Sittings · Compare

What changed

From · agreement provisional · 2023-10-25 IMCO-AG-756006 Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2005/29/EC and 2011/83/EU as regards empowering consumers for the green transition through better protection against unfair practices and better information

→

To · Adopted text · 2023-05-11 TA-9-2023-0201 Empowering consumers for the green transition

+692 added · −176 removed · 5 modified paragraphs hide unchanged text

~~7.11.2023~~

P9_TA(2023)0201

~~PROVISIONAL AGREEMENT RESULTING FROM INTERINSTITUTIONAL NEGOTIATIONS~~

Empowering consumers for the green transition

Subject: Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2005/29/EC and 2011/83/EU as regards empowering consumers for the green transition through better protection against unfair practices and better information

Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection

~~(COM(2022)0143 – C90128/2022 – 2022/0092(COD))~~

PE736.537

The interinstitutional negotiations on the aforementioned proposal for a directive have led to a compromise. In accordance with Rule 74(4) of the Rules of Procedure, the provisional agreement, reproduced below, is submitted as a whole to the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection for decision by way of a single vote.

Amendments adopted by the European Parliament on 11 May 2023 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on amending Directives 2005/29/EC and 2011/83/EU as regards empowering consumers for the green transition through better protection against unfair practices and better information (COM(2022)0143 – C9-0128/2022 – 2022/0092(COD))

~~2022/0092 (COD)~~

(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)

~~Proposal for a~~

Amendment 1

~~DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL~~

Proposal for a directive

~~amending Directives 2005/29/EC and 2011/83/EU as regards empowering consumers for the green transition through better protection against unfair practices and better information~~

Recital 1

~~(Text with EEA relevance)~~

Text proposed by the Commission

~~THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,~~

Amendment

~~Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 114 thereof,~~

(1) In order to tackle unfair commercial practices which prevent consumers from making sustainable consumption choices, such as practices associated with the early obsolescence of goods, misleading environmental claims (“greenwashing”), non-transparent and non-credible sustainability labels or sustainability information tools, specific rules should be introduced in Union consumer law. This would enable national competent bodies to address those practices effectively. By ensuring that environmental claims are fair, consumers will be able to choose products that are genuinely better for the environment than competing products. This will encourage competition towards more environmentally sustainable products, thus reducing negative impact on the environment.

~~Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,~~

(1) In order to tackle unfair commercial practices that deceive consumers and prevent them from making sustainable consumption choices, such as practices associated with the early obsolescence of goods, misleading or false environmental claims (“greenwashing”), non-transparent, non-certified and non-credible sustainability labels or sustainability information tools, specific rules should be introduced in Union consumer law. This would enable national competent bodies to address those practices effectively. By ensuring that environmental claims are reliable, clear, understandable and fair, consumers will be able to choose products that are genuinely better for the environment than competing products. This will encourage competition towards more environmentally sustainable products, thus reducing negative impact on the environment. Companies also have a role to play in promoting a green transition and greater sustainability of the products they produce and sell on the internal market.

~~After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments,~~

Amendment 2

~~Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee,~~

Proposal for a directive

~~Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure,~~

Recital 3

~~Whereas:~~

Text proposed by the Commission

(1) In order to contribute to the proper functioning of the internal market, taking as a base a high level of consumer protection and environmental protection, and to make progress in the green transition, it is essential that consumers can make informed purchasing decisions and thus contribute to more sustainable consumption patterns. This implies that traders have a responsibility to provide clear, relevant and reliable information. Therefore, specific rules should be introduced in Union consumer law to tackle unfair commercial practices that mislead consumers and prevent them from making sustainable consumption choices, such as practices associated with the early obsolescence of goods, misleading environmental claims ("greenwashing"), misleading information about the social characteristics of products or traders’ businesses ("social washing"), or non-transparent and non-credible sustainability labels. Those rules would enable competent national bodies to effectively address such practices ▌ . ▌ Ensuring that environmental claims are fair, understandable and reliable will allow traders to operate on a level playing field and will enable consumers to choose products that are genuinely better for the environment than competing products. This will encourage competition towards more environmentally sustainable products, thereby reducing the negative impact on the environment.

Amendment

(2) Those new rules should be introduced both through amending Articles 6 and 7 of Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to those commercial practices which are to be considered misleading, and therefore prohibited, on the basis of a case-by-case assessment, and through amending Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC with the addition of specific misleading practices which are in all circumstances considered unfair, hence prohibited. As already laid down in Directive 2005/29/EC, it should still be possible to consider that a commercial practice is unfair on the basis of Articles 5 to 9 of that Directive, even though that particular practice is not listed as an unfair commercial practice in Annex I of Directive 2005/29/EC.

(3) In order to deter traders from deceiving consumers as regards the environmental or social impact, durability or reparability of their products, including through the overall presentation of the products, Article 6(1) of Directive 2005/29/EC should be amended by adding the environmental or social impact, durability and reparability of the product to the list of the main characteristics of the product in respect of which the trader’s practices can be considered misleading, following a case-by-case assessment. Information provided by traders on the social sustainability of products, such as working conditions, charity contributions or animal welfare, should not mislead consumers either.

(3) In order ~~for consumers~~ to ~~be empowered to take better-informed decisions and~~deter ~~thus~~traders ~~stimulate~~from ~~the~~deceiving ~~demand~~consumers ~~for,~~as ~~and~~regards the ~~supply of, more sustainable goods, they should not be misled about a product’s~~ environmental or social ~~characteristics or circularity~~impact, ~~aspects,~~durability ~~such~~or asreparability ~~durability,~~of ~~reparability~~their orproducts, ~~recyclability,~~including through the overall presentation of the ~~products.~~products, Article 6(1) of Directive 2005/29/EC should ~~therefore~~ be amended by adding ▌the environmental ~~and~~or social ~~characteristics~~impact, durability, reusability, recyclability and ~~circularity~~reparability ~~aspects~~of the product to the list of the main characteristics of athe product in respect of which the trader’s practices can be considered misleading, following a case-by-case assessment. Information provided by traders on the social ~~characteristics of a product throughout its value chain can relate for example to the quality and fairness of working conditions~~sustainability of ~~the involved workforce, such as adequate wages, social protection, work environment safety and social dialogue; to the respect for human rights; to equal treatment and opportunities for all,~~products, such as ~~gender equality, inclusion and~~working ~~diversity;~~conditions, tocharity contributions ~~to social initiatives;~~ or ~~to ethical commitments, such as~~ animal ~~welfare. Environmental and social characteristics of a product~~welfare, should ~~be considered to have a broad meaning, including environmental and social aspects,~~not ~~impacts~~mislead ~~and~~consumers ~~performance.~~either.

(4) Environmental claims, in particular climate-related claims, increasingly relate to future performance in the form of a transition to carbon or climate neutrality, or a similar objective, by a certain date. Through such claims, traders create the impression that consumers contribute to a low-carbon economy by purchasing their products. To ensure the fairness and credibility of such claims, Article 6(2) of Directive 2005/29/EC should be amended to prohibit such claims, following a case-by-case assessment, when they are not supported by clear, objective, publicly available and verifiable commitments and targets given by the trader and are not set out in a detailed and realistic implementation plan that shows how these commitments and targets will be achieved and allocates resources to this end. The implementation plan should include all the relevant elements necessary to fulfil the commitments, such as budgetary resources and technological developments, where appropriate and in accordance with Union law. Such claims should also be verified by a third party expert, who should be independent from the trader, free from any conflicts of interest, with experience and competence in environmental issues and who should be enabled to monitor regularly the progress of the trader with regard to the commitments and targets, including the milestones for achieving them. Traders should make those regular findings of the third party expert available to consumers.

Amendment 3

(5) Another potentially misleading commercial practice to be added to the specific practices referred to in Article 6(2) of Directive 2005/29/EC is advertising benefits to consumers that are irrelevant and not directly related to any feature of that specific product or business and which may mislead consumers into believing that they are more beneficial to consumers, the environment or society than other products or traders' businesses of the same type, for example, claiming that a particular brand of bottled water is gluten-free or claiming that paper sheets do not contain plastic.

Proposal for a directive

(6) Comparing products based on their environmental or social characteristics or circularity aspects, such as durability, reparability or recyclability, is an increasingly common marketing technique that could mislead consumers, who are not always able to assess the reliability of that information. In order to ensure that such comparisons do not mislead consumers, Article 7 of Directive 2005/29/EC should be amended to require that the consumer is provided with information about the method of the comparison, the products which are the object of comparison and the suppliers of those products, and the measures to keep information up to date. This should ensure that consumers make better informed transactional decisions when using such services. The comparison should be objective by, in particular, comparing products which serve the same function, using a common method and common assumptions, and comparing material and verifiable features of the products being compared.

Recital 4

(7) Sustainability labels can relate to many aspects and it is essential to ensure their transparency and credibility. Therefore, the displaying of sustainability labels which are not based on a certification scheme, or which have not been established by public authorities should be prohibited by including such practices in the list in Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC. Before displaying a sustainability label, the trader should ensure, that according to the publicly available terms of the certification scheme, it meets minimum conditions of transparency and credibility, including the existence of an objective monitoring of compliance with the requirements of the scheme. Such monitoring should be carried out by a third party whose competence and independence from the scheme owner and the trader is ensured based on international, Union or national standards and procedures, for example by demonstrating compliance with relevant international standards, such as ISO 17065 "Conformity assessment — Requirements for bodies certifying products, processes and services" or through the mechanisms provided for in Regulation (EC) No 765/2008. The displaying of sustainability labels remains possible without a certification scheme when such labels are established by a public authority, or in case of additional forms of expression and presentation of food in accordance with Article 35 of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011. Examples of sustainability labels established by public authorities are logos awarded when complying with the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 (EMAS) or Regulation (EC) No 66/2010 (EU Ecolabel). Some certification marks, as defined in Article 27 of Directive 2015/2436/EC, can also operate as sustainability labels if they promote a product, process or business with reference to, for example, its environmental or social characteristics or both. The trader should display such certification marks only if they are established by public authorities or based on a certification scheme. This rule complements point 4 of Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC, which prohibits claiming that a trader, the commercial practices of a trader ▌ or a product have been approved, endorsed or authorised by a public or private body when that is not the case, or making such a claim without complying with the terms of the approval, endorsement or authorisation. Voluntary market-based and public standards for green and sustainable bonds do not primarily target retail investors and are subject to specific legislation. For these reasons, these standards should not be considered sustainability labels according to this Directive. Public authorities should, as far as possible and in compliance with Union law, promote measures to facilitate access to sustainability labels for small and medium-sized enterprises.

Text proposed by the Commission

(8) In cases where the displaying of a sustainability label involves a commercial communication that suggests or creates the impression that a product has a positive or no impact on the environment, or is less damaging to the environment than competing products, that sustainability label also should be considered as constituting an environmental claim.

