What changed

(1) The European Green Deal55 is Europe’s strategy to ensure, by 2050, a climate-neutral, clean and circular economy, optimising resource management, minimising pollution while recognising the need for deeply transformative policies. The Union is also committed to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development56 and its Sustainable Development Goals57 . The EU Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability58 of October 2020 and the Zero Pollution Action Plan59 adopted in May 2021 specifically address pollution aspects of the European Green Deal. In parallel, the New Industrial Strategy for Europe60 further emphasises the potential role of transformative technologies. Other particularly relevant policies for this initiative include the ‘Fit for 55’ package61 , the Methane Strategy62 and the Glasgow methane pledge63 , the Climate Adaptation Strategy64 , the Biodiversity Strategy65 , the Farm to Fork strategy66 and the Sustainable Products Initiative67 . Besides, as part of the EU response to the 2022 Russia-Ukraine war, REPowerEU68 proposes a Joint European Action to support the diversification of energy supplies, accelerate the transition to renewable energy and improve energy efficiency.

(1) The European Green Deal55 is Europe’s strategy to ensure, by 2050, a climate-neutral, clean and circular economy, optimising resource management, minimising pollution while recognising the need for deeply transformative policies. The Union is also committed to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development56 and its Sustainable Development Goals57 . The EU Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability58 of October 2020 and the Zero Pollution Action Plan59 adopted in May 2021 specifically address pollution aspects of the European Green Deal. In parallel, the New Industrial Strategy for Europe60 further emphasises the potential role of transformative technologies. Other particularly relevant policies for this initiative include the ‘Fit for 55’ package61 , the Methane Strategy62 and the Glasgow methane pledge63 , the Climate Adaptation Strategy64 , the Biodiversity Strategy65 , the Farm to Fork strategy66, the New Circular Economy Action Plan66a,strategy66 the,the Sustainable Products Initiative67.Initiative67 . Also of relevance is the CommissionCommission’s Communication entitled ‘A long-term vision for the EU’s rural areas –Towards stronger, connected, resilient and prosperous rural areas by 2040’67a. Besides, as part of the EU response to the 2022 Russia-Ukraine war, REPowerEU68 proposes a Joint European Action to support the diversification of energy supplies, accelerate the transition to renewable energy and improve energy efficiency.

__________________

66 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions A Farm to Fork Strategy for a fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly food system COM(2020) 381 final.

66a European Parliament resolution of 10 February 2021 on the New Circular Economy Action Plan (2020/2077(INI))

67 COM(2022) 142

68 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions REPowerEU: Joint European Action for more affordable, secure and sustainable energy; COM(2022) 108 final.

Or. en

Amendment 2

Amendment

(2) The European Green Deal announced a revision of Union measures to address pollution from large industrial installations, including reviewing the sectoral scope of the legislation and how to make it fully consistent with climate, energy and circular economy policies. In addition, the Zero Pollution Action Plan, the Circular Economy Action Plan and the Farm to Fork Strategy also call for reducing pollutant emissions at source, including sources not currently within the scope of Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council69.Council69 . Addressing pollution from certain agro-industrial activities thus requires their inclusion within the scope of that Directive.

(2) The European Green Deal announced a revision of Union measures to address pollution from large industrial installations, including reviewing the sectoral scope of the legislation and how to make it fully consistent with climate, energy and circular economy policies. In addition, the Zero Pollution Action Plan, the Circular Economy Action Plan and the Farm to Fork Strategy also call for reducing pollutant emissions at source, including sources not currently within the scope of Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council69. The problem of pollution from large-scale rearing of animals could be addressed by maintaining the current framework.

_________________

__________________

_________________

__________________

69 Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control); OJ L 334, 17.12.2010, p. 17-119.

69 Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control); OJ L 334, 17.12.2010, p. 17-119.

Or. en

Amendment 3

Proposal for a directive

Recital 3

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(3) The Union’s extractive industry is key to achieving the aims of the European Green Deal and the EU industrial strategy, including its update. Raw materials are of strategic importance for the digital and green transition, the energy, materials and circular economy transformation and to strengthen EU economic resilience. In order to achieve these objectives, sustainable domestic capacities need to be further developed. This requires effective, tailored and harmonised measures to ensure that the best available techniques are established and employed, thus applying processes that are both the most efficient and have the lowest possible impacts on human health and the environment . The governance mechanisms of Directive 2010/75/EU that closely associate industry experts to the development of consensual and tailored environmental requirements will support the sustainable growth of those activities in the Union. The development and availability of commonly agreed standards will level the Union’s playing field while ensuring a high level of protection of human health and the environment. It is therefore appropriate to include those activities within the scope of Directive 2010/75/EU.

(3) The Union’s extractive industry is key to achieving the aims of the European Green Deal and the EU industrial strategy, including its update. Raw materials are of strategic importance for the digital and green transition, the energy, materials and circular economy transformation and to strengthen EU economic resilience. In order to achieve these objectives, sustainable domestic capacities need to be further developed according to national specificities. This requires effective, tailored and harmonised measures to ensure that the best available techniques are established and employed, thus applying processes that are both the most efficient and have the lowest possible impacts on human health and the environment . The governance mechanisms of Directive 2010/75/EU that closely associate industry experts to the development of consensual and tailored environmental requirements will support the sustainable growth of those activities in the Union. The development and availability of commonly agreed standards will level the Union’s playing field while ensuring a high level of protection of human health and the environment.

