Member States. Nothing in this paragraph shall prevent the Commission from disclosing and using information necessary to prove an infringement.
(d) aiming at accelerating relevant product approval procedures in view of placing on the market crisis-relevant goods that are not subject to any Union legislation harmonising the conditions for the marketing of products.
Or. en
Part V Public procurement
Amendment 147
CHAPTER I Public procurement of goods and services of critical importance and crisis-relevant goods and services by the Commission on behalf of or in the name of Member States during vigilance and emergency modes
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34
Article 32 – paragraph -1 (new)
Request of Member States to the Commission to procure goods and services on their behalf or in their name
Text proposed by the Commission
1. Two or more Member ▌ may request that the Commission launch a procurement on behalf of or in the name of the Member States that wish to be represented by the Commission (ʽparticipating Member States'), for the provision of goods and services of critical importance listed in an implementing act ▌ pursuant to Article 9(1) or crisis-relevant goods and services listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14(3).
Amendment
2. The Commission in consultation with the Board, shall assess without delay the necessity and proportionality of the request referred to in paragraph 1. Where the Commission intends not to follow that request, it shall inform the Member States concerned and the Board and give reasons for its refusal.
-1. In the event of a shortage of crisis-relevant goods or services affecting one or more Member States, the Member States concerned may notify the Commission, indicating the quantities needed and any other relevant information. The Commission shall transmit the information to all competent authorities and streamline the coordination of Member States’ responses.
3. Where the Commission agrees to procure on behalf of or in the name of the participating Member States, it shall:
Or. en
(a) inform all Member States and the Board of its intention to carry out the procurement procedure and invite the interested Member States to participate;
Amendment 148
(b) draw up a proposal for an agreement to be concluded with the participating Member States allowing the Commission to procure in their name on their behalf. This agreement shall lay down the detailed conditions for the procurement, including practical arrangements and the proposed maximum quantities, the conditions of the common purchasing or renting, including prices, and delivery timeframes on behalf of or in the name of the participating Member States.
Proposal for a regulation
▌
Article 32 – paragraph 1
3a. Where the Commission cancels the procurement procedure in accordance with Article 171 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046, it shall immediately inform the participating Member States thereof, so that the participating Member States can initiate their own procurement procedures without delay.
Text proposed by the Commission
Article 35
Amendment
Establishment and implementation of the negotiating mandate of the Commission
Where the strategic reserves constituted by the Member States in accordance with Article 12 prove to be insufficient to meet the needs related to the Single Market emergency, the Commission, taking into consideration the opinion provided by the advisory group, may recommend to the Member States to distribute the strategic reserves in a targeted way, where possible, having regard to the need not to further aggravate disruptions on the Single Market, including in geographical areas particularly affected by such disruptions and in accordance with the principles of necessity, proportionality and solidarity and establishing the most efficient use of reserves with a view to ending the Single Market emergency.
1. The agreement ▌ referred to in Article 34(3), point (b) shall establish a negotiating mandate for the Commission to procure on behalf of or in the name of the participating Member States for relevant goods and services of critical importance or crisis-relevant goods and services through the conclusion of new contracts. The negotiating mandate shall include the award criteria.
Where the strategic reserves constituted by the Member States prove to be insufficient to meet the needs related to the internal market emergency, the Commission, taking into consideration the opinion provided by the advisory board, may recommend to the Member States to distribute the strategic reserves in a targeted way, where possible, having regard to the need not to further aggravate disruptions on the internal market, including in geographical areas particularly affected by such disruptions and in accordance with the principles of necessity, proportionality and solidarity and establishing the most efficient use of reserves with a view to ending the internal market emergency.
2. Under this agreement, the Commission shall be entitled, when procuring on behalf of or in the name of the participating Member States, to enter into contracts with economic operators, including individual producers of goods and services of critical importance or crisis-relevant goods and services, concerning the provision of such goods or services.
Or. en
▌
Amendment 149
▌
Proposal for a regulation
4. Without prejudice to Article 171 of the Financial Regulation, the Commission shall carry out the procurement procedures. When awarding on behalf of or in the name of the participating Member States, the Commission shall conclude the resulting contracts with the economic operators.
Article 33 – paragraph 1
4a. The Commission shall invite participating Member States to nominate representatives to take part in the negotiation of the agreement referred to in Article 34 (3)(b) as well as in the preparation of the public procurement procedure.