Amendment

(9) Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit making generic environmental claims without recognised excellent environmental performance which is relevant to the claim. Examples of such generic environmental claims are ‘environmentally friendly’, ‘eco-friendly’, ‘ ▌green’, ‘nature’s friend’, ‘ecological’, ‘environmentally correct’, ‘climate friendly’, ‘gentle on the environment’, ‘carbon friendly’, ‘ ▌ energy efficient’, ‘biodegradable’, ‘biobased’ or similar statements ▌ that suggest or create the impression of excellent environmental performance. Such generic environmental claims should be prohibited whenever ▌ no recognised excellent environmental performance can be demonstrated. Whenever the specification of the environmental claim is ▌ provided in clear and prominent terms on the same medium, such as the same advertising spot, product’s packaging or online selling interface, the environmental claim is not considered to be a generic environmental claim. For example, the claim ‘climate-friendly packaging’ would be a generic claim, whilst claiming that 100% of energy used to produce this packaging comes from renewable sources’ would be a specific claim, which would not fall under this prohibition without prejudice to other provisions of Directive 2005/29/EC remaining applicable to those specific claims. Furthermore a claim made in written form or orally combined with implicit claims such as colours or images could constitute a generic environmental claim altogether.

(10) Recognised excellent environmental performance can be demonstrated by compliance with Regulation (EC) No 66/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council, or officially recognised EN ISO 14024 ecolabelling schemes in the Member States, or ▌ with top environmental performance for a specific environmental characteristic in accordance with other applicable Union laws, such as a class A in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/1369 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The excellent environmental performance in question should be relevant to the entire claim. For example, a generic environmental claim ‘energy efficient’ could be made based on recognised excellent environmental performance in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/1369. By contrast, a generic environmental claim ‘biodegradable’ could not be made based on recognised excellent environmental performance in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 66/2010, insofar as there are no requirements for biodegradability in the specific EU Ecolabel criteria related to the product in question. Similarly, a trader should not make a generic claim such as ‘conscious’, ‘sustainable’ or ‘responsible’ exclusively based on recognised excellent environmental performance because such claims relate to other aspects in addition to the environmental aspect, such as social characteristics.

(4) Environmental claims, in particular climate-related claims, increasingly relate to future performance in the form of a transition to carbon or climate neutrality, or a similar objective, by a certain date. Through such claims, traders create the impression that consumers contribute to a low-carbon economy by purchasing their products. To ensure the fairness and credibility of such claims, Article 6(2) of Directive 2005/29/EC should be amended to prohibit such claims, following a case-by-case assessment, when they are based solely on carbon offsetting schemes or are not supported by clear, objective, quantified, science-based and verifiable commitments and targets given by the trader, including a detailed and realistic implementation plan to achieve this future environmental performance. That plan should include concrete targets consistent with achieving the trader's long-term commitment, underpinned by a sufficient budget and allocation of sufficient resources. Claims should also be supported by an independent monitoring system to monitor the progress of the implementation plan, the trader’s commitments and targets.

(11) Another misleading commercial practice which should be prohibited in all circumstances and thus added to the list in Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC is making an environmental claim about the entire product or the entire trader’s business when it actually concerns only a certain aspect of the product or a specific, unrepresentative activity of the trader’s business. This ban would apply, for example, when a product is marketed as ‘made with recycled material’ giving the impression that the entire product is made of recycled material, when in fact it is only the packaging that is made of recycled material, or when a trader gives the impression that it is only using renewable energy sources when several of the trader’s business facilities still use fossil fuels. This should not prevent traders to make environmental claims at the global level of their business provided that they are accurate and verifiable and do not overstate the environmental benefit, such as reporting a decrease of the use of fossil fuels at the global level of their business in the example above.

Amendment 4

(11a) It is particularly important to prohibit claims, based on greenhouse gas emissions offsetting, that a product, either a good or service, has a neutral, reduced, or positive impact on the environment in terms of greenhouse gas emissions. Such claims should be prohibited under all circumstances and therefore added to Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC as they mislead consumers by making them believe that such claims relate to the product itself, or the supply and production of that product, or as they give the false impression to consumers that the consumption of that product has no environmental impact, while this is not the case. Examples of such claims are ‘climate neutral’, ‘CO2 neutral certified’, ‘carbon positive’, ‘climate net zero’, ‘climate compensated’, ‘reduced climate impact’, ‘limited CO2 footprint’ among others. Such claims can only be allowed when they are based on the actual lifecycle impacts of the product in question, and not based on greenhouse gas emissions offsetting outside the product’s value chain, as the former and the latter are not equivalent. This should not prevent companies from advertising their investments in environmental initiatives, including carbon credit projects, as long as they provide such information in a way that is not misleading and also complies with the requirements laid down in Union legislation.

Proposal for a directive

(12) ▌ Additional requirements on environmental claims will have to be set in specific Union legislation. Those new requirements will contribute to the Green Deal6 objective of enabling buyers to make more sustainable decisions and reduce the risk of greenwashing through reliable, comparable and verifiable information.

Recital 6

(12a) Marketing across the Member States of goods as being identical when, in reality, they have a significantly different composition or characteristics may mislead consumers and cause them to take a transactional decision that they would not have taken otherwise. Such marketing practices are expressly addressed in Article 6(2)(c) of Directive 2005/29/EC, introduced by Directive (EU) 2019/2161 that entered into application on 28 May 2022. The Commission will assess and report in 2024 on the application of Directive (EU) 2019/2161, including Article 6(2)(c) of Directive 2005/29/EC and whether those cases should be subject to more stringent requirements, including prohibition in Annex I. The new provisions against greenwashing practices in this Directive also apply to such practices where versions of the same product are marketed as being identical in different Member States despite their significant differences in the meaning of Article 6(2)(c) of Directive 2005/29/EC.

Text proposed by the Commission

(13) Presenting requirements imposed by law on all products within the relevant product category on the Union market, including imported products, as a distinctive feature of the trader’s offer, should ▌ be prohibited in all circumstances and thus added to the list in Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC. This prohibition could apply, for example, when a trader is advertising that a given product does not include a specific chemical substance while that substance is already forbidden by law for all products within that product category in the Union. Conversely, the prohibition should not cover commercial practices promoting traders’ or products’ compliance with legal requirements that only apply to some products but not to other competing products of the same category on the Union market, such as products of non-EU origin. It could be the case that certain products on the market are required to comply with certain legal requirements while other products in the same product category do not. For example, fish products produced using EU-mandated sustainable fishing methods would be allowed to advertise compliance with EU legal requirements, where fish products offered on the EU market and of third country origin need not to comply with them.

Amendment

(14) In order to improve the welfare of consumers, the amendments to ▌ Directive 2005/29/EC should also address several practices associated with early obsolescence, including planned early obsolescence practices, understood as a commercial policy involving deliberately planning or designing a product with a limited useful life so that it prematurely becomes obsolete or non-functional after a certain period of time or after a predetermined intensity of use. Purchasing products that are expected to last longer than they actually do causes consumer detriment. Furthermore, early obsolescence practices have an overall negative impact on the environment in the form of increased ▌ waste and use of energy and materials. Therefore, addressing information related to early obsolescence practices is also likely to reduce the amount of waste, contributing to a more sustainable consumption.

(6) Comparing products based on their environmental or social aspects, including through the use of sustainability information tools, is an increasingly common marketing technique. In order to ensure that such comparisons do not mislead consumers, Article 7 of Directive 2005/29/EC should be amended to require that the consumer is provided with information about the method of the comparison, the products which are the object of comparison and the suppliers of those products, and the measures to keep information up to date. This should ensure that consumers make better informed transactional decisions when using such services. The comparison should be objective by, in particular, comparing products which serve the same function, using a common method and common assumptions, and comparing material and verifiable features of the products being compared.

~~(15) It should also be prohibited under~~(6) ~~Annex~~Comparing Iproducts tobased ~~Directive~~on ~~2005/29/EC~~their toenvironmental ~~withhold~~or ~~information~~social ~~from~~aspects, ~~consumers~~including ~~about~~through the ~~fact that a software update ▌ will~~use ~~negatively~~of ~~impact~~sustainability ~~the~~information ~~functioning~~tools, ofis ~~goods~~an ~~with~~increasingly ~~digital~~common ~~elements~~marketing ortechnique ~~the~~that ~~use~~could ofbe ~~digital~~misleading ~~content~~to orconsumers, ~~digital~~who ~~services.~~are Innot ~~general,~~always ~~traders~~able ~~responsible~~to ~~for~~assess the ~~development~~reliability of ~~software~~that ~~updates~~information. ~~are~~In ~~expected~~order to ~~have such information, while in other cases traders can rely on reliable information provided by,~~ensure ~~for~~that ~~example,~~such ~~software~~comparisons ~~developers,~~do ~~suppliers~~not ormislead byconsumers, ~~competent~~Article ~~national~~7 ~~authorities.~~of ~~For~~Directive ~~example,~~2005/29/EC ~~when~~should ~~inviting~~be ~~consumers~~amended to ~~update the operating system on their~~require ~~smartphone,~~that the ~~trader should~~consumer ~~not~~is ~~withhold~~provided ~~the~~with information ~~towards~~about the ~~consumer~~method ~~that~~of ~~such~~the ancomparison, ~~update~~the ~~will~~products ~~negatively~~which ~~impact~~are the ~~functioning~~object of ~~any~~comparison ofand the ~~features~~suppliers of ~~the smartphone,~~those ~~such~~products, asand the ~~battery, certain applications~~measures ~~performances~~to orkeep ainformation ~~complete~~up ~~smartphone~~to ~~slowdown.~~date. This ~~prohibition~~should ~~applies~~ensure tothat ~~any~~consumers ~~update,~~make ~~including~~better ~~security~~informed ~~and~~transactional ~~functionality~~decisions ~~updates.~~when ~~For~~using ~~updates,~~such ~~including~~services. ~~security~~The ~~updates,~~comparison ~~necessary~~should tobe ~~keep~~objective ~~the~~by, ~~good,~~in ~~digital~~particular, ~~content~~comparing ~~and~~products ~~digital~~which ~~service~~serve inthe ~~conformity,~~same ~~Article~~function, 8using ofa ~~Directive~~common ~~2019/770~~method and ~~Article 7 of Directive 2019/771 also~~common ~~apply.~~assumptions, ~~This~~and ~~provision~~comparing ismaterial ~~without~~and ~~prejudice~~verifiable tofeatures ~~Article~~of 19the ofproducts ~~Directive~~being ~~2019/770.~~compared.

(15a) Software updates that are security updates are necessary for the secure use of the product while updates related to enhancing functionality features are not. Therefore, Directive 2005/29/EC should prohibit the presentation of a software update as necessary to keep the product in conformity where it only enhances functionality features.

Amendment 5

(16) Commercial communications for a good containing a feature introduced to limit its durability is a commercial practice detrimental to consumers and the environment as they encourage the sale of such goods which leads to higher costs for consumers and unnecessary use of resources, waste production and greenhouse gas emissions. Any such commercial communication should therefore be prohibited when information on the feature and its effects on the durability of the good are available to the trader. Examples of such a feature could be software which stops or downgrades the functionality of the good after a particular period of time, or ▌ a piece of hardware which is designed to fail after a particular period of time. It could also be a design or manufacturing flaw which, although not introduced as a feature for that purpose, leads to the premature failures of the good, if it is not fixed once information about the existence and effects of this feature has become available to the trader. In the context of this provision, commercial communications include communications designed to promote, directly or indirectly, the goods. The manufacturing of goods and making them available on the market do not constitute a commercial communication. This prohibition is aimed to cover mainly the traders who are the producers of the goods as they are the ones determining the durability of the goods. Therefore, in general, when a good is identified as containing a feature to limit the durability, the producer of that good is expected to be aware of that feature and its effect on the durability of that good. Nevertheless, traders who are not the producers of the goods, such as the sellers, can be targeted by this provision where reliable information is available to them about the feature and its effects on durability, such as a statement from a competent national authority or information provided by the producer. Therefore, as soon as such information is available to the trader, such prohibition should apply irrespective of whether the trader is actually aware or unaware of that information, for example by neglecting it. For such a commercial practice to be considered unfair, it should not be necessary to demonstrate that the purpose of the feature is to stimulate the replacement of the respective good, but it would be sufficient to prove that this feature has been introduced to limit the durability of the good. This prohibition complements and does not affect the remedies available to consumers when they constitute a lack of conformity under Directive (EU) 2019/771 of the European Parliament and of the Council7. The use of features limiting the durability of the goods should be distinguished from manufacturing practices using materials or processes of general low quality resulting in limited durability of the goods. Lack of conformity of a good resulting from the use of low quality materials or processes should continue to be governed by the rules on the conformity of goods set out in Directive (EU) 2019/771.

Proposal for a directive

(17) Another practice which should be prohibited under Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC is the practice of falsely claiming that a good has a certain durability in terms of usage time or intensity under normal conditions of use. That would be the case, for instance, when a trader informs consumers that a washing machine is expected to last a certain number of washing cycles, in accordance with normal expected use indicated in the instructions, while the actual use of the washing machine under the prescribed conditions shows this is not the case. Such claims are largely made by the producers, as they determine themselves the durability of the goods. Therefore, in general, traders who are the producers of those goods are expected to be aware of false claims on the durability of the good, whereas other traders such as sellers should rely on reliable information available to them, for instance based on a statement from a competent national authority or information provided by the producer. Lack of conformity of a good resulting from occasional faults in the manufacturing of a good should continue to be governed by the rules on the conformity of goods set out in Directive (EU) 2019/771.

Recital 7

~~(18) Similarly, Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit presenting products as allowing repair when such repair is not possible.~~

Text proposed by the Commission

(19) The prohibition of those practices in relation to durability and reparability in Directive 2005/29/EC would provide the consumer protection authorities of Member States with an additional enforcement tool for better protection of consumers’ interests in the cases where traders fail to comply with requirements on the durability and reparability of goods under Union product legislation.

Amendment

(20) Another practice associated with early obsolescence which should be prohibited and added to the list in Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC is inducing the consumer into replacing or replenishing the consumables of a product earlier than would otherwise be necessary for technical reasons. Such practices mislead the consumer into believing that the goods will no longer function unless their consumables are replaced, thus leading them to purchase more consumables than necessary. For example, the practice of urging the consumer, via the settings of the printer, to replace the printer ink cartridges before they are actually empty in order to stimulate the purchase of additional ink cartridges would be prohibited.

(21) Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit withholding information from the consumer about the impairment of the functionality of a good when using consumables, spare parts or accessories that are not provided by the original producer. For example, if a printer is designed to limit its functionality when using ink cartridges not provided by the original producer of the printer, this information should not be hidden to the consumer because this practice could mislead consumers into purchasing an alternative ink cartridge which cannot be used for that printer, thus leading to unnecessary ▌ waste streams or additional costs for the consumer. Similarly, if a smart device is designed to limit its functionality when using chargers or spare parts that are not provided by the original producer, this information should not be hidden to the consumer at the time of purchase. It should also be prohibited to mislead consumers into believing that using consumables, spare parts or accessories not supplied by the original producer will impair the functionality of a good while this is not the case. In general, traders who are the producers of those goods are expected to have that information, whereas other traders such as sellers should rely on reliable information available to them, for instance based on a statement from a competent national authority or information provided by the producer.

(7) The displaying of sustainability labels which are not based on a certification scheme or not established by public authorities should be prohibited by including such practices in the list in Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC. The certification scheme should fulfil minimum transparency and credibility conditions. The monitoring of compliance of the certification scheme should be supported by methods that are proportionate and relevant to the nature of the products, processes and businesses that are subject to the scheme. It should be carried out by a third party whose competencies and independence, from both the scheme owner and the trader, have been verified by the Member States. Furthermore, certification schemes should include a complaints system that is available to consumers and other external stakeholders, focuses on non-compliance and ensures the withdrawal of the sustainability label in cases of non-compliance. The displaying of sustainability labels remains possible without a certification scheme where such labels are established by a public authority, or in case of additional forms of expression and presentation of food in accordance with Article 35 of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011. This rule complements point 4 of Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC which prohibits claiming that a trader, the commercial practices of a trader, or a product has been approved, endorsed or authorised by a public or private body when it has not, or making such a claim without complying with the terms of the approval, endorsement or authorisation. Sustainability labels established by public authorities should be accessible at a reasonable cost to all businesses regardless of their size and financial capability. Certification schemes and sustainability labels that foster the incremental uptake of sustainable practices by small and medium enterprises should be encouraged.

(22) In order for consumers to take better informed decisions and stimulate the demand for, and the supply of, more durable goods, specific information about a product’s durability and reparability should be provided for all types of goods before concluding the contract. Moreover, as regards goods with digital elements, digital content and digital services, consumers should be informed about the period of time during which free software updates are available. Therefore, Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council8 should be amended to provide consumers with pre-contractual information about durability, reparability and the availability of updates. Information should be provided to consumers in a clear and comprehensible manner and in line with the accessibility requirements of Directive 2019/8829. The obligation to provide this information to consumers complements and does not affect the rights of consumers provided in Directives (EU) 2019/77010 and (EU) 2019/77111 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

Amendment 6

(23) A good indicator of a good’s durability is the producer’s commercial guarantee of durability within the meaning of Article 17 of Directive (EU) 2019/771. The producer’s commercial guarantee of durability is a commitment from a producer to the consumer on the durability of the good, more specifically it is a commitment that the good will maintain its required functions and performance through normal use. In order to inform consumers about the fact that a guarantee of durability is offered for a particular good, that information should be provided to the consumer using a harmonised label. Traders selling goods should be required to inform consumers about the existence and duration of the producer’s commercial guarantee of durability covering the entire good, offered without additional costs, and for more than two years, where the producer makes this information available to the trader. The trader should not be required to actively search for such information from the producer, for example, on the product-specific websites. To avoid consumer’s confusion between the commercial guarantee of durability and the legal guarantee of conformity, consumers should be reminded on the harmonised label that they also benefit from the legal guarantee of conformity.

Proposal for a directive

(23a) Recent consumer reports have shown that consumers are often unaware of their legal rights under Directive (EU) 2019/771. Therefore a harmonised notice should remind consumers about the existence and the main elements of the legal guarantee of conformity, including its minimum duration of two years and a general reference to the possibility that the duration of the legal guarantee of conformity can be longer under national rules. This will prevent possible confusion with the information on commercial guarantee of durability.

Recital 9

(23b) The harmonised label should be displayed in a prominent manner and used in a way that allows the consumers to identify easily which particular good benefits from a commercial guarantee of durability covering the entire good, offered without additional costs, and for more than two years, for example by placing the label directly on the packaging of a particular good or by displaying the label in a prominent manner on the shelf where the goods covered by such a guarantee are placed, or by placing it directly next to the picture of the good when the good is offered for sale online. Producers offering such commercial guarantees of durability can themselves place the harmonised label directly on the particular good or on its packaging, with the aim of benefitting from a commercial advantage. Traders should ensure that the harmonised label is clearly visible. The harmonised notice should meanwhile provide a general reminder to the consumers about the legal guarantees of conformity applicable to all goods in accordance with Directive 2019/771. The harmonised notice should be displayed in a prominent manner, for example, as a poster in an eye-catching way on a wall in the shop, next to the checkout counter or, in cases of online sale, placed as a general reminder on the website of the trader selling goods.

Text proposed by the Commission

(23c) Implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission as regard to the design and content of the harmonised label and the harmonised notice. Those implementing powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council12.

Amendment

▌

(9) Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit making generic environmental claims without recognised excellent environmental performance which is relevant to the claim. Examples of such generic environmental claims are ‘environmentally friendly’, ‘eco-friendly’, ‘eco’, ‘green’, ‘nature’s friend’, ‘ecological’, ‘environmentally correct’, ‘climate friendly’, ‘gentle on the environment’, ‘carbon friendly’, ‘carbon neutral’, ‘carbon positive’, ‘climate neutral’, ‘energy efficient’, ‘biodegradable’, ‘biobased’ or similar statements, as well as broader statements such as ‘conscious’ or ‘responsible’ that suggest or create the impression of excellent environmental performance. Such generic environmental claims should be prohibited whenever there is no excellent environmental performance demonstrated or whenever the specification of the claim is not provided in clear and prominent terms on the same medium, such as the same advertising spot, product’s packaging or online selling interface. For example, the claim ‘biodegradable’, referring to a product, would be a generic claim, whilst claiming that ‘the packaging is biodegradable through home composting in one month’ would be a specific claim, which does not fall under this prohibition.

▌

(9) Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit making generic environmental claims without providing evidence of the excellent environmental performance which is relevant to the claim. Examples of such generic environmental claims are ‘environmentally friendly’, ‘eco-friendly’, ‘eco’, ‘green’, ‘nature’s friend’, ‘natural’, ‘animal-friendly’, ‘cruelty-free’, ‘sustainable’, ‘ecological’, ‘environmentally correct’, ‘climate friendly’, ‘gentle on the environment’, ‘deforestation-free’, ‘carbon friendly’, ‘climate neutral’, ‘energy efficient’, ‘biodegradable’, ‘plastic neutral’, ‘plastic-free’, ‘biobased’ or similar statements, as well as broader statements such as ‘conscious’ or ‘responsible’ that suggest or create the impression of excellent environmental performance. Such generic environmental claims should be prohibited whenever they are based on offsetting of environmental impacts, such as purchasing of carbon credits, or whenever there is no excellent environmental performance demonstrated or scientific evidence to it, or whenever the specification of the claim is not provided in clear and prominent terms on the same medium, such as the same advertising spot, product’s packaging or online selling interface. For example, the claim ‘biodegradable’, referring to a product, would be a generic claim, whilst claiming that ‘the packaging is biodegradable through home composting in one month’ would be a specific claim, which does not fall under this prohibition. In cases where it cannot be substantiated by scientific evidence, it is particularly important to prohibit claims suggesting, based on carbon offsetting, that a product or service has a neutral, reduced, compensated or positive carbon emissions’ impact on the environment as it can mislead consumers by making them believe that the product they buy or the trader’s business has no impact on the environment. This should not prevent companies from advertising their investments in environmental initiatives as long as such advertising does not claim that such investments or initiatives compensate, neutralise, or render positive the impact of the product or the impact of the trader’s business on the environment.

