What changed

24.1.2024

Mr Johan Van OvertveldtChairOvertveldt

Committee on Budget

Chair

BRUSSELS

Committee on Budgets

Subject: Opinion on Guidelines for the 2025 Budget –Section– Section III (2023/2220(BUI))

Dear Mr Johan Van Overtveldt,Chair,

Under the procedure referred to above, the Committee on Culture andForeign EducationAffairs has been asked to submit an opinion to your committee. At its meeting of 28 November 2023, the committee decided to send the opinion in the form of a letter. It considered the matter at its meeting of 24 January 2024 and adopted the opinion at that meeting.

The Committee on Culture and Education:

The Committee on Foreign Affairs considered the matter at its meeting of 23 January 2024. At that meeting, it decided to call on the Committee on Budgets, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions into its motion for a resolution.

Insists on simplification, administrative efficiency and synergies with other funding programmes and on fresh money to improve the overall success rate of Erasmus+, Creative Europe, European Solidarity Corps (ESC), and the third strand of the Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values (CERV).

Stresses that learning mobility grants in Erasmus+ should cover increases in living costs to ensure widely accessible and inclusive participation. Calls for financial stability for the European Universities initiative and the Teacher Academies, together with the allocation of dedicated funding to the European Education Area (EEA) in the future. Calls for increased synergies between the EEA, the Digital Education Action Plan and the European Skills Agenda. Warns against cuts to the programme: the disappointing results obtained in the latest round of the OECD’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) can only be reversed by investing in education.

Calls for an increase in the 2025 Creative Europe's budget to avoid the detrimental impact that frontloading in the first half of the financial cycle could have on the second half. Notes that the current financial allocation cannot meet the high demand for projects. Stresses the importance of maintaining a balance between the strands: calls for the adequate financing of the music sector, and of the European Capitals of Culture by increasing the Melina Mercouri Prize (Culture strand), the support of the cross-border circulation of European films, of cinemas and of video games (Media strand) and of quality journalism and media literacy (Cross-sectorial strand).

Calls for the secretariat of the future European Board for Media Services to be resourced adequately, in line with the future European Media Freedom Act. Reiterates the long-standing Parliament’s call for a permanent EU editorial and news media fund.

Stresses the need for increased funding for the ESC programme, which is massively oversubscribed by young people, as a flat-rate budget increase would not be adequate to mitigate inflation rates and would curtail the participating organisations’ ability to comply with the highest standards and inclusion measures set out in the programme; given the opportunities it offers to young people and its promotion of European values, emphasizes the need for securing regular funding for label holders over several years, increase the financial support and ensure greater flexibility among the project strands to face the increasing requests for solidarity after recurrent crises.

Emphasises that a proportionate and increased budget should be foreseen, as Citizen’s engagement in the CERV programme is crucial to address the social polarisation, the low institutional trust, the democratic backsliding, the erosion of the rule of law, the shrinking space for civil society, and the instrumentalisation of Euroscepticism.

Urges the Commission to support the system of European schools to enable high teaching standards and increase the exchange of best practices with national educational systems.

While acknowledging the need for redeployments, in the light of mandatory NGEU repayments, recalls the importance of Erasmus+, the European Solidarity Corps, Creative Europe and CERV, and calls for all possible efforts to keep their 7-year programme funding allocations intact.

Emphasises the importance of pilot projects and preparatory actions; stresses the need to ensure sufficient financing of proposals submitted by the Committee on Culture and Education.

Yours sincerely,

Sabine Verheyen

David McAllister

ANNEX: ENTITIES OR PERSONS FROM WHOM THE RAPPORTEUR HAS RECEIVED INPUT

SUGGESTIONS

The Chair in her capacity of rapporteur declares under her exclusive responsibility that she did not receive input from any entity or person to be mentioned in this Annex pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure.

1. Notes that the majority of external action spending is concentrated under the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument - Global Europe (NDICI-Global Europe) and the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA III); reiterates the urgent need to increase funding, particularly in crisis regions where the needs are greatest; reiterates therefore its call for a substantial increase in Heading 6 to address the various challenges in the neighbourhood, invest in partnerships and strengthen the geopolitical position of the EU; deplores the fact that the MFF review has not been completed and deems this to be insufficient; underlines the vital importance of a stronger, more unified and coherent communication by the EU institutions with regards to the funds provided by the Union;

2. Emphasises the need for continued efforts to finance the immediate funding needs for Ukraine, following the unprovoked and unjustified war of aggression by Russia; therefore welcomes the Ukraine Facility for a total amount of up to EUR 50 billion for the period 2024 to 2027 and urges the European Council to find agreement;

3. Reiterates that an adequate level of funding should be maintained for the Southern Neighbourhood in 2025 to support political, economic and social reforms in the region; highlights the pressing need to vastly increase humanitarian aid to Palestinian civilians in the Gaza strip due to the unfolding humanitarian crisis, matched with a prudent distribution mechanism fully in line with EU priorities to prevent criminal use of European funds;

4. Insists on continuous and sustained financial and administrative support to the accession countries; recalls the need to upgrade the existing accession tools, their funding and conditionality with an improved monitoring mechanism in all fields underlined in recent EU evaluation reports to speed up beneficiaries’ transformation and sustainable incremental progress towards EU membership which achieving better compliance with EU norms, with due attention to rule of law reforms, for a more seamless accession; in this context insists on a mid-term review of the IPA III, increasing accession-related support for the Western Balkans and the inclusion of Moldova and Ukraine among its beneficiaries;

5. Underlines the need for the DG NEAR and the European External Action Service to be provided with adequate financial and human resources in order to promote peace, prosperity, security, and the EU values and interests in its neighbourhood and across the globe; while adhering to their own commitments on coherent representation and efficient use of resources; recalls that their administrative expenditure should be covered under the Heading 7.