Amendment 4

Proposal for a directive

Recital 4

Amendment

(4) Rearing of pigs, poultry and cattle cause significant pollutant emissions into the air and water. In order to reduce such pollutant emissions, including ammonia, methane, nitrates and greenhouse gas emissions and thereby improve air, water and soil quality, it is necessary to lower the threshold above which pigs and poultry installations are included within the scope of Directive 2010/75/EU and to include also cattle farming within that scope. Relevant BAT requirements take into consideration the nature, size, density and complexity of these installations, including the specificities of pasture based cattle rearing systems, where animals are only seasonally reared in indoor installations, and the range of environmental impacts they may have. The proportionality requirements in BATs aim to incentivise farmers to implement the necessary transition towards increasingly environmentally friendly agricultural practices.

(4) Large-scale rearingRearing of pigs and poultry can cause environmentally harmful pollutant emissions into the soil, the air and water.water that could be harmful to the environment. Member States should address that risk through existing legal frameworksin andtheir goodnational practices,strategic includingplan withunder the support ofCommon CAPAgricultural nationalPolicy strategic(CAP), plans.which Furthermore,will Memberbe Statesin shouldforce considerfrom engaging1 inJanuary a2023. dialogueFurthermore, withthe farmers’Member representativesStates, via the CAPCAP, andshould theimplement requirementsmeasures setto outreduce inGHG Directiveemissions 2010/75/EUfrom oragriculture, theincluding relevantmethane, BATand requirementsreduce toammonia ensureemissions, thesuch proportionalityas offrom thelivestock foreseenand constraints.fertilizers. In addition to the targets set under the CAP, Directive (EU) 2016/2284 ('NEC')1a setsset targets to reduce emissions, including ammonia from agriculture. Therefore, in order to avoid creating an administrative burden and unnecessary overlaps in the existingcurrent legislative framework, the current thresholds for pigs and poultry should remain unchanged.

__________________

a1a Directive (EU) 2016/2284 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2016 on the reduction of national emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants, amending Directive 2003/35/EC and repealing Directive 2001/81/EC (OJ L 344, 17.12.2016, p. 1)1–31)

Amendment 5

Or. en

Proposal for a directive

Amendment 4

Recital 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(4a) Sufficient importance should be given to protection of the surrounding environment, but it should be ensured that no additional administrative or financial burden is created for the livestock sector; on the contrary, the activities of these operators need constant stimulus in order to meet all of the current challenges they face.

Amendment 6

Proposal for a directive

Recital 6

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(6) With a view to further strengthening public access to environmental information, it is necessary to clarify that permits for installations granted pursuant to Directive 2010/75/EU are to be made available to the public on the Internet, free of charge and without restricting access to registered users. A uniform summary of permits should also be made available to the public under the same conditions.

(6) With a view to further strengthening the access of the public concerned to environmental information, it is necessary to clarify that non-technical information from the installation permits granted pursuant to Directive 2010/75/EU is to be made available upon request to the public concerned on the Internet, free of charge and without restricting access to registered users. A uniform summary of permits should also be made available to the public concerned under the same conditions.

Amendment 7

Proposal for a directive

Recital 6 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(6a) The Commission shall specify in a clear and accessible manner which non-technical information can be made available to the public concerned upon request in order to enhance public interest without affecting the economic activity of the producer. The Commission shall specify who is responsible for the preparation of the non-technical information and the uniform summary. In the event that an environmental assessor is required to synthesise that information, the Commission should establish how its costs will be covered.

Amendment 8

Proposal for a directive

Recital 12

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(12) To ensure the protection of human health and the environment as a whole, synergies and coordination with other relevant Union environmental legislation are necessary, at all stages of its implementation. Therefore, all relevant competent authorities that ensure compliance with relevant Union environmental legislation should be duly consulted before the granting of a permit under Directive 2010/75/EU.

(12) To ensure the protection of human health and the environment as a whole, synergies and coordination with other relevant Union environmental legislation are necessary, at all stages of its implementation. Therefore, all relevant competent authorities that ensure compliance with relevant Union environmental legislation should be duly consulted before the granting of a permit under Directive 2010/75/EU, but without complicating or creating difficulties in the process of granting permits.

Amendment 9

Proposal for a directive

Recital 13

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(13) With a view to continuously improving the environmental performance and safety of the installation, including by preventing waste generation, optimising resource use and water reuse, and preventing or reducing risks associated with the use of hazardous substances, the operator should establish and implement an environmental management system (EMS) in accordance with relevant BAT conclusions, and should make it available to the public. The EMS should also cover the management of risks related to the use of the hazardous substances and an analysis of the possible substitution of hazardous substances by safer alternatives.

(13) With a view to continuously improving the environmental performance and safety of the installation, including by preventing waste generation, optimising resource use and water reuse, and preventing or reducing risks associated with the use of hazardous substances, the operator should establish and implement an environmental management system (EMS) in accordance with relevant BAT conclusions, and should make it available to the public upon request. The EMS should also cover the management of risks related to the use of the hazardous substances and an analysis of the possible substitution of hazardous substances by safer alternatives. However, the EMS should maintain the integrity of confidential business information by not publishing information classified as confidential business information or commercially sensitive information.