(26) In view of the established minimum duration of two years of the legal guarantee of conformity in accordance with Directive (EU) 2019/771 and the fact that many product failures occur after this duration, the trader’s obligation to inform consumers about the existence and duration of the producer’s commercial guarantee of durability using a harmonised label should only apply to commercial guarantees of durability that are offered for a period longer than two years. In addition, the harmonised label should also remind consumers of the existence of the legal guarantee of conformity.

Amendment 7

Proposal for a directive

Recital 14

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(14) In order to improve the welfare of consumers, the amendments to Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also address several practices associated with early obsolescence, including planned obsolescence practices, understood as a commercial policy involving deliberately planning or designing a product with a limited useful life so that it prematurely becomes obsolete or non-functional after a certain period of time. Purchasing products that are expected to last longer than they actually do causes consumer detriment. Furthermore, early obsolescence practices have an overall negative impact on the environment in the form of increased material waste. Therefore, addressing those practices are also likely to reduce the amount of waste, contributing to a more sustainable consumption.

(14) In order to improve the welfare of consumers, the amendments to Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also address several practices associated with early obsolescence, including planned obsolescence practices, understood as a commercial policy involving deliberately planning or designing a product with a limited useful life so that it prematurely becomes obsolete or non-functional after a certain period of time. Engaging in practices that lead to the shortening of a product’s lifespan or purchasing products that are expected to last longer than they actually do causes consumer detriment. Furthermore, early obsolescence practices have an overall negative impact on the environment in the form of increased material waste. Therefore, addressing those practices, are also likely to reduce the amount of waste, contributing to a more sustainable consumption.

Amendment 8

Proposal for a directive

Recital 16

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(16) It should also be prohibited to omit to inform the consumer about the existence of a feature of the good introduced to limit its durability. For example, such a feature could be software which stops or downgrades the functionality of the good after a particular period of time, or it could be a piece of hardware which is designed to fail after a particular period of time. The prohibition of omitting to inform consumers of such features of the goods complements and does not affect the remedies available to consumers when they constitute a lack of conformity under Directive (EU) 2019/771 of the European Parliament and of the Council26 . For such a commercial practice to be considered unfair, it should not be necessary to demonstrate that the purpose of the feature is to stimulate the replacement of the respective good. The use of features limiting the durability of the goods should be distinguished from manufacturing practices using materials or processes of general low quality resulting in limited durability of the goods. Lack of conformity of a good resulting from the use of low quality materials or processes should continue to be governed by the rules on the conformity of goods set out in Directive (EU) 2019/771.

(16) It should also be prohibited to introduce a feature of the good that limits its durability. For example, such a feature could be software which stops or downgrades the functionality of the good after a particular period of time, or it could be a piece of hardware which is designed to fail after a particular period of time. The prohibition to introduce such features of the goods does not affect the remedies available to consumers when they constitute a lack of conformity under Directive (EU) 2019/771 of the European Parliament and of the Council 26 . For such a commercial practice to be considered unfair, it should not be necessary to demonstrate that the purpose of the feature is to stimulate the replacement of the respective good. The use of features limiting the durability of the goods should be distinguished from manufacturing practices using materials or processes of general low quality resulting in limited durability of the goods. Lack of conformity of a good resulting from the use of low quality materials or processes should continue to be governed by the rules on the conformity of goods set out in Directive (EU) 2019/771.

__________________

26 Directive (EU) 2019/771 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019 on certain aspects concerning contracts for the sale of goods, amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2394 and Directive 2009/22/EC, and repealing Directive 1999/44/EC (OJ L 136, 22.5.2019, p. 28).

Amendment 9

Proposal for a directive

Recital 17

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(17) Another practice which should be prohibited under Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC is the practice of claiming that a good has a certain durability when it does not. That would be the case, for instance, when a trader informs consumers that a washing machine is expected to last a certain number of washing cycles, while the actual use of washing machine shows this is not the case.

(17) Another practice which should be prohibited under Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC is the practice of claiming that a good has a certain durability when it does not. That would be the case, for instance, when a trader informs consumers that a washing machine is expected to last a certain number of washing cycles in accordance with normal expected use in accordance with the instructions while the actual use of washing machine shows this is not the case.

Amendment 10

Proposal for a directive

Recital 18

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(18) Similarly, Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit presenting products as allowing repair when such repair is not possible, as well as omitting to inform consumers that it is not possible to repair goods in accordance with legal requirements.

(18) Similarly, Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit marketing a good which does not allow repair in accordance with legal requirements or failing to inform the consumer that a good is unrepairable. In addition, Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to ensure that the consumer is always informed of repair restrictions such as the unavailability of repair services, the unavailability of spare parts or the refusal to repair in the event that the product has been repaired by an independent professional, a non-professional or a user.

Amendment 11

Proposal for a directive

Recital 20

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(20) Another practice associated with early obsolescence which should be prohibited and added to the list in Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC is inducing the consumer into replacing the consumables of a product earlier than would otherwise be necessary for technical reasons. Such practices mislead the consumer into believing that the goods will no longer function unless their consumables are replaced, thus leading them to purchase more consumables than necessary. For example, the practice of urging the consumer, via the settings of the printer, to replace the printer ink cartridges before they are actually empty in order to stimulate the purchase of additional ink cartridges would be prohibited.

(20) Another practice associated with early obsolescence which should be prohibited and added to the list in Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC is marketing goods that require replacing the consumables earlier than would otherwise be necessary for technical reasons. Such practices mislead the consumer into believing that the goods will no longer function unless their consumables are replaced, thus leading consumers to purchase more consumables than necessary. For example, marketing a printer that requires consumers to replace the printer ink cartridges before they are actually empty in order to stimulate the purchase of additional ink cartridges would be prohibited.

Amendment 12

Proposal for a directive

Recital 21

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(21) Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit omitting to inform the consumer that the good is designed to limit its functionality when using consumables, spare parts or accessories that are not provided by the original producer. For example, the marketing of printers that are designed to limit their functionality when using ink cartridges not provided by the original producer of the printer without disclosing this information to the consumer would be prohibited. This practice could mislead consumers into purchasing an alternative ink cartridge which cannot be used for that printer, thus leading to unnecessary repair costs, waste streams or additional costs due to the obligation to use the original producer’s consumables which the consumer could not foresee at the time of purchase. Similarly, marketing smart devices designed to limit their functionality when using chargers or spare parts that are not provided by the original producer without disclosing this information to the consumer would be prohibited as well.

(21) Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit marketing goods that are designed in a way that limits their functionality when using consumables, spare parts or accessories that are not provided by the original producer. For example, the marketing of printers that are designed to limit their functionality when using ink cartridges not provided by the original producer of the printer would be prohibited. This practice could mislead consumers into purchasing an alternative ink cartridge which cannot be used for that printer, thus leading to unnecessary repair costs, waste streams or additional costs due to the obligation to use the original producer’s consumables which the consumer could not foresee at the time of purchase. Similarly, marketing smart devices designed to limit their functionality when using chargers or spare parts that are not provided by the original producer would be prohibited as well.

Amendment 13

Proposal for a directive

Recital 22

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(22) In order for consumers to take better informed decisions and stimulate the demand for, and the supply of, more durable goods, specific information about a product’s durability and reparability should be provided for all types of goods before concluding the contract. Moreover, as regards goods with digital elements, digital content and digital services, consumers should be informed about the period of time during which free software updates are available. Therefore, Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council27 should be amended to provide consumers with pre-contractual information about durability, reparability and the availability of updates. Information should be provided to consumers in a clear and comprehensible manner and in line with the accessibility requirements of Directive 2019/88228 . The obligation to provide this information to consumers complements and does not affect the rights of consumers provided in Directives (EU) 2019/77029 and (EU) 2019/77130 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

(22) In order for consumers to take better informed decisions and stimulate the demand for, and the supply of, more durable goods, specific information about a product’s durability and reparability should be provided for all types of goods before concluding the contract. Moreover, as regards goods with digital elements, digital content and digital services, consumers should be informed about the period of time during which free software updates are available in accordance with requirements under Union or national law, which covers as a minimum, the period as specified in Union law and its voluntary extension, where the producer makes such information available. Therefore, Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council 27 should be amended to provide consumers with pre-contractual information about durability, reparability and the availability of updates. Information should be provided to consumers, including in an official language or in official languages of the Member State where the good is offered, in a clear and comprehensible manner and in line with the accessibility requirements of Directive 2019/88228 . The obligation to provide this information to consumers complements and does not affect the rights of consumers provided in Directives (EU) 2019/77029, (EU) 2019/77130 and (EU) 2011/83 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

__________________

27 Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 304, 22.11.2011, p. 64).

28 Directive 2019/882/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on the accessibility requirements for products and services (OJ L 151, 7.6.2019, p. 70).

29 Directive (EU) 2019/770 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019 on certain aspects concerning contracts for the supply of digital content and digital services (OJ L 136, 22.5.2019, p. 1).

30 Directive (EU) 2019/771 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019 on certain aspects concerning contracts for the sale of goods, amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2394 and Directive 2009/22/EC, and repealing Directive 1999/44/EC (OJ L 136, 22.5.2019, p. 28).

Amendment 14

Proposal for a directive

Recital 23

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(23) A good indicator of a good’s durability is the producer’s commercial guarantee of durability within the meaning of Article 17 of Directive (EU) 2019/771. Therefore, Directive 2011/83/EU should be amended to specifically require traders selling goods to inform consumers about the existence of the producer’s commercial guarantee of durability for all types of goods, where the producer makes this information available.

(23) A good indicator of a good’s durability is the duration of the legal guarantee of conformity, as well as its voluntary extension in the form of the equivalent producer’s commercial guarantee of durability within the meaning of Article 17 of Directive (EU) 2019/771, covering the entire good and provided without an additional cost. Therefore, Directive 2011/83/EU should be amended to specifically require traders to provide, before the conclusion of the contract, a label indicating, as a minimum, a reminder of the legal guarantee of conformity, and if relevant, its voluntary extension in the form of a commercial guarantee of durability.

Amendment 15

Proposal for a directive

Recital 23 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(23a) When the goods are made available to consumers and other end-users, the label should be displayed prominently and in a clearly legible way.