Text proposed by the Commission
▌
Amendment
4c. The Commission shall ensure that participating Member States are treated in a non-discriminatory manner when carrying out the procurement procedures and when implementing the resulting agreements.
1. The Commission may, when it considers that there is a risk of a shortage of crisis-relevant goods, recommend that Member States implement specific measures to ensure the efficient re-organisation of supply chains and production lines and to use existing stocks to increase the availability and supply of crisis-relevant goods and services, as quickly as possible.
Article 36
1. The Commission may, when it considers that there is a risk of a shortage of crisis-relevant goods and services, recommend that Member States implement specific measures to ensure the efficient re-organisation of supply chains and production lines and to use existing stocks to increase the availability and supply of crisis-relevant goods and services, as quickly as possible.
Modalities of procurement by the Commission on behalf of or in the name of the Member States
Or. en
1. Procurement under this Regulation shall be carried out by the Commission in accordance with the rules set out in Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 ▌for its own procurement.
Amendment 150
2. When duly justified by the extreme urgency or when strictly necessary in order to adapt to unforeseen circumstances in the evolution of the internal market emergency, and provided the modification does not substantially alter the subject matter of the contract or agreement, the Commission may in agreement with the contractor:
Proposal for a regulation
(a) allow to modify the contract which has been signed, beyond the threshold of 50% and up to 100% of the initial contract value, provided that this is justified as strictly necessary to respond to the evolution of the internal market emergency; and/or
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
(b) in common agreement with the simple majority of the participating Member States, allow other Member States to join a signed contract for procurement by the Commission on behalf of or in the name of Member States, or to sign an additional contract in the name of new participating Member State; provided that this is justified as strictly necessary to respond to the evolution of the internal market emergency.
Text proposed by the Commission
2a. A modification shall be considered to be substantially altering the subject matter of the contract or agreement, where it renders the contract or agreement materially different in substance from the one initially concluded. A modification shall be considered to be substantially altering the subject matter of the contract or agreement where one or more of the following conditions are met:
Amendment
(a) the modification introduces or supresses significant conditions which, had they been part of the initial procurement procedure, would have allowed for the admission of other tenderers than those initially selected or for the acceptance of a tender other than that originally accepted, or would have attracted additional participants in the procurement procedure, or would not have led to the selection of the winning tenderer;
(ca) facilitating the free movement of crisis-relevant services.
(b) the modification significantly changes the economic balance of the contract or the agreement in favour of the contractor in a manner which was not provided for in the initial contract or agreement;
Or. en
(c) the modification significantly extends the scope of the contract or agreement.
Justification
CHAPTER II Joint Procurement during vigilance and emergency modes
Service providers, for example maintenance workers of crisis relevant machinery, may also be in short supply, and the Commission could issue recommendations if it sees fit.
Article 37
Amendment 151
Joint procurement procedure
Proposal for a regulation
1. ▌The Commission and one or more contracting authorities from the participating Member States may carry out a joint procurement procedure in accordance with the rules set out in Article 165(2) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 with a view to the provision of crisis-relevant goods or services or goods and services of critical importance. The Member States may acquire, rent or lease fully the capacities jointly procured.
Article 34 – paragraph 1
1a. The participation in the joint procurement procedure shall be open to all Member States, as well as to the European Free Trade Association States and Union candidate countries as well as the Principality of Andorra, the Principality of Monaco, the Republic of San Marino and the Vatican City State.
Text proposed by the Commission
1b. The joint procurement procedure shall be preceded by a joint procurement agreement between the participating Member States and third countries in order to determine the practical arrangements governing the procurement and the criteria for awarding the contract, in accordance with the relevant Union law.
Amendment
▌
1. Two or more Member States may request that the Commission launch a procurement on behalf of the Member States that wish to be represented by the Commission (ʽparticipating Member Statesʼ), for the purchasing of goods and services of strategic importance listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 9(1) or crisis-relevant goods and services listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14(5).
▌
1. Two or more Member States may request that the Commission launch a procurement on behalf of the Member States that wish to be represented by the Commission (‘participating Member Statesʼ), for the purchasing of goods and services of critical importance listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 9(1) or crisis-relevant goods and services listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14(5).