Amendment 10

Proposal for a directive

Recital 19

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(19) Environmental quality standards refer to all the requirements set out in Union law, such as Union legislation on air and water; which must be fulfilled at a given time by a given environment or particular part thereof. Therefore it is appropriate to clarify that when granting a permit to an installation, competent authorities should not only set out conditions to ensure compliance of the installation’s operations with the best available techniques conclusions, but should also, where appropriate with a view to reducing the specific contribution of the installation to the pollution occurring in the relevant area, include specific additional conditions in the permit stricter than those set in relevant BAT conclusions, so as to ensure the installation’s compliance with environmental quality standards. Such conditions may consist in setting stricter emission limit values or limiting the operation or capacity of the installation.

(19) Environmental quality standards refer to all the requirements set out in Union law, such as Union legislation on air and water; which must be fulfilled at a given time by a given environment or particular part thereof. Therefore it is appropriate to clarify that when granting a permit to an installation, competent authorities should not only set out conditions to ensure compliance of the installation’s operations with the best available techniques conclusions, but should also, where appropriate, plan to reduce the specific contribution of the installation to the pollution occurring in the relevant area, so as to ensure the installation’s compliance with environmental quality standards. At the discretion of Member States, such conditions may consist in setting stricter emission limit values or limiting the operation or capacity of the installation according to national specificities.

Amendment 11

Proposal for a directive

Recital 20

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(20) Permit conditions should be regularly reviewed and, where necessary, updated by the competent authority to ensure compliance with relevant legislation. Such review or update should also take place where it is necessary for the installation to comply with an environmental quality standard, including in the case of a new or revised environmental quality standard or where the status of the receiving environment requires a revision of the permit in order to achieve compliance with plans and programmes set under Union legislation, such as the river basin management plans under Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council72.

(20) Permit conditions should be regularly reviewed and, where necessary, updated by the competent authority to ensure compliance with relevant legislation. Such review or update should also take place where it is necessary for the installation to comply with an environmental quality standard, including in the case of a new or revised environmental quality standard or where the status of the receiving environment requires a revision of the permit in order to achieve compliance with plans and programmes set under Union legislation, such as the river basin management plans under Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Agricultural installations should be given sufficient transition time to comply with the new permit conditions so that production, human resources and end consumers are affected as little as possible. The transition period should be determined according to the type and capacity of the installation.

_________________

72 Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (OJ L 327, 22.12.2000).

Amendment 12

Proposal for a directive

Recital 22

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(22) As clarified by the case-law of the Court of Justice73, Member States may not restrict legal standing to challenge a decision of a public authority to those members of the public concerned who participated in the preceding administrative procedure to adopt that decision. As also clarified by the case-law of the Court of Justice74, effective access to justice in environmental matters and effective remedies requires inter alia that members of the public concerned should have the right to ask the court or ancompetent independent and impartial body to order interim measures to prevent a given instance of pollution, including, where necessary, through the temporary suspension of the disputed permit. Therefore, it should be specified that legal standing should not be made conditional on the role that the concerned member of the public played during a participatory phase of the decision-making procedures under this Directive. In addition, any review procedure should be fair, equitable, timely and not prohibitively expensive, and provide for adequate and effective redress mechanisms, including injunctive relief as appropriate.

(22) As clarified by the case-law of the Court of Justice73, Member States may not restrict legal standing to challenge a decision of a public authority to those members of the public concerned who participated in the preceding administrative procedure to adopt that decision. As also clarified by the case-law of the Court of Justice74, effective access to justice in environmental matters and effective remedies requires inter alia that members of the public concerned should have the right to ask the court or ancompetent independent and impartial body to order interim measures to prevent a given instance of pollution, including, where necessary, through the temporary suspension of the disputed permit. In addition, any review procedure should be fair, equitable, timely and not prohibitively expensive, and provide for adequate and effective redress mechanisms, including injunctive relief as appropriate.

_________________

_________________

73 Case C–826/18, Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 January 2021; LB and Others v College van burgemeester en wethouders van de gemeente Echt-Susteren; paragraphs 58 and 59.

73 Case C–826/18, Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 January 2021; LB and Others v College van burgemeester en wethouders van de gemeente Echt-Susteren; paragraphs 58 and 59.

74 Case C-416/10 Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 15 January 2013; Jozef Križan and Others v Slovenská inšpekcia životného prostredia.Križan, paragraph 109.

74 Case C-416/10 Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 15 January 2013; Jozef Križan and Others v Slovenská inšpekcia životného prostredia.Križan, paragraph 109.

Amendment 13

Proposal for a directive

(27) In light of the high number of rearing installations that should be included within the scope of Directive 2010/75/EU, and the relative simplicity of the processes and emissions patterns of such installations, it is appropriate to set out specific administrative procedures for issuing permits and for the operation of the relevant activities which are adapted to the sector, without prejudice to requirements related to public information and participation, monitoring and compliance.

(27) In light of the high number of agricultural installationspig ofand poultry and pigsfarms that should be included within the scope of Directive 2010/75/EU, and the relative simplicity of the processes and emissions patterns of such agricultural installations,farms, it is appropriate to set out specific simplified administrative procedures for issuing permits, simplified registration procedurespermits and for the operation of the relevant activities which are adapted to the sector, without prejudice to requirements related to public information and participation, monitoring and compliance. In addition, the requirements to issue a permit or to register farms should not create additional administrative or financial burden.

Amendment 14

Or. en

Proposal for a directive

Amendment 5

Recital 27 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(27a) The Commission and the Member States shall ensure that farmers have access to sufficient financing for developing and modernising installations as necessary to meet the objectives of this Directive.