Amendment 16

Proposal for a directive

Recital 24

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(24) The problem of limited durability contrary to consumer expectations is most relevant for energy-using goods, which are goods that function from an external energy source. Consumers are also most interested in receiving information about the expected durability of this category of goods. For these reasons, only for this category of goods, consumers should be made aware that the information about the existence of a producer’s commercial guarantee of durability of more than two years has not been provided by the producer.

deleted

Amendment 17

Proposal for a directive

Recital 25

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(25) Goods containing energy-using components, where those components are mere accessories and do not contribute to the main function of those goods, such as decorative lighting for clothing or footwear or electric light for a bicycle, should not be classified as energy-using goods.

deleted

Amendment 18

Proposal for a directive

Recital 26

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(26) In view of the established minimum duration of two years of the seller’s liability for lack of conformity in accordance with Directive (EU) 2019/771 and the fact that many product failures occur after two years, the trader’s obligation to inform consumers about the existence and duration of the producer’s commercial guarantee of durability should apply to guarantees that are of more than two years.

deleted

Amendment 19

Proposal for a directive

Recital 27

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(27) In order to make it easier for consumers to take an informed transactional decision when comparing goods before concluding a contract, traders should inform consumers about the existence and duration, of the producer’s commercial guarantee of durability for the entire good and not for specific components of the good.

(28) The producer and the seller should remain free to offer other types of commercial guarantees and after-sales services ▌ . However, the information provided to the consumer about such other commercial guarantees or services should not confuse the consumer with regard to the existence and duration of the producer’s commercial guarantee of durability covering the entire good, offered without additional costs, and for more than two years, using a harmonised label.

deleted

(29) In order for consumers to take better-informed decisions and to promote competition between producers as regards the durability of goods with digital elements, the traders selling those goods should inform consumers about the minimum period of time during which or date until when the producer commits to provide software updates for such goods. Likewise, traders offering digital content and digital services should inform consumers about the minimum period during which or until when the provider of the digital content or digital service commits to provide software updates, including security updates, ▌ necessary to keep the digital content and digital services in conformity. This obligation should ensure that consumers receive this information in a simple and clear manner allowing them to compare different minimum periods. This is without prejudice to the obligations set out in Union law, in particular in Directives (EU) 2019/770 and EU) 2019/771 and, where applicable, specific Union product legislation. The information on software updates should be provided in a manner that is not misleading under the provisions of Directive 2005/29/EC. The trader should be obliged to provide this information only where the producer or provider has made such information available.

Amendment 20

▌

Proposal for a directive

(31) Pursuant to Article 5(1), point (e), and Article 6(1), point (m), of Directive 2011/83/EU, traders are obliged to provide the consumer before the consumer is bound by the contract with information on the existence and the conditions of after-sales services, including repair services, where such services are provided. In addition, to allow consumers to make an informed transactional decision and choose goods that are easier to repair, traders should provide, before the conclusion of the contract, for all types of goods, where applicable, the reparability score of the good as provided by the producer and established in accordance with Union law.

Recital 28

(32) ▌In order to ensure that consumers are well informed about the reparability of the goods they purchase, where a reparability score is not established in accordance with Union law, traders should provide ▌ other relevant repair information that is made available by the producer, such as information about the availability, estimated cost and ordering procedure of spare parts necessary to keep goods in conformity, about the availability of repair and maintenance instructions as well as about repair restrictions.

Text proposed by the Commission

(33) Traders should provide consumers with the harmonised label, information about the minimum period for updates and the repair information other than the reparability score, where the producer or provider of the digital content or digital service, when different from the trader, makes the relevant information available. In particular, as regards goods, the trader should convey to consumers the information that the producer has provided to the trader or has otherwise intended to make readily available to the consumer before the conclusion of the contract, by indicating it on the product itself, its packaging or tags and labels that the consumer would normally consult before concluding the contract. The trader should not be required to actively search for such information from the producer, for example, on the product-specific websites. At the same time, it would be in the interest of the producers to proactively provide such information to benefit from a commercial advantage.

Amendment

(33a) Traders should, where applicable, inform the consumer about the availability of environmentally friendly delivery options, such as the delivery of goods by cargo bikes or electric delivery vehicles or the possibility of bundled shipping options.

(28) The producer and the seller should remain free to offer other types of commercial guarantees and after-sales services of any duration. However, the information provided to the consumer about such other commercial guarantees or services should not confuse the consumer with regard to the existence and duration of the producer’s commercial guarantee of durability that covers the entire good and has a duration of more than two years.

(33b) If a distance contract to be concluded by electronic means places the consumer under an obligation to pay, the trader should also make the consumer aware about the harmonised label, whenever provided, in a clear and prominent manner, and directly before the consumer places his order to ensure the consumer takes that information into account.

(34) Directives 2005/29/EC and 2011/83/EU should continue to work as a ‘safety net’ ensuring that a high level of consumer protection can be maintained in all sectors, by complementing sector and product-specific Union law that prevail in case of conflict.

Amendment 21

(35) Since the objectives of this Directive, namely, enabling better informed transactional decisions by consumers to promote sustainable consumption, eliminating practices that cause damage to the sustainable economy and mislead consumers away from sustainable consumption choices, and ensuring a better and consistent application of the Union consumer legal framework, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States individually but can rather, by reason of the Union-wide character of the problem, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve those objectives.

Proposal for a directive

(36) In accordance with the Joint Political Declaration of 28 September 2011 of Member States and the Commission on explanatory documents13, Member States have undertaken to accompany, in justified cases, the notification of their transposition measures with one or more documents explaining the relationship between the components of a directive and the corresponding parts of national transposition instruments. With regard to this Directive, the legislator considers the transmission of such documents to be justified,

Recital 29

(36a) To facilitate the proper application of this Directive, it is important that the Commission keeps the guidance documents on Directive 2005/29/EC and Directive 2011/83/EU updated to take into account the content of this Directive.

Text proposed by the Commission

~~HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:~~

Amendment

~~Article 1~~

(29) To promote competition between producers as regards the durability of goods with digital elements the traders selling those goods should inform consumers about the minimum period of time during which the producer commits to provide software updates for such goods. However, to avoid overloading consumers with information, such information should only be provided when this period is longer than the period of the producer’s commercial guarantee of durability, as that guarantee entails the provision of updates, including security updates, that are necessary to maintain the required functions and performance of goods with digital elements. Furthermore, information about the producer’s commitment to provide software updates is relevant only where the sales contract regarding goods with digital elements provides for a single act of supply of the digital content or digital service in respect of which Article 7(3), point (a), of Directive (EU) 2019/771 applies. In contrast, there should be no new obligation to provide that information where the sales contract provides for a continuous supply of the digital content or digital service over a period of time, since for those contracts Article 7(3), point (b), of Directive (EU) 2019/771 specifies, by reference to Article 10 (2) or (5), the period of time during which the seller is to ensure that the consumer is informed of and supplied with updates.

~~Amendments to Directive 2005/29/EC~~

~~Directive 2005/29/EC is amended as follows:~~

Amendment 22

~~(1) in Article 2, the following points (ca) and (o) to (y) are added:~~

Proposal for a directive

~~‘(ca) ‘goods’ means goods as defined in point (5) of Article 2 of Directive (EU) 2019/771 of the European Parliament and of the Council;~~

Recital 30

(o) ‘environmental claim’ means any message or representation ▌ which is not mandatory under Union law or national law, including text, pictorial, graphic or symbolic representation, in any form, including labels, brand names, company names or product names, in the context of a commercial communication, and which states or implies that a product, product category, brand or trader has a positive or no impact on the environment or is less damaging to the environment than other products, brands or traders, respectively, or has improved their impact over time;

Text proposed by the Commission

~~▌ ▌~~

Amendment

(q) ‘generic environmental claim’ means any ▌ environmental claim made in written form or orally, including through audiovisual media, not contained in a sustainability label, where the specification of the claim is not provided in clear and prominent terms on the same medium;

(30) Likewise, traders offering digital content and digital services should also inform consumers about the minimum period during which the provider of the digital content or digital service, where the provider is different from the trader, commits to provide software updates, including security updates, necessary to keep the digital content and digital services in conformity. Information about the provider’s commitment to provide software updates is relevant only where the contract provides for a single act of supply or a series of individual acts of supply in respect of which Article 8(2), point (b), of Directive 2019/770 applies. In contrast, there should be no new obligation to provide that information where the contract provides for a continuous supply over a period of time, since for these contracts Article 8(2), point (a) of Directive (EU) 2019/770 specifies the period of time during which the trader is to ensure that the consumer is informed of and supplied with updates.

(r) ‘sustainability label’ means any voluntary trust mark, quality mark or equivalent, either public or private, that aims to set apart and promote a product, a process or a business with reference to its environmental or social aspects or both. This does not cover any mandatory label required in accordance with Union or national law;

(30) Likewise, traders offering digital content and digital services should also inform consumers about the minimum period, after the date of placement on the market, during which the provider of the digital content or digital service, where the provider is different from the trader, will provide software updates, including security updates, necessary to keep the digital content and digital services in conformity. This information should include, as a minimum, the period for which the updates have to be provided for in Union law. The provider will provide this information to the trader in all cases.

(s) ‘certification scheme’ means a third-party verification scheme which certifies that a product, process or business complies with certain requirements and which, in case of compliance, allows for the use of a corresponding sustainability label. Its terms, including its requirements, are publicly available and meet the following criteria:

Amendment 23

i. The scheme is open under transparent, fair, and non-discriminatory terms to all traders willing and able to comply with the scheme’s requirements; ii. The scheme’s requirements are developed by the scheme owner in consultation with relevant experts and stakeholders;

Proposal for a directive

iii. The scheme sets out procedures for dealing with non-compliance and foresees the withdrawal or suspension of the use of the sustainability label by the trader in case of non-compliance with the scheme’s requirements; and

Recital 31

iv. The monitoring of compliance by the trader with the scheme’s requirements is subject to an objective procedure and carried out by a third party whose competence and independence from both the scheme owner and the trader is based on international, Union or national standards and procedures.

Text proposed by the Commission

~~▌ ▌~~

Amendment

(u) ‘recognised excellent environmental performance’ means environmental performance compliant with Regulation (EC) No 66/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council, with national or regional EN ISO 14024 type I ecolabelling schemes officially recognised in the Member States or with top environmental performance in accordance with other applicable Union law;

(31) To allow consumers to make an informed transactional decision and choose goods that are easier to repair, traders should provide, before the conclusion of the contract, for all types of goods, where applicable, the reparability score of the good as provided by the producer in accordance with Union law.

~~(v) ‘durability’ means durability as defined in Article 2, point (13), of Directive (EU) 2019/771 of the European Parliament and of the Council;~~

(w) ‘software update’ means an update, including a security update, that is necessary to keep goods with digital elements, digital content and digital services in conformity in accordance with Directives (EU) 2019/770 and (EU) 2019/771 or a functionality update

Amendment 24

Proposal for a directive

Recital 32

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(32) Pursuant to Article 5(1), point (e), and Article 6(1), point (m), of Directive 2011/83/EU traders are obliged to provide the consumer before the consumer is bound by the contract with information on the existence and the conditions of after-sales services, including repair services, where such services are provided. In addition, in order to ensure that consumers are well informed about the reparability of the goods they purchase, where a reparability score is not established in accordance with Union law, traders should provide, for all types of goods, other relevant repair information that is made available by the producer, such as information about the availability of spare parts, and a user and repair manual.