The Commission shall inform the European Parliament about the joint procurement procedures conducted in accordance with this Article and, upon request, grant access to the contracts that are concluded as a result of those procedures, subject to the adequate protection of commercially sensitive information, including business secrets, commercial relations and the interests of the Union.
Or. en
Chapter III Procurement by the Member States during the emergency mode
Amendment 152
Article 38
Proposal for a regulation
Consultation and coordination regarding individual procurement by the Member States
Article 35 – paragraph 1
When the internal market emergency mode has been activated pursuant to Article 14, Member States, shall make best efforts to inform each other and the Commission about the ongoing procurement procedures of crisis-relevant goods and services listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14(3).
Text proposed by the Commission
Prior to launching any new procurement procedures in accordance with Directive 2014/24/EU, Member States shall:
Amendment
(a) inform each other about the intention to launch procurement of such crisis-relevant goods and services by any of their contracting authorities or contracting entities;
1. The agreement [referred to in Article 34(3) shall establish a negotiating mandate for the Commission to act as a central purchasing body for relevant goods and services of strategic importance or crisis-relevant goods and services on behalf of the participating Member States through the conclusion of new contracts.
(b) consult the other Member States and the Commission about the most appropriate manner of procurement; and
1. The agreement referred to in Article 34(3) shall establish a negotiating mandate for the Commission to act as a central purchasing body for relevant goods and services of critical importance or crisis-relevant goods and services on behalf of the participating Member States through the conclusion of new contracts.
(c) coordinate their procurement actions at the time of internal market emergency in the spirit of solidarity between the Member States.
Or. en
Article 39
Amendment 153
Exclusivity clause
Proposal for a regulation
1. During an internal market emergency mode, the agreement governing the Commission’s procurement on behalf or in the name of one or more participating Member States or joint procurement between the Commission and one or more Member States shall, where appropriate, provide for an exclusivity clause, under which participating countries commit to not procuring the crisis-relevant goods or services in question through other channels and to not running parallel negotiation processes.
Article 35 – paragraph 3
Where such clause is provided for, it shall stipulate that the participating Member States are allowed to launch their own procurement procedure for acquisition of additional quantities of crisis-relevant goods or services that are subject to the ongoing joint procurement or procurement by the Commission on behalf of or in the name of the Member States in a manner that does not undermine the ongoing procurement, upon the agreement of the Commission, after consulting all other participating Member States. The request for agreement shall be addressed to the Commission who shall forward it to the other participating Member States for their observations.
Text proposed by the Commission
2. The exclusivity clause shall apply to any new contracts, including specific contracts in framework contracts, that the contracting authorities or contracting entities of the participating Member States would consider concluding during the activation of the internal market emergency mode.
Amendment
▌ ▌
3. Representatives of the Commission or experts nominated by the Commission may carry out on-site visits at the locations of production facilities of relevant goods of strategic importance or crisis-relevant goods.
deleted
Or. en
Justification
The right of Commission representatives or experts to visit may be negotiated as part of the procurement agreement, but this provision is not necessary to ensure compliance with a procurement agreement itself.
Amendment 154
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
Where it is necessary to carry out a joint procurement between the Commission and one or more contracting authorities from Member States in accordance with the rules set out in Article 165(2) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council, the Member States may acquire, rent or lease fully the capacities jointly procured.
The Commission and any of the Member States may engage, as contracting parties, in a joint procurement procedure conducted pursuant to Article 165(2) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 with a view to the purchase of crisis-relevant goods or goods and services of critical importance within a reasonable time frame.
Or. en
Amendment 155
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
By way of derogation from Article 165(2) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046, participation in the joint procurement procedure shall be open to all Member States, European Free Trade Association States and Union candidate countries as well as the Principality of Andorra, the Principality of Monaco, the Republic of San Marino and the Vatican City State.
Or. en
Amendment 156
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1 b (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The joint procurement procedure shall comply with the following conditions:
(a) it shall not affect the functioning of the internal market and shall not constitute discrimination or a restriction of trade, nor shall it cause distortion of competition;
(b) it shall not have any direct financial impact on the budget of the countries referred to in paragraph 2 that do not participate in the joint procurement.
Or. en
Amendment 157
Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 1
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
When the Single Market emergency mode has been activated pursuant to Article 14, Member States shall consult each other and the Commission and coordinate their actions with the Commission and the representatives of the other Member States in the advisory group prior to launching procurement of crisis-relevant goods and services listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14(5) in accordance with Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council55 .