Amendment 15

Proposal for a directive

Amendment

(29) In order to ensure that Directive 2010/75/EU continues meeting its objectives to prevent or reduce emissions of pollutants and achieve a high level of protection of human health and the environment, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission to supplement that Directive in order to establish operating rules containing requirements for activities relating to rearing of poultry, pigs and cattle, and to amend Annexes I and Ia to that Directive by adding an agro-industrial activity to ensure that it meets its objectives to prevent or reduce pollutants emissions and achieve a high level of protection of human health and the environment. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 201677.201677 . In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts.

(29) In order to ensure that Directive 2010/75/EU continues meeting its objectives to prevent or reduce emissions of pollutants and achieve a high level of protection of human health and the environment, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission to supplement that Directive in order to establish operating rules containing requirements for activities relating to rearing of poultry and pigs. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016201677 77.. In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. The operating rules should not preclude the use of emerging techniques nor define or prescribe any specific techniques or technology. They should be based on an integral assessment that takes into account the impact on overall economic sustainability, safety, in particular fire safety, and animal health and welfare.

_________________

__________________

_________________

__________________

77 Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on Better Law-Making; OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1–14.

77 Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on Better Law-Making; OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1–14.

Amendment 16

Or. en

Proposal for a directive

Amendment 6

Recital 33

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(33) It is therefore appropriate for Directive 2010/75/EU to address the right for compensation for damages suffered by individuals. To ensure that individuals can defend their rights against damages to health caused by violations of Directive 2010/75/EU and thereby ensure a more efficient enforcement of that Directive, non-governmental organisations promoting the protection of human health or the environment, including those promoting the protection of consumers and meeting any requirements under national law, as members of the public concerned, should be empowered to engage in proceedings, as the Member States so determine, either on behalf or in support of any victim, without prejudice to national rules of procedure concerning representation and defence before the courts. Member States usually enjoy procedural autonomy to ensure an effective remedy against violations of Union law, subject to the respect of the principles of equivalence and effectivity. However, experience shows that while there is overwhelming epidemiologic evidence on the negative health impacts of pollution on the population, in particular as regards air, it is difficult for the victims of violations of Directive 2010/75/EU under the procedural rules on the burden of proof generally applicable in the Member States to demonstrate a causality link between the suffered harm and the violation. As a result, in the majority of cases, victims of violations of Directive 2010/75/EU do not have an effective way to obtain compensation for the harm caused by such violations. To strengthen the rights of individuals to obtain compensation for violations of Directive 2010/75/EU and to contribute to a more efficient enforcement of its requirements throughout the Union, it is necessary to adapt the burden of proof applicable to such situations. Therefore, when an individual can provide sufficiently robust evidence to give rise to a presumption that the violation of Directive 2010/75/EU is at the origins of the damage caused to the health of an individual, or has significantly contributed to it, it should be for the defendant to rebut that presumption in order to escape his liability.

(33) It is therefore appropriate for Directive 2010/75/EU to address the right for compensation for damages suffered by individuals. To ensure that individuals can defend their rights against damages to health caused by violations of Directive 2010/75/EU and thereby ensure a more efficient enforcement of that Directive, non-governmental organisations promoting the protection of human health or the environment, including those promoting the protection of consumers and meeting any requirements under national law, as members of the public concerned, should be empowered to engage in proceedings, as the Member States so determine, either on behalf of or in support of any victim, without prejudice to national rules of procedure concerning representation and defence before the courts. Member States usually enjoy procedural autonomy to ensure an effective remedy against violations of Union law, subject to the respect of the principles of equivalence and effectivity. However, experience shows that while there is overwhelming epidemiologic evidence on the negative health impacts of pollution on the population, in particular as regards air, it is difficult for the victims of violations of Directive 2010/75/EU under the procedural rules on the burden of proof generally applicable in the Member States to demonstrate a causality link between the suffered harm and the violation. As a result, in the majority of cases, victims of violations of Directive 2010/75/EU do not have an effective way to obtain compensation for the harm caused by such violations. To strengthen the rights of individuals to obtain compensation for violations of Directive 2010/75/EU and to contribute to a more efficient enforcement of its requirements throughout the Union, it is necessary to facilitate the burden of proof applicable to such situations.

Amendment 17

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 –paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)

Directive 2010/75/EU

Title

Present text

Amendment

(-1) The title of the Directive is replaced by the following

Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control)

"Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial and agricultural emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control)"

Amendment 18

Proposal for a directive

(3) ‘installation’ means a stationary technical unit within which one or more activities listed in Annex I or in Part 1 of Annex VII are carried out, and any other directly associated activities on the same site which have a technical connection with the activities listed in those Annexes and which could have an effect on emissions and pollution;

Amendment 19

Or. en

Proposal for a directive

Justification

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d

The definition of 'installation' should not cover agricultural activities. The word 'farm' is better suited when referring to rearing poultry and pigs. These change should apply throughout the text where appropriate and in Chapter VIa in particular.

Directive 2010/75/EU

Amendment 7

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 17

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(17) ‘the public concerned’ means the public affected or likely to be affected by, or having an interest in, the taking of a decision on the granting or the updating of a permit or of permit conditions; for the purposes of this definition, non-governmental organisations promoting the protection of human health or the environment and meeting any requirements under national law shall be deemed to have an interest;.