(32) Pursuant to Article 5(1), point (e), and Article 6(1), point (m), of Directive 2011/83/EU traders are obliged to provide the consumer before the consumer is bound by the contract with information on the existence and the conditions of after-sales services, including repair services. In addition, in order to ensure that consumers are well informed about the reparability of the goods they purchase, where a reparability score is not established, traders should provide, for all types of goods, other relevant repair information, such as information about the availability and maximum price expected of the spare parts necessary to repair a good, including the minimum period after the purchase of the good during which spare parts and accessories are available, the procedure for ordering them, the availability of a user and repair manual as well as the availability of diagnosis and repair tools and services. This information should be provided to the respective traders by the producers of the goods.

Amendment 25

Proposal for a directive

Recital 33

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(33) Traders should provide consumers with information about the existence and duration of the producer’s commercial guarantee of durability, the minimum period for updates and the repair information other than the reparability score, where the producer or provider of the digital content or digital service, when different from the trader, makes the relevant information available. In particular, as regards goods, the trader should convey to consumers the information that the producer has provided to the trader or has otherwise intended to make readily available to the consumer before the conclusion of the contract, by indicating it on the product itself, its packaging or tags and labels that the consumer would normally consult before concluding the contract. The trader should not be required to actively search for such information from the producer, for example, on the product-specific websites.

(33) Traders should provide consumers with information about the existence of the label, the minimum period for updates and the repair information other than the reparability score. In particular, as regards goods, the trader should convey to consumers the information that the producer has provided to the trader or has otherwise intended to make readily available to the consumer before the conclusion of the contract, by indicating it on the product itself, its packaging or tags and labels that the consumer would normally consult before concluding the contract. The trader should not be required to actively search for such information from the producer, for example, on the product-specific websites. Where traders are not producers of goods, their influence on the design of the products and their input regarding any information accompanying the products might be limited. In that case, the producers should provide the relevant information to traders interacting with consumers. Furthermore, traders should be responsible for further passing on the information to consumers.

Amendment 26

Proposal for a directive

Recital 36 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(36a) The Commission should present easy-to-understand guidelines for businesses with the requirements of this Directive. When developing such guidelines, the Commission should take into consideration the needs of SMEs in order to keep administrative and financial burdens to a minimum while facilitating their compliance with this Directive. The Commission should consult relevant stakeholders, with expertise in the field of marketing.

Amendment 27

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(1) in Article 2, the following points (o) to (y) are added:

(1) in Article 2, the following points (o) to (ya) are added:

Amendment 28

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1

Directive 2005/29/EC

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point o

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(o) ‘environmental claim’ means any message or representation, which is not mandatory under Union law or national law, including text, pictorial, graphic or symbolic representation, in any form, including labels, brand names, company names or product names, in the context of a commercial communication, which states or implies that a product or trader has a positive or no impact on the environment or is less damaging to the environment than other products or traders, respectively, or has improved their impact over time;

(o) ‘environmental claim’ means any message or representation which is not mandatory under Union law or national law, including text, pictorial, graphic or symbolic representation, in any form, including labels, brand names, company names or product names, in the context of a commercial communication, and which states or implies that a product, product category, brand or trader has a positive or no impact on the environment or is less damaging to the environment than other products, brands or traders, respectively, or has improved their impact over time;

Amendment 29

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1

Directive 2005/29/EC

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point p

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(p) ‘explicit environmental claim’ means an environmental claim that is in textual form or contained in a sustainability label;

deleted

Amendment 30

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1

Directive 2005/29/EC

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point q

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(q) ‘generic environmental claim’ means any explicit environmental claim, not contained in a sustainability label, where the specification of the claim is not provided in clear and prominent terms on the same medium;

(q) ‘generic environmental claim’ means an environmental claim, not contained in a sustainability label, where the specification of the claim is not provided in clear and prominent terms on the same medium;

Amendment 31

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1

Directive 2005/29/EC

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point s

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(s) ‘certification scheme’ means a third-party verification scheme that is open under transparent, fair and non-discriminatory terms to all traders willing and able to comply with the scheme’s requirements, which certifies that a product complies with certain requirements, and for which the monitoring of compliance is objective, based on international, Union or national standards and procedures and carried out by a party independent from both the scheme owner and the trader;

(s) ‘certification scheme’ means a third-party verification scheme:

(i) that is open under publicly available, transparent, fair and non-discriminatory terms and at a reasonable cost to traders and entities willing and able to comply with the scheme’s requirements;

(ii) that certifies that a product, a process or a business complies with certain publicly available and independently developed requirements;

(iii) for which the monitoring of compliance and the award of the certification are objective, based on international, Union or national standards and procedures taking into account the nature of the products, processes, or businesses concerned;

(iv) that ensures that the monitoring of compliance referred to in point (iii) is carried out by a third party, whose competencies and independence, from both the scheme owner and the trader, have been verified by the Member States; and

(v) that includes a complaints system that is available to consumers and other external stakeholders, focuses on non-compliance and ensures the withdrawal of the sustainability label in cases of non-compliance;

Amendment 32

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1

Directive 2005/29/EC

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point t

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(t) ‘sustainability information tool’ means software, including a website, part of a website or an application, operated by or on behalf of a trader, which provides information to consumers about environmental or social aspects of products, or which compares products on those aspects;

(t) ‘sustainability information and comparison tool’ means software, including a website, part of a website or an application, operated by or on behalf of a trader, which provides information to consumers about environmental or social aspects of products, or which compares products on those aspects.

Amendment 33

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1

Directive 2005/29/EC

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point w

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(w) ‘software update’ means a free update, including a security update, that is necessary to keep goods with digital elements, digital content and digital services in conformity in accordance with Directives (EU) 2019/770 and (EU) 2019/771;

(w) ‘software update’ means a free update, including either a security update or a functionality or feature update, that is necessary to keep goods with digital elements, digital content and digital services in conformity in accordance with Directives (EU) 2019/770 and (EU) 2019/771 or which improves or reduces their durability;

Amendment 34

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1

Directive 2005/29/EC

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point w a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(wa) ‘security update’ means an operating system update, including security patches, if relevant for a given device, whose main purpose is to provide enhanced security for the device;

Amendment 35

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1

Directive 2005/29/EC

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point w b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(wb) ‘functionality update’ means an operating system update whose main purpose is to implement new functionalities;

Amendment 36

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1

Directive 2005/29/EC

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point x

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(x) ‘consumable’ means any component of a good that is used up recurrently and needs to be replaced for the good to function as intended;

(x) ‘consumable’ means any component of a good that is used up recurrently and needs to be replaced or replenished for the good to function as intended;

~~(y) ‘functionality’ means functionality as defined in point (9) of Article 2 of Directive (EU) 2019/771.~~

Amendment 37

~~(2) Article 6 is amended as follows:~~

Proposal for a directive

~~(a) in paragraph 1, point (b) is replaced by the following:~~

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1

‘(b) the main characteristics of the product, such as its availability, benefits, risks, execution, composition, environmental or social characteristics, accessories, circularity aspects, such as durability, repairability and recyclability, after-sale customer assistance and complaint handling, method and date of manufacture or provision, delivery, fitness for purpose, usage, quantity, specification, geographical or commercial origin or the results to be expected from its use, or the results and material features of tests or checks carried out on the product.’;’

Directive 2005/29/EC

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point y a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(ya) ‘carbon offsetting’ means the purchase of carbon credits or the provision of financial support for environmental projects, that aim to neutralise, reduce, compensate or inset the purchaser’s own environmental impact, or that of their goods or services.

Amendment 38

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a

Directive 2005/29/EC

Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(b) the main characteristics of the product, such as its availability, benefits, risks, execution, composition, environmental or social impact, accessories, durability, reparability, after-sale customer assistance and complaint handling, method and date of manufacture or provision, delivery, fitness for purpose, usage, quantity, specification, geographical or commercial origin or the results to be expected from its use, or the results and material features of tests or checks carried out on the product.;

(b) the main characteristics of the product, such as its availability, benefits, risks, execution, composition, environmental or social impact, accessories, durability, reparability, reusability, recyclability, after-sale customer assistance and complaint handling, method and date of manufacture or provision, delivery, fitness for purpose, usage, quantity, specification, geographical or commercial origin or the results to be expected from its use, or the results and material features of tests or checks carried out on the product.;

Amendment 39

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a a (new)

Directive 2005/29/EC

Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point c

Present text

Amendment

(aa) in paragraph 2, point (c) is replaced by the following:

(c) any marketing of a good, in one Member State, as being identical to a good marketed in other Member States, while that good has significantly different composition or characteristics, unless justified by legitimate and objective factors.

‘(c) any marketing of a good, in one Member State, with seemingly identical presentation to another good, which is marketed, in other Member States, under the same brand, trademark or designation, while that good presents differences in composition or characteristics, including its sensory profile;’

Amendment 40

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(b) in paragraph 2, the following points (d) and (e) are added:

‘(d) making an environmental claim related to future environmental performance without clear, objective, publicly available and verifiable commitments set out in a detailed and realistic implementation plan that includes measurable and time-bound targets and other relevant elements necessary to support its implementation, such as allocation of resources, and that is regularly verified by an independent third party expert, whose findings shall be made available to consumers.

(b) in paragraph 2, the following points (d) to (ea) are added:

~~(e) advertising benefits to consumers that are irrelevant and do not result from any feature of the product or business.’~~

Amendment 41

~~(3) in Article 7, the following paragraph (7) is added:~~

Proposal for a directive

‘7. ▌ Where a trader provides a service which compares products and provides the consumer with information on environmental or social characteristics or on circularity aspects, such as durability, reparability or recyclability, of the products or suppliers of those products, information about the method of comparison, the products which are the object of comparison and the suppliers of those products, as well as the measures in place to keep that information up to date, shall be regarded as material information.;’

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b

~~(4) Annex I is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Directive.~~

Directive 2005/29/EC

~~Article 2~~

Article 6 –paragraph 2 – point d

~~Amendments to Directive 2011/83/EU~~

Text proposed by the Commission

~~Directive 2011/83/EU is amended as follows:~~

Amendment

~~(1) Article 2 is amended as follows:~~

(d) making an environmental claim related to future environmental performance without clear, objective and verifiable commitments and targets and without an independent monitoring system;

▌

(d) making an environmental claim related to future environmental performance solely based on carbon offsetting schemes or without clear, objective, quantified, science-based and verifiable commitments, without a detailed and realistic implementation plan with reference to budgetary and technological commitments, without feasible targets, and without an independent monitoring system that is based on relevant data;

▌

Amendment 42

~~(b) the following points (14a) to (14e) are inserted:~~

Proposal for a directive

‘(14a) ‘commercial guarantee of durability’ means a producer’s commercial guarantee of durability referred to in Article 17 of Directive (EU) 2019/771, under which the producer is directly liable to the consumer during the entire period of the guarantee of durability for repair or replacement of the goods, under the conditions laid down in Article 14 of Directive (EU) 2019/771, whenever the goods do not maintain their durability;

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b

~~(14b) ‘durability’ means durability as defined in Article 2, point (13), of Directive (EU) 2019/771;~~

Directive 2005/29/EC

~~(14c) ‘producer’ means producer as defined in Article 2, point (4), of Directive (EU) 2019/771;~~

Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)

~~(14d) ‘reparability score’ means a score expressing the capacity of a good to be repaired, based on harmonised requirements established at Union level;~~

Text proposed by the Commission

(14e) ‘software update’ means a free update, including a security update, that is necessary to keep goods with digital elements, digital content and digital services in conformity in accordance with Directives (EU) 2019/770 and (EU) 2019/771;;’

Amendment

~~(1a) in Article 5, paragraph 1 is amended as follows:~~

(ea) practices with the effect or likely effect of distorting or impairing the autonomy, decision-making or choice of the recipients of the service, on purpose or in effect, via the structure, design, or functionalities of an online interface or a part thereof.

