Skip to content

What changed

From · Plenary report · 25 Feb 2026 A-10-2026-0019 on copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges
To · Adopted text · 10 Mar 2026 TA-10-2026-0066 Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges
✦ In short · AI narration of the differences below, generated 4 Sept 2026

The versions differ only in formal points: decimal separator and punctuation are updated. #1#2

0 changes of substance, plus 2 formal. Each change below carries a one-line ✦ note from the same model. Written from the two texts only — read the highlighted passages before relying on it.

The changes to the text itself, in document order. Cover page, citations (“having regard to …”), standard resolution paragraphs and punctuation-only edits are left out — they are in “Show every difference”.

Show:

Change #1 Formal

Replaces the decimal separator in the percentage from a period to a comma, aligning with European formatting conventions.

C. whereas the creative and cultural sector plays a key role in safeguarding European values and cultural diversity, representing approximately 4 % of EU value added and 6.96,9 % of the EU’s gross domestic product; whereas the sector employs around 8 million people, underpinning Europe’s cultural diversity, social cohesion, values and democratic dialogue;

Change #2 Formal

Changes the punctuation at the end of the paragraph from a period to a semicolon, likely to connect with the following text.

18. Notes the use of GenAI systems that rely massively on protected content, reproducing it without authorisation from, or compensation for, the rights holders affected by such use, particularly when integrated into search engines or other digital services that enable the generation, often in real time and at marginal cost, of content that infringes upon original works and other protected subject matter on which the models were trained, or that was scraped, including in real time, by such models; is alarmed that these practices may result in the provision of products and services that directly and unfairly compete with those of the rights holders, including through illegal self-preferencing of gatekeepers.gatekeepers;