(17) ‘the public concerned’ means the public affected or having an interest in, the taking of a decision on the granting or the updating of a permit;

Amendment 20

Proposal for a directive

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 22 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(da) the following point is inserted:

‘(22a) ‘farm’ or ‘agricultural installation’ means a single unit, both technically and economically, that has a single management, within which activities of large-scale rearing of pigs and poultry listed in Article 70a are carried out;’;

Amendment 21

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d b (new)

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 23

Amendment

(db)(da) point (23) is replaced by the following:

(23) ‘poultry’ means poultry as defined in point 1 of Article 2 of Council Directive 90/539/EEC of 15 October 1990 on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in, and imports from third countries of, poultry and hatching eggs*

‘(23)(23) ‘poultry' means poultry as defined in Article 4, point 9, of Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council on transmissible animal diseases*;’;diseases*;

__________________

* OJ L 303, 31.10.1990, p. 6.

* 1 OJ L 084, 31.3.2016, p. 1

Amendment 22

Or. en

Amendment 8

Proposal for a directive

deleted

Amendment 23

Or. en

Amendment 9

Proposal for a directive

(23c) ‘livestock unit’ or ‘LSU’ means the grazing equivalent of one adult dairy cow producing 3 000 kg of milk annually, without additional concentrated foodstuffs, which is used to express the size of farms rearing different categories of animals, using the conversion rates, with reference to actual production within the calendar year, set out in Annex II to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 808/2014**’.

(23c) ‘livestock unit’ or ‘LSU’ means a standard measurement unit that allows for the aggregation of categories of livestock units covering pigs and poultry the coefficients of which are listed in Annex -Ia, in order to compare those categories;

deleted

___________________________

____________

____________________

* Council Directive 2008/120/EC of 18 December 2008 laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs (OJ L 47, 18.2.2009, p. 5).

** Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 808/2014 of 17 July 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ L 227 31.7.2014, p. 18).’;.

Amendment 24

Or. en

Amendment 10

Proposal for a directive

‘By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, Member States may set a procedure for the registration of installations covered only by Chapter V’.

Amendment 25

Or. en

Proposal for a directive

Amendment 11

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 5 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

This paragraph shall not apply to Chapter VIa.

Amendment 26

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 13 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

1. In order to draw up, review and, where necessary, update BAT reference documents, the Commission shall organise an exchange of information between Member States, the industries concerned, non-governmental organisations promoting environmental protection, the European Chemicals Agency and the Commission.

1. In order to draw up, review and, where necessary, update BAT reference documents, the Commission shall organise an exchange of information between Member States, the industries and farmers concerned, non-governmental organisations promoting environmental protection, the European Chemicals Agency and the Commission.

Amendment 27

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 14a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

Member States shall require the operator to prepare and implement, for each installation falling within the scope of this Chapter, an environmental management system (‘EMS’). The EMS shall comply with the provisions included in relevant BAT conclusions that determine aspects to be covered in the EMS.

Member States shall require the operator to prepare and implement, for each installation falling within the scope of this Chapter, an environmental system (‘EMS’). The EMS shall comply with the provisions included in relevant BAT conclusions that determine aspects to be covered in the EMS. The Commission shall determine which person or institution is qualified to design the management system and the fund from which the costs shall be covered. The EMS shall be periodically reviewed to ensure its continued suitability, adequacy and effectiveness.

Amendment 28

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11

Directive 2010/75/EU –

Article 14a – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

3. The EMS of an installation shall be made available on the Internet, free of charge and without restricting access to registered users.

3. The EMS of an installation shall be made available on the Internet upon request, free of charge to the public concerned, without restricting access to registered users and without affecting the activities of producers in terms of protecting confidential business information.

Amendment 29

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 27a – paragraph 3 – point e a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(ea) representatives of the farmers concerned;

Amendment 30

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 27c –paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

In the case of rearing facilities covered by the provisions of Chapter VIa, for provisions associated with emerging techniques, the applicable time limits may be extended up to 17 years.

Amendment 31

Proposal for a directive

SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR REARING POULTRY, PIGS AND CATTLE

SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR LARGE-SCALEINTENSIVE REARING OF POULTRY AND PIGS

Amendment 32

Or. en

Amendment 12

Proposal for a directive

This Chapter shall apply to the activities set out in Annex Ia which reach the capacity thresholds set out in that Annex.

1. This Chapter shall apply to any of the following activities ofintensive rearing pigs andof poultry reaching the lowerand threshold:pigs:

(a) farm or agricultural installation:

(a) with more than 40 000 places for poultry,

(i)(b) with more than 402 000 places for poultry;production pigs (over 30 kg), or

(ii)(c) with more than 2 000750 places for production pigs (over 30 kg); orsows.

(iii) with more than 750 places for sows;

Or. en

or

Amendment 13

(b) farm or agricultural installation of 750 livestock unit (LSU) or more. The approximate equivalent in LSU shall be based on the coefficients established in Annex -Ia to this Directive.

Amendment 33

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 70a – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

1a. The Commission and the Member States shall ensure that specialist farmers have access to sufficient financing for developing and modernising installations as necessary to meet the objectives of this Directive.

Amendment 34

Proposal for a directive

If two or more installations are located close to each other and if their operator is the same or if the installations are under the control of operators who are engaged in an economic or legal relationship, the installations concerned shall be considered as a single unit for the purpose of calculating the capacity threshold referred to in Article 70a.