When the internal market emergency mode has been activated pursuant to Article 14, Member States shall consult each other and the Commission and coordinate their actions with the Commission and the representatives of the other Member States in the advisory group prior to launching procurement of crisis-relevant goods and services listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14(5) in accordance with Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council55 .
__________________
__________________
55 Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 65)..
55 Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 65)..
Or. en
Amendment 158
Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 1
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
Where the Single Market emergency mode has been activated pursuant to Article 16 and procurement by the Commission on behalf of Member States has been launched in accordance with Articles 34 to 36, the contracting authorities of the participating Member States shall not procure goods or services covered by such procurement by other means.
Where the internal market emergency mode has been activated pursuant to Article 16 and procurement by the Commission on behalf of Member States has been launched in accordance with Articles 34 to 36, the contracting authorities of the participating Member States shall not procure goods or services covered by such procurement by other means.
Or. en
Amendment 159
Proposal for a regulation
Article 40
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
Article 40
deleted
Personal data protection
1. This Regulation shall be without prejudice to the obligations of Member States relating to their processing of personal data under Regulation (EU) No 2016/679 and Directive 2002/58/EC on privacy and electronic communications, or the obligations of the Commission and, where appropriate, other Union institutions and bodies, relating to their processing of personal data under Regulation (EU) No 2018/1725, when fulfilling their responsibilities.
2. Personal data shall not be processed or communicated except in cases where this is strictly necessary to the purposes of this Regulation. In such cases, the conditions of Regulation (EU) No 2016/679 and Regulation (EU) No 2018/1725 shall apply as appropriate.
3. Where processing of personal data is not strictly necessary to the fulfilment of the mechanisms established in this Regulation, personal data shall be rendered anonymous in such a manner that the data subject is not identifiable.
Or. en
Article 40a
Justification
Confidentiality and security rules on the protection of the received information
moved to Art. 2.6.
1. Information received as a result of the application of this Regulation shall be used only for the purpose for which it was requested.
Amendment 160
2. Member States and the Commission shall ensure the protection of trade and business secrets and other sensitive and confidential information acquired and generated in application of this Regulation, including recommendations and measures to be taken, in accordance with Union and the respective national law.
Proposal for a regulation
3. The Commission shall not share any information that it has received under this Regulation in a way that can lead to the identification of an individual operator when the sharing of the information results in potential commercial or reputational damage to this operator or in divulging any trade secrets.
Part V a (new)
4. The Board shall be bound by the Commission's security rules for protecting European Union classified information (EUCI) and sensitive non-classified information.
Text proposed by the Commission
5. Member States and the Commission shall ensure that classified information provided or exchanged under this Regulation is not downgraded or declassified without the prior written consent of the originator.
Amendment
▌
Part Va
Article 41
Digital Tools
Or. en
Justification
During the Covid pandemic, divergent requirements and procedures for entering another Member State created great confusion and frustration for citizens, especially workers and service providers, in particular in border regions. Therefore, the Commission must immediately develop IT tools similar to the Covid-19 certificate to guarantee the functioning of “fast lanes” for critical goods and services. The Commission must provide a digital portal, covering all registration or authorisation forms for cross-border activities, especially for crisis-relevant declarations similar to Covid Certificates, and for crisis-relevant professional services to accelerate authorisation, registration or declaration procedures.
Amendment 161
Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – title
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
Digital tools
General provisions on digital tools
1. By ... [18 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission and the Member States shall, where there are no suitable existing tools or IT infrastructures, set up, maintain and regularly update interoperable digital tools or IT infrastructures supporting the objectives of this Regulation. Such tools or infrastructures shall be developed outside the duration of an internal market emergency in order to respond to possible future emergencies in a timely and efficient manner. They shall include, inter alia, standardised, secure and effective digital tools for the secure collection and exchange of information, as well as a dedicated single digital portal or website where citizens and businesses can find and submit declaration, registration or authorisation forms.
Or. en
2. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, set out the technical aspects of such tools or infrastructures using, where possible, already existing IT tools or portals. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 42(2).
Amendment 162
▌
Proposal for a regulation
▌
Article 41 – paragraph 1
▌
Text proposed by the Commission
▌
Amendment
▌
The Commission and the Member States may set up interoperable digital tools or IT infrastructures supporting the objectives of this Regulation. Such tools or infrastructures may be developed outside the duration of the Single Market Emergency.