~~(a) point (e) is replaced by the following:~~

Amendment 43

(e) a reminder of the existence of the legal guarantee of conformity for goods, and its main elements including its minimum duration of two years in accordance with Directive (EU) 2019/771, provided in a prominent manner, using the harmonised notice referred to in Article 22a;

Proposal for a directive

~~(b) the following points (ea) to (ec) are inserted:~~

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a

‘(ea) where a commercial guarantee of durability of more than two years covering the entire good is offered to the consumer without additional costs, and the producer makes that information available to the trader, the information that the specific good benefits from such a ▌ guarantee ▌ and its duration together with a reminder of the existence of the legal guarantee of conformity [shall be] provided in a prominent manner, using the harmonised label referred to in Article 22a;

Directive 2011/83/EU

~~(eaa) a reminder of the existence of the legal guarantee of conformity for digital content and digital services;~~

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3a

~~(eab) where applicable, the existence and the conditions of after-sales services and commercial guarantees;~~

Text proposed by the Commission

~~▌ ▌~~

Amendment

(ec) for goods with digital elements or for digital content and digital services, where the producer or the provider makes such information available to the trader, the minimum period in units of time during which, or date until when, the producer or the provider provides software updates.

(a) the following point (3a) is inserted:

~~▌ ▌~~

deleted

~~(c) the following points (i) and (j) are added:~~

‘(3a) ‘energy-using good’ means any good that depends on energy input (electricity, fossil fuels and renewable energy sources) to work as intended;’;

~~‘(i) where applicable, the reparability score for the goods;~~

Amendment 44

(j) when point (i) is not applicable and the producer makes such information ▌ available to the trader, information about the availability, estimated cost, ordering procedure of spare parts necessary to keep the good in conformity, ▌ about the availability of repair and maintenance instructions as well as information about repair restrictions. ▌

Proposal for a directive

~~(3) in~~ Article 6,2 – paragraph 1 is– ~~amended~~point as1 ~~follows:~~– point b

Directive 2011/83/EU

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14d

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(14d) ‘reparability score’ means a score expressing the capacity of a good to be repaired, based on a method established in accordance with Union law;

(14d) ‘reparability score’ means a score expressing the capacity of a good to be repaired, based on a harmonised method established at Union level;

Amendment 45

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a

Directive 2011/83/EU

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point -a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(-a) point (e) is deleted;

Amendment 46

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(a) the following points (ea) to (ed) are inserted:

(a) the following points (ea) to (ec) are inserted:

Amendment 47

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a

Directive 2011/83/EU

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point ea

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(ea) for all goods, where the producer makes it available, information that the goods benefit from a commercial guarantee of durability and its duration in units of time, where that guarantee covers the entire good and has a duration of more than two years;

(ea) for all goods, a label as set out in Annex Z indicating the duration of the legal guarantee of conformity and, if relevant, its voluntary extension in the form of a commercial guarantee of durability;

Amendment 48

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a

Directive 2011/83/EU

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point eb

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(eb) for energy-using goods, where the producer does not make available the information referred to in point (ea), information that the producer has not provided information on the existence of a commercial guarantee of durability of more than two years. This information shall be at least as prominent as any other information about the existence and the conditions of after-sales services and commercial guarantees provided in accordance with point (e);

deleted

Amendment 49

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a

Directive 2011/83/EU

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point ec

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(ec) for goods with digital elements, where the producer makes such information available, the minimum period in units of time during which the producer provides software updates, unless the contract provides for a continuous supply of the digital content or digital service over a period of time. Where information about the existence of a commercial guarantee of durability is provided in accordance with point (ea), the information on the updates shall be provided if those updates are supplied for a longer period than the commercial guarantee of durability;

(ec) for goods with digital elements, the minimum period in units of time, after the date of placement on the market, during which the producer provides software updates, which covers, as a minimum, the period as provided for in Union law and its voluntary extension, where the producer makes such information available for which the updates shall be provided;

Amendment 50

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a

Directive 2011/83/EU

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point ed

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(ed) for digital content and digital services, where their provider is different from the trader and makes such information available, the minimum period in units of time during which the provider provides software updates, unless the contract provides for a continuous supply of the digital content or digital service over a period of time;

(ed) for digital content and digital services, where their provider is different from the trader, the minimum period, after the date of placement on the market, in units of time during which the provider provides software updates, which covers, as a minimum, the period during which updates shall be provided in accordance with the applicable Union law;

Amendment 51

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b

Directive 2011/83/EU

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point j

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(j) when point (i) is not applicable, information made available by the producer about the availability of spare parts, including the procedure of ordering them, and about the availability of a user and repair manual.;

(j) when point (i) is not applicable, information provided by the producer about the availability and maximum price expected of the spare parts necessary to repair goods, including the minimum period, after the purchase of the good, during which spare parts and accessories are available, the procedure of ordering them, and the availability of a user and repair manual, as well as the availability of diagnosis and repair tools and services.’;

Amendment 52

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a

Directive 2011/83/EU

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

Notwithstanding point (ea), when traders offer products in more than one Member State, they may opt to refer to the minimum Union period of two years of legal guarantee of conformity on the label referred to in Annex Z. Under this option, traders shall ensure that the label is accompanied by a statement that reads that ‘a consumer benefits from a minimum legal guarantee of two years, unless a guarantee of more than two years is provided for under the applicable national law’.

Amendment 53

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b a (new)

Directive 2011/83/EU

Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(ba) the following paragraph 1 a is inserted:

‘1a. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article XXX in order to amend Annex Z by introducing, modifying, adding or removing any details in relation to the information or textual elements set out in this Article.’;

Amendment 54

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b b (new)

Directive 2011/83/EU

Article 5 – paragraph 1 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(bb) the following paragraph 1b is inserted:

“1b. The producer shall make all relevant information, including information listed in points ea, eb, ec, i and j, available to the trader, in order to ensure that the trader is able to comply with the relevant information obligations set out in paragraph 1.”

Amendment 55

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point -a (new)

Directive 2011/83/EU

Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point g

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(-a) point (g) is replaced by the following:

‘(g) the arrangements for payment, ~~delivery including where available environmentally friendly delivery options,~~delivery, performance, the time by which the trader undertakes to deliver the goods or to perform the services, and where applicable, the existence of delivery options that emit less CO2, and, where applicable, the trader’s complaint handling policy;’;

~~(-aa) point (l) is replaced by the following:~~

Amendment 56

“(l) a reminder of the existence of the legal guarantee of conformity for goods, and its main elements including its minimum duration of two years in accordance with Directive (EU) 2019/771, provided in a prominent manner, using the Harmonised notice referred to in Article 22a; ”

Proposal for a directive

~~(a) the following points (la), (laa) and (lc) are inserted:~~

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point -aa (new)

‘(la) where a commercial guarantee of durability of more than two years covering the entire good is offered to the consumer without additional costs, and the producer makes that information available to the trader, the information that the specific good benefits from such a guarantee ▌ and its duration together with a reminder of the existence of the legal guarantee of conformity [shall be] provided in a prominent manner, using the harmonised label referred to in Article 22a;

Text proposed by the Commission

~~(laa) a reminder of the existence of the legal guarantee of conformity for digital content and digital services;~~

Amendment

▌

(-aa) points (l) and (m) are deleted;

(lc) for goods with digital elements or for digital content and digital services, where the producer or the provider makes such information available to the trader, the minimum period in units of time during which, or date until when, the producer or the provider provides software updates.

Amendment 57

▌

Proposal for a directive

~~(b) the following points (u) and (v) are added:~~

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a

~~‘(u) where applicable, the reparability score for the goods;~~

Directive 2011/83/EU

(v) when point (u) is not applicable and the producer makes such information ▌ available to the trader, information about the availability, estimated cost, ordering procedure of spare parts necessary to keep the good in conformity, ▌ about the availability of repair and maintenance instructions as well as information about repair restrictions. ▌

Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point ma

▌

Text proposed by the Commission

~~(4) in Article 8(2), the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:~~

Amendment

‘If a distance contract to be concluded by electronic means places the consumer under an obligation to pay, the trader shall make the consumer aware in a clear and prominent manner, and directly before the consumer places his order, of the information provided for in Article 6(1), points (a), (e), (la), (o) and (p). ▌

(ma) for all types of goods, where the producer makes it available, information that the goods benefit from a commercial guarantee of durability and its duration in units of time, where that guarantee covers the entire good and has a duration of more than two years;

~~(4a) the following article 22a is inserted:~~

(ma) for all goods a label as set out in Annex Z indicating the duration of the legal guarantee of conformity and, if relevant, its voluntary extension in the form of a commercial guarantee of durability;

~~Article 22a~~

Amendment 58

~~Harmonised notice and harmonised label~~

Proposal for a directive

1. In order to ensure that consumers are well informed and easily understand their rights throughout the Union, a harmonised notice and harmonised label shall be used when providing information in accordance with Article 5(1)(e) and 6(1)(l) and Articles 5(1)(ea) and 6(1)(la) respectively.

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a

2. By [the date of entry into force of this Directive + 18 months] the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, specify the design and content of the harmonised notice referred to in paragraph 1.

Directive 2011/83/EU

3. The harmonised notice shall contain the main elements of the legal guarantee of conformity, including its minimum duration of two years as provided in Directive (EU) 2019/771 and a general reference to the possibility that the duration of the legal guarantee is longer under national rules.

Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point mb

4. By [the date of entry into force of this Directive + 18 months] the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, specify the design and content of the harmonised label referred to in paragraph 1.