Amendment 35

Or. en

Amendment 14

Proposal for a directive

Permits and simplified registration procedure

Amendment 36

Or. en

Proposal for a directive

Amendment 15

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 70c – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

Member States may include requirements for certain categories of installations falling within the scope of this Chapter in the general binding rules referred to in Article 6.

Member States may include requirements for certain categories of farms falling within the scope of this Chapter in the general binding rules referred to in Article 6.

Member States shall specify the procedure for granting a permit in respect of installations falling within the scope of this Chapter. Those procedures shall include at least the information listed in paragraph 2.

Member States shall specify the procedure for granting a permit in respect of farms falling within the scope of this Chapter. Those procedures shall include at least the information listed in paragraph 2.

Amendment 37

Proposal for a directive

Amendment

1a. By way of derogation from the firstparagraph subparagraph1 of Article 4 and the first paragraph to this Article, Member States may establishprovide for a specific simplified procedure for the registration of thefarms agriculturalrearing installationsanimals covered byin this Chapter.

The simplifiedprocedure for registration procedurereferred to in the first subparagraph shall be specifiedlaid down in a binding act and include at least a notificationrequirement byfor thea farmernotification to the competent authority by the farmer of the intention to operate anits activity.

Member States mayshall use any similar procedure already inpre-existing placeprocedure for registration. They shallthe avoidregistration administrativein burdenorder andto additionalavoid costscreating foran theadministrative farmer.burden.

Amendment 38

Or. en

Proposal for a directive

Justification

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25

The derogation initially proposed in Art. 4 is transferred to this Article.

Directive 2010/75/EU

Amendment 16

Article 70c – paragraph 2 –introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

2. Applications for permits shall include at least a description of the following elements:

2. Applications for permits or simplified registration shall include at least a description of the following elements:

Amendment 39

Proposal for a directive

(a) the farm, its buildings and its activities

Amendment 40

Or. en

Proposal for a directive

Amendment 17

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 70c – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(b) the animal types

(b) the animal type

Amendment 41

Proposal for a directive

(c) the capacity of the building where the rearing takes place;

Amendment 42

Or. en

Amendment 18

Proposal for a directive

(d) the sources of emissions from the building where the rearing takes place;

Amendment 43

Or. en

Amendment 19

Proposal for a directive

(e) the nature and quantities of foreseeable emissions from the building where the rearing takes place, into each medium under normal operating conditions.

Amendment 44

Or. en

Proposal for a directive

Amendment 20

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 70c – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

3. Applications shall also include a non-technical summary of the information referred to in paragraph 2.

3. Applications may include a summary of the information referred to in paragraph 2.

Amendment 45

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 70c – paragraph 3a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

3a. Member States shall issue the permits or confirm the registration within six months from the date of the farmer's application.

Amendment 46

Proposal for a directive

4. Member States shall take necessary measures to ensure that the operator informs the competent authority, without delay, of any planned substantial change to the installations falling within the scope of this Chapter which may have consequences for the environment. Where appropriate, the competent authority shall reconsider and update the permit.

4. Member States shall take necessary measures to ensure that the farmer informs the competent authority, without delay, of any planned substantial change to the farm orand agriculturalfarm installationbuildings where the rearing activity takes place, falling within the scope of this Chapter which may have consequences for the environment. Where appropriate and within two months from the notification by the farmer,appropriate, the competent authority shall reconsider and update the permit.

Amendment 47

Or. en

Proposal for a directive

Justification

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Replacing 'operator' by 'farmer' should be applied throughout this Chapter.

Directive 2010/75/EU

Amendment 21

Article 70c – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

4a. One year following the full implementation of the authorisation and registration system in Member States, the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council assessing the impact of the system on the economic viability of farms falling within the scope of this Directive, taking into account all costs related to complying with the conditions set out in this Directive, in order to adapt certain dispositions emanating from the Directive accordingly.

Amendment 48

Proposal for a directive

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 70d – title

Text proposed by the Commission

Obligations of the operator

Amendment 49

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 70d – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

1. Member States shall ensure that the operator carries out monitoring of emissions and of associated environmental performance levels in accordance with the operating rules referred to in Article 70i.

deleted

The operator shall keep a record of, and process, all monitoring results, for a period of at least 6 years, in such a way as to enable the verification of compliance with the emission limit values and environmental performance limit values set out in operating rules referred to in Article 70i.

Amendment 50

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 70d – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

2. In the event of non-compliance with the emission limit values and environmental performance limit values set out in the operating rules referred to in Article 70i, Member States shall require that the operator takes the measures necessary to ensure that compliance is restored within the shortest possible time.

deleted

Amendment 51

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 70d – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

3. The operator shall ensure that any land spreading of waste, animal by-products or other residues generated by the installation is undertaken in accordance with the best available techniques, as specified in the operating rules referred to in Article 70i, and other relevant Union legislation and that it does not cause significant pollution of the environment.

deleted

Or. en

Amendment 52

Justification

The obligations under this article to the farmer are disproportionate and does not add any strong value to the monitoring of the emissions as referred to in Article 70e. Some monitoring could be outsourced or falling outside the responsibility of the farmer.

Amendment 22

Proposal for a directive

3. The operator shall, without delay, make available the data and information listed in paragraph 2 of this Article to the competent authority upon request. The competent authority may make such a request in order to verify compliance with the operating rules referred to in Article 70i. The competent authority shall make such a request if a member of the public requests access to the data or information listed in paragraph 2 of this Article.