▌
By ... [6 months after the entry into force of the Regulation], the Commission and the Member States shall set up, maintain and regularly update interoperable digital tools or IT infrastructures supporting the objectives of this Regulation. Such tools or infrastructures shall include real time information on national restrictions referred to in Article 41a, emergency and resilience fast lanes referred to in Article 41b and the stakeholder platform referred to in Article 41c, and shall be developed outside the duration of the internal market emergency.
▌
Or. en
▌
Amendment 163
▌
Proposal for a regulation
▌
Article 41 – paragraph 2 a (new)
▌
Text proposed by the Commission
▌
Amendment
▌
Member States shall regularly exchange information with the Commission and among themselves on all matters, falling within the scope of this Regulation via a secure channel of communication.
Part VI
Or. en
Final provisions
Amendment 164
Article 42
Proposal for a regulation
Committee
Article 41 a (new)
1. The Commission shall be assisted by the internal market emergency and resilience committee. That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011.
Text proposed by the Commission
2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.
Amendment
3. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 8 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011, in conjunction with Article 5 thereof, shall apply.
Article 41a
▌
Real time information on national restrictions
▌
The Commission shall set up a dedicated website combining information from Member States on national restrictions, notified pursuant to Article 19, including information on their scope and duration. The dedicated website shall include an interactive map with relevant real-time information on national restrictions.
▌
Or. en
▌
Amendment 165
▌
Proposal for a regulation
▌
Article 41 b (new)
▌
Text proposed by the Commission
▌
Amendment
Article 44
Article 41b
Report, review and evaluation
Fast lanes
1. By ... [five years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation] and every five years thereafter ▌ the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of and submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the functioning and effectiveness of this Regulation.
The Commission shall establish fast lanes that aim to facilitate the free movement of goods, services and workers, especially as regards crisis-relevant goods and services. In particular, the Commission shall:
1a. In addition, by 4 months after the deactivation of the internal market vigilance mode or, as applicable, the internal market emergency mode, the Commission shall carry out an evaluation and submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the measures implemented under this Regulation in relation to the crisis that led to such an activation, in particular on the effectiveness of those measures.
(a) provide templates or single digital declaration, registration or authorisation forms for cross-border activities, in particular for professional services in the area of healthcare, maintenance and repair, construction, food and agriculture to accelerate authorisation, registration or declaration procedures, including recognition of professional qualifications or posting of workers; those digital forms shall be free of charge, available in all official languages of the Union, and valid in all Member States;
1b. The reports referred to in paragraph 1 and 1a shall be accompanied, where appropriate, by relevant legislative proposals.
(b) indicate fast lane border crossings to facilitate the free movement of goods, services and persons in the event of border restrictions.
▌
Or. en
2. The reports referred to in paragraphs 1 and 1a shall include, in particular, an evaluation of the following:
Amendment 166
(a) the contribution of this Regulation to the smooth and efficient functioning of the internal market, in particular as regards the free movement of goods, services and persons and the avoidance of divergent national measures which would create cross-border restrictions;
Proposal for a regulation
(b) all the measures implemented under this Regulation including an assessment of the principles of non-discrimination and proportionality, in particular: (i) the impact of the measures implemented under the contingency mode, in particular measures regarding stress tests, training and crisis protocols, digital tools, resilience and availability of goods; (ii) the impact of the measures implemented under the internal market vigilance mode; (iii) the impact of the measures implemented during the internal market emergency mode, and in particular on the fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, namely as regards the freedom to conduct business, the freedom to seek employment and to work, and on the right to collective bargaining and action, including the right to strike;
Article 41 c (new)
(c) the work of the Board, including its work in relation to the work of other relevant Union-level crisis management bodies, in particular the IPCR, HERA and UCPM; (ca) the appropriateness of the criteria for the activation of the internal market vigilance mode or the internal market emergency mode, as appropriate.
Text proposed by the Commission
▌
Amendment
2a. For the purpose of paragraphs 1 and 1a, the competent authorities of the Member States and the Board shall provide the Commission with information upon its request. Where necessary, the Commission may also ask and obtain from relevant Union bodies, offices and agencies any relevant specialised or scientific knowledge.
