Sittings · Compare
What changed
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the United Mexican States, of the other part
(COM(2025)810(COM(2025)0810 – C100000/2026C100128/2026 – 2025/0810(NLE))
(Consent)
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2025)810),(COM(2025)0810),
– having regard to the draft Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the United Mexican States, of the other part (12461/25),(12461/2025),
– having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 91, Article 100(2), Article 207(4), first subparagraph, Article 209(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(iii)(a), and Article 218(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C10-0000/2026),(C10-0128/2026),
– having regard to its non-legislative resolution of [date] on the proposal for a decision,
– having regard to Rule 107(1) and (4), and Rule 117(7) of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on International Trade (A100000/2026),(A10-0181/2026),
1. Gives its consent to the conclusion of the agreement;
2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the United Mexican States.
ANNEX: DECLARATIONS OF INPUT
DECLARATION OF INPUT FROM JAVI LÓPEZ
Pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure, the rapporteur declares that he included in his report input on matters pertaining to the subject of the file that he received, in the preparation of the report, prior to the adoption thereof in committee, from the following interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register, or from the following representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies:
1. Interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register
2. Representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies
Embassy of Mexico in the European Union
Government of Mexico
Gobierno de España
European External Action Service
DG INTPA
The list above is drawn up under the exclusive responsibility of the rapporteur.
Where natural persons are identified in the list by their name, by their function or by both, the rapporteur declares that he has submitted to the natural persons concerned the European Parliament's Data Protection Notice No 484 (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/data-protect/index.do), which sets out the conditions applicable to the processing of their personal data and the rights linked to that processing.
DECLARATION OF INPUT FROM BORJA GIMÉNEZ LARRAZ
Pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure, the rapporteur declares that he included in his report input on matters pertaining to the subject of the file that he received, in the preparation of the report, prior to the adoption thereof in committee, from the following interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register, or from the following representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies:
1. Interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register
Confederación Española de Organizaciones Empresariales (CEOE)
Confederation of European Business (Business Europe)
Universidad de Sevilla
Asociación Nacional de Fabricantes de Conservas de Pescados y Productos Transformados de Pescados y Mariscos - Centro Nacional de Conocimiento y Tecnología para la Industria Marina, Acuícola y Alimentaria (ANFACO-CYTMA)
2. Representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies
Embassy of Mexico to the Kingdom of Belgium and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg / Mission of Mexico to the European Union
The list above is drawn up under the exclusive responsibility of the rapporteur.
Where natural persons are identified in the list by their name, by their function or by both, the rapporteur declares that he has submitted to the natural persons concerned the European Parliament's Data Protection Notice No 484 (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/data-protect/index.do), which sets out the conditions applicable to the processing of their personal data and the rights linked to that processing.
MINORITY POSITION
pursuant to Rule 56(4) of the Rules of Procedure
Lynn Boylan, Marina Mesure, Danilo Della Valle
The Commission argues that this trade agreement will help Europe address geopolitical instability and economic uncertainty. But this deal will not deliver the benefits claimed.
It gives corporations the right to sue States before international tribunals for millions of euros when governments regulate in the public interest, while granting no equivalent rights to workers, communities or the environment. This exposes a contradiction with Europe’s exit from the Energy Charter Treaty to protect itself from such lawsuits.
The agreement also runs counter to efforts to re-industrialise Europe. It facilitates the relocation of industries, particularly automotive production, to Mexico, and puts workers in Europe and Mexico into competition instead of supporting decent jobs, deepening a race to the bottom.
It restricts governments’ policy space while promoting a harmful extractivist model. It also incentivises agri-food exports instead of supporting agricultural sovereignty in Mexico and Europe.
The Commission’s own evaluation of the existing agreement with Mexico found that, after nearly twenty years, its impact was marginal for both parties even by the narrow measure of GDP. There is little basis to expect this revised deal to deliver the promised economic benefits.
We support a stronger EU-Mexico relationship and closer cooperation, but on different terms.
PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
Title
Conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the United Mexican States, of the other part
References
12463/2025 – C10-0128/2026 – 2025/0810(NLE)
Date of consultation or request for consent
29.5.2026
Committee(s) responsible
Date announced in plenary
AFET
18.6.2026
INTA
18.6.2026
Committees asked for opinions
Date announced in plenary
BUDG
18.6.2026
Not delivering opinions
Date of decision
BUDG
23.9.2025
Rapporteurs
Date appointed
Javi López
24.9.2025
Borja Giménez Larraz
24.9.2025
Discussed in committee
15.4.2026
Date adopted
23.6.2026
Result of final vote
+:
–:
0:
67
15
3
Date tabled
24.6.2026
FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL BY THE COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
Key to symbols: