What changed

PR_IMM_Waiver

P10_TA(2026)0105

PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION

Request for the waiver of the immunity of Patryk Jaki

on the request for the waiver of the immunity of Patryk Jaki

Committee on Legal Affairs

(2025/2171(IMM))

PE786.688

– having regard to the request for the waiver of the immunity of Patryk Jaki, submitted by letter dated 6 August 2025 from the District Court for Warsaw-Śródmieście, in connection with criminal proceedings brought against him by way of a private indictment filed by the legal representative of the private prosecutor, and announced in Parliament on 8 September 2025,

European Parliament decision of 28 April 2026 on the request for the waiver of the immunity of Patryk Jaki (2025/2171(IMM))

– having heard Patryk Jaki on 23 March 2026 in accordance with Rule 9(6) of its Rules of Procedure,

– having regard to the request for the waiver of the immunity of Patryk Jaki, submitted by the District Court for Warsaw-Śródmieście by letter dated 6 August 2025, in connection with criminal proceedings brought against him by way of a private indictment filed by the legal representative of the private prosecutor and announced in Parliament on 8 September 2025,

– having heard Patryk Jaki on 23 March 2026, in accordance with Rule 9(6) of its Rules of Procedure,

– having regard to Articles 8 and 9 of Protocol No 7 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union, and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,

– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A10-0108/2026),

A. whereas, by letter dated 6 August 2025, the District Court for Warsaw-Śródmieście submitted a request for the waiver of the immunity of Patryk Jaki, Member of the European Parliament elected in Poland, in relation to criminal proceedings brought before it for an alleged offence subject to a private prosecution;

B. whereas, according to the request, during the period from 5 June 2024 to 7 June 2024, acting in quick succession in pursuit of a premeditated plan, and with direct intent, Patryk Jaki allegedly slandered the private prosecutor – a judge – in the following manner: (i) during an election campaign meeting in Będzin on 5 June 2024, in an exchange with one of the persons present at the meeting, Patryk Jaki allegedly made statements about the private prosecutor allegingclaiming that hethe hadlatter unknowingly authorised the use of Pegasus spyware, and (ii) on 7 June 2024 Patryk Jaki then allegedly disseminated the recording of the exchange that took place during the election campaign meeting on 5 June 2024exchange throughout the country via mass media (i.e. the social media platforms Instagram, Facebook and X (Twitter)), allegingclaiming that the private prosecutor had neglected his duties as a judge related to performing unspecified ‘inquiries and checks’ regarding the method of operational surveillance in the context of considering requests for operational surveillance orders, that he improperly exercised his profession as a judge, and that he was biased due to his being under the influence of a political party;

C. whereas Patryk Jaki therefore allegedly slandered the private prosecutor with direct intent to humiliate him in the public eye and damage his reputation, as well as cause him to lose the trust necessary for the performance of his duties as a judge; whereas the alleged actions could constitute an offence under Article 212(1), in conjunction with Articles 212(2) and 12(1), of the Polish Criminal Code;

E. whereas the alleged offence does not constitute, and the subsequent request for the waiver of the immunity of Patryk Jaki is not related to, an opinion expressed or vote cast by him in the performance of his duties within the meaning of Article 8 of Protocol No 7 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union;

F. whereas Article 9, first paragraph, point (a), of Protocol No 7 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union provides that, during the sessions of the European Parliament, its Members are to enjoy, in the territory of their own Member State, the immunities accorded to members of the parliament of their Member State;

G. whereas, pursuant to Article 105(2) and (5) of the PolishConstitution Constitution,of the Republic of Poland, from the day the election results are announced until the day their mandate expires, a deputy cannot be subjected to criminal accountability without the consent of the Sejm, and can be neither detained nor arrested without the consent of the Sejm, except in cases where they have been apprehended in the commission of an offence and in which their detention is necessary to secure the proper course of proceedings;

H. whereas the purpose of the immunity provided for in Protocol No 7 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union is to protect Parliament and its Members from legal proceedings in relation to activities carried out in the performance of parliamentary duties and which cannot be separated from those duties;

I. whereas, in accordance with Rule 5(2) of its Rules of Procedure, parliamentary immunity is not a Member’s personal privilege of the Member but a guarantee of the independence of Parliament as a whole and of its Members;

J. whereas, in this case, Parliament has found no evidence of fumus persecutionis, that is to say it does not appear that the intention underlying the legal proceedings in question is to underminedamage thePatryk Member’sJaki’s political activity as a Member of the European Parliament and thus Parliament’s independence;

K. whereas Parliament cannot assume the role of a court and, in a waiver of immunity procedure, a Member cannot be regarded as a defendant;

2. Instructs its President to forward this decision and the report of its committee responsible immediately to the competent authority of the Republic of Poland and to Patryk Jaki.

INFORMATION ON ADOPTION BY THE COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

Date adopted

23.4.2026

Result of final vote

+:

–:

0:

15

4

0