Article 41c45
Emergency and resilience stakeholder platform
Amendments to Regulation (EC) No 2679/98
The Commission shall establish a stakeholder platform in order to facilitate sector-specific dialogues and partnerships by bringing together key stakeholders, namely representatives of economic operators, researchers and civil society, that aim to encourage economic actors to draw up voluntary roadmaps in response to an internal market emergency. In particular, the platform should provide a functionality for interested parties to:
Council Regulation (EC) No 2679/98 is amended as follows:
(a) indicate voluntary actions needed to successfully respond to an internal market emergency;
(1) Article 2 is replaced by the following:
(b) provide scientific advice, opinions or reports and issue reports on crisis-related questions;
‘This Regulation shall not in any way affect the exercise of fundamental rights as recognised in the Member States and at Union level, including the right or freedom to strike or to take other action covered by the specific industrial relation systems in Member States, in accordance with national law or practice. Nor does it affect the right to negotiate and conclude collective agreements and, in cases of conflicts of interest, to take collective action to defend their interests, including strike action in accordance with national law or practice.’;
(c) contribute to the exchange of information and best practices.
(2) The following Article is added:
Or. en
‘Article 5a
Amendment 167
1. Where the internal market emergency mode referred to in Article 14 of Regulation …/2023 [IMERA] has been activated, Articles 3, 4 and 5 of this Regulation shall cease to apply in respect to the crisis-relevant goods listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14(3) of Regulation (EU) .../... (IMERA)] for the duration of that mode.
Proposal for a regulation
2. Paragraph 1 is without prejudice to any obligation arising from this Regulation prior to the activation of the emergency mode in accordance with the [IMERA Regulation].’
Article 42 – paragraph 1
Article 46
Text proposed by the Commission
Entry into force and application
Amendment
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
1. The Commission shall be assisted by a Single Market Emergency Instrument Committee. That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011.
▌
1. The Commission shall be assisted by an Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Committee. That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011.
▌
Or. en
It shall apply from ... [18 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation].
Amendment 168
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Proposal for a regulation
Done at Brussels,
Article 42 – paragraph 3 a (new)
For the European Parliament For the Council
Text proposed by the Commission
The President The President
Amendment
3a. Before the adoption of any implementing act pursuant to this Regulation, the Commission shall publish a draft thereof and invite all interested parties to submit their comments within a reasonable time limit.
Or. en
Justification
Implementing acts may have wide-ranging implications, in particular for determining the scope of the crisis response. Therefore, there must be ample time for stakeholders, in particular economic operators and social partners, to be heard.
Amendment 169
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 2
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 6 shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of five years from date of entry into force of this Directive or any other date set by the co-legislators.
2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 6 shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of five years from date of entry into force of this Regulation. The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before the end of each period.
Or. en
Amendment 170
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
5a. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 6 shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or by the Council within a period of three months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by three months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.
Or. en
Amendment 171
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – title
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
Report and review
Evaluation and review
Or. en
Amendment 172
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 1
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
1. By [OP: please insert date = five years from the entry into force of this Regulation] and every five years thereafter, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the functioning of the contingency planning, vigilance and Single Market emergency response system suggesting any improvements if necessary, accompanied, where appropriate, by relevant legislative proposals.
1. By ... [OP: please insert date = five years from the entry into force of this Regulation] and every five years thereafter, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the functioning of the contingency planning, vigilance and internal market emergency response system suggesting any improvements if necessary. That report shall be accompanied, where appropriate, by relevant legislative proposals.
Or. en
Amendment 173
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 2
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
2. This report shall include an evaluation of the work of the advisory group under the emergency framework established by this Regulation, and its relation to the work of other relevant Union level crisis management bodies.
2. This report shall include an evaluation of the work of the advisory board under the emergency framework established by this Regulation, and its relation to the work of other relevant Union level crisis management bodies.
Or. en
Amendment 174
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
2a. For the purpose of paragraph 1, the advisory board and the Member States’ competent authorities shall provide the Commission with information upon its request.
Or. en
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
1. Introduction
On 19 September 2022, the European Commission published the proposal for the “Single Market Emergency Instrument” (SMEI) and two legislative proposals with targeted amendments to sectoral legislation. SMEI provides a general framework for EU crisis response in the internal market and complements other sector-specific crisis response mechanisms such as the Union Civil Protection Mechanism and sector-specific crisis frameworks in the areas of health, semiconductors or food security.
SMEI was drawn up in response to the fragmentation of the internal market during the Covid-19 pandemic where ad-hoc, unilateral border closures impinged on the freedom of movement of goods, services and workers, and exacerbated supply chain disruptions. The unprecedented crisis led to a chaotic initial response by the Member States, marked by a lack of coordination and solidarity, and the introduction of unjustified restrictions, without fully taking into consideration their devastating effect on the proper functioning of the internal market. The new instrument provides for a horizontal crisis governance framework to make sure that the internal market remains open and that supply chains are more resilient.
2. The Draft Report
The Rapporteur fully supports the objective of the Regulation of safeguarding free movement of goods, workers and services. At the same time, the Rapporteur believes that resilience is key to ensuring that the internal market delivers on its ultimate goal of supporting the EU’s economy. The Rapporteur therefore proposes to change the title to “Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Act” (IMERA) and to introduce additional changes to strengthen the Union’s resilience. The Rapporteur welcomes IMERA’s approach to preserving the free movement of goods, services and workers. During the Covid-19 pandemic, the rights of workers and companies as enshrined in the Treaties were disproportionately limited. The Rapporteur would like to highlight that the Treaty freedoms are not suspended in times of crises: unilateral limitations to free movement often even hampered the crisis response, such as limiting the mobility of health workers, hospital machinery maintenance service providers or the availability of food supplies. Therefore, the Rapporteur emphasizes the important role that “Fast lanes” played during the pandemic and highlights that the new instrument should further develop such measures.
During the Covid 19 pandemic and the EU’s response to Russia’s illegal war in Ukraine, the government-led crisis responses were complemented by the rapid adjustments companies made to their supply chains and production lines. The Rapporteur believes that market interventions must remain instruments of last resort, while market-based mechanisms such as procurement and cooperation between the government and the industry are better, faster and more efficient crisis responses.
In view of these considerations, the Rapporteur strengthens some elements, in particular pertaining to resilience and the free movement of workers, goods and services. At the same time, he wants to ensure that during a crisis, the spirit of cooperation and solidarity governs the relationship between governments and companies willing to help.
2.2 Resilience during the contingency mode
The Rapporteur believes that IMERA must increase the resilience of supply chains by fostering cooperation between businesses, the Commission and Member States on a voluntary basis. The Rapporteur therefore proposes to ensure the crisis-preparedness of all actors through biennial stress tests, trainings and crisis protocols involving not only all relevant national authorities, but also stakeholders such as businesses, social partners and experts.
Companies possess critical knowledge and resources for crisis responses, as highlighted by the Covid pandemic. In the Rapporteur’s opinion, the inclusion of companies must be an integral part of any crisis response mechanism. The Rapporteur wants to foster greater involvement of companies by allowing them to provide advice on crisis-measures through an online platform. Moreover, to address common sector-specific vulnerabilities at a European level, the Commission should conduct supply chain stress tests on a voluntary basis, thereby giving both the Commission and businesses the opportunity to develop best practices on supply chain resilience.
The Rapporteur believes that strategic reserves must become a more permanent consideration in increasing the Union’s resilience, and increased cooperation and exchange of best practices between the Commission and the Member States is needed. At the same time, the Rapporteur notes that the pro-cyclical creation of reserves during the “Vigilance Mode” or “Emergency Mode” risks increased scarcity, rising prices, affecting competition and the level playing field, and an exacerbation of the situation. Moreover, strategic reserves require established relationships between economic operators and administrative arrangements specific to each sector. Member States are better placed to accomplish that as they already have well-established mechanisms to administer strategic reserves. Therefore, the Rapporteur suggests giving the Commission a permanent role in ensuring coordination, information exchange and promoting solidarity between Member States in the administration of strategic reserves, while removing the empowerment to prescribe mandatory stockpiles during the “Vigilance Mode”.
2.3 Emergency Mode
The Rapporteur believes that the focus of IMERA during a crisis must be to safeguard the free movement of goods, services and workers as enshrined in the treaties, especially in case of emergencies. The Rapporteur proposes to strengthen the elements of the first chapter of the emergency mode and align it with the treaties and with case law. Moreover, the Rapporteur wants to draw more attention to the situation of border regions as they are the most affected by limitations to free movement. Hence, he would like to aim for a unified definition of “working from home”.