3. Where appropriate, the farmeroperator shallshall, without delay, make available the data and information listed in paragraph 2 of this Article to the competent authority upon duly justified request. The competent authority may make such a request in order to verify compliance with the operating rules referred to in Article 70i. Nonetheless,The withoutcompetent prejudiceauthority shall make such a request if a member of the public requests access to the seconddata subparagraphor information listed in paragraph 2 of this Article. Nonetheless, without prejudice to Article 4(2)4(2), second subparagraph, of Directive 2003/4/EC, at the request of the farmer,operator, parts of such reports that involve sensitive commercial or industrial information, or which include personal data within the meaning of Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679(EU)2016/679 that are not strictly necessary for the purpose of this Article, shall not be published.

Amendment 53

Or. en

Proposal for a directive

Justification

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25

With the deletion of Art. 70d, some monitoring could be outsourced or falling outside the responsibility of the farmer. The addition to sensitive commercial or industrial information should be added.

Directive 2010/75/EU

Amendment 23

Article 70f – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

Where non-compliance causes a significant degradation of local air, water or soil conditions, or where it poses, or risks to pose, a significant danger to human health, the operation of the installation shall be suspended by the competent authority until compliance is restored.

deleted

Amendment 54

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 70g – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

1. Member States shall ensure that the public concerned are given early and effective opportunities to participate in the following procedures:

1. Member States shall ensure that the public concerned are given early and effective opportunities to be consulted in the following procedures:

Amendment 55

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 70g – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(a) preparation of general binding rules as referred to in Article 6 on permits for installations falling within the scope of this Chapter;

deleted

Amendment 56

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 70g – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(b) the granting of a permit for a new installation falling within the scope of this Chapter;

(b) the granting of a permit for a new farm falling within the scope of this Chapter;]

Amendment 57

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 70g – paragraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(c) the granting of an updated permit in accordance with article 70c.4 for any substantial change to an existing installation falling within the scope of this Chapter.

(c) the granting of an updated permit in accordance with article 70c.4 for any substantial change to an existing farm falling within the scope of this Chapter.]

Amendment 58

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 70g – paragraph 2 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

2. The competent authority shall make available to the public, including systematically via the Internet, free of charge and without restricting access to registered users, the following documents and information:

2. The competent authority shall make available to the public concerned, upon request, the following documents and information:

Amendment 59

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 70g – paragraph 2 – point c

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(c) the general binding rules referred to in Article 6 applicable to installations falling within the scope of this Chapter;

(c) the general binding rules referred to in Article 6 applicable to farms falling within the scope of this Chapter;

Amendment 60

Proposal for a directive

(d) the reports of inspections of the installations falling within the scope of this Chapter.

deleted

(d) the reports of inspections of the installations falling within the scope of this Chapter. Nonetheless, without prejudice to Article 4(2), second subparagraph, of Directive 2003/4/EC, at the request of the operator, parts of such reports that involve sensitive commercial or industrial information, or which include personal data within the meaning of Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU)2016/679 that are not strictly necessary for the purpose of this article, shall not be published.

Amendment 61

Or. en

Proposal for a directive

Amendment 24

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 70h – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(a) they have a sufficient interest;

(a) they have a direct and legitimate interest;

Amendment 62

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 70h – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

Standing in the review procedure may not be conditional on the role that the concerned member of the public played during a participatory phase of the decision-making procedures under this Directive.

Standing in the review procedure may not be conditional on the role that the member of the public concerned played during a participatory phase of the decision-making procedures under this Directive.

Amendment 63

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 70h – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

The review procedure shall be fair, equitable, timely and not prohibitively expensive, and shall provide for adequate and effective redress mechanisms, including injunctive relief as appropriate.

The review procedure shall be fair, equitable, proportionate, timely and not prohibitively expensive, and shall provide for adequate and effective redress mechanisms.

Amendment 64

Proposal for a directive

The Commission shall establish operating rules containing requirements consistent with the use of best available techniques for the activities listed in Annex Ia, which shall include the following:

The Commission shall, in cooperation with farmers whose production falls within the scope of this Directive,shall establish operating rules containing requirements consistent with the use of best available techniques for the activities listedreferred to in Article 70a, which shall include the following:

Amendment 65

Or. en

Proposal for a directive

Justification

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Annex Ia is deleted and its provisions are now included in Art. 70a

Directive 2010/75/EU

Amendment 25

Article 70i – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(c) land spreading practices;

deleted

Amendment 66

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 70i – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(d) pollution prevention and mitigation practices;

deleted

Amendment 67

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 70i – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point f

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(f) other measures consistent with Annex III.

deleted

Amendment 68

Proposal for a directive

The operating rules shall take into account inter alia the nature, type, size and density of these installations and the specificities of pasture based cattle rearing systems, where animals are only seasonally reared in indoor installations.

The operating rules shall take into account inter alia the nature, type, size and density of these farms.installations.

Amendment 69

Or. en

Proposal for a directive

Amendment 26

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 70i – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

The operating rules shall be based on an integral assessment taking into account the potential effects on, inter-alia, overall economic sustainability, safety, in particular fire safety, and animal health and welfare.

Amendment 70

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 70i – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

The operating rules shall take into account emerging techniques in animal husbandry, as referred to in Article 27(1), and shall lay down the conditions under which the competent authority may grant a permit to a farm using such techniques.

Amendment 71

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 70i – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 c (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

The operating rules shall offer a wide range of options and not prescribe the use of a particular technique or technology.