Text proposed by the Commission

~~5. The harmonised notice and the harmonised label shall be easily recognisable and understandable for consumers and easy to use and reproduce for traders.~~

Amendment

~~6. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 27a.~~

(mb) for energy-using goods, where the producer does not make available information referred to in point (ma), information that the producer has not provided information on the existence of a commercial guarantee of durability of more than two years. This information shall be at least as prominent as any other information about the existence and the conditions of after-sales services and commercial guarantees provided in accordance with point (m);

~~(4b) The following Article 27a is inserted:~~

deleted

~~‘Article 27a~~

Amendment 59

~~Implementing act~~

Proposal for a directive

~~1. The Commission shall be assisted by a Committee. That Committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011.~~

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a

~~2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.’~~

Directive 2011/83/EU

~~Article 3~~

Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point mc

~~Reporting~~Text proposed by the Commission ~~and review~~

~~By ▌ 5 years from application [entry into force + 5 years + 30 months], the Commission shall submit a report on the application of this Directive to the European Parliament and to the Council.~~

Amendment

That report shall include an assessment on the Directive’s contribution to enhancing consumer rights, in particular regarding the effectiveness of the harmonised label and the harmonised notice to improving the availability and consumers’ understanding of commercial guarantees of durability as well as the consumers’ awareness of their legal guarantee rights. Furthermore, the report shall assess the Directive’s overall contribution to the participation of consumers in the green transition and its impact on traders

(mc) for goods with digital elements, where the producer makes such information available, the minimum period in units of time during which the producer provides software updates, unless the contract provides for a continuous supply of the digital content or digital service over a period of time. Where information about the existence of a commercial guarantee of durability is provided in accordance with point (ma), the information on the updates shall be provided if those updates are supplied for a longer period than the commercial guarantee of durability;

~~That report shall be accompanied, where appropriate, by relevant legislative proposals.~~

(mc) for goods with digital elements, the minimum period in units of time, after the date of placement on the market, during which the producer provides software updates, which covers as a minimum, the period as provided for in Union law and its voluntary extension, where the producer makes such information available, for which the updates shall be provided;

~~Article 4~~

Amendment 60

~~Transposition~~

Proposal for a directive

1. Member States shall adopt and publish by ... [24 months from the date of entry into force] at the latest, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions.

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a

~~They shall apply those provisions from ... [30 months from the date of entry into force].~~

Directive 2011/83/EU

When Member States adopt those provisions, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication. Member States shall determine how such reference is to be made.

Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point md

~~2. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the main provisions in national law which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive.~~

Text proposed by the Commission

~~Article 5~~

Amendment

~~Entry into force~~

(md) for digital content and digital services, where their provider is different from the trader and makes such information available, the minimum period in units of time during which the provider provides software updates, unless the contract provides for a continuous supply of the digital content or digital service over a period of time;

~~This Directive shall enter into force on the twentieth day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.~~

(md) for digital content and digital services, where their provider is different from the trader, the minimum period, after the date of placement on the market, in units of time during which the provider provides software updates, which covers, as a minimum, the period during which updates shall be provided in accordance with the applicable Union law;’

~~Article 6~~

Amendment 61

~~Addressees~~

Proposal for a directive

~~This Directive is addressed to the Member States.~~

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b

~~Done at Brussels,~~

Directive 2011/83/EU

~~For the European Parliament For the Council~~

Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point v

~~The President The President~~

Text proposed by the Commission

~~Annex~~

Amendment

~~Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC is amended as follows:~~

(v) when point (u) is not applicable, information made available by the producer about the availability of spare parts, including the procedure of ordering them, and about the availability of a user and repair manual.;

~~(1) (1) the following point 2a is inserted:~~

(v) when point (u) is not applicable, information provided by the producer about the availability and maximum price expected of the spare parts necessary to repair goods, including the minimum period, after the purchase of the good, during which spare parts and accessories are available, the procedure of ordering them, and the availability of a user and repair manual, as well as the availability of diagnosis and repair tools and services.’;

~~‘2a. Displaying a sustainability label which is not based on a certification scheme or not established by public authorities.;’~~

Amendment 62

~~(2) (2) the following points 4a to 4ba are inserted:~~

Proposal for a directive

~~4a. ‘Making a generic environmental claim for which the trader is not able to demonstrate recognised excellent environmental performance relevant to the claim.~~

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b

4b. Making an environmental claim about the entire product or the entire trader’s business when it actually concerns only a certain aspect of the product or a specific activity of the trader’s business;

Directive 2011/83/EU

~~4ba. Claiming, based on greenhouse gas emissions offsetting, that a product has a neutral, reduced or positive impact on the environment in terms of greenhouse gas emissions. ’~~

Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point v a (new)

~~(3) (3) the following point 10a is inserted:~~

Text proposed by the Commission

~~10a. ‘Presenting requirements imposed by law on all products within the relevant product category on the Union market as a distinctive feature of the trader’s offer.;’~~

Amendment

~~(4) (4) the following points 23d to 23i are inserted:~~

(va) the address of the available repair centres where the goods shall be returned to by the consumer for the purpose of repair.

23d. ‘Withholding information from the consumer about the fact that a software update will negatively impact the functioning of goods with digital elements or the use of digital content or digital services.

Amendment 63

~~23da. Presenting a software update as necessary where it only enhances functionality features.~~

Proposal for a directive

23e. Any commercial communication in relation to a good containing a feature introduced to limit its durability despite information on the feature and its effects on the durability of the good being available to the trader.

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b b (new)

~~23f. Falsely claiming that a good has a certain durability in terms of usage time or intensity under normal conditions of use.~~

Directive 2011/83/EU

~~23g. Presenting goods as allowing repair when they do not ▌ .~~

Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new)

~~23h. Inducing the consumer into replacing or replenishing the consumables of a good earlier than necessary for technical reasons ▌ .~~

Text proposed by the Commission

23i. Withholding information concerning the impairment of the functionality of a good when consumables, spare parts or accessories not supplied by the original producer are used, or falsely claiming that such impairment will happen.’

Amendment

(bb) the following paragraph 1a is inserted:

“1a. The producer shall make all relevant information, including information listed in points ea, eb, ec, i and j of paragraph 1, available to the trader, in order to ensure that the trader is able to comply with the relevant information obligations set out in paragraph 1.”

Amendment 64

Proposal for a directive

Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

By [5 years from adoption], the Commission shall submit a report on the application of this Directive to the European Parliament and to the Council.

By [5 years from adoption], the Commission shall submit a report on the application of this Directive and on the level of progress achieved to the European Parliament and to the Council.

Amendment 65

Proposal for a directive

Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

That report shall contain an assessment regarding whether the Directive contributed to enhancing the protection of consumers against unfair commercial practices and misleading advertising of products advertised as sustainable as well as a summary of positive and negative effects on businesses, and in particular on small and medium-sized enterprises.

Amendment 66

Proposal for a directive

Annex Z

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

Annex Z

Content and format of the label

1. The label shall have the following format:

XX Years + YY Years

2. The letters ‘XX’ shall be replaced by the figure corresponding to the duration of the legal guarantee of conformity. The letters YY shall be replaced by the figure corresponding to the voluntary extension of the legal guarantee of conformity in the form of an equivalent commercial guarantee of durability.

3. The label shall be displayed prominently and in a way that is clearly legible to the consumer.

Amendment 67

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(2) the following points 4a and 4b are inserted:

(2) the following points 4a to 4bb are inserted:

Amendment 68

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2

Directive 2005/29/EC

Annex I – point 4a

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

4a. Making a generic environmental claim for which the trader is not able to demonstrate recognised excellent environmental performance relevant to the claim.

4a. Making a generic environmental claim for which the trader does not provide evidence of the recognised excellent environmental performance relevant to the claim.

Amendment 69

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2

Directive 2005/29/EC

Annex I – point 4b

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

4b. Making an environmental claim about the entire product when it actually concerns only a certain aspect of the product.;

4b. Making an environmental claim about the entire product or the trader’s business when it actually concerns only a certain aspect of the product or of the trader’s business.

Amendment 70

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2

Directive 2005/29/EC

Annex I – point 4ba (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

4ba. Claiming, based on carbon offsetting, that a product has a neutral, reduced, compensated or positive greenhouse gas emissions’ impact on the environment.

Amendment 71

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2

Directive 2005/29/EC

Annex I – point 4bb (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

4bb. Making an environmental claim which cannot be substantiated in accordance with legal requirements.

Amendment 72

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)

Directive 2005/29/EC

Annex I – point 7a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(2 a) the following point7a inserted:

‘7a. (i) Giving more prominence to certain choices when asking the recipient of an online service for a decision.

(ii) Making the procedure of terminating a service significantly more burdensome than signing up to it.’

Amendment 73

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new)

Directive 2005/29/EC

Annex I – point 13 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(3a) the following point 13a is inserted:

‘13a. Any marketing of a good as being identical or seemingly identical to the other good marketed in one or various Member States, while those goods have different composition or characteristics which have not been clearly marked on the packaging, so as to be visible to the consumer.’

Amendment 74

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 – introductory part

Directive 2005/29/EC

Annex I – point 4

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(4) the following points 23d to 23i are inserted:

(4) the following points 23d to 23ib are inserted:

Amendment 75

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4

Directive 2005/29/EC

Annex I – point 23d a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

23da. Omitting to inform the consumer in a clear and understandable manner that the functionality update is not necessary to keep the product in conformity.

Amendment 76

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4

Directive 2005/29/EC

Annex I – point 23e

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

23e. Omitting to inform the consumer about the existence of a feature of a good introduced to limit its durability.

23e. Introducing a feature to limit the durability of a good.

Amendment 77

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4

Directive 2005/29/EC

Annex I – point 23e a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

23ea. Marketing a good without fixing a design issue, within a reasonable time after it became known, thus leading to the early failure of that good.

Amendment 78

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4

Directive 2005/29/EC

Annex I – point 23g

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

23g. Presenting goods as allowing repair when they do not or omitting to inform the consumer that goods do not allow repair in accordance with legal requirements.

23g. Marketing a good which does not allow repair in accordance with legal requirements or failing to inform the consumer that a good is not repairable.

Amendment 79

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4

Directive 2005/29/EC

Annex I – point 23g a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

23ga. Omitting to inform the consumer about the unavailability of spare parts and other repair restrictions.

Amendment 80

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4

Directive 2005/29/EC

Annex I – point 23g b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

23gb. Omitting to inform the consumer that the trader will refuse to repair a product that has previously been repaired by an independent professional, a non-professional or a user.

Amendment 81

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4

Directive 2005/29/EC

Annex I – point 23h

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

23h. Inducing the consumer into replacing the consumables of a good earlier than for technical reasons is necessary.

23h. Marketing a good that requires replacing the consumables earlier than necessary for technical reasons.

Amendment 82

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4

Directive 2005/29/EC

Annex I – point 23i

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

23i. Omitting to inform that a good is designed to limit its functionality when using consumables, spare parts or accessories that are not provided by the original producer..

23i. Marketing a product that is designed to limit its functionality when using consumables, spare parts or accessories that are not provided by the original producer.

Amendment 83

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4

Directive 2005/29/EC

Annex I – point 23i a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

23ia. The same producer or trader offering the same product with disadvantageous terms or a shorter period of commercial guarantee in one or more Member States resulting in a disadvantageous situation for consumers.

Amendment 84

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4

Directive 2005/29/EC

Annex I – point 23i b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

23ib. Marketing a good which is not compliant with the requirements under Union product legislation.