To the Rapporteur, companies and market forces are central to any crisis response in the Internal Market. While he sees the necessity for priority rated orders, he suggests improvements to provide further leeway to companies and ensure more legal certainty. Since businesses delivered despite uncoordinated actions by public authorities during the pandemic, the Rapporteur suggests more limited and voluntary requests for information. Moreover, to provide legal certainty, the Rapporteur improves the rules governing the use of data and the protection of trade and business secrets, and of intellectual property. Furthermore, the Rapporteur proposes procedural elements to ensure that priority rated orders remain an instrument of last resort and will not endanger the economic viability of companies. Recalling that companies during the Covid pandemic were under a heavy strain, the Rapporteur suggests adjustments to the sanctions regimes to reflect the lower revenues likely generated during a crisis.
The Rapporteur considers solidarity to be the key for the mutual trust and, ultimately, for the smooth free movement of goods, services and workers. Therefore, he suggests a mechanism whereby Member States may launch a call for solidarity in case of shortages of crisis-relevant goods and services. During Covid, export restrictions and joint procurement pitted EU-members against like-minded neighbours that were equally in need of crisis-relevant goods. To avoid such situations in the future and to strengthen European solidarity, the rapporteur proposes to open up the joint procurement to Andorra, Monaco and San Marino, accession candidate countries and countries of the European Free Trade Area.
2.3 Digital Tools and harmonisation of administrative procedures
During the Covid pandemic, nationally divergent requirements and administrative procedures for entering another Member State created great confusion and frustration for citizens, especially workers and service providers, in particular in border regions. The Rapporteur therefore foresees that the Commission must immediately develop digital tools similar to the successful interoperable Covid-19 certificate to guarantee the functioning of “fast lanes” for critical goods and services. The Commission must provide a digital portal, covering all registration or authorisation forms for cross-border activities, especially for crisis-relevant declarations similar to Covid Certificates, and for crisis-relevant professional services to accelerate authorisation, registration or declaration procedures.
2.4 Governance
Covid highlighted the importance of good cooperation between all governments in the EU’s internal market, but also the importance of parliamentary scrutiny. Therefore, the Rapporteur proposes to model the advisory group after an expert group within the well-known and established rules for such groups, thereby giving the European Parliament and EEA/EFTA countries a more permanent seat at the table as observers. Given the general nature of IMERA, the Rapporteur also suggests improvement to key definitions, thereby increasing legal certainty and predictability.
3. Accompanying proposals
The Rapporteur suggests targeted changes to the two accompanying proposals to make sure that free movement of harmonised and non-harmonised goods is facilitated across the EU. As regards the crisis instruments at the Commission’s disposal, the Rapporteur suggests providing a mechanism also for the rapid placing on the market for non-harmonized products, which would have increased the availability of safe personal protection equipment during the Covid pandemic. Furthermore, to incentivize companies to ramp up production during a crisis, the Rapporteur proposes to permit the continued sale of goods that were put on the market under emergency procedures for a limited period of time after the end of the single market emergency, without compromising on the safety of the products.
It is the Rapporteur’s belief that IMERA should primarily improve the resilience of the internal market, ensuring constant coordination between Member States and ensuring readiness for the event of sudden shocks at all times. Thereby, in times of crisis, the Internal Market must stay open and functional and protect consumers, workers and businesses alike from emergencies.
ANNEX: LIST OF ENTITIES OR PERSONS FROM WHOM THE RAPPORTEUR HAS RECEIVED INPUT
The following list is drawn up on a purely voluntary basis under the exclusive responsibility of the rapporteur. The rapporteur has received input from the following entities or persons in the preparation of the [draft report / report, until the adoption thereof in committee]:
Entity and/or person
Affordable Medicines Europe
APPLiA - Home Appliance Europe
BDA - Bundesvereinigung der Deutschen Arbeitgeberverbände e.V.
BDI - Bundesverband der Deutschen Industry e.V.
Business Europe
BWL - Bundesamt für wirtschaftliche Landesversorgung der Schweiz
Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs
Eurochambres
Eurocommerce
France Industrie
Germany Ministry of Climate and Economics
Independent Retail Europe
Mission of the United Kingdom to the European Union
NESA - National Emergency Supply Agency of Finland
Orgalim
Prof. Dr. iur. Jan Bergmann
SME United