Amendment 72

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 70i – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

3. Member States shall ensure that all the permit conditions for the installations concerned are in compliance with the operating rules referred to in paragraph 1 within 42 months of the entry into force of the delegated act establishing those rules..

3. Member States shall ensure that all the permit conditions for the farms concerned are in compliance with the operating rules referred to in paragraph 1 within 42 months of the entry into force of the delegated act establishing those rules.’.

Amendment 73

Proposal for a directive

2. In order to allow the provisions of this Directive to meet its objectives to prevent or reduce pollutants emissions and achieve a high level of protection of human health and the environment, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt a delegated act, in accordance with Article 76, to amend Annex I or Annex Ia by including in those Annexes an agro-industrial activity that meets the following criteria:

deleted

2. In order to allow the provisions of this Directive to meet its objectives to prevent or reduce pollutants emissions and achieve a high level of protection of human health and the environment, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt a delegated act, in accordance with Article 76, to amend Annex I:

(a) it has or is expected to have an impact on human health or the environment, in particular as a consequence of pollutant emissions and use of resources;

(d) its inclusion within the scope of this Directive is assessed, on the basis of its environmental, economic and social impacts, to have a favourable ratio of societal benefits to economic costs.

Amendment 74

Or. en

Proposal for a directive

Amendment 27

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 32

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 79a – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

2. Member States shall ensure that, as part of the public concerned, non-governmental organisations promoting the protection of human health or the environment and meeting any requirements under national law are allowed to represent the individuals affected and bring collective actions for compensation. Member States shall ensure that a claim for a violation leading to a damage cannot be pursued twice, by the individuals affected and by the non-governmental organisations referred to in this paragraph.

deleted

Amendment 75

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 32

Directive 2010/75/EU

Article 79a – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

4. Where there is a claim for compensation in accordance with paragraph 1, supported by evidence from which a causality link may be presumed between the damage and the violation, Member States shall ensure that the onus is on the person responsible for the violation to prove that the violation did not cause or contribute to the damage.

4. Where there is a claim for compensation in accordance with paragraph 1, supported by evidence from which a causality link may be presumed between the damage and the violation, Member States shall ensure that the onus is on the person who made the allegation to prove that the violation caused or contributed to the damage

Amendment 76

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 33 a (new)

Directive 2010/75/EU

Annex -Ia (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(33a) Annex -Ia set out in Annex Ia to this Directive is inserted.

Amendment 77

Proposal for a directive

Annex Ia (new)

Directive 2010/75/EU

Annex -Ia (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

ANNEX -Ia

Conversion rates of animals to livestock units (‘LSU’) referred to in the LSU definition

Pigs

Breeding sows > 50kg

0,5 LSU

Other pigs > 30kg

0,3 LSU

Poultry

Broilers

0,007 LSU

Laying hens

0,014 LSU

Ostriches

0,35 LSU

Turkeys

0,03 LSU

Ducks

0,01 LSU

Geese

0,02 LSU

Other poultry fowls n.e.c.

0,001 LSU

Amendment 78

Proposal for a directive

Directive 2010/75/EU

Annex Ia (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

deleted

Amendment 79

Or. en

Proposal for a directive

Amendment 28

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point g

Directive 2010/75/EU

Annex I – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 5 – point 5.3 –point a – indent i

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(i) biological treatment (such as anaerobic digestion);

(i) biological treatment (such as anaerobic digestion except for manure);

Amendment 80

Proposal for a directive

The approximate equivalent in LSU is based on the conversion rates established in Annex II to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 808/2014*.

__________________________________

_______________

* Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 808/2014 of 17 July 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (OJ L 227, 31.07.2014, p.18).

PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION

Or. en

Title

Amending Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) and Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste

References

COM(2022)0156 – C9-0144/2022 – 2022/0104(COD)

Committee responsible

Date announced in plenary

ENVI

2.5.2022

Opinion by

Date announced in plenary

AGRI

2.5.2022

Associated committees - date announced in plenary

20.10.2022

Rapporteur for the opinion

Date appointed

Benoît Lutgen

3.5.2022

Discussed in committee

29.9.2022

24.10.2022

20.4.2023

Date adopted

25.4.2023

Result of final vote

+:

–:

0:

36

8

2

Members present for the final vote

Mazaly Aguilar, Clara Aguilera, Atidzhe Alieva-Veli, Álvaro Amaro, Attila Ara-Kovács, Carmen Avram, Adrian-Dragoş Benea, Benoît Biteau, Daniel Buda, Isabel Carvalhais, Asger Christensen, Ivan David, Paolo De Castro, Jérémy Decerle, Salvatore De Meo, Herbert Dorfmann, Paola Ghidoni, Martin Häusling, Martin Hlaváček, Krzysztof Jurgiel, Jarosław Kalinowski, Elsi Katainen, Norbert Lins, Elena Lizzi, Chris MacManus, Colm Markey, Marlene Mortler, Maria Noichl, Juozas Olekas, Daniela Rondinelli, Bronis Ropė, Bert-Jan Ruissen, Anne Sander, Simone Schmiedtbauer, Veronika Vrecionová, Sarah Wiener, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez

Substitutes present for the final vote

Franc Bogovič, Rosanna Conte, Claude Gruffat, Anja Hazekamp, Pär Holmgren, Benoît Lutgen, Irène Tolleret

Substitutes under Rule 209(7) present for the final vote

Catherine Griset, Achille Variati

FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION

Key to symbols: